FIRST ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 32, Art. 1]

Whether Operation Is the Proper Cause of Pleasure?

Objection 1: It would seem that operation is not the proper and first

cause of pleasure. For, as the Philosopher says (Rhet. i, 11),

"pleasure consists in a perception of the senses," since knowledge is

requisite for pleasure, as stated above (Q. 31, A. 1). But the

objects of operations are knowable before the operations themselves.

Therefore operation is not the proper cause of pleasure.

Obj. 2: Further, pleasure consists especially in an end gained: since

it is this that is chiefly desired. But the end is not always an

operation, but is sometimes the effect of the operation. Therefore

operation is not the proper and direct cause of pleasure.

Obj. 3: Further, leisure and rest consist in cessation from work: and

they are objects of pleasure (Rhet. i, 11). Therefore operation is

not the proper cause of pleasure.

_On the contrary,_ The Philosopher says (Ethic. vii, 12, 13; x, 4)

that "pleasure is a connatural and uninterrupted operation."

_I answer that,_ As stated above (Q. 31, A. 1), two things are

requisite for pleasure: namely, the attainment of the suitable good,

and knowledge of this attainment. Now each of these consists in a

kind of operation: because actual knowledge is an operation; and the

attainment of the suitable good is by means of an operation.

Moreover, the proper operation itself is a suitable good. Wherefore

every pleasure must needs be the result of some operation.

Reply Obj. 1: The objects of operations are not pleasurable save

inasmuch as they are united to us; either by knowledge alone, as when

we take pleasure in thinking of or looking at certain things; or in

some other way in addition to knowledge; as when a man takes pleasure

in knowing that he has something good--riches, honor, or the like;

which would not be pleasurable unless they were apprehended as

possessed. For as the Philosopher observes (Polit. ii, 2) "we take

great pleasure in looking upon a thing as our own, by reason of the

natural love we have for ourselves." Now to have such like things is

nothing else but to use them or to be able to use them: and this is

through some operation. Wherefore it is evident that every pleasure

is traced to some operation as its cause.

Reply Obj. 2: Even when it is not an operation, but the effect of an

operation, that is the end, this effect is pleasant in so far as

possessed or effected: and this implies use or operation.

Reply Obj. 3: Operations are pleasant, in so far as they are

proportionate and connatural to the agent. Now, since human power is

finite, operation is proportionate thereto according to a certain

measure. Wherefore if it exceed that measure, it will be no longer

proportionate or pleasant, but, on the contrary, painful and irksome.

And in this sense, leisure and play and other things pertaining to

repose, are pleasant, inasmuch as they banish sadness which results

from labor.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 225 / 746 题