SIXTH ARTICLE [I-II, Q. 1, Art. 6]

Whether Man Wills All, Whatsoever He Wills, for the Last End?

Objection 1: It would seem that man does not will all, whatsoever he

wills, for the last end. For things ordained to the last end are said

to be serious matter, as being useful. But jests are foreign to

serious matter. Therefore what man does in jest, he ordains not to

the last end.

Obj. 2: Further, the Philosopher says at the beginning of his

Metaphysics (i. 2) that speculative science is sought for its own sake.

Now it cannot be said that each speculative science is the last end.

Therefore man does not desire all, whatsoever he desires, for the last

end.

Obj. 3: Further, whosoever ordains something to an end, thinks of

that end. But man does not always think of the last end in all that

he desires or does. Therefore man neither desires nor does all for

the last end.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (De Civ. Dei xix, 1): "That is the

end of our good, for the sake of which we love other things, whereas

we love it for its own sake."

_I answer that,_ Man must, of necessity, desire all, whatsoever he

desires, for the last end. This is evident for two reasons. First,

because whatever man desires, he desires it under the aspect of good.

And if he desire it, not as his perfect good, which is the last end,

he must, of necessity, desire it as tending to the perfect good,

because the beginning of anything is always ordained to its

completion; as is clearly the case in effects both of nature and of

art. Wherefore every beginning of perfection is ordained to complete

perfection which is achieved through the last end. Secondly, because

the last end stands in the same relation in moving the appetite, as

the first mover in other movements. Now it is clear that secondary

moving causes do not move save inasmuch as they are moved by the first

mover. Therefore secondary objects of the appetite do not move the

appetite, except as ordained to the first object of the appetite,

which is the last end.

Reply Obj. 1: Actions done jestingly are not directed to any external

end; but merely to the good of the jester, in so far as they afford

him pleasure or relaxation. But man's consummate good is his last end.

Reply Obj. 2: The same applies to speculative science; which is

desired as the scientist's good, included in complete and perfect

good, which is the ultimate end.

Reply Obj. 3: One need not always be thinking of the last end,

whenever one desires or does something: but the virtue of the first

intention, which was in respect of the last end, remains in every

desire directed to any object whatever, even though one's thoughts be

not actually directed to the last end. Thus while walking along the

road one needs not to be thinking of the end at every step.

________________________

Summa Theologica, Part I-II (Pars Prima Secundae) From the Complete American Edition · 第 16 / 746 题