"'For example, then,' continued Holgrave, 'a dead man, if he happen to

have made a will, disposes of wealth no longer his own; or, if he die

intestate, it is distributed in accordance with the notions of men much

longer dead than he. A dead man sits on all our judgment-seats; and

living judges do but search out and repeat his decisions. We read in

dead men's books! We laugh at dead men's jokes, and cry at dead men's

pathos! We are sick of dead men's diseases, physical and moral, and die

of the same remedies with which dead doctors killed their patients! We

worship the living Deity according to dead men's forms and creeds.

Whatever we seek to do, of our own free motion, a dead man's icy hand

obstructs us! Turn our eyes to what point we may, a dead man's white,

immitigable face encounters them, and freezes our very heart! And we

must be dead ourselves before we can begin to have our proper influence

on our own world, which will then be no longer our world, but the world

of another generation, with which we shall have no shadow of a right to

interfere. I ought to have said, too, that we live in dead men's houses;

as, for instance, in this of the Seven Gables!'"

This is in the form of dialogue; but Hawthorne's own attitude toward

reform is clearly disclosed in the analytic passages in which he

discusses Holgrave, though it is observable that he embodies no adverse

criticism upon it in the character itself, as he was to do in his next

novel. He appears to take the same view of reform that is sometimes

found in respect to prayer, that it has great subjective advantages and

is good for the soul, but is futile in the world of fact. It was well

for Holgrave, he says, to think as he did; this enthusiasm "would serve

to keep his youth pure and make his aspirations high," and he goes on

with his own judgment on the matter:--

"And when, with the years settling down more weightily upon him, his

early faith should be modified by inevitable experience, it would be

with no harsh and sudden revolution of his sentiments. He would still

have faith in man's brightening destiny, and perhaps love him all the

better, as he should recognize his helplessness in his own behalf; and

the haughty faith, with which he began life, would be well bartered for

a far humbler one at its close, in discerning that man's best directed

effort accomplishes a kind of dream, while God is the sole worker of

realities."

This may be profound truth, as it is intended to be; but it needs no

penetration to see here a man whose sympathies with all kinds of those

"come-outers" who then multiplied exceedingly in his neighborhood, would

be infinitesimal. He had not, however, yet engaged with this problem so

closely as he was to do. So far one would discern only that fatalistic

and pessimistic trait indicated by "The Scarlet Letter" and found in

"The House of the Seven Gables" in the hard conclusion that there was no

remedy for the harm that had been done in the long past. The curse was

done with now, it is true, by the marriage of Phoebe and Holgrave, but

for Clifford and Hepzibah there was no amends for the lives the dead

Judge had ruined by the aid of an imperfect and blundering human law;

they were wrecks, so Hawthorne represents it,--they had missed life's

happiness and were now in hospital, as it were, till they should die;

but in their lives evil had been triumphant, had made them innocent

victims, and for this there was neither help nor compensation. The

irremediableness of the breach that sin makes in the soul had been

preached in "The Scarlet Letter;" here is the other half of the truth,

as Hawthorne saw it, the irremediableness of the injury done to others.

So far as the book has ethical meaning it lies in the implacability of

the uncanceled wrong lingering as a curse, destroying the bad and

blasting the good descendants of the house, and presenting the mystery

of evil as something positive, persisting, and unchecked in its career.

The moral element, nevertheless, lies well in the background and is

overlaid with romantic and legendary features; its hatefulness in the

main story is not the principal theme; and the novel pleases and

succeeds, not by these traits, but by its humble realism, its delicate

character-drawing, and that ancestral power which makes it the story of

a house long lived in.

On finishing this work Hawthorne took that rest which he always required

after any great intellectual exertion, and spent the time with his

children and wife. His second daughter, Rose, was born in the spring. A

happier childhood seldom gets into books than that which appears in the

reminiscences of this small family, whether they were in Salem, or

Berkshire, or Liverpool. Hawthorne lived much with his children, and he

had the habit of observing them minutely and writing down the history of

their little lives in his journals. All winter their play and

recreation, their sayings and adventures and habits, diversified the

Berkshire days; they thrived on "the blue nectared air," and had rosy

cheeks and abounding spirits, and their heads were stuffed with fairy

tales. The year was a glorious one in Julian's memory, and the page he

makes of it may be taken as a leaf of his father's life at home,

disclosing his daily life and home-nature, as it was through years of

domestic happiness. Hawthorne, indeed, is never so attractive as when

seen with the light of his children's eyes upon him:--

"He made those spring days memorable to his children. He made them boats

to sail on the lake, and kites to fly in the air; he took them fishing

and flower-gathering, and tried (unsuccessfully for the present) to

teach them swimming. Mr. Melville used to ride or drive up, in the

evenings, with his great dog, and the children used to ride on the dog's

back. In short, the place was made a paradise for the small people. In

the previous autumn, and still more in the succeeding one, they all went

nutting, and filled a certain disused oven in the house with such bags

upon bags of nuts as not a hundred children could have devoured during

the ensuing winter. The children's father displayed extraordinary

activity and energy on these nutting expeditions; standing on the ground

at the foot of a tall walnut-tree, he would bid them turn their backs

and cover their eyes with their hands; then they would hear, for a few

seconds, a sound of rustling and scrambling, and, immediately after, a

shout, whereupon they would uncover their eyes and gaze upwards; and lo!

there was their father--who but an instant before, as it seemed, had

been beside them--swaying and soaring high aloft on the topmost

branches, a delightful mystery and miracle. And then down would rattle

showers of ripe nuts, which the children would diligently pick up, and

stuff into their capacious bags. It was all a splendid holiday; and they

cannot remember when their father was not their playmate, or when they

ever desired or imagined any other playmate than he."

The spirit of such a fatherhood, and all this delight in the children's

world, was distilled for the great multitude of other children in "The

Wonder-Book" and its sequel "Tanglewood Tales." From very early in his

career he had written charming childhood sketches, of which "Little

Annie's Ramble" and "Little Daffydown-dilly" are easily recalled; and

his association with his wife's sister, Elizabeth Peabody, had directed

his attention particularly to literature for children, and

"Grandfather's Chair" had been the result. Whenever he fell into

discouragement in respect to the earning capacity of his pen, his first

thought was that he would write children's books for a living. For some

time he had meditated a volume which should adapt the classical tales of

mythology to the understanding and interests of such children as his

own, and he now put the plan in execution. He began "The Wonder-Book"

with the summer, and finished it at one effort in six weeks of June and

July; the ease with which he accomplished the task indicates how

pleasurable it was, and well adapted to his sympathies and powers; and

the result was very successful, a book of sunshine from cover to cover.

It [Footnote: _A Wonder-Book for Girls and Boys_. By Nathaniel

Hawthorne, with Engravings by Baker from designs by Billings. Boston:

Ticknor, Reed and Fields. 1852. 16mo. Pp. vi. 256.] was published in the

fall, and was followed after an interval by its second part, "Tanglewood

Tales." [Footnote: _Tanglewood Tales for Girls and Boys_. Being a

Second Wonder-Book. By Nathaniel Hawthorne, with Fine Illustrations.

Boston: Ticknor, Reed and Fields. 1853. 16mo. Pp. 336.]

A multitude of children have loved these books, for whom their very

names are a part of the golden haze of memory; and, in view of the

association of Hawthorne's genius and temperament with quite other

themes and the darker element in grown lives, this band of children make

a kind of halo round his figure. Whether the thing done should have been

so done, whether Greek should have been turned into Gothic, is a foolish

matter. To please a child is warrant enough for any work; and here

romantic fancy plays around the beautiful forms and noble suggestion of

old heroic and divine life, and marries them to the hillside and

fireside of New England childhood with the naturalness of a fairy

enchantment; these tales are truly transplanted into the minds of the

little ones with whose youngest tendrils of imagination they are

intertwined. To tear apart such tender fibres were a poor mode of

criticism, for the living fact better speaks for itself; and, in the

case of the present writer, whose earliest recollection of the great

world of literature, his first dawn-glimpse of it, lying in dreamy

beauty, was Bellerophon's pool, the memory is potent and yields an

appreciation not to be distilled in any other alembic. Few facts are

more fixed in his memory than that he was the child who watched the pool

for the tall boy with the shining bridle who was his strange friend from

another world. If to wake and feed the imagination and charm it, and

fill the budding mind with the true springtime of the soul's life in

beautiful images, noble thoughts, and brooding moods that have in them

the infinite suggestion, be success for a writer who would minister to

the childish heart, few books can be thought to equal these; and the

secret of it lies in the wondering sense which Hawthorne had of the

mystical in childhood, of that element of purity in being which is felt

also in his reverence for womanhood, and which, whether in child or

woman, was typical of the purity of the soul itself,--in a word, the

spiritual sense of life. His imagination, living in the child-sphere,

pure, primitive, inexperienced, found only sunshine there, the freshness

of the early world; nor are there any children's books so dipped in

morning dews.

On finishing "The Wonder-Book" Hawthorne devoted himself to life with

Julian for three weeks, during the absence of the rest of the family on

a visit, and wrote a daily account of it with such fullness that this

history would fill a hundred pages of print. Some passages have been

published, and they illustrate how this amusement had taken the place of

the earlier note-books which recorded his observations of ordinary and

even trivial life round about him. There may be some wonder that a mind

of Hawthorne's powers should find its play in such literary

journalizing, and the inference is ready that, when not at work in

imagination, he was mentally unoccupied; his intellectual interests

were, however, always limited in scope, and his readings in the evening

to his wife were confined to pure literature; outside of such books he

apparently had no intellectual life, and his thoughts and affections

found their exercise in the domestic circle just as his eyes were

engaged with the look of the landscape, the incidents of the road, and

the changes of the weather. His capacity for idleness was great, and as

his vigor had already somewhat waned his periods of repose were long. He

undertook no new work during the summer, but prepared for the press a

new volume of tales, "The Snow Image," [Footnote: _The Snow Image and

other Twice-Told Tales_. By Nathaniel Hawthorne. Boston: Ticknor,

Reed and Fields. 1852. 12mo, brown cloth. Pp. 273. The contents and

source of the tales were as follows: The Snow Image, _International

Review_, November, 1850; The Great Stone Face, _National Era_,

January 24, 1850; Main Street, _∆sthetic Papers_, 1849; Ethan

Brand, _Dollar Magazine_, May, 1851; A Bell's Biography,

_Knickerbocker Magazine_, March, 1837; Sylph Etherege, Boston

_Token_, 1838; The Canterbury Pilgrims, Boston _Token_, 1833;

No. I, Old News, _New England Magazine_, February, 1835; No. II,

The Old French War, March, 1835; No. III, The Old Tory, May, 1835; The

Man of Adamant, Boston _Token_, 1837; The Devil in Manuscript,

_New England Magazine_, May, 1835; John Inglefield's Thanksgiving,

_Democratic Review_, March, 1840; Old Ticonderoga, _Democratic

Review_, February, 1836; The Wives of the Dead, Boston _Token_,

1832; Little Daffydowndilly, _Boys' and Girls' Magazine_, Boston,

1843; Major Molineux, Boston _Token_, 1832.] which was ready by the

first of November and was soon afterwards issued. It is made up of

stories and sketches out of old periodicals, which had not been gathered

in the former collection, some of them dating from the beginning of his

career. Three, however, were later in composition, and were perhaps

among those which he had thought of binding up with "The Scarlet

Letter," had that been issued according to his original plan as one of

several new tales. These three were "The Great Stone Face," from "The

National Era," January 24, 1850, "The Snow Image" from "The

International Magazine," November, 1850, and "Ethan Brand; a Chapter

from an Abortive Romance," from "Holden's Dollar Magazine," May, 1851;

they were all published with the author's name. These stories require no

comment, as the types to which they belong are well marked. They were,

in reality, his last trials of his art as a teller of tales.

Late in November, the family again removed to a new dwelling-place. The

inland air had proved, it was thought, less favorable to health than was

expected, and except in the bracing months of mid-winter Hawthorne found

it enervating. He had been, however, very happy in Berkshire, as happy

probably as it was in his nature to be, and the distant beauty and near

wildness of the country had been attractive; the house, nevertheless,

was very small, and he fretted at its inconveniences, not in a

disagreeable way, but desiring to have a house and home of his own among

more familiar scenes and within reach of the sea; he regarded the new

move as a makeshift, and settled in West Newton, a suburb of Boston,

where his wife's family lived, until he should purchase a place of his

own. The change from the winter picturesqueness of Berkshire was marked,

but the village was of the usual New England type and his surroundings

were not essentially different from those he was accustomed to at

Concord and Salem.

West Newton was near to Roxbury and the scenes of his rural experience

at Brook Farm; but he hardly needed to refresh his memory of the places

and persons that had been so much a part of his life ten years before.

Brook Farm, as an experiment in the regeneration of society, had run its

course, and was gone; but much that was characteristic of it externally

was now to be transferred to the novel Hawthorne had in hand as his next

work. "The Blithedale Romance" [Footnote: The Blithedale Romance, By

Nathaniel Hawthorne. Boston: Ticknor, Reed and Fields. 1852. 12mo,

cloth. Pp. viii, 288.] was written during the winter, and was finished

as early as May, 1852, when it was at once issued. It is the least

substantial of any of his longer works. It lacks the intensity of power

that distinguishes "The Scarlet Letter," and the accumulated richness of

surface that belongs to "The House of the Seven Gables," due to the

overlaying of story on story in that epitome of a New England family

history. "The Blithedale Romance," on the contrary, has both less depth

and less inclusiveness; and much of its vogue springs from the fact of

its being a reflection of the life of Brook Farm, which possesses an

interest in its own right. Hawthorne used his material in the direct way

that was his custom, and transferred bodily to his novel, to make its

background and atmosphere, what he had preserved in his note-books or

memory from the period of his residence with the reformers. The April

snowstorm in which he arrived at the farm, his illness there, the

vine-hung tree that he made his autumnal arbor, the costume and habits,

the fancy-dress party, the Dutch realism of the figure of Silas Foster,

and many another detail occur at once to the mind as from this origin;

his own attitude is sketched frankly in Miles Coverdale, and the germs

of others of the characters, notably Priscilla, are to be found in the

same experience. The life of the farmhouse, however, is not of

sufficient interest in itself to hold attention very closely, and the

socialistic experiment, after all, is not the theme of the story; these

things merely afford a convenient and appropriate ground on which to

develop a study of the typical reformer, as Hawthorne conceived him, the

nature, trials, temptations, and indwelling fate of such a man; and to

this task the author addressed himself. In the way in which he worked

out the problem, he revealed his own judgment on the moral type brought

so variously and persistently under his observation by the wave of

reform that was so strongly characteristic of his times.

The characters are, as usual, few, and they have that special trait of

isolation which is the birthmark of Hawthorne's creations. Zenobia,

Priscilla, and Hollingsworth are the trio, who, each in an environment

of solitude, make the essence of the plot by their mutual relations.

Zenobia is set apart by her secret history and physical nature, and

Priscilla by her magnetic powers and enslavement to the mesmerist;

Hollingsworth is absorbed in his mission. It is unlikely that Hawthorne

intended any of these as a portrait of any real person, though as the

seamstress of Brook Farm gave the external figure of Priscilla, it may

well be that certain suggestions of temperament were found for the other

two characters among his impressions of persons whom he met. Neither

Zenobia nor Priscilla, notwithstanding the latter's name, are

essentially New England characters; in each of them there is something

alien to the soil, and they are represented as coming from a different

stock. Hollingsworth, on the other hand, is meant as a native type. The

unfolding of the story, and the treatment of the characters, are not

managed with any great skill. Hawthorne harks back to his old habits,

and does so in a feebler way than would have been anticipated. He

interjects the short story of The Veiled Lady, for example, in the

middle of the narrative, as he had placed the tale of Alice in "The

House of the Seven Gables," but very ineffectively; it is a pale

narrative and does not count visibly in the progress of the novel, but

only inferentially. He uses also the exotic flower, which Zenobia wears,

as a physical symbol, but it plays no part and is only a relic of his

old manner. The description of the performance in the country hall seems

like an extract from one of the old annuals of the same calibre as the

Story-Teller's Exhibition. Mesmerism is the feebler substitute for the

old witchcraft element. In a word, the work is not well knit together,

and the various methods of old are weakly combined. One comes back to

the moral situation as the centre of interest; and in it he exhibits the

reformer as failing in the same ways in which other egotists fail, for

he perceives in the enthusiasm of the humanitarian only selfishness,

arrogance, intolerance in another form. Hollingsworth, with the best of

motives apparently, since his cause is his motive, as he believes, is

faithless to his associates and willing to wreck their enterprise

because it stands in his way and he is out of sympathy with it; he is

faithless to Priscilla in so far as he accepts Zenobia because she can

aid him with her wealth, and on her losing her wealth he is faithless to

her in returning to Priscilla; he has lost the power to be true, in the

other relations of life, through his devotion to his cause. One feels

that Hollingsworth is the victim of Hawthorne's moral theory about him.

It is true that at the end Hawthorne has secured in the character that

tragic reversal which is always effective, in the point that

Hollingsworth, who set out to be the friend and uplifter and saviour of

the criminal classes, sees at last in himself the murderer of Zenobia;

but this is shown almost by a side-light, and not as the climax of the

plot, perhaps because the reader does not hold him guilty in any true

sense of the disaster which overtakes Zenobia. In its main situation,

therefore, the plot, while it suggests and illustrates the temptations

and failures of a nature such as Hollingsworth's, does not carry

conviction. Description takes the place of action; much of Zenobia's

life and of Hollingsworth's, also, is left untold in the time after

Coverdale left them; as in the case of Judge Pyncheon, the wrong-doing

is left much in the shadow, suggested, hinted at, narrated finally, but

not shown in the life; and such wrong-doing loses the edge of villainy.

It might be believed that Hollingsworth as a man failed; but as a

typical man, as that reformer who is only another shape of the selfish

and heartless egotist sacrificing everything wrongfully to his

philanthropic end, it is not so easily believed that he must have

failed; it is the absence of this logical necessity that discredits him

as a type, and takes out of his character and career the universal

quality. This, however, may be only a personal impression. The truth of

the novel, on the ethical side, may be plainer to others; it presents

some aspects of moral truth, carefully studied and probably observed,

but they seem very partial aspects, and too incomplete to allow them,

taken all together, to be called typical. The power of the story lies

rather in its external realism, and especially in that last scene, which

was taken from Hawthorne's experience at Concord on the night when he

took part in rescuing the body of the young woman who had drowned

herself; but with the exception of this last scene, and of some of the

sketches that reproduce most faithfully the life and circumstances of

Brook Farm, the novel does not equal its predecessors in the ethical or

imaginative value of its material, in romantic vividness, or in the

literary skill of its construction. The elements of the story are

themselves inferior; and perhaps Hawthorne made the most of them that

they were capable of; but his mind was antipathetic to his main theme.

His representation of the New England reformer is as partial as that of

the Puritan minister; both are depraved types, and in the former there

is not that vivid truth to general human nature which makes the latter

so powerful a revelation of the sinful heart.

Hawthorne had purchased at some time during the winter, while at work

upon this novel, the house at Concord that he named The Wayside. It had

belonged to Mr. Alcott, and was an ordinary country residence with about

twenty acres of ground, part of which was a wooded hillside rising up

steeply back of the house, which itself stood close to the road. The

family took possession of this new home early in June, and it soon took

on the habitual look of their domicile, which, wherever it might be, had

a character of its own. Mrs. Hawthorne, as usual, was much pleased with

everything, and wrote an enthusiastic account of its prettiness and

comfort, though no important changes were then made in the house itself.

She describes the "Study," and the passage, which is in a letter to her

mother, gives the very atmosphere of the place:--

Nathaniel Hawthorne(#7301) · 第 13 / 18 段