THE ORGAN, ORGAN PLAYING AND ORGAN MUSIC.

In the book of Genesis it is written: “Jubal, he was the father of all

such as handle the harp and organ.” It is not to be understood that the

word organ in this passage meant an instrument anything like that heard

in our churches at the present day. In fact, as St. Augustine tells us,

there was a time when all musical instruments were called organs.

=The Germ of the Organ=.—The invention of the organ is veiled in

deepest darkness. Its development from its earliest forms to its

present state has occupied a period of almost two thousand years.

Doubtless, the first idea of a wind instrument was suggested by the

breeze blowing across the open ends of broken reeds, the discovery

naturally following that reeds of different lengths gave forth sounds

of varying pitch. In course of time, reeds or pipes, differing in

length, began to be joined together, conveniently arranged so as to

produce a succession of musical sounds, the players blowing them with

the mouth. These instruments were called =Pan’s Pipes=, the =Syrinx= of

the ancient Greeks.

=The First Stage of Development=.—As the number of pipes was increased,

the moving of the head back and forth in order to blow them became

difficult. The pipes were then placed in a sort of box or wind chest,

a tube being added through which the player could blow, the pipes not

intended to sound being closed by the fingers. Furthermore, as the

pipes were increased in number and in size, it became necessary to

employ various mechanical accessories to furnish adequate wind supply,

and to open and close the pipes at will, the breath and fingers of the

player proving insufficient. A device was invented in the form of a

slide, rule or tongue of wood, which was placed beneath the aperture

of the pipe, and perforated so as to shut off or admit wind to the pipe

as it was drawn back or forth. The earliest form of bellows might be

suggested by the leathern bag of the bagpipe. In this the wind pressure

was unsteady and the tone necessarily disconnected.

[Illustration: PAN’S PIPES (SYRINX). EARLY FORM OF THE ORGAN.]

=The Hydraulic Organ=.—The first attempts to secure regular or steady

wind pressure were made by Ctesibus, who lived at Alexandria, about 180

B. C. To him is ascribed the invention of the so-called “=Hydraulic

Organ=.” This term seems somewhat of a misnomer, since the water was

used merely to give the necessary pressure to the bellows, and to

regulate the wind supply. This method was never developed, since the

device did not seem applicable to instruments of any considerable size.

The trend was rather toward a wind supply from a bellows operated on

the same principle as that of the blacksmith’s. In the Hydraulic Organ

the water was thus applied: An inverted air receiver, into which the

wind was forced by a bellows, was immersed in a tank of water, the

pressure of the water around and above the receiver forcing the air

through an aperture at the top into the pipes, the pressure being

regulated by the volume of water in the tank. The hydraulic organ

continued more or less in use up to the early part of the 14th century.

=The Earliest Organs=.—The organ developed little as to size or

mechanical improvements during the first ten centuries of the Christian

Era, and it is difficult to trace the progressive stages in point of

time, place or mechanical invention. The first organ known to the

people of Western Europe was a present from the Byzantine emperor,

Constantine, to Pepin the Short, Major-Domo of the Frankish Kingdom, in

742. It had brass pipes and the “keys” were struck by hands and feet.

Eastern organs also came into France in the time of Charlemagne, son

of Pepin. The first organ used in Germany was made in 812, modelled

after the one just mentioned. In 880, the Pope ordered an organ and

an organ builder from Germany, which seems to indicate that the art

had found support there at an early date. Although not considered

absolutely indispensable, the organ from that time on seems to have

been generally adopted for use in churches. Its many imperfections gave

ground for criticism, yet today it is considered, _par excellence_, the

ecclesiastical instrument.

=Increase in the Size of Organs=.—The organ builders of these early

days were mostly monks, Pope Sylvester II (1003) being eminent,

under the name of Gerbert, prior to his election to the papacy. They

built small organs called “=Portative=,” and large organs called

“=Positive=.” The old hydraulic organ, owing to its excessive weight,

was called “Positive” to distinguish it from the “Portative” or

portable organ, and these terms have been perpetuated to the present

time. An organ built for the Cathedral at Winchester, England, had ten

keys, four hundred pipes and twenty-six bellows, which were operated

by seventy men, “in the sweat of their brows.” Since forty pipes were

attached to a single key, it may be readily understood why its tone was

compared to thunder. The keys were very large, having a deep fall, and

required the whole force of the hand to press down a single one.

=Mechanical Improvements=.—The pipes in the early organs were made

of copper, lead, tin, silver, glass, ivory and various woods, but

experiments finally showed =tin= or =wood= to be best suited for the

purpose. The earliest organs had about twelve pipes, and the larger

instruments three octaves, but without the chromatic intervals. The

pipes were arranged according to the sequence of tones in the old

Church modes, the _octave containing_ but _three semitones_: between

E-F, A-B flat and B-C. The chromatic tones were added gradually, the

breadth of the keys being correspondingly reduced as the increased

number of keys occupied the same space as before. Heretofore, the

_wind_ had usually been _forced from_ the _bellows_ by the _weight_ of

men standing upon them, but in the 10th century use began to be made of

a =lever=, the bellows presumably being weighted.

=The Keyboard is Adopted=.—In the 11th century, the keyboard appeared,

supplanting the levers and slides, previously in use. The first organ

containing this marked improvement was made for the Cathedral at

Magdeburg, Germany. It had sixteen keys. In 1350, a monk at Thorn built

an organ with twenty-two keys, and in 1361 an organ was built for the

Cathedral at Halberstadt with fourteen diatonic and eight chromatic

tones in a compass extending from B, second line, bass staff, to A,

second space, treble. This organ had three keyboards, now termed

manuals.

=The Pedals=.—The invention of pedals is variously ascribed to Albert

Van Os (about 1120), to Van Valbeke, of Brabant, and to a German named

=Bernhard= (1470), an organist of Venice. The latter probably improved,

but did not invent the pedals. The pedals at first did not exceed the

compass of an octave, and were used only for sustaining prolonged

tones. They were _fastened_ to the broad _manual keys_ by stout cords,

thus enabling the performer to draw down the desired key with the foot.

About the year 1418 the pedals began to be attached to _independent

pedal-pipes_, thus imparting to the organ a certain dignity and

sonority, still a chief characteristic of the instrument. After 1475,

all important organs were built with pedal keyboard.

=The Introduction of Stops=.—Up to the 14th century, the different

registers (set of pipes with uniform tone quality) could not be sounded

separately, that is to say: _all_ the _pipes_ belonging to any one key

_sounded_ when that key was depressed. At the close of the 14th century

it was found possible to add =valves= to the pipes in such a manner

as to cause the wind to pass through or be cut off from any series of

pipes at will. The opening and closing was managed through a spring.

The next improvement was to introduce a =slide= to open or close the

passage of wind into the pipes. With these improvements it became

possible for builders to set themselves to the improvement of the

various “stops” or registers.

=Improvements in Stops=.—In the 15th century, pipes of sixteen and

thirty-two feet in length began to be used, necessitating a greatly

_enlarged bellows_. Pipes were _closed_ at the _top_, thereby lowering

the pitch an octave. They were given _smaller diameters_, producing a

softer tone quality. The _shapes_ of the pipes were _varied_, giving

additional variety in tone quality.

Thus began the broad classifications of “=Open=” and “=Stopped=” pipes

in all their varieties. The “=Reeds=” (pipes containing a vibrator

or tongue to set the column of air in motion) were familiar to the

earliest performers, but were not introduced into the organ until as

late as the 14th century. Further improvements were made in the bellows

at the beginning of the 16th century.

=St. Mary’s, Lübeck=.—In 1561, a three-manual organ was in use in St.

Mary’s, Lübeck, Germany. To this organ all the important improvements

were successively added at various intervals until it had, at the

beginning of the 18th century, in the three manuals, respectively,

thirteen, fourteen and fifteen stops, and in the pedal, fifteen stops.

It was to hear the famous Buxtehude play upon this organ that Sebastian

Bach walked fifty miles in 1705.

=Design of Improvements=.—Great improvements have been made in organ

building since the time of Bach, all designed to give the player

greater resources, and increased facility in the handling and control

of the resources, which in the present day are simply enormous.

=The Organ in the American Colonies=.—Although the first organs heard

in America were probably introduced by the Spaniards, of these there

are no authentic records. According to reliable historic data, the

famous old “Brattle” organ was “the first organ that ever pealed to the

glory of God in this country.” It was imported from London, in 1713,

by Mr. Thomas Brattle, who bequeathed it to the Brattle Street Church,

Boston, directing that the parish “procure a sober person that can play

skilfully thereon with a loud noise.” This organ became the property of

King’s Chapel, Boston, and was used until 1756.

=No Art in Early Organ Playing=.—The organs of the early Christian

period were of such a character that playing, in the sense in which we

now understand the word, was out of the question. For some time the

span of the hand possible to players did not exceed the distance of a

fifth. If an octave was to be struck, a second player was necessary.

Only with the narrowing of the keys did artistic playing become

possible. In fact, organ playing has invariably reflected the style and

development of contemporary musical art.

=Early Organists=.—The credit of being “father of organists” is given

to =Francesco Landino=, of Florence (1325-1390), and after him to

=Bernhard=, mentioned as the inventor of the organ pedals. The oldest

organ compositions are some works by =Konrad Paumann= (1410-1473),

who was born blind, yet, like many others since, became a thoroughly

trained musician in spite of his affliction. He also played other

instruments and was a fine contrapuntist. Another of the early

organists is =Benedictus Ducis= (or Hertoghs), born at Bruges, about

1480. He was a pupil of Josquin des Pres. From Ducis, representing the

second Flemish school, as founded by Okeghem, there is a chain almost

of master and pupil, between the early masters of organ playing and

polyphonic writing and Bach, who in these arts became the master of

all. Paumann’s pieces show the style of composing for the instrument

that was considered appropriate. They are essentially transcribed,

but elaborated, vocal works. The compositions of the next organists

of fame, Willaert, of Venice (1490-1562), and Cyprian di Rore

(1516-1565), pupil of the former, have distinct names. _Ricercari_,

_Intonationi_, _Contrapunti_, _Toccati_, _Praeambula_, and _Canzoni_,

but the character remains the same, vocal pieces, elaborated and

freely embellished with runs and other passage work. Later the term

_Ricercari_ came to mean a sort of fantasia in fugal form, often on

a popular air; _Toccata_ became a free fantasia with brilliantly

figurated passages, and a _Praeambulo_ a prelude to a larger piece.

Other famous organists of this period were =Bernhard Schmidt= (1520-?),

German; =Claudio Merulo= (1532-1604), organist at Venice, and his

successors, the two =Gabrieli’s=.

=Frescobaldi and His Successors=.—The greatest of all the organists

of the earlier days, to whom the title of “Father of true organ

playing” has been given, was =Girolamo Frescobaldi=, born in 1583 at

Ferrara, in Italy, educated in Flanders, and from 1608 to his death

in 1644 organist at St. Peter’s, Rome. His fame was so great that the

spacious cathedral was often filled when he gave an organ recital. His

compositions, many of which have been preserved, have a very decided

contrapuntal character, whence some have called him the inventor of the

organ fugue. Two prominent German organists, whose compositions were

studied by Bach, were =Caspar Kerl= (1627-1693), and =Jacob Froberger=

(———1667), both of whom lived in Vienna. The most eminent organist

of the 17th century was =Johann Peter Sweelinck= (1562-1621), pupil

of Zarlino, the famous Italian theorist, and of Andreas Gabrieli,

organist of Venice. Sweelinck occupied the position of organist at the

Cathedral in Amsterdam, and gave much attention to the development of

the fugal style of composition. His compositions are of the highest

importance historically, since they exhibit the first known examples

of the independent use of the pedals in a real fugal part. He was the

most eminent organist of his time (being called the organist maker),

and was the teacher of the following noted players: =Jacob Praetorius=

(died at Hamburg in 1651); =Heinrich Scheidemann= (1596-1663), also

located at Hamburg; =Jan Adams Reinken= (1623-1722), from 1663 organist

and successor to Scheidemann at the Catherine Church, Hamburg (Bach

came to Hamburg several times to hear Reinken play and to learn his

style); =Samuel Scheidt= (1587-1654), organist at Halle. Some of their

compositions are accessible.

[Illustration: JOHANN PETER SWEELINCK.]

Other famous organists of this period were =Johann Pachelbel=

(1653-1706), located at Nuremberg (Bach studied his works as a lad);

=Dietrich Buxtehude= (1637-1707), organist at Lübeck for thirty-nine

years. One of the most important names of this period of development is

that of =Johann Joseph Fux= (1660-1741). His “_Gradus ad Parnassum_,”

published in 1725, a treatise on counterpoint based on the practice of

the great masters, played an important part in the training of Haydn,

Mozart and Beethoven.

=English Organists=.—In the history of English organ playing, the

first great name to engage our attention is that of =Thomas Tallys=,

born about 1520. He is called the “Father of English church music.” He

served under Henry VIII, Edward VI, Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth,

as organist of the Chapel Royal. English organists of distinction

contemporary with and succeeding Tallys were =John Merbecke=, =Richard

Farrant=, =William Byrd=, =John Bull=, =Thomas Morley=, =Orlando

Gibbons= (a contemporary of Frescobaldi), =Matthew Lock=, =John Blow=

and =Henry Purcell=. The last mentioned, born in 1658, became organist

of Westminster Abbey in 1680. The name of Purcell is one of the

strongest in the history of English music. It was his ambition to found

a distinctive school of English composition. Although not successful in

this, he made a lasting impression on English church music and produced

many charming secular works. It is on record that he stood high in the

estimation of his European contemporaries.

=Culmination in Bach and Handel=.—The Polyphonic Period culminated in

Bach and Handel, both born in 1685. These two, who never met, and who

worked upon dissimilar lines, were the most famous organists of their

day, in addition to their greatness in composition.

=The Organ and Polyphonic Music=.—Bach must be regarded as the source

of modern organ composition and playing. In him polyphonic composition

attained its highest perfection and the organ stands as the centre of

the Polyphonic school. The development of the Opera and its influence

towards a freer style in vocal and instrumental composition and the

tendency of instrumental music to develop along harmonic lines had the

effect of relegating polyphonic music to the Church with the organ

as its chief vehicle. It is only of comparatively recent years that

the organ has become a concert instrument. Bach’s treatment of the

instrument serves as a model for the composers of all time and the

study of his works is indispensable to the development of technical

command of the organ and the cultivation of the true organ style.

Handel’s permanent contribution to organ literature consists of sets

of =Concertos=. These concertos, a number of which are still played

and admired, excited the enthusiasm of Sir John Hawkins, who gives a

glowing account of them in his history. =Bach= was appointed Cantor

at the _St. Thomas Schule_, Leipzig, in 1723, and it was here that

much of his greatest work was accomplished. In addition to his duties

at the school, he directed the music in the Churches of St. Thomas

and St. Nicholas. As to the relative superiority of Bach and Handel

as organists, contemporary opinion seems to have differed widely.

Each undoubtedly had a style of his own as shown in his published

compositions. Each excelled in improvisation.

=The Chorale in Protestant Organ Music=.—In addition to his

incomparable preludes and fugues, toccatas, fantasias and pieces in

the larger forms, Bach made the polyphonic treatment of the =chorale=

an art peculiarly his own. In fact, the German style of organ playing

may be said to have developed from the chorale and from the music of

the Reformation. This furnished a fresher and very different source

of inspiration from the Gregorian chant which had been handled so

effectively by Frescobaldi and his Italian successors.

=Marchand=.—One of the most renowned of early French organists was

=Louis Marchand= (1671-1732). In 1717, while living under banishment

in Dresden, he was to have entered into a trial of skill with Bach,

but lost courage and departed on the morning of the appointed day. A

certain triviality has at times characterized the French school of

organ music, undoubtedly a reflection of the prevailing style and taste

in other branches of musical composition. Of later years, however, a

more serious and exalted style has developed.

=The German School=.—To return to the German organists. A name familiar

to all students of the organ is that of Rinck. =Johann C. H. Rinck=

(1770-1846) was a pupil of Kittel, who in turn was a pupil of J. S.

Bach. Rinck’s reputation is based largely on his “Practical Organ

School,” a work still in use. Another name of importance is that of

=Johann Gottlob Schneider= (1789-1864). He has had the reputation of

being one of the greatest German organists since the time of Bach. Of

the great composers since Bach, =Mendelssohn= stands conspicuous as

an organist and composer of organ music. Haydn, Mozart and Beethoven,

although occasionally using the organ in their scores, did not compose

for the instrument. Mendelssohn developed a decided fondness for the

organ, which he played admirably. His six sonatas and three preludes

and fugues are masterpieces. Among the representative German organists

and composers should be mentioned: =Adolph Hesse= (1809-1863), author

of the “Practical Organist” and a prolific composer; =Karl August

Haupt= (1810-1891), a celebrated teacher, numbering among his many

pupils from all countries such prominent American organists as Eugene

Thayer, Clarence Eddy and J. K. Paine; =Carl Ludwig Thiele= (1816-1848)

composer of some of the most difficult known works for the organ;

=Gustav Merkel= (1827-1885), a prolific composer, whose sonatas

are numbered among the standard works for the instrument; =J. G.

Rheinberger= (1837-1901), one of the finest organists and best teachers

of his time and a composer of great ability, whose twenty sonatas form

a permanent addition to the best organ literature. A number of American

organists were among his pupils.

=The French School=.—Prominent among organists of the French school in

the 19th century may be mentioned: =L. J. A. Lefébure-Wély= (1817-1869)

and =Antoine Eduard Batiste= (1820-1876). The works of both these

organists are still widely played and have won much popularity. Wely

has been called the “Auber of the organ.” His works display fertility

of melodic invention and a piquancy of harmonic treatment, but are

entirely lacking in the polyphonic element. Much the same may be said

of Batiste, who was a fine player and teacher, and who equalled Wely

in tunefulness but not in musicianship. =Nicholas Jacques Lemmens=

(1823-81), a great player (especially of Bach) and author of the

celebrated “Ecole d’Orgue” may be said to have laid the foundation of

the modern French school. Conspicuous among his successors have been:

=Camille Saint-Saëns= (1835-——), a most versatile musician and a noted

organist; =Théodore Dubois= (1837-——), =Théodore Salome= (1834-——)

and =Felix Alexandre Guilmant= (1837-——). Guilmant, one of the most

noted organists and composers of the present day, was a favorite pupil

of Lemmens. He has been one of the most prolific composers since the

time of Bach, is a master of all the resources of the modern organ,

and has a fertility of invention and a fluent command of contrapuntal

resources. Another eminent French organist is =C. M. Widor= (1845-——),

also a composer of distinction. A powerful influence was exerted on

modern organ music, as well as general composition, by the eminent

organist and composer, =César Franck=, who was, for a number of years,

in charge of the organ class at the Paris _Conservatoire_.

=The Italian School=.—Among recent Italian organists =Filippo Capocci=

(1840-——) and =Enrico Bossi= (1861-——) are worthy of mention. Both are

splendid organists and prolific composers. They are leaders in the

revival of good organ playing in Italy, where a determined effort is

being made to restore the art to its former supremacy.

=The English School=.—England has furnished a long line of 19th century

organists of ability, prominent among whom are: =Sir John Goss=

(1800-1880), =Henry Smart= (1813-1879), =E. J. Hopkins= (1818-1901),

=S. S. Wesley= (1810-1876), =Dr. Wm. Spark= (1825-1897). Foremost among

English organists stands the name of =Wm. T. Best= (1826-1897). He was

one of the most famous concert organists of his time, but is best known

to organ students by his “Arrangements from the Scores of the Great

Masters,” in which he demonstrated that the organ is in itself capable

of reproducing certain orchestral effects without transcending its

proper functions or descending to trickery. “The Organ,” by =Sir John

Stainer= (1840-1901), is one of the most widely used elementary works

for instruction in organ playing. Dr. Stainer was the successor of Sir

John Goss, at St. Paul’s, London, and was appointed Professor of Music

at Oxford University in 1889. =Frederic Archer= (1838-1901) has been

considered one of the greatest of organ players. After a successful

career in England, he came to America in 1880. He did much towards

popularizing and elevating the art of organ playing in this country.

Prominent among contemporary English organists stands =Edwin H. Lemare=

(1865-——), who succeeded Frederic Archer as organist of Carnegie

Hall, Pittsburg, in 1902. He is a skilful virtuoso, a composer of

originality, and a leading representative of the modern English school.

=Modern Organ Music=.—Organ playing and composition have kept pace

with the mechanical and artistic evolution of the instrument, and the

lines between the various schools are becoming less closely drawn.

The tendency of builders to imitate orchestral tone and effects

has had influence on composers and players alike. This tendency is

less noticeable in the works of the German school, where a modified

polyphony still flourishes, based on the principle of the classic

treatment of the chorale and growing out of the music of the Lutheran

Church. The organ compositions of the modern French school are

characterized by grace, refinement and originality, coupled with a

certain dignity and elegance. They combine free harmonic treatment and

modern polyphony, together with certain ornate characteristics, growing

out of the elaborate ceremonial music of the Latin Church, and bringing

into play all the resources of tone color and expressive treatment

of the modern instrument. Much the same may be said of the modern

English school, which nevertheless still shows traces of the early

English style, based on the dignity and purity of cathedral use and

tradition. The orchestral tendency, both in composition for the organ

and in the transcription of orchestral works for the instrument, shows

itself more or less in all schools, and the organ, in addition to its

position in the church, is becoming more and more a concert instrument.

The compositions of the American organists reflect, in a measure, the

characteristics of the schools in which they have been trained, and in

particular show traces of the styles of the masters with whom they have

chiefly studied.[9]

A Complete History of Music for Schools, Clubs, and Private Reading · 第 93 / 305 题