"Le Chef Ngulu de Wangata est envoye dans la Maringa, pour m'y acheter

des esclaves. Priere a MM. les agents de l'A.B.I.R. de bien vouloir me

signaler les mefaits que celui-ci pourrait commettre en route.

"Le Capitaine-Commandant,

(Signe) "SARRAZZYN."

"_Colquilhatville, le 1er Mai, 1896._"

Pretty good for the State which boasts that it has put down the slave

trade.

There is a passage showing the working of the rubber system which is so

clear and authoritative that I transcribe it in full:

"I went to the homes of these men some miles away and found out their

circumstances. To get the rubber they had first to go fully a two

days' journey from their homes, leaving their wives, and being absent

for from five to six days. They were seen to the forest limits under

guard, and if not back by the sixth day trouble was likely to ensue.

To get the rubber in the forests--which, generally speaking, are very

swampy--involves much fatigue and often fruitless searching for a

well-flowing vine. As the area of supply diminishes, moreover, the

demand for rubber constantly increases. Some little time back I

learned the Bongandanga district supplied seven tons of rubber a

month, a quantity which it was hoped would shortly be increased to ten

tons. The quantity of rubber brought by the three men in question

would have represented, probably, for the three of them certainly not

less than seven kilog. of pure rubber. That would be a very safe

estimate, and at an average of 7fr. per kilog. they might be said to

have brought in L2 worth of rubber. In return for this labour, or

imposition, they had received goods which cost certainly under 1_s._,

and whose local valuation came to 45 rods (1_s._ 10_d._). As this

process repeats itself twenty-six times a year, it will be seen that

they would have yielded L52 in kind at the end of the year to the

local factory, and would have received in return some 24_s._ or 25_s._

worth of goods, which had a market value on the spot of L2 7_s._ 8_d._

In addition to these formal payments they were liable at times to be

dealt with in another manner, for should their work, which might have

been just as hard, have proved less profitable in its yield of rubber,

the local prison would have seen them. The people everywhere assured

me that they were not happy under this system, and it was apparent to

a callous eye that in this they spoke the strict truth."

Again I insert a passage to show that Casement was by no means an

ill-natured critic:

"It is only right to say that the present agent of the A.B.I.R.

Society I met at Bongandanga seemed to me to try, in very difficult

and embarrassing circumstances, to minimize as far as possible, and

within the limits of his duties, the evils of the system I there

observed at work."

Speaking of the Mongalla massacres--those in which Lothaire was

implicated--he quotes from the judgment of the Court of Appeal:

"That it is just to take into account that, by the correspondence

produced in the case, the chiefs of the Concession Company have, if

not by formal orders, at least by their example and their tolerance,

induced their agents to take no account whatever of the rights,

property, and lives of the natives; to use the arms and the soldiers

which should have served for their defence and the maintenance of

order to force the natives to furnish them with produce and to work

for the Company, as also to pursue as rebels and outlaws those who

sought to escape from the requisitions imposed upon them.... That,

above all, the fact that the arrest of women and their detention, to

compel the villages to furnish both produce and workmen, was tolerated

and admitted even by certain of the administrative authorities of the

region."

Yet another example of the workings of the system:

"In the morning, when about to start for K----, many people from the

surrounding country came in to see me. They brought with them three

individuals who had been shockingly wounded by gun fire, two men and a

very small boy, not more than six years of age, and a fourth--a boy

child of six or seven--whose right hand was cut off at the wrist. One

of the men, who had been shot through the arm, declared that he was Y

of L----, a village situated some miles away. He declared that he had

been shot as I saw under the following circumstances: the soldiers had

entered his town, he alleged, to enforce the due fulfilment of the

rubber tax due by the community. These men had tied him up and said

that unless he paid 1,000 brass rods to them they would shoot him.

Having no rods to give them they had shot him through the arm and had

left him."

I may say that among my photographs are several with shattered arms who

have been treated in this fashion.

This is how the natives were treated when they complained to the white

man:

"In addition, fifty women are required each morning to go to the

factory and work there all day. They complained that the remuneration

given for these services was most inadequate, and that they were

continually beaten. When I asked the Chief W why he had not gone to D

F to complain if the sentries beat him or his people, opening his

mouth he pointed to one of the teeth which was just dropping out, and

said: 'That is what I got from the D F four days ago when I went to

tell him what I now say to you.' He added that he was frequently

beaten, along with others of his people, by the white man."

One sentry was taken almost red-handed by Mr. Casement:

"After some little delay a boy of about fifteen years of age appeared,

whose left arm was wrapped up in a dirty rag. Removing this, I found

the left hand had been hacked off by the wrist, and that a shot hole

appeared in the fleshy part of the forearm. The boy, who gave his name

as I I, in answer to my inquiry, said that a sentry of the La Lulanga

Company now in the town had cut off his hand. I proceeded to look for

this man, who at first could not be found, the natives to a

considerable number gathering behind me as I walked through the town.

After some delay the sentry appeared, carrying a cap-gun. The boy,

whom I placed before him, then accused him to his face of having

mutilated him. The men of the town, who were questioned in

succession, corroborated the boy's statement. The sentry, who gave his

name as K K, could make no answer to the charge. He met it by vaguely

saying some other sentry of the Company had mutilated I I; his

predecessor, he said, had cut off several hands, and probably this was

one of the victims. The natives around said that there were two other

sentries at present in the town, who were not so bad as K K, but that

he was a villain. As the evidence against him was perfectly clear, man

after man standing out and declaring he had seen the act committed, I

informed him and the people present that I should appeal to the local

authorities for his immediate arrest and trial."

The following extract must be my final quotation from Consul Casement's

report:

"I asked then how this tax was imposed. One of them, who had been

hammering out an iron neck-collar on my arrival, spoke first. He said:

"'I am N N. These other two beside me are O O and P P, all of us

Y----. From our country each village had to take twenty loads of

rubber. These loads were big: they were as big as this....' (Producing

an empty basket which came nearly up to the handle of my

walking-stick.) 'That was the first size. We had to fill that up, but

as rubber got scarcer the white man reduced the amount. We had to take

these loads in four times a month.'

"_Q._ 'How much pay did you get for this?'

"_A._ (Entire audience.) 'We got no pay! We got nothing!'

"And then N N, whom I asked again, said:

"'Our village got cloth and a little salt, but not the people who did

the work. Our chiefs eat up the cloth; the workers got nothing. The

pay was a fathom of cloth and a little salt for every big basketful,

but it was given to the chief, never to the men. It used to take ten

days to get the twenty baskets of rubber--we were always in the forest

and then when we were late we were killed. We had to go further and

further into the forest to find the rubber vines, to go without food,

and our women had to give up cultivating the fields and gardens. Then

we starved. Wild beasts--the leopards--killed some of us when we were

working away in the forest, and others got lost or died from exposure

and starvation, and we begged the white man to leave us alone, saying

we could get no more rubber, but the white men and their soldiers

said: "Go! You are only beasts yourselves; you are nyama (meat)." We

tried, always going further into the forest, and when we failed and

our rubber was short, the soldiers came to our towns and killed us.

Many were shot, some had their ears cut off: others were tied up with

ropes around their necks and bodies and taken away. The white men

sometimes at the posts did not know of the bad things the soldiers did

to us, but it was the white men who sent the soldiers to punish us for

not bringing in enough rubber.'

"Here P P took up the tale from N N:

"'We said to the white men, "We are not enough people now to do what

you want us. Our country has not many people in it and we are dying

fast. We are killed by the work you make us do, by the stoppage of our

plantations, and the breaking up of our homes." The white man looked

at us and said: "There are lots of people in Mputu"' (Europe, the

white man's country). '"If there are lots of people in the white man's

country there must be many people in the black man's country." The

white man who said this was the chief white man at F F----; his name

was A B; he was a very bad man. Other white men of Bula Matadi who had

been bad and wicked were B C, C D, and D E.' 'These had killed us

often, and killed us by their own hands as well as by their soldiers.

Some white men were good. These were E F, F G, G H, H I, I K, K L.'

"These ones told them to stay in their homes and did not hunt and

chase them as the others had done, but after what they had suffered

they did not trust more any one's word, and they had fled from their

country and were now going to stay here, far from their homes, in this

country where there was no rubber.

"_Q._ 'How long is it since you left your homes, since the big trouble

you speak of?'

"_A._ 'It lasted for three full seasons, and it is now four seasons

since we fled and came into the K---- country.'

"_Q._ 'How many days is it from N---- to your own country?'

"_A._ 'Six days of quick marching. We fled because we could not endure

the things done to us. Our chiefs were hanged, and we were killed and

starved and worked beyond endurance to get rubber.'

"_Q._ 'How do you know it was the white men themselves who ordered

these cruel things to be done to you? These things must have been done

without the white man's knowledge by the black soldiers.'

"_A._ (P P): 'The white men told their soldiers: "You kill only women;

you cannot kill men. You must prove that you kill men." So then the

soldiers when they killed us' (here he stopped and hesitated, and then

pointing to the private parts of my bulldog--it was lying asleep at my

feet), he said: 'then they cut off those things and took them to the

white men, who said: "It is true, you have killed men."'

"_Q._ 'You mean to tell me that any white man ordered your bodies to

be mutilated like that, and those parts of you carried to him?'

"P P, O O, and all (shouting): 'Yes! many white men. D E did it.'

"_Q._ 'You say this is true? Were many of you so treated after being

shot?'

"All (shouting out): 'Nkoto! Nkoto!' (Very many! Very many!)

"There was no doubt that these people were not inventing. Their

vehemence, their flashing eyes, their excitement, was not simulated.

Doubtless they exaggerated the numbers, but they were clearly telling

what they knew and loathed. I was told that they often became so

furious at the recollection of what had been done to them that they

lost control over themselves. One of the men before me was getting

into this state now."

Such is the story--or a very small portion of it--which His Majesty's

Consul conveyed to His Majesty's Government as to the condition of those

natives, who, "in the name of Almighty God," we had pledged ourselves to

defend!

The same damning White Book contained a brief account of Lord Cromer's

experience upon the Upper Nile in the Lado district. He notes that for

eighty miles the side of the river which is British territory was crowded

with native villages, the inhabitants of which ran along the bank calling

to the steamer. The other bank (Congolese territory), was a deserted

wilderness. The "Tuquoque" argument which King Leopold's henchmen are so

fond of advancing will find it hard to reconcile the difference. Lord

Cromer ends his report:

"It appears to me that the facts which I have stated above afford

amply sufficient evidence of the spirit which animates the Belgian

Administration, if, indeed, Administration it can be called. The

Government, so far as I could judge, is conducted almost exclusively

on commercial principles, and, even judged by that standard, it would

appear that those principles are somewhat short-sighted."

In the same White Book which contains these documents there is printed the

Congolese defence drawn up by M. de Cuvelier. The defence consists in

simply ignoring all the definite facts laid before the public, and in

making such statements as that the British have themselves made war upon

natives, as if there were no distinction between war and massacre, and

that the British have put a poll-tax upon natives, which, if it be

reasonable in amount, is a perfectly just proceeding adopted by all

Colonial nations. Let the possessors of the Free State use this system,

and at the same time restore the freedom of trade by throwing open the

country to all, and returning to the natives that land and produce which

has been taken from them. When they have done this--and punished the

guilty--there will be an end of anti-Congo agitation. Beyond this, a large

part (nearly half) of the Congo Reply (_notes sur le rapport de Mr.

Casement, de Dec. 11, 1903_), is taken up by trying to show that in one

case of mutilation the injuries were, in truth, inflicted by a wild boar.

There must be many wild boars in Congo land, and their habits are of a

singular nature. It is not in the Congo that these boars are bred.

VIII

KING LEOPOLD'S COMMISSION AND ITS REPORT

The immediate effect of the publication as a State paper of the general

comment of Lord Cromer, and of the definite accusations of Consul

Casement, was a demand both in Belgium and in England for an official

inquiry. Lord Landsdowne stipulated that this inquiry should be impartial

and thorough. It was also suggested by the British Government that it

should be international in character, and separated from the local

administration. Very grudgingly and under constant pressure the King

appointed a Commission, but whittled down its powers to such a point that

its proceedings must lose all utility. Such were the terms that they

provoked remonstrance from men like M. A. J. Wauters, the Belgian

historian of the Congo Free State, who protested in the _Mouvement

Geographique_ (August 7th, 1904) that such a body could serve no useful

end. Finally, their functions were slightly increased, but they possessed

no punitive powers and were hampered in every direction by the terms of

their reference.

The _personnel_ of the Commission was worthy of the importance of the

inquiry. M. Janssens, a well-known jurist of Belgium, was the president.

He impressed all who came in contact with him as a man of upright and

sympathetic character. Baron Nisco's appointment was open to criticism, as

he was himself a Congo functionary, but save for that fact there was no

complaint to make against him. Dr. Schumacher, a distinguished Swiss

lawyer, was the third Commissioner. The English Government applied to have

a representative upon the tribunal, and with true Congo subtlety the

request was granted after the three judges had reached the Congo. The

Englishman, Mr. Mackie, hurried out, but was only in time to attend the

last three sittings, which were held in the lower part of the river, far

from the notorious rubber agents. It is worth noting that on his arrival

he applied for the minutes of the previous meetings and that his

application was refused. In Belgium the evidence of the Commission has

never been published, and it is safe to say that it never will be.

Fortunately the Congo missionaries took copious notes of the proceedings

and of the testimony which came immediately under their own notice. It is

from their evidence that I draw these accounts. If the Congo authorities

contest the accuracy of those accounts, then let them confute them forever

and put their accusers to confusion by producing the actual minutes which

they hold.

The first sitting of any length of which there are records is that at

Bolobo, and extended from November 5th to 12th, 1904. The veteran, Mr.

Grenfell, gave evidence at this sitting, and it is useful to summarize his

views as he was one of the men who held out longest against the

condemnation of King Leopold, and because his early utterances have been

quoted as if he were a supporter of the system. He expressed to the

Commissioners his disappointment at the failure of the Congo Government to

realize the promises with which it inaugurated its career. He declared he

could no longer wear the decorations which he had received from the

Sovereign of the Congo State. He gave it as his opinion that the ills the

country was suffering from were due to the haste of a few men to get rich,

and to the absence of anything like a serious attempt to properly police

the country in the interests of the people. He instanced the few judicial

officers, and the virtual impossibility of a native obtaining justice,

owing to witnesses being compelled to travel long distances, either to

Leopoldville or Boma. Mr. Grenfell spoke out emphatically against the

administrative _regime_ on the Upper River, so far as it had been brought

under his notice.

Mr. Scrivener, a gentleman who had been twenty-three years on the Congo,

was the next witness. His evidence was largely the same as the "Diary"

from which I have already quoted, concerning the condition of the Crown

Domain. Many witnesses were examined. "How do you know the names of the

men murdered?" a lad was asked. "One of them was my father," was the

dramatic reply. "Men of stone," wrote Mr. Scrivener, "would be moved by

the stories that are unfolded as the Commission probes this awful history

of rubber collection."

Mr. Gilchrist, another missionary, was a new witness. His testimony was

concerned with the State Domain and the Concessionnaire area, principally

on the Lulanga River. He said:

"I also told them what we had seen on the Ikelemba, of the signs of

desolation in all the districts, of the heartrending stories the

people told us, of the butcheries wrought by the various white men of

the State and companies who had, from time to time, been stationed

there among whom a few names were notorious. I pointed out to them the

fact that the basin of the Ikelemba was supposed to be free-trade

territory also, but that everywhere the people of the various

districts were compelled to serve the companies of these respective

districts, in rubber, gum copal or food. At one out-of-the-way place

where we were on the south bank, two men arrived just as we were

leaving, with their bodies covered with marks of the chicotte, which

they had just received from the trader of Bosci because their quantity

had been short. I said to the Commissaire, given favourable

conditions, particularly freedom, there would soon be a large

population in these interior towns, the Ngombe and Mongo."

In answer to questions the following facts were solicited:

"_Unsettled condition of the people._ The older people never seem to

have confidence to build their houses substantially. If they have any

suspicion of the approach of a canoe or steamer with soldiers they

flee.

"_Chest disease, pneumonia, etc._ These carry off very many. The

people flee to the islands, live in the open air, expose themselves to

all kinds of weather, contract chills, which are followed by serious

lung troubles, and die. For years we never saw a new house because of

the drifting population. They have a great fear of soldiers. In the

case of many the absence from the villages is temporary; in the case

of a few they permanently settle on the north bank of the river.

"_Want of proper nourishment._ I have witnessed the collecting of the

State imposition, and after this was set aside the natives had nothing

but leaves to eat."

Also, that fines, which the Commission at once declared to be illegal,

were constantly levied on the people, and that these fines had continued

after the matter had been reported to the Governor-General. In spite of

this declaration of illegality, no steps were taken in the matter, and M.

de Bauw, the chief offender, was by last accounts the supreme executive

official of the district. At every turn one finds that there is no

relation at all between law and practice in the Congo. Law is habitually

broken by every official from the Governor-General downward if the profits

of the State can be increased thereby. The only stern enforcement of the

laws is toward the foreigner, the Austrian Rubinck, or the Englishman

Stokes, who is foolish enough to think that an international agreement is

of more weight than the edicts of Boma. These men believed it, and met

their death through their belief without redress, and even, in the case of

the Austrian, without public remonstrance.

The next considerable session of the Commission was at Baringa. Mr. Harris

and Mr. Stannard, the missionaries at this station, had played a noble

part throughout in endeavouring within their very limited powers to shield

the natives from their tormentors. In both cases, and also in that of Mrs.

Harris, this had been done at the repeated risk of their lives. Their

white neighbours of the rubber factories made their lives miserable also

by preventing their receipt of food from the natives, and harassing them

in various ways. On one occasion a chief and his son were both murdered by

the order of the white agent because they had supplied the Harris

household with the fore-quarter of an antelope. Before giving the terrible

testimony of the missionaries--a testimony which was admitted to be true

by the chief agent of the A.B.I.R. Company on the spot, it would be well

to show the exact standing of this Corporation and its relation to the

State. These relations are so close that they become to all intents and

purposes the same. The State holds fifty per cent. of the shares; it

places the Government soldiers at the company's disposal; it carries up in

the Government steamers and supplies licenses for the great number of

rifles and the quantity of cartridges which the company needs for its

murderous work. Whatever crimes are done by the company, the State is a

close accomplice. Finally, the European directors of this bloodstained

company are, or were at the time, the Senator Van der Nest, who acted as

President; and as Council: Count John d'Oultremont, Grand Marshal of the

Belgian Court; Baron Dhanis, of Congo fame, and M. van Eetevelde, the

creature of the King, and the writer of so many smug despatches to the

British Government about the mission of civilization and the high purpose

of the Congo State. Now listen to some of the testimony as condensed by

Mr. Harris:

The Crime of the Congo · 第 6 / 12 段