M. DUBOST: Catholic?

DUPONT: Catholic. At Mansleben-am-See hangings took place in public in

the hall of a factory connected with the salt mine. The SS were present

at these hangings in full dress uniform, wearing their decorations.

The prisoners were forced to be present at these hangings under threats

of the most cruel beatings. When they hanged the poor wretches, the

prisoners had to give the Hitler salute. Worse still, one prisoner was

chosen to pull away the stool on which the victim stood. He could not

evade the order, as the consequences to himself would have been too

grave. When the execution had been carried out, the prisoners had to

file off in front of the victim between two SS men. They were made to

touch the body and, gruesome detail, look the dead man in the eyes. I

believe that men who had been forced to go through such rites must

inevitably lose the sense of their dignity as human beings.

In Buchenwald itself all the executive work was entrusted to the

internees, that is, the hangings were carried out by a German prisoner

assisted by other prisoners. The camp was policed by prisoners. When

someone in the camp was sentenced to death, it was their duty to find

him and take him to the place of execution.

Selection for the labor squads, with which we were well acquainted,

especially for Dora, Laura, and S III—extermination detachments—was

carried out by prisoners, who decided which of us were to go there. In

this way the internees were forced down to the worst possible level of

degradation, inasmuch as every man was forced to become the executioner

of his fellow.

I have already referred to Block 61, where the extermination of the

physically unfit and those otherwise unsuited for labor was carried out.

These executions were also carried out by prisoners under SS supervision

and control. From the point of view of humanity in general, this was

perhaps the worst crime of all, for these men who were constrained to

torture their fellow-beings have now been restored to life, but

profoundly changed. What is to become of them? What are they going to

do?

M. DUBOST: Who was responsible for these crimes as far as your personal

knowledge goes?

DUPONT: One thing which strikes me as being particularly significant is

that the methods which I observed in Buchenwald now appear to have been

the same, or almost the same, as those prevailing in all the other

camps. The degree of uniformity in the way in which the camps were run

is clear evidence of orders from higher quarters. In the case of

Buchenwald, in particular, the personnel, no matter how rough it might

be, would not have done such things on their own initiative. Moreover,

the camp chief and the SS doctor, himself, always pleaded superior

orders, often in a vague manner. The name most frequently invoked was

that of Himmler. Other names also were given. The chief medical officer

for all the camps, Lolling, was mentioned on numerous occasions in

connection with the extermination block, especially by an SS doctor in

the camp, named Bender. In regard to the selection of invalids or Jews

to be sent to Auschwitz or Bergen-Belsen to be gassed, I heard the name

of Pohl mentioned.

Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremburg, 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, Volume 06 · 第 170 / 333 题