Graft in Tail

As one of America's head muck-rakers, I found that I was popular

with the British ruling classes; they found my books useful in

their campaigns against democracy, and they were surprised and

disconcerted when they found I did not agree with their

interpretation of my writings. I had told of corruption in

American politics; surely I must know that in England they had no

such evils! I explained that they did not have to; their graft,

to use their own legal phrase, was "in tail"; the grafters had,

as a matter of divine right, the things which in America they had

to buy. In America, for instance, we had a Senate, a

"Millionaire's Club", for admission to which the members paid in

cash; but in England the same men came to the same position as

their birth-right. Political corruption is not an end in itself,

it is merely a means to exploitation; and of exploitation England

has even more than America. When I explained this, my popularity

with the British ruling classes vanished quickly.

As a matter of fact, England is more like America than she

realizes; her British reticence has kept her ignorant about

herself. I could not carry on my business in England, because of

the libel laws, which have as their first principle "the greater

the truth, the greater the libel". Englishmen read with

satisfaction what I write about America; but if I should turn my

attention to their own country, they would send me to jail as

they sent Frank Harris. The fact is that the new men in England,

the lords of coal and iron and shipping and beer, have bought

their way into the landed aristocracy for cash, just as our

American senators have done; they have bought the political

parties with campaign gifts, precisely as in America; they have

taken over the press, whether by outright purchase like

Northcliffe, or by advertising subsidy--both of which methods we

Americans know. Within the last decade or two another group has

been coming into control; and not merely is this the same class

of men as in America, it frequently consists of the same

individuals. These are the big money-lenders, the international

financiers who are the fine and final flower of the capitalist

system. These gentlemen make the world their home--or, as

Shakespeare puts it, their oyster. They know how to fit

themselves to all environments; they are Catholics in Rome and

Vienna, country gentlemen in London, bons vivants in Paris,

democrats in Chicago, Socialists in Petrograd, and Hebrews

wherever they are.

And of course, in buying the English government, these new

classes have bought the English Church. Skeptics and men of the

world as they are, they know that they must have a Religion. They

have read the story of the French revolution, and the shadow of

the guillotine is always over their thoughts; they see the giant

of labor, restless in his torment, groping as in a nightmare for

the throat of his enemy. Who can blind the eyes of this giant,

who can chain him to his couch of slumber? There is but one

agent, without rival--the Keeper of the Holy Secrets, the Deputy

of the Almighty Awfulness, the Giver and Withholder of Eternal

Life. Tremble, slave! Fall down and bow your forehead in the

dust! I can see in my memory the sight that thrilled my

childhood--my grim old Bishop, clad in his gorgeous ceremonial

robes, stretching out his hands over the head of the new priest,

and pronouncing that most deadly of all the Christian curses:

"Whose sins thou dost forgive, they are forgiven; and whose sins

thou dost retain, they are retained!"

The Profits of Religion: An Essay in Economic Interpretation · 第 34 / 117 题