SECOND ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 5, Art. 2]

Whether One Man Can Be Happier Than Another?

Objection 1: It would seem that one man cannot be happier than

another. For Happiness is "the reward of virtue," as the Philosopher

says (Ethic. i, 9). But equal reward is given for all the works of

virtue; because it is written (Matt. 20:10) that all who labor in the

vineyard "received every man a penny"; for, as Gregory says (Hom. xix

in Evang.), "each was equally rewarded with eternal life." Therefore

one man cannot be happier than another.

Obj. 2: Further, Happiness is the supreme good. But nothing can

surpass the supreme. Therefore one man's Happiness cannot be

surpassed by another's.

Obj. 3: Further, since Happiness is "the perfect and sufficient good"

(Ethic. i, 7) it brings rest to man's desire. But his desire is not

at rest, if he yet lacks some good that can be got. And if he lack

nothing that he can get, there can be no still greater good.

Therefore either man is not happy; or, if he be happy, no other

Happiness can be greater.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (John 14:2): "In My Father's house

there are many mansions"; which, according to Augustine (Tract. lxvii

in Joan.) signify "the diverse dignities of merits in the one eternal

life." But the dignity of eternal life which is given according to

merit, is Happiness itself. Therefore there are diverse degrees of

Happiness, and Happiness is not equally in all.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (Q. 1, A. 8; Q. 2, A. 7), Happiness

implies two things, to wit, the last end itself, i.e. the Sovereign

Good; and the attainment or enjoyment of that same Good. As to that

Good itself, Which is the object and cause of Happiness, one

Happiness cannot be greater than another, since there is but one

Sovereign Good, namely, God, by enjoying Whom, men are made happy.

But as to the attainment or enjoyment of this Good, one man can be

happier than another; because the more a man enjoys this Good the

happier he is. Now, that one man enjoys God more than another,

happens through his being better disposed or ordered to the enjoyment

of Him. And in this sense one man can be happier than another.

Reply Obj. 1: The one penny signifies that Happiness is one in its

object. But the many mansions signify the manifold Happiness in the

divers degrees of enjoyment.

Reply Obj. 2: Happiness is said to be the supreme good, inasmuch as

it is the perfect possession or enjoyment of the Supreme Good.

Reply Obj. 3: None of the Blessed lacks any desirable good;

since they have the Infinite Good Itself, Which is "the good of all

good," as Augustine says (Enarr. in Ps. 134). But one is said to be

happier than another, by reason of diverse participation of the same

good. And the addition of other goods does not increase Happiness,

since Augustine says (Confess. v, 4): "He who knows Thee, and others

besides, is not the happier for knowing them, but is happy for knowing

Thee alone."

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 48 / 746 题