FIFTH ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 50, Art. 5]

Whether Any Habit Is in the Will?

Objection 1: It would seem that there is not a habit in the will. For

the habit which is in the intellect is the intelligible species, by

means of which the intellect actually understands. But the will does

not act by means of species. Therefore the will is not the subject of

habit.

Obj. 2: Further, no habit is allotted to the active intellect, as

there is to the "possible" intellect, because the former is an active

power. But the will is above all an active power, because it moves

all the powers to their acts, as stated above (Q. 9, A. 1). Therefore

there is no habit in the will.

Obj. 3: Further, in the natural powers there is no habit, because, by

reason of their nature, they are determinate to one thing. But the

will, by reason of its nature, is ordained to tend to the good which

reason directs. Therefore there is no habit in the will.

_On the contrary,_ Justice is a habit. But justice is in the will;

for it is "a habit whereby men will and do that which is just"

(Ethic. v, 1). Therefore the will is the subject of a habit.

_I answer that,_ Every power which may be variously directed to act,

needs a habit whereby it is well disposed to its act. Now since the

will is a rational power, it may be variously directed to act. And

therefore in the will we must admit the presence of a habit whereby

it is well disposed to its act. Moreover, from the very nature of

habit, it is clear that it is principally related to the will;

inasmuch as habit "is that which one uses when one wills," as stated

above (A. 1).

Reply Obj. 1: Even as in the intellect there is a species which is

the likeness of the object; so in the will, and in every appetitive

power there must be something by which the power is inclined to its

object; for the act of the appetitive power is nothing but a certain

inclination, as we have said above (Q. 6, A. 4; Q. 22, A. 2). And

therefore in respect of those things to which it is inclined

sufficiently by the nature of the power itself, the power needs no

quality to incline it. But since it is necessary, for the end of

human life, that the appetitive power be inclined to something fixed,

to which it is not inclined by the nature of the power, which has a

relation to many and various things, therefore it is necessary that,

in the will and in the other appetitive powers, there be certain

qualities to incline them, and these are called habits.

Reply Obj. 2: The active intellect is active only, and in no way

passive. But the will, and every appetitive power, is both mover and

moved (De Anima iii, text. 54). And therefore the comparison between

them does not hold; for to be susceptible of habit belongs to that

which is somehow in potentiality.

Reply Obj. 3: The will from the very nature of the power is inclined

to the good of the reason. But because this good is varied in many

ways, the will needs to be inclined, by means of a habit, to some

fixed good of the reason, in order that action may follow more

promptly.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 336 / 746 题