The “Old Witch House” that forms the subject of our sketch was

originally the home of Roger Williams while he was preaching in Salem

in 1635–1636. From it he fled to the shores of Narraganset Bay, where

he founded the Colony of Rhode Island. Its next occupant was Captain

Richard Davenport who cut the cross from the King’s colours because

“it savoured of Popery.” In 1674 or 1675, Judge Corwin of witchcraft

fame took possession and made many alterations. Before his day the old

house presented a more attractive appearance, resembling many houses

of this period still standing in England. In its original state, it

was composed of several overhanging stories, each larger than the one

below and the roof was broken into several peaked gables, each of which

was ornamented with a pineapple of carved wood. Narrow windows with

lozenge-shaped panes added to its quaintness. More alterations were

made in 1746 and 1772, and all feeling of picturesqueness has vanished

completely.

SHRINE OF GUADALUPE

THOMAS UNETT BROCKLEHURST

One day I took a car to pay a visit to the shrine of Guadalupe, which

is situated three miles from the city (Mexico), and is a great point of

attraction both to residents and visitors.

The old road from the city to Guadalupe, with its handsome wayside

shrines, was given up to the Vera Cruz Railway, and a new road for

tramcars and traffic has been made alongside of it. As soon as we had

passed the gates and the _aduna_, “crack, crack, hi, hi, hi!” and

off we went at a hand gallop past adobe houses and _pulquerias_, the

snow-capped giant Popocatapetl lifting his white head to the azure on

the right, and soon, through the avenue of trees, the little church on

the hill Tepeyac, erected where the Virgin appeared to the peasant Juan

Diego, and the Cathedral at its foot, with its flat façade flanked by

low towers, were both visible in the distance.

The cars came to a standstill in front of the Cathedral, and a motley

crowd of loungers watched us alight.

The houses are one-storied and old, the windows barred after the

fashion introduced by the Moors into Spain; behind the bars stood

village maidens and matrons who signalled and saluted their male

acquaintances by holding up the left hand, the fingers extended, which

they wiggled to and fro about half-a-dozen times; this is their mode of

salutation, possibly it means we have fruit and entertainment to offer.

The church of Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe is the most famous of all

the churches in the country, owing its notoriety to the legend that,

on the 12th of December, 1531, the Virgin Mary appeared to a poor

Mexican shepherd in that neighbourhood; he reported the vision to the

priests, who asked him to substantiate his statement by proofs. The

Virgin showed herself to him on five different occasions, and finally

stamped her image on his blanket; this mark was accepted; Our Lady

of Guadalupe was officially proclaimed the patron saint of Mexico by

the authority of Pope Clement VII., and thereby the influence of the

Catholic religion was greatly extended, it being asserted that, by her

graciously appearing to a native, all natives were taken under her

special protection. A shrine was erected on the top of the hill where

the vision appeared. At its foot rose a magnificent Cathedral, which

at one time was very rich in gold and silver ornaments, the offerings

of the faithful; but many of these were confiscated and coined into

money by order of President Benito Juarez in 1860, and have since been

replaced by inferior metal.

The name of Guadalupe was combined with that of Hidalgo, the Mexican

priest who in 1810 raised the cry of independence from the Spanish

yoke. He had painted on his standard the image of the Virgin of

Guadalupe which greatly helped to excite the patriotism of the natives;

more than 100,000 of them rallied round him; but they were so badly

armed that they could not compete with the Spanish forces, who,

curious to say, fought under the banner of the Virgin Los Remedios.

[Illustration: CHURCH OF GUADALOUPE, MEXICO]

Poor Hidalgo was captured by the Spaniards and shot in 1811; but his

followers in whom he had aroused much enthusiasm, continued the war,

and, after eleven years’ hard fighting, independence was accomplished,

in 1821, under Iturbide; and Spanish Viceroys and their rule were

abolished. Mexican presidents, nominated every four years by the

plebiscite of the nation, took their place.

There is not much to see in the Cathedral, which has been despoiled of

its silver and valuables (the golden frame of the Virgin was taken, but

returned); so I made the ascent by a zigzag road to the shrine at the

top of the hill.

Before entering the chapel, stop to look at the view; it will repay

any amount of trouble taken in mounting the steep steps. The city, the

lake and Chapultepec are within the range of a camera, if it could be

so fixed as to avoid the roof of the Cathedral below you. Turn and

enter the shrine: at a little altar on the right are rude daubs of

pictures representing miracles worked through the intervention of the

Virgin--pious offerings in commemoration of a child saved from fire,

a husband from lightning, a wife from a runaway train, a lady and

gentleman from an overturn of a carriage, people rising from a bed of

sickness, and such like--some of them with the paint hardly dry.

The altar railing is of solid silver; this railing was, of all the

sumptuous church fixtures throughout the land, alone spared by the

Liberals. Its value must be immense; pious Mexicans do not like to

appraise it, for reasons best known to themselves. The great gem,

however, of this church is the image of the Virgin of Guadalupe, which

she herself imprinted--according to the legend--upon the _tilma_,

or garment, of Juan Diego, the poor peasant, as a proof that she

had appeared to him; this relic is hung over the high altar in a

wrought-iron case and is only exposed on rare holidays. By especial

grace I obtained a view of it. The _tilma_ is a very coarse piece

of woollen fabric; the colouring of the image is distinct, and may have

been touched up from time to time. On a table at the door are copies of

the picture in all sizes, and you see them in every Indian hut, every

wayside shrine, in all the public offices, in every church--indeed in

every place in the land, appropriate or inappropriate, as the case may

be.

In an adjoining churchyard are some pretty tombs, and great prices are

paid for interment in this sacred spot. Santa Anna rests here, and the

names of the leading families of Mexico could be read on the marble on

all directions.

After descending from the hill I visited the miraculous sulphur spring,

said to cure everything; the church or dome which covers it was being

redecorated at great expense at the time of my visit. The legend says

that this spring of sulphur hydrogen gushed forth from a spot touched

by one of the Virgin’s feet. On the 12th of December every year (the

anniversary of the apparition), thousands of natives from all parts of

the country visit this shrine and the Church of Guadalupe. The name is

familiar to many people as that of a town between Toledo and Trujillo

in Spain, where there is a famous shrine to the Virgin. There is

always a longing in the minds of colonists to perpetuate the names of

the country of their birth, and Guadalupe is no doubt an instance of

this patriotic feeling on the part of the Spaniards; the Geronomite

convent in Spain was at the time of the Conquest the richest and most

venerated shrine in the old country, its celebrated figure of the

Virgin, being believed to have been carved by St. Luke himself, and

it was given by St. Gregory the Great to San Leandro for putting down

Arianism. The figure was hidden and miraculously preserved during

six centuries of Moorish invasion, and when brought to light was so

venerated by the whole Spanish nation that the settlers in New Spain

would delight in perpetuating the name of the shrine in their new home.

CHRIST CHURCH, ALEXANDRIA

BISHOP MEADE

The town of Alexandria was at first called Hunting Creek Warehouse,

sometimes Belle Haven, and consisted of a small establishment at that

place. Its growth was encouraged by successive acts of the Legislature,

establishing semi-annual fairs and granting certain privileges to

those who attended them. In the year 1762, it was enlarged by the

laying off of numerous lots on the higher ground, belonging to Dade,

West and the Alexanders, after which it improved rapidly, so that at

the close of the Eighteenth or beginning of the Nineteenth Century

its population was ten thousand, and its commerce greater than it now

is. So promising was it at the close of the war, that its claims were

weighed in the balance with those of Washington as the seat of National

Government. It is thought that, but for the unwillingness of Washington

to seem partial to Virginia, Alexandria would have been the chosen

spot, and that on the first range of hills overlooking the town the

public buildings would have been erected. Whether there had been any

public worship or church at Alexandria previous to this enlargement of

it, and the great impulse thus given to it, does not appear from the

vestry-book, though it is believed that there was. But soon after this,

in the year 1764, Fairfax parish is established, and measures taken for

the promotion of the Church in this place. The vestry book commences

in 1765. At one time there were two churches in the new parish of

Fairfax--one at the Falls, called, as the present one is Little Falls

Church; the position of the other--the Lower Church--is not known. It

may have been an old one at Alexandria.

[Illustration: OLD CHRIST CHURCH, ALEXANDRIA, VA.]

Among the first acts of the vestry was the repairing of the two old

churches in the parish, at a cost of more than thirty-two thousand

pounds of tobacco. In the year 1766, it is determined to build two

new churches,--one at the Little Falls, very near the old one, and

one in Alexandria, to contain twenty-four hundred square feet and to

be high-pitched so as to admit of galleries. Mr. James Wrenn agrees

to build the former, and Mr. James Parsons the other, for about six

hundred pounds each. A most particular contract is made for them.

The mortar is to have two-thirds of lime and one of sand,--the very

reverse of the proportion at this day, and which accounts for the

greater durability of ancient walls. The shingles were to be of the

best cypress or juniper, and three-quarters of an inch thick, instead

of our present half-inch ones. Mr. Parsons was allowed to add ten feet

to the upper part of the church on his own account, and to pay himself

by their sale, on certain conditions. He commenced his work, but was

unable to finish it. It lingered for some years, until in 1772, Mr.

John Carlisle undertakes it, and completes it in 1773. The ten pews are

now sold, and General Washington, though having just been engaged in

the erection of Mount Vernon Church, which was finished the same year,

and having a pew therein, gives the highest price for one in Christ

Church, which was occupied by him and his family during his life, and

has been by some of his name ever since. The gallery was not put up

until the year 1787, at which time the pews were balloted for. The

steeple is of modern construction.

Christ Church stands on Cameron and Washington Streets in a

pretty green churchyard, where in 1774, Washington addressed

the citizens advocating resistance to Great Britain; and it was

on the spot also that General Lee agreed to take command of the

Virginia forces at the beginning of the Civil War in 1861.

Washington attended Christ Church regularly, and his pew is

still shown. Unfortunately, the old high backed pews were

cut down a few years ago at the instance of the rector of an

important church in Washington. Washington always drove from

_Mount Vernon_ to Alexandria in a handsome cream-coloured

coach, the body of which was suspended by heavy leather straps.

The sides and front were shaded with green blinds and black

leather outside curtains. The lining of the coach was black

leather; the Washington arms were painted on the doors and a

picture of the seasons was also painted on each of the four

panels. Four horses were ordinarily harnessed to this coach

except when six were required for long journeys. What became of

this coach we learn from Bishop Meade, who says:

“There was one object of interest belonging to General

Washington, concerning which I have a special right to

speak,--viz.: his old English coach, in which himself and Mrs.

Washington not only rode in Fairfax County, but travelled

through the length and breadth of our land. So faithfully was

it executed that, at the conclusion of this long journey, its

builder, who came over with it and settled in Alexandria, was

proud to be told by the General that not a nail or screw had

failed. It so happened, in a way I need not state, that this

coach came into my hands about fifteen years after the death

of General Washington. In the course of time, from disuse, it

being too heavy for these latter days, it began to decay and

give way. Becoming an object of desire to those who delight

in relics, I caused it to be taken to pieces and distributed

among the admiring friends of Washington who visited my house,

and also among a number of female associations for benevolent

and religious objects, which associations, at their fairs and

other occasions, made a large profit by converting the fragments

into walking-sticks, picture-frames, and snuff-boxes. About

two-thirds of one of the wheels thus produced one hundred and

forty dollars. There can be no doubt but that at its dissolution

it yielded more to the cause of charity than it did to its

builder at its first erection. Besides other mementos of it, I

have in my study, in the form of a sofa, the hind-seat, on which

the General and his lady were wont to sit.”--E. S.

A GLIMPSE AT NEW ORLEANS HOUSES

LADY HARDY

We start in the early morning on a pedestrian excursion through this

“Paris of the South.” We almost fancy that we have gone to sleep in

the New World, and woke up in the old fair and familiar city across

the sea. It is the same, yet not the same; there is a similarity in

the general features especially in the vicinity of Canal Street, to

which I shall allude more fully by and by, and an insouciant gaiety in

the aspect of the people, which pervades the very air they breathe;

an electric current seems always playing upon their spirits; moving

their emotional nature, sometimes to laughter, sometimes to tears.

It seems as though the two cities had been built on the same model,

only differently draped and garnished, decorated with different orders

and stamped with a different die. Coming down a narrow lane, we met

a Frenchwoman, her mahogany coloured face scored like the bark of an

old tree scarcely visible beneath her flapping sunbonnet. She wore

short petticoats, and came clattering along over the rough stones in

her wooden sabots, while her tall blue-bloused grandson carrying her

well-filled basket strode beside her; and a meek-eyed Sister of Charity

bent on her errand of mercy passed in at a creeking doorway. These

were the only signs of life we saw as we first turned on our way to

the French quarter of the town, which still bears the impress of

the old Colonial days. This is the most ancient portion of the city,

and full of romantic traditions of the days that are dead and gone.

The long narrow crooked streets, running on all sides in a spidery

fashion, with rows of shabby-looking houses, remain exactly as they

were a hundred years ago. Strict conservatism obtains here; nothing

has been done in the way of improvement; the old wooden houses are

bruised and battered as though they had been engaged in a battle with

time and been worsted; they are covered with discolourations and

patches, naked and languishing for a new coat of paint. There are no

dainty green sun blinds here, but heavy worm-eaten wooden shutters and

queer timber-doors hung on clumsy iron hinges; here and there we get

a glimpse of the dingy interiors while a few bearded men are lounging

smoking in the doorways, and a few children, clattering like French

magpies, are playing on the threshold. Everything is quiet and dull--a

sort of Rip Van Winkle-ish sleep seems drooping its drowsy wings and

brooding everywhere, till a lumbering dray comes clattering over the

cobble stones, and sends a thousand echoes flying through the lonely

streets.

[Illustration: ST. CHARLES AVENUE, NEW ORLEANS]

From these stony regions, past the little old-fashioned church where

the good Catholics worshipped a century ago and we emerge upon Canal

Street, the principal business thoroughfare of the city; it is thronged

with people at this time of day, busy crowds are passing to and fro,

the shop windows are dressed in their most attractive wares, temptingly

exposed to view. Confectioners, fruit and fancy stores overflow into

open stalls in front and spread along the sidewalk; huge bunches of

green bananas, strawberries, peas, pines, cocoa-nuts and mangoes,

mingled with dainty vegetables, are lying in heaps. We are tempted to

try a mango, the favourite southern fruit, of whose luscious quality

we have so often heard, but the first taste of its sickening sweetness

satisfies our desires. The street is very wide, and the jingle-jangle

of the car-bells, the rattling of wheels and the spasmodic shriek and

whistle of the steam engine--all mingle together in a not unsweet

confusion. Lumbering vehicles, elegant carriages, street-cars and a

fussy little railway, all run in parallel lines along the wide roadway.

This is the great backbone of the city, whence all lines of vehicular

traffic branch off on their diverse tracks into all the highways and

byways of the land. Here we get on to a car which carries us through

the handsomest quarter of the city. Quaint old-fashioned houses,

surrounded by gardens of growing flowers, and magnificent magnolias,

now in full bloom, stand here and there in solitary grandeur, or

sometimes in groups like a conclave of green limbed giants, clothed in

white raiment, and perfumed with the breath of paradise. Past lines of

elegant residences, where the _élite_ of the city have their abode, and

we soon reach a rough wooden shed yclept a “depot.”

The architectural beauty of New Orleans is unique, and wholly unlike

any other Southern city; the avenues are wide and beautifully planted,

a generous shade spreads every way you turn. The dwelling-houses

which line St. Charles’s Avenue are graceful, classical structures,

no blending together of ancient and modern ideas, and running wild

into fancy chimney-pots, arches, points and angles like a Twelfth

Cake ornament. Some are fashioned like Greek temples, most impressive

in their chaste outline and simplicity of form; others straight and

square, with tall Corinthian columns or fluted pillars, sometimes of

marble, sometimes of stone. The severe architectural simplicity, the

pure white buildings shaded by beautiful magnolias and surrounded

by brilliant shrubs and flowers, form a vista charming to the eye

and soothing to the senses, and all stands silhouetted against the

brightest of blue skies--a blue before which the bluest of Italian

skies would seem pale.

The aspect of the city changes on every side; we leave the fashionable

residential regions and enter broad avenues lined with grand old forest

trees, sometimes in double rows, the thick-leaved branches meeting and

forming a canopy overhead. The ground is carpeted with soft green turf,

and bare-legged urchins, black and white, are playing merry games; a

broken down horse is quietly grazing, and a cow is being milked under

the trees, while a company of pretty white goats, with a fierce-looking

Billie at their head, are careering about close by. Pretty pastoral

bits of landscape on every side cling to the skirts and fringe the

sides of this quaint city. As we get farther away from St. Charles’s

Avenue, the better class of residences get fewer and fewer, till they

cease altogether, and we come upon pretty greenshuttered cottages,

with their porches covered with blossoms and rows of the old-fashioned

straw bee-hives in front. Here and there are tall tenement houses built

of cherry-red bricks, which are let out in flats to the labouring

classes.

THE CHÂTEAU DE RAMEZAY, MONTREAL

MAJOR A. C. YATE

The history of Canada that is destined to live is that of its earliest

explorers and colonists, amongst whom the French rank first and the

English second. One of the most interesting monuments of that history

is the Château de Ramezay in Montreal, of which I propose to record

here what little I have been able to learn during a short visit to

Canada. It was built about 1705 by Claude de Ramezay, “a distinguished

soldier of noble birth,” who was Governor of Montreal from 1703 to

1724. In some books I find the name spelt Ramsay or Ramesay, but

Ramezay is the spelling adopted by the Numismatic and Antiquarian

Society of Montreal. It is practically certain that the Governor of

Montreal who bore the name was of Scotch extraction. In the Seventeenth

Century the cadets of many families of the French nobility emigrated to

Canada (“La Nouvelle France,” as it was then called), while the nominal

Vice-royalty was held by several of the highest nobles of the land,

viz., the Prince de Condé, Duc de Montmorenci, and Duc de Ventadour.

The emigrant nobles were granted seigneuries in various parts of New

France, and in some cases these seigneuries have remained in their

families to the present day. The Château de Ramezay is the town mansion

of one of these seigneurial families. Very little, however, seems to

be known of Claude de Ramezay. An autograph letter of his, presented

by Judge Baby, is in the museum. In 1703, the Marquis de Vaudreuil,

Commandant of Montreal, succeeded the Chevalier de Callière (who had

also in his day been Governor or Commandant of Montreal) as Governor of

Canada. Claude de Ramezay apparently succeeded De Vaudreuil as Military

Governor of Montreal. He appears to have been a man of capacity and to

have interested himself keenly in the pioneering and exploring work to

which so many men at that time devoted themselves. In 1702, during his

Governorship, a French post was established at Detroit, and in 1717,

another at the mouth of the Kaministiquia River, on Lake Superior,

where Fort William now is. Nor was M. de Ramezay backward in organizing

military expeditions against the English settlements in the New England

States. During the whole of De Ramezay’s Governorship the English and

French colonies in America were at war, as indeed they almost always

were, whether the mother-countries were at peace or not.

The Governorship of Claude de Ramezay is said to have ended in 1724,

whether owing to his death or retirement we are not told. In 1745, the

Château passed into the hands of “_La Compagnie des Indes_,” and

remained with them till September, 1760, when Montreal surrendered to

the united forces of Amherst, Haviland and Murray. We are not told what

use was made of the Château from 1724 to 1745. Tradition associates

with the Château the name of De Vaudreuil, one celebrated in the annals

of “_La Nouvelle France_,” but it is not explicit as to date, or

indeed any detail. The first Marquis de Vaudreuil, after having been

for some years Commandant of Montreal, became Governor of Canada in

1703, and retained that post until he died, respected and regretted in

1725.

[Illustration:

Copyright, 1900, by Detroit Photographic Co.

THE CHÂTEAU DE RAMEZAY, MONTREAL]

It is said that when Claude de Ramezay died (no date given), his heirs

found themselves unable to bear the expense of keeping up so large a

residence, and sold it to “_La Compagnie des Indes_.” From 1745 to

1760, it was thus the headquarters of a great French trading-company,

the resort of Indian _voyageurs_ and _coureurs de bois_, coming in from

the north and west with their loads of furs, and selling or bartering

them to the agents of the company, by whom they were shipped to France.

This company also held by charter a monopoly in the purchase and sale

of all imports and exports in the Colony. When Canada passed into the

possession of Great Britain, in 1760, the Château de Ramezay became

General Amherst’s headquarters, and subsequently for a short time those

of General Gage. We find from Withrow’s History that it was a De Ramsay

(as Withrow spells it), who surrendered Quebec to General Townshend

after Wolfe’s victory on the Heights of Abraham.

Historic buildings of America · 第 16 / 20 段