SECOND ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 37, Art. 2]

Whether the Effect of Sorrow or Pain Is to Burden the Soul?

Objection 1: It would seem that it is not an effect of sorrow to

burden the soul. For the Apostle says (2 Cor. 7:11): "Behold this

self-same thing, that you were made sorrowful according to God, how

great carefulness it worketh in you: yea, defence, yea indignation,"

etc. Now carefulness and indignation imply that the soul is uplifted,

which is contrary to being depressed. Therefore depression is not an

effect of sorrow.

Obj. 2: Further, sorrow is contrary to pleasure. But the effect of

pleasure is expansion: the opposite of which is not depression but

contraction. Therefore depression should not be reckoned as an effect

of sorrow.

Obj. 3: Further, sorrow consumes those who are inflicted therewith,

as may be gathered from the words of the Apostle (2 Cor. 2:7): "Lest

perhaps such an one be swallowed up with overmuch sorrow." But that

which is depressed is not consumed; nay, it is weighed down by

something heavy, whereas that which is consumed enters within the

consumer. Therefore depression should not be reckoned an effect of

sorrow.

_On the contrary,_ Gregory of Nyssa [*Nemesius, De Nat. Hom. xix.]

and Damascene (De Fide Orth. ii, 14) speak of "depressing sorrow."

_I answer that,_ The effects of the soul's passions are sometimes

named metaphorically, from a likeness to sensible bodies: for the

reason that the movements of the animal appetite are like the

inclinations of the natural appetite. And in this way fervor is

ascribed to love, expansion to pleasure, and depression to sorrow.

For a man is said to be depressed, through being hindered in his own

movement by some weight. Now it is evident from what has been said

above (Q. 23, A. 4; Q. 25, A. 4; Q. 36, A. 1) that sorrow is caused

by a present evil: and this evil, from the very fact that it is

repugnant to the movement of the will, depresses the soul, inasmuch

as it hinders it from enjoying that which it wishes to enjoy. And if

the evil which is the cause of sorrow be not so strong as to deprive

one of the hope of avoiding it, although the soul be depressed in so

far as, for the present, it fails to grasp that which it craves for;

yet it retains the movement whereby to repulse that evil. If, on the

other hand, the strength of the evil be such as to exclude the hope

of evasion, then even the interior movement of the afflicted soul is

absolutely hindered, so that it cannot turn aside either this way or

that. Sometimes even the external movement of the body is paralyzed,

so that a man becomes completely stupefied.

Reply Obj. 1: That uplifting of the soul ensues from the sorrow which

is according to God, because it brings with it the hope of the

forgiveness of sin.

Reply Obj. 2: As far as the movement of the appetite is concerned,

contraction and depression amount to the same: because the soul,

through being depressed so as to be unable to attend freely to

outward things, withdraws to itself, closing itself up as it were.

Reply Obj. 3: Sorrow is said to consume man, when the force of the

afflicting evil is such as to shut out all hope of evasion: and thus

also it both depresses and consumes at the same time. For certain

things, taken metaphorically, imply one another, which taken

literally, appear to exclude one another.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 259 / 746 题