FIFTH ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 29, Art. 5]

Whether a Man Can Hate the Truth?

Objection 1: It would seem that a man cannot hate the truth. For

good, true, and being are convertible. But a man cannot hate good.

Neither, therefore, can he hate the truth.

Obj. 2: Further, "All men have a natural desire for knowledge," as

stated in the beginning of the _Metaphysics_ (i, 1). But knowledge is

only of truth. Therefore truth is naturally desired and loved. But

that which is in a thing naturally, is always in it. Therefore no man

can hate the truth.

Obj. 3: Further, the Philosopher says (Rhet. ii, 4) that "men love

those who are straightforward." But there can be no other motive for

this save truth. Therefore man loves the truth naturally. Therefore

he cannot hate it.

_On the contrary,_ The Apostle says (Gal. 4:16): "Am I become your

enemy because I tell you the truth?" [*St. Thomas quotes the passage,

probably from memory, as though it were an assertion: "I am become,"

etc.]

_I answer that,_ Good, true and being are the same in reality, but

differ as considered by reason. For good is considered in the light

of something desirable, while being and true are not so considered:

because good is "what all things seek." Wherefore good, as such,

cannot be the object of hatred, neither in general nor in particular.

Being and truth in general cannot be the object of hatred: because

disagreement is the cause of hatred, and agreement is the cause of

love; while being and truth are common to all things. But nothing

hinders some particular being or some particular truth being an

object of hatred, in so far as it is considered as hurtful and

repugnant; since hurtfulness and repugnance are not incompatible with

the notion of being and truth, as they are with the notion of good.

Now it may happen in three ways that some particular truth is

repugnant or hurtful to the good we love. First, according as truth

is in things as in its cause and origin. And thus man sometimes hates

a particular truth, when he wishes that what is true were not true.

Secondly, according as truth is in man's knowledge, which hinders him

from gaining the object loved: such is the case of those who wish not

to know the truth of faith, that they may sin freely; in whose person

it is said (Job 21:14): "We desire not the knowledge of Thy ways."

Thirdly, a particular truth is hated, as being repugnant, inasmuch as

it is in the intellect of another man: as, for instance, when a man

wishes to remain hidden in his sin, he hates that anyone should know

the truth about his sin. In this respect, Augustine says (Confess. x,

23) that men "love truth when it enlightens, they hate it when it

reproves." This suffices for the Reply to the First Objection.

Reply Obj. 2: The knowledge of truth is lovable in itself: hence

Augustine says that men love it when it enlightens. But accidentally,

the knowledge of truth may become hateful, in so far as it hinders

one from accomplishing one's desire.

Reply Obj. 3: The reason why we love those who are straightforward is

that they make known the truth, and the knowledge of the truth,

considered in itself, is a desirable thing.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 208 / 746 题