INTRODUCTION.

Nola, a city founded by the Chalcidian Greeks, at a short distance from

Naples and from Vesuvius, was the birth-place of Giordano Bruno. It is

described by David Levi as a city which from ancient times had always

been consecrated to science and letters. From the time of the Romans to

that of the Barbarians and of the Middle Ages, Nola was conspicuous for

culture and refinement, and its inhabitants were in all times remarkable

for their courteous manners, for valour, and for keenness of perception.

They were, moreover, distinguished by their love for and study of

philosophy; so that this city was ever a favourite dwelling-place for

the choice spirits of the Renaissance. It may also be asserted that Nola

was the only city of Magna Græcia which, in spite of the persecutions of

Pagan emperors and Christian princes and clergy, always preserved the

philosophical traditions of the Pythagoreans, and never was the sacred

fire on the altar of Vesta suffered to become entirely extinct. Such was

the intellectual and moral atmosphere in which Bruno passed his

childhood. His paternal home was situated at the foot of Mount Cicada,

celebrated for its fruitful soil. From early youth his pleasure was to

pass the night out on the mountain, now watching the stars, now

contemplating the arid, desolate sides of Vesuvius. He tells how, in

recalling those days--the only peaceful ones of his life--he used to

think, as he looked up at the infinite expanse of heaven and the

confines of the horizon, with the towering volcano, that this must be

the ultimate end of the earth, and it appeared as if neither tree nor

grass refreshed the dreary space which stretched out to the foot of the

bare smoky mountain. When, grown older, he came nearer to it, and saw

the mountain so different from what it had appeared, and the intervening

space that, seen from afar, had looked so bare and sterile, all covered

with fruit-trees and enriched with vineyards, he began to see how

illusory the judgment of the senses may be; and the first doubt was

planted in his young soul as he perceived that, while the mind may grasp

Nature in her grandeur and majesty, the work of the sage must be to

examine her in detail, and penetrate to the cause of things. When he

appeared before the tribunal of the Holy Office at Venice, being asked

to declare who and what he was, he said: "My name is Giordano, of the

family of Bruno, of the city of Nola, twelve miles from Naples. There

was I born and brought up. My profession has been and is that of

letters, and of all the sciences. My father's name was Giovanni, and my

mother was Francesca Savolini; and my father was a soldier. He is dead,

and also mother. I am forty-four years old, having been born in 1548."

He always regarded Nola with patriotic pride, and he received his first

instruction in his father's house and in the public schools. Of a sad

disposition, and gifted with a most lively imagination, he was from his

earliest years given to meditation and to poetry. The early years of

Bruno's life were times of agitation and misfortune, and not propitious

to study. The Neapolitan provinces were disturbed by constant

earthquakes, and devastated by pestilence and famine. The Turks fought,

and ravaged the country, and made slaves of the inhabitants; the

neighbouring provinces were still more harassed by hordes of bandits and

outlaws, who invested Calabria, led by a terrible chief called Marcone.

The Inquisition stood prepared to light its fires and slaughter the

heretic. The Waldensians, who had lately been driven out of Piedmont,

and had sought a shelter in the Calabrian territory, were hunted down

and given over to the executioner.

The convent was the only refuge from violence, and Bruno, either from

religious enthusiasm, or in order to be able to devote himself to study,

became a friar at the age of fifteen. There, in the quiet cloister of

the convent of St. Dominic at Naples, his mind was nourished and his

intellect developed; the cloistral and monkish education failed to

enslave his thought, and he emerged from this tutelage the boldest and

least fettered of philosophers. Everything about this church and this

convent, famous as having been the abode of Thomas Aquinas, was

calculated to fire the enthusiasm of Bruno's soul; the leisure and

quiet, far from inducing habits of indolence, or the sterile practices

of asceticism, were stimulants to austere study, and to the fervour of

mystical speculations. Here he passed nearly thirteen years of early

manhood, until his intellect strengthened by study he began to long for

independence of thought, and becoming, as he said himself, solicitous

about the food of the soul and the culture of the mind, he found it

irksome to go through automatically the daily vulgar routine of the

convent; the pure flame of an elevated religious feeling being kindled

in his soul, he tried to evade the vain exercises of the monks, the

puerile gymnastics, and the adoration of so-called relics. His character

was frank and open, and he was unable to hide his convictions; he put

some of his doubts before his companions, and these hastened to refer

them to the superiors; and thus was material found to institute a cause

against him. It became known, that he had praised the methods used by

the Arians or Unitarians in expounding their doctrines, adding that they

refer all things to the ultimate cause, which is the Father: this, with

other heretical propositions, being brought to the notice of the Holy

Office, Bruno found himself in the position of being first observed and

then threatened. He was warned of the danger that hung over him by some

friends, and decided to quit Naples. He fled from the convent, and took

the road to Rome, and was there received in the monastery of the

Minerva. A few days after his arrival in Rome he learned that

instructions for his arrest had been forwarded from Naples; he tarried

not, but got away secretly, throwing aside the monk's habiliments by the

way. He wandered for some days about the Roman Campagna, his destitute

condition proving a safeguard against the bands of brigands that

infested those lands, until arriving near Civita Vecchia, he was taken

on board a Genoese vessel, and carried to the Ligurian port, where he

hoped to find a refuge from his enemies; but the city of Geneva was

devastated by pestilence and civil war, and after a sojourn of a few

days he pursued once more the road of exile. Seeking for a place wherein

he might settle for a short time and hide from his pursuers, he stayed

his steps at Noli, situated at a short distance from Savona, on the

Riviera: this town, nestled in a little bay surrounded by high hills

crowned by feudal castles and towers, was only accessible on the shore

side, and offered a grateful retreat to our philosopher. At Noli, Bruno

obtained permission of the magistracy to teach grammar to children, and

thus secured the means of subsistence by the small remuneration he

received; but this modest employment did not occupy him sufficiently,

and he gathered round him a few gentlemen of the district, to whom he

taught the science of the Sphere. Bruno also wrote a book upon the

Sphere, which was lost. He expounded the system of Copernicus, and

talked to his pupils with enthusiasm about the movement of the earth and

of the plurality of worlds.

As in that same Liguria Columbus first divined another hemisphere

outside the Pillars of Hercules, so Bruno discovered to those astonished

minds the myriads of worlds which fill the immensity of space. Columbus

was derided and banished by his fellow-citizens, and the fate of our

philosopher was similar to his. In the humble schoolmaster who taught

grammar to the children, the bishop, the clergy, and the nobles, who

listened eagerly to his lectures on the Sphere, began to suspect the

heretic and the innovator. After five months it behoved him to leave

Noli; he took the road to Savona, crossed the Apennines, and arrived at

Turin. In Turin at that time reigned the great Duke Emanuele Filiberto,

a man of strong character--one of those men who know how to found a

dynasty and to fix the destiny of a people; at that time, when Central

and Southern Italy were languishing under home and foreign tyranny, he

laid the foundations of the future Italy.

He was warrior, artist, mechanic, and scholar. Intrepid on the field of

battle, he would retire from deeds of arms to the silence of his study,

and cause the works of Aristotle to be read to him; he spoke all the

European languages; he worked at artillery, at models of fortresses, and

at the smith's craft; he brought together around him, from all sides of

Italy, artisans and scientists to promote industry, commerce, and

science; he gathered together in Piedmont the most excellent compositors

of Italy, and sanctioned a printer's company.

Bruno, attracted to Turin by the favour that was shown to letters and

philosophy, hoped to get occupation as press reader; but it was

precisely at that time that the Duke, instigated by France, was

combating, with every kind of weapon, the Waldensian and Huguenot

heresies, and had invited the Jesuits to Turin, offering them a

substantial subsidy; so that on Bruno's arrival he found the place he

had hoped for, as teacher in the university, occupied by his enemies,

and he therefore moved on with little delay, and embarked for Venice.

Berti, in his Life of Bruno, remarks that when the latter sought refuge

in Turin, Torquato Tasso, also driven by adverse fortune, arrived in the

same place, and he notes the affinity between them--both so great, both

subject to every species of misfortune and persecution in life, and

destined to immortal honours after their death: the light of genius

burned in them both, the fire of enthusiasm flamed in each alike, and on

the forehead of each one was set the sign of sorrow and of pain.

Both Bruno and Tasso entered the cloister as boys: the one joined the

Dominicans, the other the Jesuits; and in the souls of both might be

discerned the impress of the Order to which they belonged. Both went

forth from their native place longing to find a broader field of action

and greater scope for their intellectual powers. The one left Naples

carrying in his heart the Pagan and Christian traditions of the noble

enterprises and the saintly heroism of Olympus and of Calvary, of Homer

and the Fathers, of Plato and St. Ignatius; the other was filled with

the philosophical thought of the primitive Italian and Pythagorean

epochs, fecundated by his own conceptions and by the new age;

philosopher and apostle of an idea, Bruno consecrated his life to the

development of it in his writings and to the propagation of his

principles in Europe by the fire of enthusiasm. The one surprised the

world with the melody of his songs; being, as Dante says, the "dolce

sirena che i marinari in mezzo al mare smaga," he lulled the anguish

that lacerated Italy, and gilded the chains which bound her; the other

tried to shake her; to recall her to life with the vigour of thought,

with the force of reason, with the sacrifice of himself. The songs of

Tasso were heard and sung from one end of Italy to the other, and the

poet dwelt in palaces and received the caress and smile of princes;

while Bruno, discoursing in the name of reason and of science, was

rejected, persecuted, and scourged, and only after three centuries of

ingratitude, of calumny, and of forgetfulness, does his country show

signs of appreciating him and of doing justice to his memory. In Tasso

the poet predominates over the philosopher, in Bruno the philosopher

predominates over and eclipses the poet. The first sacrifices thought to

form; the second is careful only of the idea. Again, both are full of a

conception of the Divine, but the God that the dying Tasso confessed is

a god that is expected and comes not; while the god that Bruno proclaims

he already finds within himself. Tasso dies in his bed in the cloister,

uneasy as on a bed of thorns; Bruno, amidst the flames, stands out as on

a pedestal, and dies serene and calm. We must now follow our fugitive to

Venice.

At the time Giordano Bruno arrived in Venice that city was the most

important typographical centre of Europe; the commerce in books extended

through the Levant, Germany, and France, and the philosopher hoped that

here he might find some means of subsistence. The plague at that time

was devastating Venice, and in less than one year had claimed forty-two

thousand victims; but Bruno felt no fear, and he took a lodging in that

part of Venice called the Frezzeria, and was soon busy preparing for the

press a work called "Segni del Tempo," hoping that the sale of it would

bring a little money for daily needs. This work was lost, as were all

those which he published in Italy, and which it was to the interest of

Rome to destroy. Disappointed at not finding work to do in Venice, he

next went to Padua, which was the intellectual centre of Europe, as

Venice was the centre of printing and publishing; the most celebrated

professors of that epoch were to be found in the University of Padua,

but at the time of Bruno's sojourn there, Padua, like Venice, was

ravaged by the plague; the university was closed, and the printing-house

was not in operation. He remained there only a few days, lodging with

some monks of the Order of St. Dominic, who, he relates, "persuaded me

to wear the dress again, even though I would not profess the religion it

implied, because they said it would aid me in my wayfaring to be thus

attired; and so I got a white cloth robe, and I put on the hood which I

had preserved when I left Rome." Thus habited he wandered for several

months about the cities of Venetia and Lombardy; and although he

contrived for a time to evade his persecutors, he finally decided to

leave Italy, as it was repugnant to his disposition to live in forced

dissimulation, and he felt that he could do no good either for himself

or for his country, which was then overrun with Spaniards and scourged

by petty tyrants; and with the lower orders sunk in ignorance, and the

upper classes illiterate, uncultivated, and corrupt, the mission of

Giordano Bruno was impossible. "Altiora Peto" was Bruno's motto, and to

realize it he had gone forth with the pilgrim's staff in his hand,

sometimes covered with the cowl of the monk, at others wearing the

simple habit of a schoolmaster, or, again, clothed with the doublet of

the mechanic: he had found no resting-place--nowhere to lay his head, no

one who could understand him, but always many ready to denounce him. He

turned his back at last on his country, crossed the Alps on foot, and

directed his steps towards Switzerland. He visited the universities in

different towns of Switzerland, France, and Germany, and wherever he

went he left behind him traces of his visit in some hurried writings.

The only work of the Nolan, written in Italy, which has survived is "Il

Candelajo," which was published in Paris. Levi, in his Life of Bruno,

passes in review his various works; but it will suffice here to

reproduce what he says of the "Eroici Furori," the first part of which

I have translated, and to note his remarks upon the style of Bruno,

which presents many difficulties to the translator on account of its

formlessness. Goethe says of Bruno's writings: "Zu allgemeiner

Betrachtung und Erhebung der Geistes eigneten sich die Schriften des

Jordanus Brunous von Nola; aber freilich das gediegene Gold and Silber

aus der Masse jener zo ungleich begabten Erzgänge auszuscheiden und

unter den Hammer zu bringen erfordert fast mehr als menschliche Kräfte

vermögen."

I believe that no translation of Giordano Bruno's works has ever been

brought out in English, or, at any rate, no translation of the "Eroici

Furori," and therefore I have had no help from previous renderings. I

have, for the most part, followed the text as closely as possible,

especially in the sonnets, which are frequently rendered line for line.

Form is lacking in the original, and would, owing to the unusual and

often fantastic clothing of the ideas, be difficult to apply in the

translation. He seems to have written down his grand ideas hurriedly,

and, as Levi says, probably intended to retouch the work before

printing.

Following the order of Levi's Life of Bruno, we next find the fugitive

at Geneva. He was hardly thirty-one years old when he quitted his

country and crossed the Alps, and his first stopping-place was Chambery,

where he was received in a convent of the Order of Predicatori; he

proposed going on to Lyons, but being told by an Italian priest, whom he

met there, that he was not likely to find countenance or support, either

in the place he was in or in any other place, however far he might

travel, he changed his course and made for Geneva.

The name of Giordano Bruno was not unknown to the Italian colony who had

fled from papal persecution to this stronghold of religious reform. He

went to lodge at an inn, and soon received visits from the Marchese di

Vico Napoletano, Pietro Martire Vermigli, and other refugees, who

welcomed him with affection, inquiring whether he intended to embrace

the religion of Calvin, to which Bruno replied that he did not intend to

make profession of that religion, as he did not know of what kind it

was, and he only desired to live in Geneva in freedom. He was then

advised to doff the Dominican habit, which he still wore; this he was

quite willing to do, only he had no money to buy other clothing, and was

forced to have some made of the cloth of his monkish robes, and his new

friends presented him with a sword and a hat; they also procured some

work for him in correcting press errors.

The term of Bruno's sojourn in Geneva seems doubtful, and the precise

nature of his employment when there is also uncertain; but his

independent spirit brought him into dispute with the rigid Calvinists of

that city, who preached and exacted a blind faith, absolute and

compulsory. Bruno could not accept any of the existing positive

religions; he professed the cult of philosophy and science, nor was his

character of that mould that would have enabled him to hide his

principles. It was made known to him that he must either adopt Calvinism

or leave Geneva: he declined the former, and had no choice as to the

latter; poor he had entered Geneva, and poor he left it, and now turned

his steps towards France.

He reached Lyons, which was also at that time a city of refuge against

religious persecutions, and he addressed himself to his compatriots,

begging for work from the publishers, Aldo and Grifi; but not succeeding

in gaining enough to enable him to subsist, after a few days he left,

and went on his way to Toulouse, where there was a famous university;

and having made acquaintance with several men of intellect, Bruno was

invited to lecture on the Sphere, which he did, with various other

subjects, for six months, when the chair of Philosophy becoming vacant,

he took the degree of Doctor, and competed for it; and he continued for

two years in that place, teaching the philosophy of Aristotle and of

others. He took for the text of his lectures the treatise of Aristotle,

"De Anima," and this gave him the opportunity of introducing and

discussing the deepest questions--upon the Origin and Destiny of

Humanity; The Soul, is it Matter or Spirit? Potentiality or Reality?

Individual or Universal? Mortal or Eternal? Is Man alone gifted with

Soul, or are all beings equally so? Bruno's system was in his mind

complete and mature; he taught that everything in Nature has a soul, one

universal mind, penetrates and moves all things; the world itself is a

_sacrum animal_. Nothing is lost, but all transmutes and becomes. This

vast field afforded him scope for teaching his doctrines upon the world,

on the movement of the earth, and on the universal soul. The novelty and

boldness of his opinions roused the animosity of the clergy against him,

and after living two years and six months at Toulouse, he felt it wise

to retire, and leaving the capital of the Languedoc, he set his face

towards Paris.

The two books--the fruit of his lectures--which he published in

Toulouse, "De Anima" and "De Clavis Magis," were lost.

The title of Doctor, or as he said himself, "Maestro delle Arti," which

Bruno had obtained at Toulouse, gave him the faculty of teaching

publicly in Paris, and he says: "I went to Paris, where I set myself to

read a most unusual lecture, in order to make myself known and to

attract attention." He gave thirty lectures on the thirty Divine

attributes, dividing and distributing them according to the method of

St. Thomas Aquinas: these lectures excited much attention amongst the

scholars of the Sorbonne, who went in crowds to hear him; and he

introduced, as usual, his own ideas while apparently teaching the

doctrines of St. Thomas. His extraordinary memory and his eloquence

caused great astonishment; and the fame of Bruno reached the ears of

King Henry III., who sent for him to the Court, and being filled with

admiration of his learning, he offered him a substantial subsidy.

During his stay at Paris, although he was much at Court, he spent many

hours in his study, writing the works that he afterwards published.

Philosophical questions were discussed at the Sorbonne with much

freedom: Bruno showed himself no partisan of either the Platonic or the

Peripatetic school; he was not exclusive either in philosophy or in

religion; he did not favour the Huguenot faction more than the Catholic

league; and precisely by reason of this independent attitude, which kept

him free of the shackles of the sects, did he obtain the faculty of

lecturing at the Sorbonne. Nor can we ascribe this aloofness to

religious indifference, but to the fact that he sought for higher things

and longed for nobler ones. The humiliating spectacle which the positive

religions, both Catholic and Reformed, presented at that time--the

hatreds, the civil wars, the assassinations which they instigated--had

disgusted men of noble mould, and had turned them against these

so-called religions; so that in Naples, in Tuscany, in Venice, in

Switzerland, France, and England, there were to be found societies of

philosophers, of free-thinkers, and politicians, who repudiated every

positive religion and professed a pure Theism.

In the "Spaccio della Bestia Trionfante" he declares that he cannot ally

himself either to the Catholic or the Lutheran Church, because he

professes a more pure and complete faith than these--to wit, the love of

humanity and the love of wisdom; and Mocenigo, the disciple who

ultimately betrayed and sold him to the Holy Office, declares in his

deposition that Bruno sought to make himself the author of a new

religion under the name of "Philosophy." He was not a man to conceal his

ideas, and in the fervour of his improvisation he no doubt revealed what

he was; some tumult resulted from this free speaking of Bruno's, and he

was forced to discontinue his lectures at the Sorbonne.

Towards the end of the year 1583 the King became enthralled by religious

enthusiasm, and nothing was talked of in Paris but the conversion of

King Henry. This fact changed the aspect of affairs as far as Bruno was

concerned; he judged it prudent to leave Paris, and he travelled to

England.

The principal works published by Bruno during his stay in Paris are "Il

Candelajo" and "Umbrae Idearum." The former, says Levi, is a work of

criticism and of demolition; in this comedy he sets in groups the

principal types of hypocrisy, stupidity, and rascality, and exhibiting

them in their true colours, he lashes them with ridicule. In the "Umbrae

Idearum" he initiates the work of reconstruction, giving colour to his

thought and sketching his idea. The philosophy of Bruno is based upon

that of Pythagoras, whose system penetrates the social and intellectual

history of Italy, both ancient and modern. The method of Pythagoras is

not confined, as most philosophies are, to pure metaphysical

speculations, but connects these with scientific observations and social

practice. Bruno having resuscitated these doctrines, stamps them with a

wider scope, giving them a more positive direction; and he may with

propriety be called the second Pythagoras. The primal idea of

Pythagoras, which Bruno worked out to a more distinct development is

this: numbers are the beginning of things; in other words numbers are

the cause of the existence of material things; they are not final, but

are always changing position and attributes; they are variable and

relative. Beyond and above this mutability there must be the Immutable,

the All, the One.

The Infinite must be one, as one is the absolute number; in the original

One is contained all the numbers; in the One is contained all the

elements of the Universe.

This abstract doctrine required to be elucidated and fixed. From a

hypothesis to concentrate and reduce it to a reality was the great work

of Bruno.

One is the perfect number; it is the primitive monad. As from the One

proceeds the infinite series of numbers which again withdraw and are

resolved into the One; so from Substance, which is one, proceed the

myriads of worlds; from the worlds proceed myriads of living creatures;

and from the union of one with the diverse is generated the Universe.

Hence the progression from ascent to descent, from spirit to that which

we call matter; from the cause to the origin, and the process of

metaphysics, which, from the finite world of sense rises to the

intelligent, passing through the intermediate numbers of infinite

substance to active being and cosmic reason.

From the absolute One, the sun of the sensible and intellectual world,

millions of stars and suns are produced or developed. Each sun is the

centre of as many worlds which are distributed in as many distinct

series in an infinite number of concentric centres and systems. Each

system is attracted, repelled, and moved by an infinite, internal

passion, or attraction; each turns round its own centre, and moves in a

spiral towards the centre of the whole, towards which centre they all

tend with infinite passional ardour. For in this centre resides the sun

of suns, the unity of unities, the temple, the altar of the universe,

the sacred fire of Vesta, the vital principle of the universe.

That which occurs in the world of stars is reflected in the telluric

world; everything has its centre, towards which it is attracted with

fervour. All is thought, passion, and aspiration.

From this unity, which governs variety, from this movement of every

world around its sun, of every sun around its centre sun--the sun of

suns--which informs all with the rays of the spirit, with the light of

thought--is generated that perfect harmony of colours, sounds, forms,

which strike the sight and captivate and enthrall the intellect. That

which in the heavens is harmony becomes, in the individual, morality,

and in companies of human beings, law. That which is light in the

spheres becomes intelligence and science in the world of the spirit and

in humanity. We must study this harmony that rules the celestial worlds

in order to deduce the laws which should govern civil bodies.

In the science of numbers dwells harmony, and therefore it behoves us to

identify ourselves with this harmony, because from it is derived the

harmonic law which draws men together into companies. Through the

revolution of the worlds through space around their suns, from their

order, their constancy and their measure, the mind comprehends the

progress and conditions of men, and their duties towards each other. The

Bible, the sacred book of man, is in the heavens; there does man find

written the word of God.

Human souls are lights, distinct from the universal soul, which is

diffused over all and penetrates everything. A purifying process guides

them from one existence to another, from one form to another, from one

world to another. The life of man is more than an experience or trial;

it is an effort, a struggle to reproduce and represent upon earth some

of that goodness, beauty, and truth which are diffused over the universe

and constitute its harmony.

Long, slow, and full of opposition is this educational process of the

soul. As the terraqueous globe becomes formed, changed, and perfected,

little by little, through the cataclysms and convulsions which, by means

of fire, flood, earthquake, and irruptions, transform the earth, so it

is with humanity. Through struggle is man educated, fortified, and

raised.

In the midst of social cataclysms and revolutions humanity has one

guiding star, a beacon which shows its light above the storms and

tempests, a mystical thread running through the labyrinth of

history--namely, the religion of philosophy and of thought. The vulgar

creeds would not, and have not dared to reveal the Truth in its purity

and essence. They covered it with veils with allegories, with myths and

mysteries, which they called sacred; they enshrouded thought with a

double veil, and called it Revelation. Humanity, deceived by a

seductive form, adored the veil, but did not lift itself up to the idea

behind it; it saw the shadow, not the light.

But we must return to our wandering hero.

Bruno was about thirty-six years old when he left Paris and went to

England. He was invited to visit the University of Oxford, and opened

his lectures there with two subjects which, apparently diverse, are in

reality intimately connected with each other--namely, on the Quadruple

Sphere and on the Immortality of the Soul. Speaking of the immortality

of the soul, he maintained that nothing in the universe is lost,

everything changes and is transformed; therefore, soul and body, spirit

and matter, are equally immortal. The body dissolves, and is

transformed; the soul transmigrates, and, drawing round itself atom to

atom, it reconstructs for itself a new body. The spirit that animates

and moves all things is one; everything differentiates according to the

different forms and bodies in which it operates. Hence, of animate

things some are inferior by reason of the meanness of the organ in which

they operate; others are superior through the richness of the same. Thus

we see that Bruno anticipates the doctrine, proclaimed later by Goethe

and by Darwin, of the transformation of species and of the organic unity

of the animal world; and this alternation from segregation to

aggregation, which we call death and life, is no other than mutation of

form.

After having criticised and scourged the religions of chimera, of

ignorance, and hypocrisy, in "Lo Spaccio della Bestia Trionfante" and in

"L'Asino Cillenico," the author, in "Gli Eroici Furori," lays down the

basis for the religion of thought and of science. In place of the

so-called Christian perfections (resignation, devotion, and ignorance),

Bruno would put intelligence and the progress of the intellect in the

world of physics, metaphysics, and morals; the true aim being

illumination, the true morality the practice of justice, the true

redemption the liberation of the soul from error, its elevation and

union with God upon the wings of thought. This idea is developed in the

work in question, which is dedicated to Sir Philip Sidney. After

treating of the infinite universe, and contemplating the innumerable

worlds in other works, he comes, in "Gli Eroici Furori," to the

consideration of virtue in the individual, and demonstrates the potency

of the human faculties. After the Cosmos, the Microcosm; after the

infinitely great, the infinitely small. The body is in the soul, the

soul is in the mind, the mind is in God. The life of the soul is the

true life of the man. Of all his various faculties, that which rules

all, that which exalts our nature, is Thought. By means of it we rise to

the contemplation of the universe, and becoming in our turn creators, we

raise the edifice of science; through the intellect the affections

become purified, the will becomes strengthened. True liberty is

acquired, and will and action becoming one through thought, we become

heroes.

This education of the soul, or rather this elevation and glory of

thought, which draws with it the will and the affections, not by means

of blind faith or supernatural grace, not through an irrational and

mystical impulse, but by the strength of a reformed intellect and by a

palpable and well-considered enthusiasm, which science and the

contemplation of Nature alone can give, this is the keynote of the poem.

It is composed of two parts, each of which is divided into five

dialogues: the first part, which may be called psychological, shows, by

means of various figures and symbols drawn from Nature, how the divine

light is always present to us, is inherent in man; it presents itself to

the senses and to the comprehension: man constantly rejects and ignores

it; sometimes the soul strives to rise up to it, and the poet describes

the struggle with the opposing affections which are involved in this

effort, and shows how at last the man of intelligence overcomes these

contending powers and fatal impulses which conflict within us, and by

virtue of harmony and the fusion of the opposites the intellect becomes

one with the affections, and man realizes the good and rises to the

knowledge of the true. All conflicting desires being at last united,

they become fixed upon one object, one great intent--the love of the

Divine, which is the highest truth and the highest good. In "Gli Eroici

Furori" we see Bruno as a man, as a philosopher, and as a believer: here

he reveals himself as the hero of thought. Even as Christ was the hero

of faith, and sacrificed himself for it, so Bruno declares himself ready

to sacrifice himself for science. It is also a literary, a

philosophical, and a religious work; form, however, is sacrificed to the

idea--so absorbed is the author in the idea that he often ignores form

altogether. An exile wandering from place to place, he wrote hurriedly

and seldom or ever had he the opportunity of revising what he had

written down. His mind in the impulsiveness of its improvisation was

like the volcano of his native soil, which, rent by subterranean

flames, sends forth from its vortices of fire, at the same time smoke,

ashes, turbid floods, stones, and lava. He contemplates the soul, and

seeks to understand its language; he is a physiologist and a naturalist,

merged in the mystic and the enlightened devotee.

Bruno might have made a fixed home for himself in England, as so many of

his compatriots had done, and have continued to enjoy the society of

such men as Sir Philip Sydney, Fulke Greville, and, perchance, also of

Shakespeare himself, who was in London about that time; but his

self-imposed mission allowed him no rest; he must go forth, and carry

his doctrines to the world, and forget the pleasures of friendship and

the ties of comfort in the larger love of humanity; his work was to

awaken souls out of their lethargy, to inspire them with the love of the

highest good and of truth; to teach that God is to be found in the study

of Nature, that the laws of the visible world will explain those of the

invisible, the union of science and humanity with Nature and with God.

Bruno returned to Paris in 1585, being at that time tutor in the family

of Mauvissier, who had been recalled from England by his Sovereign.

During Bruno's second sojourn in Paris efforts were made by Mendoza,

the Spanish ambassador, and others, to induce him to return to his

allegiance to the Church, and to be reconciled to the Pope; but Bruno

declined these overtures, and soon after left Paris for Germany, where

he arrived on foot, his only burden being a few books.

He visited Marburg and Wurtemburg, remaining in the latter place two

years, earning his bread by teaching.

Prague and Frankfort were next visited; ever the same courage and

boldness characterised his teaching, and ever the same scanty welcome

was accorded to it, although in every city and university crowds of the

intelligent listened to his lectures; but the Church never lost sight of

Bruno, he was always under surveillance, and few dared to show

themselves openly his friends. Absorbed in his studies and intent upon

his work, writing with feverish haste, he observed nothing of the

invisible net which his enemies kept spread about him, and while his

slanderers were busy in doing him injury he was occupied in teaching the

mnemonic art, and explaining his system of philosophy to the young

Lutherans who attended his lectures; in settling the basis of a new and

rational religion, and in writing Latin verses; using ever greater

diligence with his work, almost as if he felt that the time was drawing

near in which he would be no longer at liberty to work and teach.

It was during the early part of the pontificate of Gregory XIV. that

Bruno received letters from Mocenigo in Venice, urging him to return to

Italy, and to go and stay with him in Venice, and instruct him in the

secrets of science. Bruno was beginning to tire of this perpetually

wandering life, and after several letters from Mocenigo, full of fine

professions of friendship and protection, Bruno, longing to see his

country again, turned his face towards Venice.

In those days men of superior intellect were often considered to be

magicians or sorcerers; Mocenigo, after enticing Bruno to Venice,

insisted upon his teaching him "the secret of memory and other things

that he knew."

The philosopher with untiring patience tried to instil into this dull

head the principles of logic, the elements of mathematics, and the

rudiments of the mnemonic art; but the pupil hated study, and had no

faculty of thought; yet he insisted that Bruno should make science

clearly known to him! But this was probably only to initiate a quarrel

with Bruno, whom he intended afterwards to betray, and deliver into the

hands of the Church.

The Holy Office would have laid hands on Bruno immediately on his

arrival in Italy, but being assured by Mocenigo that he could not

escape, they left him a certain liberty, so that he might more surely

compromise himself, while his enemies were busy collecting evidence

against him. When at last his eyes became opened to what was going on

about him, and he could no longer ignore the peril of his position, it

was too late; Bruno could not get away, and was told by Mocenigo that if

he stayed not by his own will and pleasure, he would be compelled to

remain where he was. Bruno, however, made his preparations for

departure, and sent his things on to Frankfort, intending to leave the

next day himself; but in the morning, while he was still in bed,

Mocenigo entered the chamber, pretending that he wished to speak with

him; then calling his servant Bartolo and five or six gondoliers, who

waited without, they forced Bruno to rise, and conducted him to a

garret, and locked him in. There he passed the first day of that

imprisonment which was to last for eight years. The next day he went

over the lagoon in a gondola, in the company of his jailors, who took

him to the prison of the Holy Office, and left him there. Levi devotes

many pages to the accusations brought against Giordano Bruno by the

Inquisitors, and the depositions and denunciations made against him by

his enemies. The Court was opened without delay, and most of the

provinces of Italy were represented by their delegates in the early part

of the trial; Bruno himself, being interrogated, gave an account in

detail of his life, of his wanderings, of his occupations and works:

serene and dignified before this terrible tribunal, he expounded his

doctrine, its principles, and logical consequences. He spoke of the

universe, of the infinite worlds in infinite space, of the divinity in

all things, of the unity of all things, the dependence and

inter-dependence of all things, and of the existence of God in all.

After nine months' imprisonment in Venice, towards the end of January

1593, Bruno, in chains, was conveyed from the Bridge of Sighs through

the lagoons to Ancona, where he remained incarcerated until the prison

of the Roman Inquisition received him. If we look upon "Gli Eroici

Furori" as a prophetical poem, we see that his sufferings in the

loneliness of his prison and in the torture-chamber of the Inquisition

passed by anticipation before his mind in the book written when he was

free and a wanderer in strange lands.

"By what condition, nature, or fell chance,

In living death, dead life I live?"

he writes eight years and more before he ever breathed the stifling air

of a dungeon; and again:

"The soul nor yields nor bends to these rough blows,

But bears, exulting, this long martyrdom,

And makes a harmony of these sharp pangs."

Further details of the trial of Giordano Bruno are to be found in Levi's

book. It is well known how he received the sentence of death passed upon

him, saying: "You, O judges! feel perchance more terror in pronouncing

this judgment than I do in hearing it." The day fixed for the burning,

which was to take place in the Campo dei Fiori, was the 17th February in

the year 1600. Rome was full of pilgrims from all parts, come to

celebrate the jubilee of Pope Clement VIII. Bruno was hardly fifty years

old at this time; his face was thin and pale, with dark, fiery eyes; the

forehead luminous with thought, his body frail and bearing the signs of

torture; his hands in chains, his feet bare, he walked with slow steps

in the early morning towards the funeral pile. Brightly shone the sun,

and the flames leapt upwards and mingled with his ardent rays; Bruno

stood in the midst with his arms crossed, his head raised, his eyes

open; when all was consumed, a monk took a handful of the ashes and

scattered them in the wind. A month later, the Bishop of Sidonia

presented himself at the Treasury of the Pope, and demanded two scudi in

payment for having degraded Fra Giordano the heretic.

"L'incendio è tal, ch'io m'ardo e non mi sfaccio."

The Heroic Enthusiasts (Gli Eroici Furori) Part the First An Ethical Poem · 第 11 / 88 题