Rhetorical Black-hanging

It is the duty of the clergy, not merely to defend large-scale

merchants while they live, but to bury them when they die, and to

place the seal of sanctity upon their careers. Concerning this

aspect of Bootstrap-lifting I quote the opinion of an earnest

hater of shams, William Makepeace Thackeray:

I think the part which pulpits play in the death of kings is the

most ghastly of all the ceremonial: the lying eulogies, the

blinking of disagreeable truths, the sickening flatteries, the

simulated grief, the falsehood and sycophancies--all uttered in

the name of Heaven in our State churches: these monstrous

Threnodies which have been sung from time immemorial over kings

and queens, good, bad, wicked, licentious. The State parson must

bring out his commonplaces; his apparatus of rhetorical

black-hanging......

And this, of course, applies not merely to kings of England, but

to kings of Steel, kings of Coal, kings of Oil, kings of Wall

Street. When a certain king of Western railroads died, a

Methodist clergyman, afterwards Bishop, likened his heir to the

boy Christ; a statement which requires for its appreciation a

mention of the fact that this heir died of syphilis. In the year

1904 there passed from his earthly reward in Pennsylvania a

United States senator who had been throughout his lifetime a

notorious and unblushing corruptionist. Matthew Stanley Quay was

his name, and the New York "Nation", having no clerical

connections, was free to state the facts about him:

He bought the organization, bribed or intimidated the press, got

his grip on the public service, including even the courts;

imposed his will on Congress and Cabinet, and upon the last three

Presidents--making the latter provide for the offal of his

political machine, which even Pennsylvania could no longer

stomach--and all without identifying his name with a single

measure of public good, without making a speech or uttering a

party watchword, without even pretending to be honest, but solely

because, like Judas, he carried the bag and could buy whom he

would.

Such was the lay opinion; and now for the clerical. It was

expressed by a Presbyterian divine, the Reverend Dr. J. S.

Ramsey, who stood over the coffin of "Matt", and without cracking

a smile declared that he had been "a statesman who was always on

the right side of every moral question!"

In that same year of 1904 died the high priest of our political

corruption, Mark Hanna. He had belonged to no church, but had

backed them all, understanding the main thesis of this book as

clearly as the writer of it. In his home city of Cleveland the

eulogy upon him was pronounced by Bishop Leonard, in St. Paul's

Episcopal Church; while in the United States Senate the service

was performed by the Chaplain, the Rev. Edward Everett Hale. This

is a name well-known in American letters, as in American

religious life; it was borne by a benevolent old gentleman, a

Unitarian and a liberal, who organized "Lend-a-Hand Clubs" and

such like amiabilities. "Do You Love This Old Man?" the signs in

the street-cars used to ask when I was a boy; and I promptly

answered "Yes"--for my mother took the "Ladies' Home Journal",

and I swallowed the sentimental dish-water set out for me. But

when I read the Rev. Edward's funeral oration over the Irrev.

Mark, I loved neither of them any longer. "This whole-souled

child of God," cried the Rev. Edward, "who believed in success,

and knew how to succeed by using the infinite powers!" You

perceive that the Chaplain of the Millionaires' Club agrees with

this book, that the "infinite powers" in America are the powers

that prey!

The Profits of Religion: An Essay in Economic Interpretation · 第 83 / 117 题