Reply Obj. 1: This argument takes _mos_ in the sense of _custom._

Reply Obj. 2: Every act of virtue can be done from choice: but no

virtue makes us choose aright, save that which is in the appetitive

part of the soul: for it has been stated above that choice is an act

of the appetitive faculty (Q. 13, A. 1). Wherefore a habit of

choosing, i.e. a habit which is the principle whereby we choose, is

that habit alone which perfects the appetitive faculty: although the

acts of other habits also may be a matter of choice.

Reply Obj. 3: "Nature is the principle of movement" (Phys. ii, text.

3). Now to move the faculties to act is the proper function of the

appetitive power. Consequently to become as a second nature by

consenting to the reason, is proper to those virtues which are in the

appetitive faculty.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 377 / 746 题