Many of the high calculations of the priests must have been for the

purpose of discovering the length of the present epoch and how soon the

world would end. They seem to have thought this would take place when

all their various time-measures would merge together into a common

unity, which each could divide without remainder.[59]

3. _Cosmical Conceptions of the Mayas._

The cosmical conceptions of the ancient Mayas have not hitherto been

understood; but by a study of existing documents I believe they can be

correctly explained in outline.

[Illustration: FIG. 9.—The Universe. (From the Chilan Balam of Mani.)]

One of these is the central design in the Chilan Balam, or Sacred Book,

of Mani (Fig. 9). It was copied by Father Cogolludo in 1640, and

inserted in his History of Yucatan, with a totally false interpretation

which the natives designedly gave him.

The lettering in the above figure is by the late Dr. C. H. Berendt, and

was obtained by him from other books of Chilan Balam, and native

sources. In Cogolludo’s work, this design is surrounded by thirteen

heads which signify the thirteen _ahau katuns_, or greater cycles of

years, as I have explained elsewhere.[60] The number thirteen in

American mythology symbolizes the thirteen possible directions of

space.[61] The border, therefore, expresses the totality of Space and

Time; and the design itself symbolizes Life within Space and Time. This

is shown as follows: At the bottom of the field lies a cubical block,

which represents the earth, always conceived of this shape in Mayan

mythology.[62] It bears, however, not the lettering, _lum_, the Earth,

as we might expect, but, significantly, _tem_, the Altar. The Earth is

the great altar of the Gods, and the offering upon it is Life.

Above the earth-cube, supported on four legs which rest upon the four

quarters of the mundane plane, is the celestial vase, _cum_, which

contains the heavenly waters, the rains and showers, on which depends

the life of vegetation, and therefore that of the animal world as well.

Above it hang the heavy rain clouds, _muyal_, ready to fill it; within

it grows the _yax che_, the Tree of Life, spreading its branches far

upward, on their extremities the flowers or fruit of life, the soul or

immortal principle of man, called _ol_ or _yol_.[63]

Turning now to the central design of what has been called the “Tableau

of the Bacabs,” in the Codex Cortesianus, Fig. 10, we can readily see in

the light of the above explanation that its lesson is the same. The

design is surrounded by the signs of the twenty days, beyond which the

field (not shown in this cut) is apportioned to the four cardinal points

and the deities and time-cycles connected with them.

[Illustration: FIG. 10.—Our First Parents. (From the Cortesian Codex.)]

Again it is Life within Space and Time which the artist presents. The

earth is not represented; but we readily recognize in conventionalized

form the great Tree of Life, across it the celestial Vase, and above it

the cloud-masses. On the right sits Cuculcan, on the left Xmucane, the

divine pair called in the _Popol Vuh_ “the Creator and the Former,

Grandfather and Grandmother of the race, who give Life, who give

Reproduction.”[64] In his right hand Cuculcan holds three glyphs, each

containing the sign of Life, _ik_. Xmucane has before her one with the

sign of union (sexual); above it, one containing the life-sign (product

of union); and these are surmounted by the head of a fish, symbolizing

the fructifying and motherly waters.

The total extension of the field in these designs resembles the glyph

_a_ in Fig. 6. It is found in both Mayan and Mexican MSS.,[65] and

expresses the conception these peoples had of the Universe. Hence I give

it the name of the “cosmic sign.”

4. _Pictorial Representations of Divinities._

Turning to the Codices and the monuments with the above mythological

lore in one’s memory, it seems to me there is no difficulty in

identifying most of the pictures presented by them. That this has not

been accomplished heretofore, I attribute to the neglect of the myths by

previous writers, and a persistent desire to discover in the mythology

of the Mayas, not the divinities which they themselves worshipped, but

those of some other nation, as the Nahuas, Quiches, Zapotecs, or Pueblo

dwellers.[66] I shall pay small attention to such analogies, as the

Mayas had a religion of their own, and it is that which I wish to

define. We may turn first to the—

[Illustration: FIG. 11.—Monogram of Itzamna.]

_Representations of Itzamna._—I have no hesitation in identifying

Itzamna with the “god B,” as catalogued by Dr. Schellhas in his

excellent study of the divinities of the Codices,[67] and which he

believes to be Cuculcan, while the Abbé Brasseur, followed by Dr. Seler,

argue, that it is a “Tlaloc” or Chac, _i. e._, a rain god.[68] He is

extremely prominent in the Codices, being painted in the Dresden Codex

alone not less than 130 times, and in the others about 70 times. No

other deity has half so many representations, and we may well believe,

therefore, that he was the Jove of their Pantheon.

This at once suggests Itzamna; but a phrase of the historian Cogolludo

leaves no doubt about it. The “god B” is associated with the signs of

the east, and his especial and invariable characteristic are two long,

serpent-like teeth, which project from his mouth, one in front, the

other to the side and backward.[69] These traits enable us to identify

“B” with Lakin Chan, “the serpent of the east,” who was portrayed “with

strangely deformed teeth,” and this was unquestionably but another name

for Itzamna, the god of the east.[70]

[Illustration: FIG. 12.—Itzamna: from the Codex Troano.]

[Illustration: FIG. 13.—Itzamna: from the Inscription of Kabah.]

An abundance of evidence may be adduced to confirm this opinion. This

deity is represented in close relations with the serpent, holding it in

his hand, sitting upon it, even swallowed by it, or emerging from its

throat. As a “medicine man” he carries the “medicine bag,” and the wand

or baton, called in Maya _caluac_, “the perforated stick,”[71]

surmounted with a hand, hinting at his name above given, _Kabil_, the

Skilful Hand. He is often in a boat, to recall his advent over the

eastern sea, and he is frequently associated with the showers, as was

Itzamna, who said of himself, _itz en muyal, itz en caan_, “I am what

trickles from the clouds, from the sky.” As the rising sun which dispels

the darkness, or else as the physician who heals disease, he is

portrayed sitting on the head of the owl, the bird of night and

sickness; and as the giver of life he is associated with the emblem of

the snail, typical of birth.

He himself is never connected with the symbols of death or misfortune,

but always with those of life and light. The lance and tomahawk which he

often carries are to drive away the spirits of evil.

Besides the above peculiarities, he is portrayed as an elderly man, his

nose is long and curved downward, his eye is always the “ornamented

eye,” which in the Maya Codices indicates a divinity. He is associated

with all four quarters of the globe, for the East defines the cardinal

points; and what is especially interesting, it is he who is connected

with the Maya “Tree of Life,” the celebrated symbol of the cross, found

on so many ancient monuments of this people and which has excited so

much comment. This I shall consider later.

[Illustration: FIG. 14.—Itzamna: from the Dresden Codex.]

[Illustration: FIG. 15.—Mask of Itzamna (?).]

We know from the mythology that Itzamna, like most deities, was

multiform, appearing in various incarnations. In the ceremonies this was

represented by masks; with this in mind I class as merely one of the

forms or epiphanies of Itzamna that figure in the Codices described by

Dr. Schellhas as a separate deity, “the god with the ornamental nose,”

whom he catalogues as “god K.” I am led to this conclusion by a careful

study of all the pictographs in which this deity appears; they all seem

to show that it is Itzamna wearing a mask to indicate some one

manifestation of his power (see especially Cod. Dresden., pp. 7, 12, 25,

26, and 34, 65, and 67, where Itzamna is carrying the mask on his head).

That there is a particular monogram for this character merely indicates

that it was a separate mythological manifestation, not a different

deity.

A remarkable and constant feature in the representations of Itzamna is

his _nose_. Thomas calls it “elephantine,” but, as Waldeck and Seler

have shown, it is undoubtedly intended to imitate the snout of the

_tapir_.[72]

When we remember that this animal was sacred to Votan, who played the

same part in Chiapas that Itzamna did in Yucatan, dividing and naming

the land, etc.; and that the interesting slate tablets from Chiapas, in

the National Museum of Mexico, portray the sacred tapir in intimate

connection with the symbol of _the hand_,[73] that associated with

Itzamna,—we are led to identify the two mythical personages as one and

the same. According to Bishop Landa the tapir was not found in Yucatan

except on the western shore near the bay of Campeche,[74] which shows

that the myth of the tapir god was imported from Tzental territory.

It may be asked why the tapir, a dull animal, loving swamps and dark

recesses of the forests, should have been chosen to represent a divinity

of light. I reply, that it arose from the “ikonomatic” method of

writing. The word for tapir in Maya is _tzimin_, in Tzental _tzemen_,

and from the similarity of this sound to _i-tzam-na_ the animal came to

be selected as his symbol. No such sacredness attached to the brute

among the Quiches, for in their tongue the allusive sound did not exist,

the tapir being called _tixl_. This rebus also confirms the identity of

Itzamna with the tapir-nosed deity of the Codices.[75]

The annual festival to Itzamna was called _Pocam_, “the cleansing.” On

that occasion the priests, arrayed in all their insignia, assembled in

the house of their prince. First, they invoked Itzamna as the founder of

their order and burned to him incense with fire newly made from the

friction of sticks. Next they spread out upon a table covered with green

leaves the sacred books, and asperged their pages with water drawn from

a spring of which no woman had ever tasted. This was the ceremonial

“cleansing.” Then the chief priest arose and declared the prognostics

for the coming year as written in the holy records.[76]

We may well believe that the Dresden Codex, pages 29–43, which are

entirely taken up with the deeds and ceremonies of Itzamna, was one of

the books spread out on this solemn occasion.

_Representations of Cuculcan._—As I believe the reasons above given are

sufficient to establish the identity of the “god B,” of Dr. Schellhas’

catalogue, with Itzamna, so I think his “god D” is Cuculcan.[77] He

himself believes it to be a “night god,” or a “moon god,” while Dr.

Seler considers it to portray Itzamna.

[Illustration: FIG. 16.—Monogram of Cuculcan.]

[Illustration: FIG. 17.—Cuculcan, with owl head-dress.]

The characteristics of this divinity are: A face of an old man, with

sunken mouth and toothless jaws, except one tooth in the lower jaw,

which, in the Tro. and Cortes. Codices, is exaggerated as a distinctive

sign; he has the “ornamented eye” peculiar to deities; and to his

forehead is attached, or over it hangs, an affix, which generally bears

the sign _akbal_, which means “darkness,” because he is the setting or

night sun; for which reason his head-dress is often the horns of the

eared owl. He is clearly a beneficent deity, and is never associated

with symbols of misfortune or death. Indeed, he is at times evidently a

god of birth, being accompanied with the symbol of the snail, above

explained, and is sometimes associated with women apparently as an

obstetrician. He is connected with serpent emblems, and holds in his

hand a sacred rattle formed of the rattles of the rattlesnake.

All these traits coincide with the myths of Cuculcan; but when we

perceive that he, and he alone of all the deities, is occasionally

depicted _with a beard under his chin_, just as Cuculcan wore in the

legend, the identification becomes complete.[78]

The most striking of his representations, and that which is most

distinctive of his identity with the “green-feathered serpent,” is the

picture which extends over pp. 4 and 5, middle, of the Dresden Codex.

Here he is seen with face emerging from the mouth of the great,

green-feathered snake-dragon, indicative of his own personality, his

hieroglyph immediately above his head.[79]

_Representations of Kin ich._—As has already been observed, the sun at

noon, conceived as a divinity, did not occupy a prominent place in Maya

mythology; and this is also the case in the pictorial designs.

[Illustration: FIG. 18.—Monogram of Kin ich.]

There is no doubt as to his representation. It is accompanied by the

well-known ideogram of the sun scattered over his body and represented

above him. It will be seen on a later page.

He is richly arrayed with large ear-rings and a characteristic,

prominent nose decoration. He has the “ornamented eye” and a full head

dress. (God “G” of Schellhas.)

Proceeding now to consider other divinities of the beneficent class, I

begin with—

_Representations of Xaman Ek, the Pole Star._—This is the “god C, of the

ornamented face,” of Dr. Schellhas’ list, who suggests its identity with

the pole star. The very characteristic face recurs extremely frequently,

especially in Codices Troano, Cortesianus, and Peresianus. We have

evidently to do with an important divinity, and, as Dr. Schellhas says,

“one of the most remarkable and difficult figures in the manuscripts.”

That it is the personification of a star he argues, (1) from the ring of

rays with which it is surrounded, Cod. Cort., p. 10; (2) from its

appearance in the “constellation band;” (3) from its surmounting in

certain pictures the “tree of life;” and that it is the North Star is

shown by its presence in the hieroglyph of that quarter and its

association with the sign for north.

There is another, and, to me, decisive argument, which at once confirms

Dr. Schellhas’ opinion, and explains why the north star is represented

by this peculiar, decorated face.

The term for “north” in Maya is _xaman_, whence _xaman ek_, north star.

The only other word in the language which at all resembles this is

_xamach_, the flat, decorated plate or dish (Nahuatl, _comalli_) on

which tortillas, etc., are served. In the rebus-writing the decorations

on the rim of this dish were conventionally transferred to the face of

the deity, so as to distinguish it by recalling the familiar utensil.

For a similar reason it is also called “the shield star,” _chimal ek_

(like _chimal ik_, north wind); but as this is a foreign word (from the

Nahuatl, _chimalli_, shield), it was doubtless later and local. I shall

refer to this peculiar edging or border as the “pottery decoration,” and

we shall find it elsewhere.

That the figure is associated at times with all four quarters of the

world, and also with the supreme number 13 (see above, p. 24), are not

at all against the identification, as Dr. Schellhas seems to think, but

in favor of it; for at night, all four directions are recognized by the

position of the pole; and its immovable relation to the other celestial

bodies seems to indicate that it belongs above the highest.

The North Star is especially spoken of as “the guide of merchants.” Its

representation is associated with symbols of peace and plenty (removing

the contents of a tall vase, C. Cortes., p. 40; seated under a canopy,

ibid., p. 29). In front of his forehead is attached a small vase, the

contents of which are trickling into his mouth (?).

[Illustration: FIG. 19.—The North Star God.]

He is especially prominent in the earlier pages of the Cod. Peres.,

where his presence seems to have been practically overlooked by previous

writers; and it is true that the drawings are nearly erased. Close

inspection will show, however, that he is portrayed on both sides of the

long column of figures which runs up the middle of page 3. On the left,

he is seated on the “Tree of Life,” as in Cod. Troanus, p. 17, _a_

(which is growing from the vase of the rains, precisely as in Cod. Tro.,

14, _b_, where the star-god is sailing in the vase itself). On the right

of the column he is shown in the darkness of night (on a black

background), holding in his hand the _kan_ symbol of fortune and food. A

similar contrast is on page 7, where on the right of the column he is

seen above the fish, and on the left, in the dark, again with the _kan_

symbol. On the intermediate page he is seated opposite the figure of Kin

ich Ahau, which is head downward, signifying that when the sun is absent

the pole star rules the sky.

[Illustration: FIG. 20.—The Bee god. (Codex Troano.)]

_Representations of the Planet Venus._—In view of the prominent part

which the Venus-year plays in the calculations of the Codices, it has

surprised students that no pictorial figures of this bright star appear

on their pages. On this point I have some suggestions to make.

In one part of the Codex Troano (pp. 1*–10*) there are a great

many—nearly fifty—pictures of an insect resembling a bee in descending

flight. These pages have been explained by Thomas as relating to

apiculture and the festivals of the bee-keepers, and by Seler, who

rejects that rendering, as referring generally to the descent of deities

to receive offerings. Direction downward is indicated not only by the

position of the insect, but by the accompanying hieroglyph, which reads

_caban_, the first syllable of which, _cab_, means “downward.” My

suggestion is that in this bee-like insect we have an ikonomatic

allusion to the Evening Star, which, as I have already stated, was

sometimes called _xux ek_, “the bee or wasp star.”[80]

Not only is the picture phonetically appropriate, and the “sign”

consistent, but that a deity is referred to is shown by three

anthropomorphic pictures of the bee (two on p. 4* and one on p. 5*).

Furthermore, the “sign” or monogram of the bee deity (Fig. 20) appears

on the so-called “title pages” of the Cod. Tro. and Cod. Cortes.,

adjacent to that of the north star, indicating that another stellar

deity is represented.

The object toward which the insect descends is generally either a fire,

or that shown in Fig. 22.[81] This was supposed by Brasseur to be a

honeycomb, and by Seler, a food offering. It is almost precisely the

conventional representation of the clouds, as may be noted in the

interesting scene on Cod. Tro., p. 5*, where this object is placed upon

the earth, below which is the cloud symbol. Often it is yellowish, a

point which has been urged in proof that it is honey. Does it not mean

the golden-hued clouds of sunset, and the fire, the flame of the setting

sun, into which the Evening Star descends?

The sign _caban_, “downward,” naturally refers to the Earth.[82] Thither

sinks the star of evening to join the departed orb of day; hence this

star mythically becomes the Earth-goddess, the associate of the setting

sun. Cuculcan is very frequently depicted in relation to an old crone,

having, like himself, but one tooth, and, like himself, ever engaged in

kindly offices, good to men. She, I take it, is the Evening Star in her

epiphany as Mother Earth, source of life, ancestress of the race.

[Illustration: FIG. 21.—Monograms of the Bee God.]

[Illustration: FIG. 22.—Offerings to the Bee God.]

A striking verbal analogy supports this. In the Popol Vuh, the sacred

book of the Quiches, the “feathered serpent,” Gukumatz, is positively

said to be the bisexual principle of life represented by the male

Xpiyacoc and the female Xmucane, ancestor and ancestress of all that

is.[83] Here, _x-mucane_ is most likely the Quiche feminine form of

_muc_ (_ul_) _canan_, which is a Tzental name for the planet Venus, as I

have already mentioned.[84] My conclusion is, therefore, that the old

woman so frequently associated with Cuculcan is the Evening Star, in her

form as the Earth-Goddess. I shall recur to her on a later page.

I think all these representations of the bee should be interpreted as

indicating the movements of Venus, and the mythical conceptions with

which they were connected in the native mind.

_Representation of Ghanan, God of Growth and Fertility._—Bishop Nuñez de

la Vega tells us that in the calendar he discovered among the natives of

his diocese, the fourth “sign” or day corresponded to the Mexican

Centeotl, god of fertility and the maize harvests. This fourth day in

the Tzental calendar bore the name _Ghanan_, and on turning to the

Tzental Dictionary prepared by Father Lara, we find that _ghan_ is the

general term for the ear of maize; _aghan_, when the grains are still

soft.

His representations in the Codices are moderately frequent and quite

peculiar. They all present in a marked degree the flattening of the

forehead and prolongation of the occiput upward which is so striking in

many of the sculptures.

[Illustration: FIG. 23.—From the Head-dress of the God of Growth.]

Dr. Schellhas, indeed (who catalogues him as “God E”), is so impressed

by this that he argues that all such forms were imaginary, obtained by

the artists through copying the conventional drawings of an ear of maize

arranged as a head-dress. This, however, is going too far, as there is

evidence, derived from ancient skulls, that certain classes of Maya

priests used to have the head artificially flattened in this manner.[85]

Perhaps they were those destined for the service of this or similar

deities. The officiants on the Palenque “Tablet of the Cross,”

presenting offerings to the “tree of life,” are both deformed in this

manner.

The maize god is associated with symbols of food, of vegetable growth,

and of prosperity. He carries a vase or is drawing forth the contents of

one, Cod. Cort., p. 40; he is seen with the loom, Cod. Dres., p. 45, and

he generally has about him the _kan_ symbol, that of means and comfort.

_Representations of the Serpent Goddess._—One of the most striking

pictures in the Codices is the Serpent Goddess, whose familiar is the

rattlesnake, which she wears as a head-dress or as a girdle. She is

depicted as an old woman, her costume ample and often splendid,

decorated with embroidery and bells, with necklace and ear-rings of

jade.

In expression she is severe, her lips protrude in anger, and her hands

and feet sometimes end in claws. The sinister cross-bones sometimes

decorate her skirts. Her business is with water and the rains. She is

pouring from a vase (_Cod. Dres._, pp. 43, 67, 74); or water is flowing

from her armpits, hands, and mammæ; or she is ejecting it forcibly from

her mouth (_Cod. Tro._, pp. 25, 27, 34*).

She is, however, not always represented as in old age, or else there was

another serpent goddess in the mythology; for in a number of places a

similar serpentine head-dress is borne by a young woman who holds a vase

containing the rattles of the rattlesnake (_Cod. Dres._, pp. 15, 18); or

(ibid., p. 20), a figure which shows seven black dots. May this be a

sign of the constellation of the Pleiades, which in the Maya language

bore the same name as the rattles of the rattlesnake, _tzab_?

As to the signification of the serpent goddess, I think there can be no

question of it, from a study of her appearance, signs, and associations.

She was the _personification of the thunderstorm_. The vase she empties

is the descending torrent of rain, the rattles she carries are the

thunderclaps, her severe mien is the terror inspired by the din of the

elements. In Maya, the word for “thunder,” _pecchac_, is derived from

the noun _pec_, which means “a sound like that of a bell or rattle”

(_Dicc. Motul_).

_Representations of Xmucane._—A third goddess who can be clearly

distinguished is one with features of an old woman, her face wrinkled,

her mouth sunken, and but one tooth left in her lower jaw. She usually

wears her hair in a peculiar style, two wisps or ends of it twisted

above her head.

She does not appear in the Peresianus, and perhaps not in the Dresden

manuscript, but holds a prominent place in the Troanus and Cortesianus.

Her occupations are peaceable; she is weaving on a loom (C. Tro., p.

11), carrying a plate of cakes, etc. (Cod. Cortes., pp. 10, 11).

A Primer of Mayan Hieroglyphics · 第 3 / 9 段