On the field of Malplaquet, that battlefield, I met a man.
He was pointed out to me as a man who drove travellers to Bavai. His
name was Mr. The Duke, and he was very poor.
If he comes across these lines (which is exceedingly unlikely) I offer
him my apologies. Anyhow, I can write about him freely, for he is not
rich, and, what is more, the laws of his country permit the telling of
the truth about our fellow-men, even when they are rich.
Mr. The Duke was of some years, and his colour was that of cedar wood.
I met him in his farmyard, and I said to him:
“Is it you, sir, that drive travellers to Bavai?”
“No,” said he.
Accustomed by many years of travel to this type of response, I
continued:
“How much do you charge?”
“Two francs fifty,” said he.
“I will give you three francs,” I said, and when I had said this he
shook his head and replied:
“You fall at an evil moment; I was about to milk the cows.” Having said
this he went to harness the horse.
When the horse was harnessed to his little cart (it was an extremely
small horse, full of little bones and white in colour, with one eye
stronger than the other) he gave it to his little daughter to hold, and
himself sat down to table, proposing a meal.
“It is but humble fare,” he said, “for we are poor.”
This sounded familiar to me; I had both read and heard it before. The
meal was of bread and butter, pasty and beer, for Malplaquet is a
country of beer and not of wine.
As he sat at table the old man pointed out to me that contraband across
the Belgian frontier, which is close by, was no longer profitable.
“The Fraud,” he said, “is no longer a living for anyone.”
Upon that frontier contraband is called “The Fraud”; it holds an
honourable place as a career.
“The Fraud,” he continued, “has gone long ago; it has burst. It is no
longer to be pursued. There is not even any duty upon apples.... But
there is a duty upon pears. Had I a son I would not put him into The
Fraud.... Sometimes there is just a chance here and there.... One can
pick up an occasion. But take it all in all (and here he wagged his
head solemnly) there is nothing in it any more.”
I said that I had no experience of contraband professionally, but that
I knew a very honest man who lived by it in the country of Andorra, and
that according to my morals a man had a perfect right to run the risk
and take his chance, for there was no contract between him and the
power he was trying to get round. This announcement pleased the old
gentleman, but it did not grip his mind. He was of your practical sort.
He was almost a Pragmatist. Abstractions wearied him. He put no faith
in the reality of ideas. I think he was a Nominalist like Abelard: and
whatever excuse you may make for him, Abelard was a Nominalist right
enough, for it was the intellectual thing to be at the time, though St.
Bernard utterly confuted him in arguments of enormous length and
incalculable boredom.
The old man, then, I say, would have nothing to do with first
principles, and he reasserted his position that, in the concrete, in
the existent world, The Fraud no longer paid.
This said for the sixth or seventh time, he drank some brandy to put
heart into him and climbed up into his little cart, I by his side. He
hit the white horse with a stick, making at the same time an
extraordinary shrill noise with his mouth, like a siren, and the horse
began to slop and sludge very dolefully towards Bavai.
“This horse,” said Mr. The Duke, “is a wonderfully good horse. He goes
like the wind. He is of Arab extraction, and comes from Africa.”
With these words he gave the horse another huge blow with his stick,
and once more emitted his piercing cry. The horse went neither faster
nor slower than before, and seemed very indifferent to the whole
performance.
“He is from Africa,” said Mr. The Duke again, meditatively. “Do you
know Africa?”
Africa with the French populace means Algiers. I answered that I knew
it, and that in particular I knew the road southward from Constantine.
At this he looked very pleased, and said:
“I was a soldier in Africa. I deserted seven times.”
To this I made no answer. I did not know how he wanted me to take it,
so I waited until he should speak again, which he soon did, and said:
“The last time I deserted I was free for a year and a half. I used to
conduct beasts; that was my trade. When they caught me I was to have
been shot. I was saved by the tears of a woman!”
Having said this the old man pulled out a very small pipe and filled it
with exceedingly black tobacco. He lit it, then he began talking again
rather more excitedly.
“It is a terrible thing and an unhappy thing none the less,” he went
on, “that a man should be taken out to be shot and should be saved by
the tears of a woman.” Then he added, “Of what use are wars? How
foolish it is that men should kill each other! If there were a war I
would not fight. Would you?”
I said I thought I would; but whether I should like to or not would
depend upon the war.
He was eager to contradict and to tell me that war was wrong and
stupid. Having behind him the logical training of fifteen Christian
centuries he was in no way muddle-headed upon the matter. He saw very
well that his doctrine meant that it was wrong to have a country, and
wrong to love it, and that patriotism was all bosh, and that no ideal
was worth physical pain or trouble. To such conclusions had he come at
the end of his life.
The white horse meanwhile slouched; Bavai grew somewhat nearer as we
sat in silence after his last sentence. He was turning many things over
in his mind. He veered off on to political economy.
“When the rich man at the Manufactory here, the place where they sell
phosphates for the land, when he stands beer to all the workmen and to
the countryside, I always say, ‘Fools! All this will be put on to the
cost of the phosphates; they will cost you more!’”
Mr. The Duke did not accept John Stuart Mill’s proposition upon the
cost of production nor the general theories of Ricardo upon which
Mill’s propositions were based. In his opinion rent was a factor in the
cost of production, for he told me that butter had gone up because the
price of land was rising near the towns. In what he next said I found
out that he was not a Collectivist, for he said a man should own enough
to live upon, but he said that this was impossible if rich people were
allowed to live. I asked him what the politics of the countryside were
and how people voted. He said:
“The politicians trick the people. They are a heap of worthlessness.”
I asked him if he voted, and he said “yes.” He said there was only one
way to vote, but I did not understand what this meant.
Had time served I should have asked him further questions—upon the
nature of the soul, its ultimate fate, the origin of man and his
destiny, whether mortal or immortal; the proper constitution of the
State, the choice of the legislator, the prince, and the magistrate;
the function of art, whether it is subsidiary or primary in human life;
the family; marriage. Upon the State he had already informed me, and
also upon the institution of property, and upon his view of armies.
Upon all those other things he would equally have given me a clear
reply, for he was a man that knew his own mind, and that is more than
most people can say.
But we were now in Bavai, and I had no time to discover more. We drank
together before we parted, and I was very pleased to see the honest
look in his face. With more leisure and born to greater opportunities
he would have been talked about, this Man of Malplaquet. He had come to
his odd conclusions as the funny people do in Scandinavia and in
Russia, and among the rich intellectuals and usurers in London and
Berlin; but he was a jollier man than they are, for he could drive a
horse and lie about it, and he could also milk a cow. As we parted he
used a phrase that wounded me, and which I had only heard once before
in my life. He said:
“We shall never see each other again!”
Another man had once said this thing to me before. This man was a
farmer in the Northumbrian hills, who walked with me a little way in
the days when I was going over Carter Fell to find the Scots people,
many, many years ago. He also said: “We shall never meet again!”