SIXTH ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 67, Art. 6]

Whether Charity Remains After This Life, in Glory?

Objection 1: It would seem that charity does not remain after this

life, in glory. Because according to 1 Cor. 13:10, "when that which

is perfect is come, that which is in part," i.e. that which is

imperfect, "shall be done away." Now the charity of the wayfarer is

imperfect. Therefore it will be done away when the perfection of

glory is attained.

Obj. 2: Further, habits and acts are differentiated by their objects.

But the object of love is good apprehended. Since therefore the

apprehension of the present life differs from the apprehension of the

life to come, it seems that charity is not the same in both cases.

Obj. 3: Further, things of the same kind can advance from

imperfection to perfection by continuous increase. But the charity of

the wayfarer can never attain to equality with the charity of heaven,

however much it be increased. Therefore it seems that the charity of

the wayfarer does not remain in heaven.

_On the contrary,_ The Apostle says (1 Cor. 13:8): "Charity never

falleth away."

_I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 3), when the imperfection of a

thing does not belong to its specific nature, there is nothing to

hinder the identical thing passing from imperfection to perfection,

even as man is perfected by growth, and whiteness by intensity. Now

charity is love, the nature of which does not include imperfection,

since it may relate to an object either possessed or not possessed,

either seen or not seen. Therefore charity is not done away by the

perfection of glory, but remains identically the same.

Reply Obj. 1: The imperfection of charity is accidental to it;

because imperfection is not included in the nature of love. Now

although that which is accidental to a thing be withdrawn, the

substance remains. Hence the imperfection of charity being done away,

charity itself is not done away.

Reply Obj. 2: The object of charity is not knowledge itself;

if it were, the charity of the wayfarer would not be the same as the

charity of heaven: its object is the thing known, which remains the

same, viz. God Himself.

Reply Obj. 3: The reason why charity of the wayfarer cannot

attain to the perfection of the charity of heaven, is a difference on

the part of the cause: for vision is a cause of love, as stated in

_Ethic._ ix, 5: and the more perfectly we know God, the more perfectly

we love Him.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 435 / 746 题