FOURTH ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 40, Art. 4]

Whether Despair Is Contrary to Hope?

Objection 1: It would seem that despair is not contrary to hope.

Because "to one thing there is one contrary" (Metaph. x, 5). But fear

is contrary to hope. Therefore despair is not contrary to hope.

Obj. 2: Further, contraries seem to bear on the same thing. But hope

and despair do not bear on the same thing: since hope regards the

good, whereas despair arises from some evil that is in the way of

obtaining good. Therefore hope is not contrary to despair.

Obj. 3: Further, movement is contrary to movement: while repose is in

opposition to movement as a privation thereof. But despair seems to

imply immobility rather than movement. Therefore it is not contrary

to hope, which implies movement of stretching out towards the

hoped-for good.

_On the contrary,_ The very name of despair (_desperatio_) implies that

it is contrary to hope (_spes_).

_I answer that,_ As stated above (Q. 23, A. 2), there is a twofold

contrariety of movements. One is in respect of approach to contrary

terms: and this contrariety alone is to be found in the concupiscible

passions, for instance between love and hatred. The other is

according to approach and withdrawal with regard to the same term;

and is to be found in the irascible passions, as stated above (Q. 23,

A. 2). Now the object of hope, which is the arduous good, has the

character of a principle of attraction, if it be considered in the

light of something attainable; and thus hope tends thereto, for it

denotes a kind of approach. But in so far as it is considered as

unobtainable, it has the character of a principle of repulsion,

because, as stated in _Ethic._ iii, 3, "when men come to an

impossibility they disperse." And this is how despair stands in

regard to this object, wherefore it implies a movement of withdrawal:

and consequently it is contrary to hope, as withdrawal is to approach.

Reply Obj. 1: Fear is contrary to hope, because their objects, i.e.

good and evil, are contrary: for this contrariety is found in the

irascible passions, according as they ensue from the passions of the

concupiscible. But despair is contrary to hope, only by contrariety

of approach and withdrawal.

Reply Obj. 2: Despair does not regard evil as such; sometimes however

it regards evil accidentally, as making the difficult good impossible

to obtain. But it can arise from the mere excess of good.

Reply Obj. 3: Despair implies not only privation of hope, but also a

recoil from the thing desired, by reason of its being esteemed

impossible to get. Hence despair, like hope, presupposes desire;

because we neither hope for nor despair of that which we do not

desire to have. For this reason, too, each of them regards the good,

which is the object of desire.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 277 / 746 题