FIRST ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 31, Art. 1]

Whether Delight Is a Passion?

Objection 1: It would seem that delight is not a passion. For

Damascene (De Fide Orth. ii, 22) distinguishes operation from

passion, and says that "operation is a movement in accord with

nature, while passion is a movement contrary to nature." But delight

is an operation, according to the Philosopher (Ethic. vii, 12; x, 5).

Therefore delight is not a passion.

Obj. 2: Further, "To be passive is to be moved," as stated in _Phys._

iii, 3. But delight does not consist in being moved, but in having

been moved; for it arises from good already gained. Therefore delight

is not a passion.

Obj. 3: Further, delight is a kind of a perfection of the one who is

delighted; since it "perfects operation," as stated in _Ethic._ x, 4,

5. But to be perfected does not consist in being passive or in being

altered, as stated in _Phys._ vii, 3 and _De Anima_ ii, 5. Therefore

delight is not a passion.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine (De Civ. Dei ix, 2; xiv, 5 seqq) reckons

delight, joy, or gladness among the other passions of the soul.

_I answer that,_ The movements of the sensitive appetite, are

properly called passions, as stated above (Q. 22, A. 3). Now every

emotion arising from a sensitive apprehension, is a movement of the

sensitive appetite: and this must needs be said of delight, since,

according to the Philosopher (Rhet. i, 11) "delight is a certain

movement of the soul and a sensible establishing thereof all at once,

in keeping with the nature of the thing."

In order to understand this, we must observe that just as in natural

things some happen to attain to their natural perfections, so does

this happen in animals. And though movement towards perfection does

not occur all at once, yet the attainment of natural perfection does

occur all at once. Now there is this difference between animals and

other natural things, that when these latter are established in the

state becoming their nature, they do not perceive it, whereas animals

do. And from this perception there arises a certain movement of the

soul in the sensitive appetite; which movement is called delight.

Accordingly by saying that delight is "a movement of the soul," we

designate its genus. By saying that it is "an establishing in keeping

with the thing's nature," i.e. with that which exists in the thing, we

assign the cause of delight, viz. the presence of a becoming good. By

saying that this establishing is "all at once," we mean that this

establishing is to be understood not as in the process of

establishment, but as in the fact of complete establishment, in the

term of the movement, as it were: for delight is not a "becoming" as

Plato [*Phileb. 32, 33] maintained, but a "complete fact," as stated

in _Ethic._ vii, 12. Lastly, by saying that this establishing is

"sensible," we exclude the perfections of insensible things wherein

there is no delight. It is therefore evident that, since delight is a

movement of the animal appetite arising from an apprehension of sense,

it is a passion of the soul.

Reply Obj. 1: Connatural operation, which is unhindered, is a second

perfection, as stated in _De Anima_ ii, 1: and therefore when a thing

is established in its proper connatural and unhindered operation,

delight follows, which consists in a state of completion, as observed

above. Accordingly when we say that delight is an operation, we

designate, not its essence, but its cause.

Reply Obj. 2: A twofold movement is to be observed in an animal: one,

according to the intention of the end, and this belongs to the

appetite; the other, according to the execution, and this belongs to

the external operation. And so, although in him who has already

gained the good in which he delights, the movement of execution

ceases, by which he tends to the end; yet the movement of the

appetitive faculty does not cease, since, just as before it desired

that which it had not, so afterwards does it delight in that which is

possesses. For though delight is a certain repose of the appetite, if

we consider the presence of the pleasurable good that satisfies the

appetite, nevertheless there remains the impression made on the

appetite by its object, by reason of which delight is a kind of

movement.

Reply Obj. 3: Although the name of passion is more appropriate to

those passions which have a corruptive and evil tendency, such as

bodily ailments, as also sadness and fear in the soul; yet some

passions have a tendency to something good, as stated above (Q. 23,

AA. 1, 4): and in this sense delight is called a passion.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 216 / 746 题