SECOND ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 31, Art. 2]

Whether Delight Is in Time?

Objection 1: It would seem that delight is in time. For "delight is

a kind of movement," as the Philosopher says (Rhet. i, 11). But all

movement is in time. Therefore delight is in time.

Obj. 2: Further, a thing is said to last long and to be morose in

respect of time. But some pleasures are called morose. Therefore

pleasure is in time.

Obj. 3: Further, the passions of the soul are of one same genus. But

some passions of the soul are in time. Therefore delight is too.

_On the contrary,_ The Philosopher says (Ethic. x, 4) that "no one

takes pleasure according to time."

_I answer that,_ A thing may be in time in two ways: first, by

itself; secondly, by reason of something else, and accidentally as

it were. For since time is the measure of successive things, those

things are of themselves said to be in time, to which succession or

something pertaining to succession is essential: such are movement,

repose, speech and such like. On the other hand, those things are

said to be in time, by reason of something else and not of

themselves, to which succession is not essential, but which are

subject to something successive. Thus the fact of being a man is not

essentially something successive; since it is not a movement, but the

term of a movement or change, viz. of this being begotten: yet,

because human being is subject to changeable causes, in this respect,

to be a man is in time.

Accordingly, we must say that delight, of itself indeed, is not in

time: for it regards good already gained, which is, as it were, the

term of the movement. But if this good gained be subject to change,

the delight therein will be in time accidentally: whereas if it be

altogether unchangeable, the delight therein will not be in time,

either by reason of itself or accidentally.

Reply Obj. 1: As stated in _De Anima_ iii, 7, movement is twofold.

One is "the act of something imperfect, i.e. of something existing in

potentiality, as such": this movement is successive and is in time.

Another movement is "the act of something perfect, i.e. of something

existing in act," e.g. to understand, to feel, and to will and such

like, also to have delight. This movement is not successive, nor is

it of itself in time.

Reply Obj. 2: Delight is said to be long lasting or morose, according

as it is accidentally in time.

Reply Obj. 3: Other passions have not for their object a good

obtained, as delight has. Wherefore there is more of the movement of

the imperfect in them than in delight. And consequently it belongs

more to delight not to be in time.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 217 / 746 题