TESTIMONY OF C. A. HAMBLEN

The testimony of C. A. Hamblen was taken at 2:50 p.m., on July 23,

1964, in the office of the U.S. attorney, 301 Post Office Building,

Bryan and Ervay Streets, Dallas, Tex., by Mr. Wesley J. Liebeler,

assistant counsel of the President's Commission.

Mr. LIEBELER. You may remain seated. Will you raise your right hand? Do

you solemnly swear that the testimony you are about to give will be the

truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?

Mr. HAMBLEN. I do.

Mr. LIEBELER. My name is Wesley J. Liebeler. I am an attorney on

the President's Commission investigating the assassination of

President Kennedy. I have been authorized to take your testimony

by the Commission pursuant to authority granted to it by Executive

Order 11130, dated November 29, 1963, and the joint resolution of

Congress, No. 137. You are entitled under the rules of the Commission

governing the taking of testimony of witnesses to have an attorney

present, should you wish. I understand that you are present pursuant

to a subpena that was served on you some days ago by the U.S. Secret

Service, and I presume since you don't have an attorney with you at

this time, you are prepared to proceed with your testimony without an

attorney?

Mr. HAMBLEN. I don't need an attorney. You might wish to make a little

correction. This should be C. A. Hamblen instead of C. R.

Mr. LIEBELER. Your name is C. A. H-a-m-b-l-e-n?

Mr. HAMBLEN. That's right.

Mr. LIEBELER. How old are you?

Mr. HAMBLEN. I will be 50 in December.

Mr. LIEBELER. You are employed by the Western Union Telegraph Co.;

isn't that right?

Mr. HAMBLEN. Yes.

Mr. LIEBELER. How long have you worked for them?

Mr. HAMBLEN. It will be 38 years the 6th day of August.

Mr. LIEBELER. I want to come right to the point in this deposition. I

think you know basically the reason we have asked you to come over.

It is my understanding that you had a conversation with a newspaper

reporter by the name of Bob Fenley shortly after the assassination, in

which you told him, in substance, that you thought that a man who you

thought looked like Lee Oswald had been in your office and had either

sent a telegram or cashed a money order telegram that he had in his

possession; is that correct?

Mr. HAMBLEN. Not exactly.

Mr. LIEBELER. What is it exactly?

Mr. HAMBLEN. During that time, I came in contact with newspaper

correspondents from all over the world. In my years of service to the

company, I have never disclosed the contents of a telegram, who they

were addressed to, who they were from, or anything pertaining to them.

I don't think I told Mr. Fenley that a Lee Oswald had been in there,

because talking with those correspondents, I wouldn't divulge any

patron coming into the telegraph office in search of any of our

services, money orders, telegrams, collateral services, collection

services, anything that we have to offer. I believe there is some

misunderstanding on Mr. Fenley's part there. Perhaps I did tell him

that I thought I had seen someone that looked like the man that I saw

over television.

Warren Commission (11 of 26): Hearings Vol. XI (of 15) · 第 208 / 297 题