But as the foremost symptom of madness is inconsistency, she was here

mistaken: when it was reported to Paul that Laptyev had accompanied her,

he said: ‘He is not such a petticoat as our young men; he knows how to

wear the breeches.’

As a rule far more value is attached to such momentary flashes of humane

feeling in Paul and others than they deserve. What would Paul have done

if all the young men had known ‘how to wear the breeches’ like Laptyev?

he had plenty of Arharovs, Araktcheyevs, and Obolyaninovs to torture

them, fetter them in chains, and send them into exile. (Pahlen and

Bennigsen[72] did show him, however, that there was an even better way to

‘wear the breeches’!)

This approbation of the victim is the final outrage on him, the

miscreant sets his conscience at rest with it. On one occasion, in the

presence of Ségur, Potyomkin gave some colonel a blow, and, recollecting

himself, said to the ambassador: ‘How is one to treat them differently

when they put up with everything?’

And what would Potyomkin’s answer have been, if the colonel had given him

a blow or a challenge?

Princess Dashkov settled in a peasant’s hut. She took another for her

daughter, and a third as a kitchen. To add to the discomforts of this

life in the wilds in winter, exiles from Petersburg to Siberia were

brought by her windows. The figure of one young officer haunted her long

afterwards; he was some distant relative of hers. Learning that she was

here, he wanted to see her. Risky as such an interview was, she received

him. She was shocked to see the convulsive twitching of his face, and how

ill he looked; this was the result of the tortures in which his limbs had

been twisted and dislocated. What had this criminal done? He had said

something about Paul in the barracks, and some one had informed against

him. Yet perhaps he, too, knew how to ‘wear the breeches,’ till his arms

were wrenched out of their sockets.

Before the spring flooding of the rivers, which would have cut off

Princess Dashkov from all communication for a long period, she wrote a

letter to the Empress Marya Feodorovna, and enclosed in it a request for

permission to move to her Kaluga estate. Paul could not have liked the

tone of her letter; she said in it that it was as little to her honour

to write this letter as it was to her Majesty’s to read it, but that

religion and humanity compelled her to make a final effort to save all

her people from this cruel exile.

Paul, as usual, flew into a fury, and gave orders that pen and paper

should be taken from Princess Dashkov, that she should be forbidden all

correspondence, be kept under stricter supervision, and I do not know

what else. ‘It is not so easy,’ he said, ‘to turn me off the throne.’

With these orders a courier was despatched, but the Empress and Madame

Nelidov induced the Grand Duke Michael Pavlovitch to beg his infuriated

father for mercy, and the little boy, with the help of the wife and

mistress, succeeded. Paul took up a pen and wrote: ‘Princess Ekaterina

Romanovna, since you desire to return to your Kaluga estate, I give you

permission for the same. I remain well disposed to you.—PAUL.’

Arharov had to despatch another courier: fortunately the second overtook

the first.

In 1798 Paul suddenly took a fancy to Prince Dashkov, showered undeserved

favours of all sorts upon him, and made him the present of an estate.

Dashkov asked Kurakin to submit to Paul that, instead of an estate, he

would prefer permission for his mother to live where she chose. Paul gave

the permission with the proviso that she should never remain in the same

town where he was.

The mother was forgiven. Now came the son’s turn. A certain Altesti was

tried for misappropriation of public money, but really for being a friend

of Zubov. Dashkov said to Lopuhin that Altesti was innocent. In the

evening he received the following note: ‘Since you meddle in affairs that

have nothing to do with you, I have dismissed you from your duties.—PAUL.’

Dashkov, afraid of worse to follow, went off to his Tambov estate.

At last, on the 12th of March 1801, Paul’s life ‘came to an end,’ as

Princess Dashkov says. With deep emotion and intense joy she learned that

this pernicious man had ceased to exist. ‘How many times,’ she goes on,

‘have I thanked Heaven that Paul exiled me! by so doing he saved me from

the humiliating obligation of appearing at the court of such a sovereign.’

She breathed freely again in the reign of Alexander ... she could appear

at his court without the loss of her human dignity, but she did not feel

at home in the new surroundings. Many things had changed since Catherine

had sent her the tailor’s bill. Princess Dashkov, now an old woman, is

angry with the younger generation surrounding Alexander, and thinks that

they are all Jacobins or martinets.

One pure presence arrested her, and with respectful love, with reverence,

she looked upon her and attached herself to her; sorrowful and

unappreciated, this melancholy being moved thoughtfully through the halls

of the Winter Palace, and vanished like a shadow; she would have been

forgotten, if we did not sometimes come across a well-known picture of

the year 1815, in which the Emperor Alexander and the Empress Elizabeth

are represented as the peacemakers of Europe.

Miss Wilmot has appended to Princess Dashkov’s Memoirs a well-drawn

portrait of the Empress Elizabeth; the unhappy woman is standing with her

arms folded, she looks out mournfully from the paper, a hidden grief and

a sort of perplexity can be seen in her eyes, the whole figure expresses

one thought: ‘I am a stranger here’; indeed, she is holding up her skirt

and wraps as though on the point of departure.

How strange was her destiny, and that of Anna Pavlovna, the wife of the

Tsarevitch!

After the coronation Princess Dashkov saw that there was really no place

for her at the new court, and she began making plans for repose at

Troitskoye. In her honoured seclusion she again became a power.

Friends and relations, celebrities whose fame was waning, and rising

stars visited her.

‘Crossing your threshold

I am back in Catherine’s days.

Taking no share in the world’s hopes and fears,

You at your window stand with mocking gaze

To watch at times the flying wheel of change.

E’en so, withdrawing from the busy whirl

To court the Muses and their idle ease,

In porphyry baths and marble palaces,

Grandees in Rome endured their world’s decay.

And to them from afar the young men came,—

Dictator, consul, tribune, warrior chief—

To rest in peace, to heave luxurious sighs,

Then off at once upon the road again.’

She often visited Moscow. There she was held in the highest respect;

active and inexhaustible, she was seen at balls and dinners, and arrived

there indeed earlier than any. Young ladies trembled at her criticisms

and observations, men sought the honour of being presented to her.

At the other end of Moscow, not far from the Donsky Monastery, another

living monument of the reign of Catherine was passing his last days in a

palace surrounded by gardens. He led a gloomy life, retaining in spite of

his age his athletic frame and savage energy of character. In 1796, with

a scowling brow but unrepentant, he carried all over Petersburg the crown

of the man whom he had murdered; hundreds of thousands of people pointed

the finger at him; his companion, Prince Baryatinsky, turned pale and

nearly fainted; old Orlov merely complained of his gout.

But his sombre life was not to pass uncheered. At his side a gentle,

tender little girl, exceptionally graceful and talented, was growing up.

The haughty old man began to live for her; he became her nurse, petted

her, cared for her, waited on her, and loved her beyond all measure, as

no one but her dead mother could have loved her.

Sitting on his sofa, he made his daughter dance gipsy and Russian dances,

watched her movements with fond tenderness and unspoken pride, sometimes

wiping a tear from eyes which had, dry and cold, looked on so many

horrors.

At last the time came for the old man to bring his treasure out into the

world; but to whom was he to confide her, into what woman’s care was he

to entrust this cherished flower? There was, indeed, one woman whom he

could have trusted, who with her marvellous tact might have directed her

first steps; but they were not on good terms. She had not forgiven him

for the stain he had brought on her revolution forty-two years before.

And now the haughty Alexey Orlov, the Orlov of Chesme,[73] whom even

Paul could not crush, sought the favour of an interview with Princess

Ekaterina Romanovna, and, receiving permission to present his daughter to

her, joyfully hastened to take advantage of it and went with his Annushka

to see her.

Princess Dashkov came in to greet him; bowing, the old man kissed her

hand; both were agitated; at last Princess Dashkov said to him: ‘So many

years have passed since we have met, Count, and so many events have

transformed the world in which we once lived that, indeed, I feel that

we are meeting now as shades in the other world. The presence of this

angel’ (she added, feelingly pressing to her bosom the daughter of her

former enemy) ‘who has brought us together again makes that feeling even

stronger.’ In his delight Orlov kissed the hand of Miss Wilmot, who was

afraid of him, in spite of the fact that she calls him ‘a majestic old

man,’ and saw with surprise the portrait of Catherine on his breast,

framed in nothing but diamonds, and the _heiduks_ standing in the hall,

and with them a dwarf dressed like a jester.

The Count invited Princess Dashkov, and gave one of those fabulous

banquets of which we used to hear traditions in our childhood,

feasts reminiscent of Versailles and the Golden Horde. The gardens

were brilliantly lighted up, the house was thrown open, throngs of

house-serfs in gorgeous masquerade costumes filled the rooms, an

orchestra played, the tables groaned under the viands; in short, a royal

banquet. He had some one now to whom to entrust his daughter!

At the height of the festivities, the father called her, the guests

formed a circle, and she danced, danced with a shawl and danced with a

tambourine in the Russian style. The old father beat time and watched

Princess Dashkov’s face; the old lady was pleased, the crowd was silent

through respect for the father’s rank and the daughter’s extraordinary

grace. ‘She danced,’ says Miss Wilmot, ‘with such simplicity, such

natural charm, such dignity and expression, that her movements seemed her

language.’

After each dance, she ran to her father and kissed his hand. Princess

Dashkov praised her; her father bade her kiss the princess’s hand too.

But he fancied that she was overheated, and with his own hands wrapped

her in a shawl that she might not take cold. At supper, with a blare

of trumpets and kettledrums, the Count, standing, drank the health of

Princess Dashkov. Then followed her favourite Russian songs accompanied

by a full orchestra. Then the strains of the polka were heard, and Orlov

led Princess Dashkov into the drawing-room, where the music of the wind

instruments astonished our Irish girl, who had never before heard serfdom

put to the service of art. At last Princess Dashkov got up to take leave,

and the Count, bowing and kissing her hand, thanked her for honouring his

poor house.

This was how Orlov of Chesme celebrated his reconciliation with old

Princess Dashkov, and this was how the grim, harsh man loved his daughter.

I, too, like Princess Ekaterina Romanovna, am almost reconciled to him.

Savage were the days in which he lived, and savage were his actions; the

Russia of Peter’s creation was still in the melting-pot: let us not judge

him more severely than Princess Dashkov did, and, if the prayers of

parents can do much in the next world, let us forgive Orlov much in this

for his love for his daughter.

Her fate, too, was a strange one.

As a boy I saw her once or twice, then I saw her again in 1841 at

Novgorod; she was living near the Yurev Monastery. Her whole life was one

prolonged, sorrowful penitence for a crime that she had not committed,

one prayer for the remission of her father’s sins, one act of atonement

for them. She could not overcome the horror inspired in her by the murder

of Peter III., and was crushed at the thought of her father’s eternal

punishment. All her mind, all her Orlov energy, she fixed on this one

object, and little by little abandoned herself completely to gloomy

mysticism and superstition. Called by birth, by wealth, and by talent

to one of the foremost positions not only in Russia, but in Europe, she

spent her days with tedious monks, with old bishops, with all sorts of

paralytics, sanctimonious hypocrites, crazy saints. I am told that after

1815 German hereditary princes sought her hand; Alexander showed her

marked attention; she withdrew from the court. Her palace grew emptier

and emptier, and at last sank into complete silence; neither the clatter

of old-fashioned goblets nor the choruses of singers were heard in it,

and no one cared about the cherished racehorses. Only the black figures

of bearded monks moved gloomily about the garden avenues and looked at

the fountains, as though Count Alexey’s funeral were not yet over—and,

indeed, the prayer for the repose of his soul still went on.

In the drawing-room, where she had spun and twirled in the gipsy dance in

her girlish purity, innocent of the significance of the ardent movements

of the Asiatic dance, where smoothly, with downcast eyes, she had danced

with modestly raised hand our languid feminine dances, and where her

terrible father had gazed at her with tears in his eyes, the bigoted

fanatic, Foty,[74] sat now uttering incoherent speeches, and bringing

even greater horror into her crushed soul; the daughter of the haughty

conqueror of Chesme meekly listened to his sinister words, carefully

covering his feet with a shawl, perhaps the very one in which her father

had wrapped her!

‘Anna,’ Foty would say, ‘fetch me water,’ and she ran for water. ‘Now sit

and listen,’ and she sat and listened. Poor woman!

Her palace and gardens in Moscow she presented to the Tsar. What for? I

do not know. The immense estates, the stud-farms, all went to adorn the

Yurev Monastery; thither she transferred, too, her father’s coffin; there

in a special vault a lamp for ever burned, and a prayer was muttered

over him, there her own sarcophagus, still empty when I saw it, was

prepared. In the church twilight, the wealth of the Orlovs, transformed

into rubies, pearls, and emeralds, glitters mournfully in the settings

of ikons and the caps of archimandrites. With them the luckless daughter

tried to bribe the Heavenly Judge.

Catherine had robbed the monasteries of their estates and distributed

them among the Orlovs and her other lovers. What a nemesis!

Princess Dashkov’s Memoirs fail us about this time. The very details of

her interview with Orlov we have taken from the letters of the two Wilmot

sisters.

Miss Mary Wilmot, grieving for the loss of her brother and dull at

home, received an invitation from Princess Dashkov to spend a year or

two with her. Miss Mary did not know the princess personally, but (she

was Mrs. Hamilton’s niece) she had from her childhood heard of this

wonderful woman, had heard how at eighteen she had been at the head of

a conspiracy, how she had dashed on horseback before revolting troops,

how afterwards she had lived in England and stayed in Ireland, had been

President of the Academy, and had written passionate letters to Mrs.

Hamilton. The young girl imagined her something fantastic, ‘a fairy and

partly a witch,’ and for that very reason decided, in 1803, to go to her.

When she reached Troitskoye, however, she felt so scared and homesick

that she would have been glad to return if it had been possible.

A short old lady, in a long dark cloth dress with a star on the left

side, and something like a peaked hat, came to meet her. Round her neck

she had a shabby old kerchief—one damp evening, when out for a walk,

twenty years earlier, Mrs. Hamilton had given her that kerchief, and from

that time forward she had kept it as a holy relic. But if her attire

really was suggestive of a witch, the noble features of her face and the

expression of infinite tenderness in her eyes fascinated the Irish girl

from the first moment. ‘There was so much truth, so much warmth, dignity,

and simplicity in her manner, that I loved her before she said anything.’

Miss Mary was completely under her influence from the first day, was

surprised at it, and angry with herself, but could not resist the

attraction of the splendid old lady. She liked everything in her, even

her broken English, which gave something childlike to her words. ‘Tears

and life,’ she says, ‘have given serenity and softness to her features,

and their expression of pride, of which slight traces still remain, has

been replaced by indulgence.’

But how Princess Dashkov loved her! She loved her passionately, as she

had once loved Catherine. Such freshness of feeling, such feminine

tenderness, such craving for love, such youthfulness of heart, are

astounding at sixty. The solicitude of a mother, the solicitude of

a sister, a lover, are what Miss Mary found at Troitskoye; for her

entertainment Princess Dashkov went to Moscow, took her to balls, showed

her monasteries, presented her to Empresses, adorned her room with

flowers, spent evenings with her reading the letters of Catherine and

other celebrities.

Miss Wilmot begged and besought her to write her Memoirs. ‘And what I

would never do for my relatives or my friends, I am doing for her.’

She wrote her Memoirs for her, and dedicated them to her.

In 1805 Princess Dashkov invited Miss Mary’s sister, Miss Katharine,

who was then in France and was obliged to leave that country, being

persecuted as an Englishwoman. The sisters were not in the least alike.

Mary was a soft, tender creature, delighted to have some one to protect

her, and to nestle under some one’s wing; she attached herself to

Princess Dashkov, as the weak twig to a strong old tree; she calls her

‘my Russian mother’; she came to her from a little town, and had seen

nothing before except her ‘Emerald Isle.’ Her sister, who had lived in

Paris, was lively and hot-tempered, independent in her opinions, clever

and ironical, not particularly loving or tolerant, and rather free in her

speech. Moreover, there was a great deal in Russia that she positively

disliked—and so her letters have for us a special interest of their own.

‘Russia,’ she says, ‘is like a girl of twelve—wild and awkward, who has

been dressed up in a fashionable Parisian hat. We are living here in the

fourteenth or fifteenth century.’[75]

She was far more shocked by serfdom than her kind-hearted sister. In

vain Princess Dashkov pointed out to her the prosperity of her peasants.

‘They are well off,’ writes Miss Katharine, ‘while the princess lives,

but what will happen to them afterwards?’ Every landowner seems to her an

iron link in the fetters of Russia.

In the pitiful cringing, the shameless servility of our society she very

correctly sees the reflection of slavery. With amazement she sees again

in assembly halls and drawing-rooms slaves devoid of all moral feeling

and personal dignity. She is astonished at visitors who dare not sit

down, and stand for hours at a time at the door, shifting from one foot

to the other, till they are dismissed with a nod. ‘The conceptions of

good and evil are in Russia mixed up with the idea of being in favour

or out of favour. A man’s worth is easily ascertained from the address

calendar, and it depends on the Tsar whether a man is unreservedly taken

for a snake or an ass.’

The Moscow grandees did not overawe her with the galaxy of their stars,

with their ponderous dignity and boring dinners.

‘I feel,’ she writes after the festivities of 1806, ‘that I have been

floating all this time among the shades and spirits of Catherine’s

palace. Moscow is the imperial political Elysium of Russia. All the

personages of power and authority in the reigns of Catherine and Paul,

who have long ago been succeeded by others, retire into the luxurious

idleness of this lazy city, maintaining a supposed consequence which is

allowed them out of courtesy. Influence and power have passed years ago

to another generation; nevertheless, the _oberkammerherr_ of the Empress

Catherine, Prince Golitsyn, is still hung all over with orders and

decorations under the burden of which his ninety years are weighed down

to the ground; still, as in the palace of Catherine, a diamond key is

tied to his skeleton, which is dressed in an embroidered kaftan, and he

still majestically accepts tokens of respect from his companion shades

who once shared power and honour with him.

‘By his side is another gaudy _revenant_, Count Osterman, once the great

Chancellor; he is hung with ribbons of every possible colour, red, blue,

and striped; eighty-three years are piled upon his head, but still he

drives his skeleton about with the bones rattling behind a team of six

horses, dines with _heiduks_ waiting at his table, and keeps up the

solemn etiquette by which he was surrounded when he was in power.’ Among

the shades she saw, too, Count Alexey Orlov.

‘The hand that murdered Peter III. is studded with diamonds, among

his gifts from royalty the portrait of the Empress is particularly

conspicuous; Catherine smiles from it in everlasting gratitude.’

Miss Wilmot mentions, too, Korsakov, ‘who might have been taken for a

glittering vision of diamonds,’ Prince Baryatinsky and some other figures

from this world of the past, ‘from which they have retained the habit of

court gossip about important nonentities, haughtiness, vanity, and the

empty bustle in which they find their joy and their sorrow.’

And she concludes with indignation: ‘And yet the open coffin stands at

their tottering feet threatening to consign their paltry existences to

speedy oblivion.’

‘All these old grandees are surrounded by wives, daughters, and

granddaughters, dressed up to the nines, and sitting in gilded

apartments, in patriarchal fashion making their maids dance for their

amusement, and incessantly regaling one on jam. There is something

French in their appearance, and, being brought up by Frenchwomen, they

speak that language well and dress in the latest Parisian mode. But

there is very little real politeness in these ladies; their education is

absolutely superficial, and there is not a trace here of the charming

lightness of French society. When a Moscow lady has scanned you from

head to foot and kissed you five or six times (though twice, one would

think, would be more than enough), has assured you of her everlasting

affection, told you to your face that you are sweet and charming, asked

you the price of everything you have got on, and babbled about the coming

ball at the Hall of the Nobility, she has nothing more to say.’

Both sisters were greatly shocked by the vulgar habit of wearing other

people’s diamonds at balls. Moreover, every one knew whose they were;

thus a Princess Golitsyn used to lend her friends a girdle of diamonds

and a headdress of marvellous beauty that was known to the whole town. On

one occasion she adorned the shoulders of a niece of Princess Dashkov’s

with her jewels; the young lady had completely forgotten that the

princess was to be present; the stern and implacable old lady, it need

hardly be said, detested these displays of other people’s wealth. The

young lady was so terrified at the sight of Princess Dashkov that she

kept out of sight all the evening. But the fatal hour of supper arrived;

Miss Mary, feeling cold, put on her shawl; this struck the young lady as

a way of salvation, and she took hers to conceal the rivers of diamonds

from Princess Dashkov. They sat down, the aunt opposite; the soup tureen

screened the niece a little, but her headdress burnt her like fire.

Princess Dashkov stared at it. Red patches came out on the poor girl’s

face and tears came into her eyes. The princess said not a word.

My past and thoughts, vol. 6 (of 6) · 第 18 / 24 段