M. DUBOST: Thank you.

THE PRESIDENT: The witness can retire.

[_The witness left the stand._]

THE PRESIDENT: M. Dubost, are you proposing or asking to call other

witnesses upon concentration camps? Because, as I have already pointed

out to you, the evidence, with the exception of Dr. Babel’s recent

cross-examination, has practically not been cross-examined; and it is

supported by other film evidence. We are instructed by Article 18 of the

Charter to conduct the Trial in as expeditious a way as possible; and I

will point out to you, as ordered under 24e of the Charter, you have the

opportunity of calling rebutting evidence, if it were necessary and,

therefore, if the evidence which has been so fully gone into as to the

condition in concentration camps . . .

M. DUBOST: The witness whom I propose to ask the Tribunal to hear will

elucidate a point which has been pending for several weeks. The Tribunal

will remember that when my American colleagues were presenting their

evidence, the question of ascertaining whether Kaltenbrunner had been in

Mauthausen arose. In evidence of this, I am going to call M. Boix, who

will prove to the Tribunal that Kaltenbrunner had been in Mauthausen. He

has photographs of that visit and the Tribunal will see them, as the

witness brought them with him.

THE PRESIDENT: Very well.

[_The witness, Boix, took the stand._]

THE PRESIDENT: What is your name?

Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremburg, 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, Volume 06 · 第 178 / 333 题