TENTH ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 73, Art. 10]

Whether the Excellence of the Person Sinning Aggravates the Sin?

Objection 1: It would seem that the excellence of the person sinning

does not aggravate the sin. For man becomes great chiefly by cleaving

to God, according to Ecclus. 25:13: "How great is he that findeth

wisdom and knowledge! but there is none above him that feareth the

Lord." Now the more a man cleaves to God, the less is a sin imputed

to him: for it is written (2 Paral. 30: 18, 19): "The Lord Who is

good will show mercy to all them, who with their whole heart seek the

Lord the God of their fathers; and will not impute it to them that

they are not sanctified." Therefore a sin is not aggravated by the

excellence of the person sinning.

Obj. 2: Further, "there is no respect of persons with God" (Rom.

2:11). Therefore He does not punish one man more than another, for

one and the same sin. Therefore a sin is not aggravated by the

excellence of the person sinning.

Obj. 3: Further, no one should reap disadvantage from good. But he

would, if his action were the more blameworthy on account of his

goodness. Therefore a sin is not aggravated by reason of the

excellence of the person sinning.

_On the contrary,_ Isidore says (De Summo Bono ii, 18): "A sin is

deemed so much the more grievous as the sinner is held to be a more

excellent person."

_I answer that,_ Sin is twofold. There is a sin which takes us

unawares on account of the weakness of human nature: and such like

sins are less imputable to one who is more virtuous, because he is

less negligent in checking those sins, which nevertheless human

weakness does not allow us to escape altogether. But there are other

sins which proceed from deliberation: and these sins are all the more

imputed to man according as he is more excellent. Four reasons may be

assigned for this. First, because a more excellent person, e.g. one

who excels in knowledge and virtue, can more easily resist sin; hence

Our Lord said (Luke 12:47) that the "servant who knew the will of his

lord . . . and did it not . . . shall be beaten with many stripes."

Secondly, on account of ingratitude, because every good in which a

man excels, is a gift of God, to Whom man is ungrateful when he sins:

and in this respect any excellence, even in temporal goods,

aggravates a sin, according to Wis. 6:7: "The mighty shall be

mightily tormented." Thirdly, on account of the sinful act being

specially inconsistent with the excellence of the person sinning: for

instance, if a prince were to violate justice, whereas he is set up

as the guardian of justice, or if a priest were to be a fornicator,

whereas he has taken the vow of chastity. Fourthly, on account of the

example or scandal; because, as Gregory says (Pastor. i, 2): "Sin

becomes much more scandalous, when the sinner is honored for his

position": and the sins of the great are much more notorious and men

are wont to bear them with more indignation.

Reply Obj. 1: The passage quoted alludes to those things which are

done negligently when we are taken unawares through human weakness.

Reply Obj. 2: God does not respect persons in punishing the great

more severely, because their excellence conduces to the gravity of

their sin, as stated.

Reply Obj. 3: The man who excels in anything reaps disadvantage, not

from the good which he has, but from his abuse thereof.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 482 / 746 题