FIRST ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 57, Art. 1]

Whether the Habits of the Speculative Intellect Are Virtues?

Objection 1: It would seem that the habits of the speculative

intellect are not virtues. For virtue is an operative habit, as we

have said above (Q. 55, A. 2). But speculative habits are not

operative: for speculative matter is distinct from practical, i.e.

operative matter. Therefore the habits of the speculative intellect

are not virtues.

Obj. 2: Further, virtue is about those things by which man is made

happy or blessed: for "happiness is the reward of virtue" (Ethic. i,

9). Now intellectual habits do not consider human acts or other human

goods, by which man acquires happiness, but rather things pertaining

to nature or to God. Therefore such like habits cannot be called

virtues.

Obj. 3: Further, science is a speculative habit. But science and

virtue are distinct from one another as genera which are not

subalternate, as the Philosopher proves in _Topic._ iv. Therefore

speculative habits are not virtues.

_On the contrary,_ The speculative habits alone consider necessary

things which cannot be otherwise than they are. Now the Philosopher

(Ethic. vi, 1) places certain intellectual virtues in that part of

the soul which considers necessary things that cannot be otherwise

than they are. Therefore the habits of the speculative intellect are

virtues.

_I answer that,_ Since every virtue is ordained to some good, as

stated above (Q. 55, A. 3), a habit, as we have already observed (Q.

56, A. 3), may be called a virtue for two reasons: first, because it

confers aptness in doing good; secondly, because besides aptness, it

confers the right use of it. The latter condition, as above stated

(Q. 55, A. 3), belongs to those habits alone which affect the

appetitive part of the soul: since it is the soul's appetitive power

that puts all the powers and habits to their respective uses.

Since, then, the habits of the speculative intellect do not perfect

the appetitive part, nor affect it in any way, but only the

intellective part; they may indeed be called virtues in so far as

they confer aptness for a good work, viz. the consideration of truth

(since this is the good work of the intellect): yet they are not

called virtues in the second way, as though they conferred the right

use of a power or habit. For if a man possess a habit of speculative

science, it does not follow that he is inclined to make use of it,

but he is made able to consider the truth in those matters of which

he has scientific knowledge: that he make use of the knowledge which

he has, is due to the motion of his will. Consequently a virtue which

perfects the will, as charity or justice, confers the right use of

these speculative habits. And in this way too there can be merit in

the acts of these habits, if they be done out of charity: thus

Gregory says (Moral. vi) that the "contemplative life has greater

merit than the active life."

Reply Obj. 1: Work is of two kinds, exterior and interior.

Accordingly the practical or active faculty which is contrasted with

the speculative faculty, is concerned with exterior work, to which

the speculative habit is not ordained. Yet it is ordained to the

interior act of the intellect which is to consider the truth. And in

this way it is an operative habit.

Reply Obj. 2: Virtue is about certain things in two ways. In the

first place a virtue is about its object. And thus these speculative

virtues are not about those things whereby man is made happy; except

perhaps, in so far as the word "whereby" indicates the efficient

cause or object of complete happiness, i.e. God, Who is the supreme

object of contemplation. Secondly, a virtue is said to be about its

acts: and in this sense the intellectual virtues are about those

things whereby a man is made happy; both because the acts of these

virtues can be meritorious, as stated above, and because they are a

kind of beginning of perfect bliss, which consists in the

contemplation of truth, as we have already stated (Q. 3, A. 7).

Reply Obj. 3: Science is contrasted with virtue taken in the second

sense, wherein it belongs to the appetitive faculty.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 369 / 746 题