THIRD ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 11, Art. 3]

Whether Enjoyment Is Only of the Last End?

Objection 1: It would seem that enjoyment is not only of the last end.

For the Apostle says (Philem. 20): "Yea, brother, may I enjoy thee in

the Lord." But it is evident that Paul had not placed his last end in

a man. Therefore to enjoy is not only of the last end.

Obj. 2: Further, what we enjoy is the fruit. But the Apostle says

(Gal. 5:22): "The fruit of the Spirit is charity, joy, peace," and

other like things, which are not in the nature of the last end.

Therefore enjoyment is not only of the last end.

Obj. 3: Further, the acts of the will reflect on one another; for I

will to will, and I love to love. But to enjoy is an act of the will:

since "it is the will with which we enjoy," as Augustine says (De

Trin. x, 10). Therefore a man enjoys his enjoyment. But the last end

of man is not enjoyment, but the uncreated good alone, which is God.

Therefore enjoyment is not only of the last end.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (De Trin. x, 11): "A man does not

enjoy that which he desires for the sake of something else." But the

last end alone is that which man does not desire for the sake of

something else. Therefore enjoyment is of the last end alone.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 1) the notion of fruit implies

two things: first that it should come last; second, that it should

calm the appetite with a certain sweetness and delight. Now a thing

is last either simply or relatively; simply, if it be referred to

nothing else; relatively, if it is the last in a particular series.

Therefore that which is last simply, and in which one delights as in

the last end, is properly called fruit; and this it is that one is

properly said to enjoy. But that which is delightful not in itself,

but is desired, only as referred to something else, e.g. a bitter

potion for the sake of health, can nowise be called fruit. And that

which has something delightful about it, to which a number of

preceding things are referred, may indeed be called fruit in a

certain manner; but we cannot be said to enjoy it properly or as

though it answered perfectly to the notion of fruit. Hence Augustine

says (De Trin. x, 10) that "we enjoy what we know, when the delighted

will is at rest therein." But its rest is not absolute save in the

possession of the last end: for as long as something is looked for,

the movement of the will remains in suspense, although it has reached

something. Thus in local movement, although any point between the two

terms is a beginning and an end, yet it is not considered as an

actual end, except when the movement stops there.

Reply Obj. 1: As Augustine says (De Doctr. Christ. i, 33), "if he had

said, 'May I enjoy thee,' without adding 'in the Lord,' he would seem

to have set the end of his love in him. But since he added that he

set his end in the Lord, he implied his desire to enjoy Him": as if

we were to say that he expressed his enjoyment of his brother not as

a term but as a means.

Reply Obj. 2: Fruit bears one relation to the tree that bore it, and

another to man that enjoys it. To the tree indeed that bore it, it is

compared as effect to cause; to the one enjoying it, as the final

object of his longing and the consummation of his delight.

Accordingly these fruits mentioned by the Apostle are so called

because they are certain effects of the Holy Ghost in us, wherefore

they are called "fruits of the spirit": but not as though we are to

enjoy them as our last end. Or we may say with Ambrose that they are

called fruits because "we should desire them for their own sake": not

indeed as though they were not ordained to the last end; but because

they are such that we ought to find pleasure in them.

Reply Obj. 3: As stated above (Q. 1, A. 8; Q. 2, A. 7), we speak of

an end in a twofold sense: first, as being the thing itself;

secondly, as the attainment thereof. These are not, of course, two

ends, but one end, considered in itself, and in its relation to

something else. Accordingly God is the last end, as that which is

ultimately sought for: while the enjoyment is as the attainment of

this last end. And so, just as God is not one end, and the enjoyment

of God, another: so it is the same enjoyment whereby we enjoy God,

and whereby we enjoy our enjoyment of God. And the same applies to

created happiness which consists in enjoyment.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 88 / 746 题