Ie me suis peut-estre estendu plus que de raison à racõpter cecy; mais

ie me plais tant à racompter les traits de la prouidence particuliere

de Dieu, qu'il me se semble que tout le mõde y doit prendre plaisir;

& de fait s'il s'en fust retourné en France ceste annee là, nous

estions pour n'auancer gueres plus que les Reuerends Peres Recolets

en 10. ans. Dieu soit loüé de tout, voila donc à quoy se passa la

meilleure partie de l'hyuer. Outre ces occupatiõs ie n'ay point manqué

à mon tour d'aller les festes & Dimanches dire la Messe aux François,

ausquels i'ay fait exhortation toutes les fois que i'y ay esté: le

Pere Brebeuf de son costé en faisoit autant, & auons si bien auancé

par la grace de Dieu, que nous auons gaigné le coeur de tous ceux de

l'habitation, auons fait faire des confessions generales à la plus

part, & auons vescu en tres-bonne intelligence auec le Chef. Enuiron le

milieu du Caresme ie m'hazarday de prier le Capitaine de nous donner

les Charpentiers de l'habitation pour nous aider à dresser vne petite

cabane au lieu que nous auons commencé à défricher, ce qu'il m'accorda

auec beaucoup de courtoisie: les charpentiers ne souhaitoient [13] rien

tant que de trauailler pour nous; & de fait ils nous auoient donné

le mot auparauant: aussi trauaillerent-ils auec tant d'affection,

que nonobstant l'incommodité du temps & de la saison (car il y auoit

encore vn pied & demy de neige) ils eurent acheué nostre cabane le

Lundy de la semaine Saincte, & cependant ils cierent plus de 250.

aix, tant pour la couuerture, que pour le tour de la cabane; vingt

cheurons, & dolerent plus de vingt-cinq grosses pieces necessaires pour

l'erection de la cabane. Voila des commencemens assez heureux graces

à Dieu, ie ne sçay quel sera le progrés à cause de la continuation

de mes imperfections. Au reste parmy ces Sauuages nos vies ne sont

pas asseurées. Si quelque François leur a fait quelque déplaisir ils

s'en vengent par la mort du premier qu'ils rencontrent, sans auoir

esgard à plaisir aucun qu'ils ayent receu de celuy qu'ils attaquent.

S'ils ont songé la nuict qu'il faut qu'ils tuënt quelque François,

gar[d]e le premier qu'ils rencontrent à l'escart. Ils ajoustent grande

croyance à leurs songes. Quelques-vns deux vous diront deux iours

auparauant la venuë des vaisseaux l'heure à laquelle ils arriueront, &

ne vous diront autre chose sinon qu'ils l'ont veu en dormant. Ceux-la

sont en reputation parmy eux de parler au Diable. Leur conuersion ne

nous donnera pas peu d'affaire. Leur vie libertine & faineante, leur

esprit grossier, & qui ne peut guere comprendre, la disette des mots

qu'ils ont pour expliquer nos mysteres, n'ayans iamais eu aucun culte

diuin, nous exercera à bon escient. Mais pourtant nous ne perdons pas

courage graces à Dieu, appuyez sur cette verité, que Dieu n'aura pas

tant esgard au fruict que nous ferons, qu'à la bonne volonté & au

trauail que nous prendrons; & puis plus il y aura difficulté en leur

conuersion, & plus y aura-t'il de défiance de nous-mesmes; tant y a

que nostre esperance est en Dieu. Si ie puis ie me transporteray en

d'autres nations: si cela est, il ne faut plus attendre de nouuelles,

car ie seray si loin d'eux, qu'à grand peine pourray-ie leur écrire;

car au cas que cela arriue ie vous dy adieu & à tout le monde iusques

à ce que nous nous reuoyons au Ciel. N'oubliez pas les suffrages pour

nostre ame, & faites les de fois à autres. A tout hazard lors que

vous vous souuiendrez de nous en vos saincts sacrifices, dites pour

vn tel vif ou mort. Le secours qui nous est venu de France est vn

bon commencement pour cette Mission; mais les affaires [14] ne sont

pas encore en tel estat que Dieu puisse y estre seruy fidellement.

L'heretique y a autant encore d'empire que iamais, c'est pourquoy ie

renuoye le Pere Noiroit selon la permissiõ que les Superieurs m'en

ont faite, afin qu'il paracheue ce qu'il a commencé; il est le mieux

entendu en cette affaire. Si nos Peres desirent l'affermissement, &

le bon succes de cette Mission, il est du tout expedient qu'ils le

laissent faire. C'est bien à son corps defendant qu'il s'en retourne,

veu principalement qu'il est tant incommodé dessus la mer. I'enuoye

son compagnon auec le Pere Brebeuf à 300 lieux d'icy à vne de ces

nations qui sont stables en leur demeure, ils y seront bien tost s'ils

trouuent des Sauuages qui les y vueillent conduire, autrement ils

seront contraints de retourner vers nous; i'attends tous les iours

de leurs nouuelles. Ie viens d'apprendre tout maintenant qu'ils sont

partis. Le Diable qui craint la touche a voulu jouër des siennes, car

nos Peres estans desia embarquez, les Sauuages par deux ou trois fois

les voulurent faire desembarquer, alleguans que leurs canaux estoient

trop chargez; mais en fin Dieu l'emporta par dessus luy, on gaigna les

Sauuages à force de presents. S'il plaist à Dieu faire reüssir cette

mission, voila vne entrée dans des nations infinies pour ainsi dire,

qui sont tousiours stables en leur demeure. I'eusse bien desiré estre

de la partie, mais nos Peres ne l'ont pas iugé à propos, iugeans qu'il

estoit necessaire que ie demeurasse icy, tant pour l'éstablissement

de nostre petit domicille, que pour l'entretien des François. Vostre

R. s'estonnera peut-estre de ce que i'ay enuoyé le P. Brebeuf qui

auoit desia quelque commencement à la langue de cette nation, mais

les talents que Dieu luy a departy m'y ont fait resoudre; le fruict

que l'on attend de ces natiõs là estant bien autre que celuy que l'on

espere de celle cy. S'il plaist à Dieu benir leurs trauaux nous aurons

grand besoin d'ouuriers; les dispositions du costé des Sauuages sont

telles, qu'on en peut esperer quelque chose de bon. Le truchement ayant

demandé en ma presence à l'vn de leurs Capitaines s'ils seroi[~e]t tous

contens que quelques-vns des nostres allassent demeurer en leur pays

pour leur apprendre à cognoistre Dieu, il respondit qu'il ne falloit

demander cela & qu'ils ne souhaittoient rien tant, puis ayant consideré

la maison des Recollets où nous estions, il adiousta qu'à la verité

ils ne pourroient pas nous bastir vne maison de pierre semblable à

celle-là, [15] mais demandés leur, dit-il au truchement, s'ils seroient

contans de trouuer à leur arriuee vne cabane faicte semblable aux

nostres. Il ne pouuoit nous tesmoigner plus d'affection; De plus il y

a eu de la sterilité dans leur pays cette année, & ils l'attribuent à

cause qu'ils n'y ont point eu de Religieux, tout cela nous fait bien

esperer. Pour ceux de cette Nation ie les ay fait sommer de respondre,

s'ils ne vouloient pas se faire instruire; & nous donner leurs enfans

pour le mesme sujet: ils nous ont tous respondu qu'ils le desiroient.

Ils attendent que nous ayons basty, c'est à nous cependant de mesnager

leur affection & apprendre bien leur langue. Au demeurant ie supplirois

volontiers ceux qui ont de l'affection pour ce pays, qu'ils ne se

dégoustassent point s'ils n'entendent promptement des nouuelles du

fruict que l'on espere. La conuersion des Sauuages demande du temps.

Les premieres six ou sept annees sembleront steriles à quelques vns.

Et si i'adioustois iusqu'à dix ou douze, possible ne m'éloigneroisie

pas de la verité. Mais est ce à dire pourtãt qu'il faille tout quitter

là? Ne faut-il pas des cõmencemens par tout? Ne faut-il pas des

dispositions pour arriuer où on pretend? Quand à moy ie vous confesse

que Dieu me fait cette misericorde, qu'encor que ie n'esperasse aucun

profit tout le temps qu'il luy plaira me conseruer en vie, pourueu

qu'il eust nos trauaux agreables, & qu'il voulust s'en seruir comme de

preparation pour ceux qui viendront apres nous, ie me tiendrois trop

heureux d'employer & ma vie & mes forces, & n'épargner rien de ce qui

seroit en mon pouuoir, non pas mesme mon sang pour semblable suiet.

Neantmoins si nos Superieurs ne sont point d'aduis qu'on passe outre,

me voicy tout prés de me sousmettre à leur volonté, & suiure leur

iugement. Voicy vn petit Huron qui s'en va vous voir, il est passionné

de voir la France. Il nous affectionne grandement & fait paroistre vn

grand desir d'estre instruict; neantmoins le pere & le Capitaine de la

nation, le veulent reuoir l'an prochain, nous asseurant que s'il est

contant il le nous donnera pour quelques annees. Il est fort important

de le bien contenter; car si vne fois cet enfant est bien instruit,

voila vne partie ouuerte pour entrer en beaucoup de nations où il

seruira grandement. Et tout à propos le truchement de cetre [cette]

nation la est retourn[é] en France. Truchement qu'il aime tant, qu'il

l'appelle son pere. Ie prie nostre Seigneur qu'il luy plaise benir le

voyage. Au reste ie remercie V. R. du courage [16] qu'elle m'a donné.

I'ay leu ses lettres, quatre ou cinq fois; mais ie n'ay peu gaigner

sur moy que ce n'ait esté la larme à l'oeil, pour plusieurs raisons,

mais specialement sur la souuenance de mes imperfections (_coram Deo

loquor_) qui m'éloignent grandement, du merite de cette vocation, & me

fait viuement apprehender que ie n'aille trauerser les desseins de la

grace de Dieu, en l'établissement du Christianisme en ce pays. Apres

cela ie ne crains rien. Ie vous supplie en vertu de ce que vous aimez

mieux dans le Ciel, de ne vous lasser point de solliciter la diuine

bonté, ou qu'il me face la grace de m'en défaire, ou si mon idignité

est venuë iusques là qu'il m'y faille encore tremper, que ce ne soit au

preiudice de nos pauures Sauuages; que ma misere n'empesche point les

effects de sa misericorde, & le desordre de ma volonté fragile, l'ordre

que sa bonté veut établir en ce pays. Nous continuons plus que iamais

les bonnes intelligences auec le Pere Ioseph, qui est icy l'vnique

Prestre de son Ordre, l'vn estant allé auec nos Peres aux Hurons; &

l'autre s'en retournant en France; il a deux bons freres auec luy. Mr.

Champlain est tousiours fort affectionné en nostre endroit, m'a pris

pour directeur de sa conscience, aussi bien que Gaumont, duquel i'auray

vn soin particulier selon les recommandations de vostre R. L'aduis que

vostre R. me donne touchant la dedicace de nostre premiere Eglise, est

fort conforme à ma deuotion si les Superieurs m'en laissent la liberté,

elle ne sera iamais appellee autrement que N. Dame des Anges; c'est

pourquoy ie supplie V. R. de nous faire auoir quelque beau Tableau

enuironné d'Anges. C'est vne des grãdes Festes des PP. Recolets, qui

ont dedié leur Chappelle à S. Charles; & la Riuiere sur laquelle, eux

& nous; sommes logez, s'appelle la riuiere S. Charles, ainsi nõmee

quelque temps auparauant que nous vinsiõs. Pour les lettres ie ne pense

pas auoir obmis personne, tant de nos bien-faiteurs plus signalez, que

de ceux qui m'ont escrit. Aussi vous confessay je que ie suis vn peu

las; voicy la 68 & si ce n'est pas la derniere. Plaise à nostre bon

Dieu que le tout soit à sa gloire. Nostre R. P. Assistant se monstre

fort affectiõné à ceste Mission; ie luy enuoye vne charte de ce pays,

asseurant que ie demeureray toute ma vie, de Vostre Reuerence,

Seruiteur tres-affectionné en N Seigneur

CHARLES L'ALLEMANT.

A Kebec ce 1.

d'Aoust 1626.

I have, perhaps, dwelt longer upon this than was necessary, but

I am so pleased to relate the special acts of God's providence,

as it seems to me every one must take pleasure in them; and in

fact, if he had gone back to France that year, we would have made

hardly any more progress than the Reverend Recolet Fathers did in

10 years. May God be praised for all! In this way we passed the

greater part of the winter. Besides these occupations, I, in

my turn, have not failed to go, on holydays and Sundays, to say

Mass for the French, to whom I have made an exhortation every time

I have been there. Father Brebeuf did the same on his part; and,

by the grace of God, we have made such progress that we have won

the hearts of all the people of the settlement, and have induced

most of them to make general confessions, and have lived on good

terms with the Chief. About the middle of Lent, I ventured to

ask the Captain to give us the Carpenters of the settlement to

help us erect a little cabin at the place we had begun to clear

away, and he very courteously granted my request. The carpenters

asked for [13] nothing better than to work for us, and in fact

they had previously given us their promise; so they worked with

such good will, that, notwithstanding the unfavorableness of the

weather and of the season (for there was still a foot and a half

of snow), they had finished our cabin by Monday of Holy week; and

besides, they had sawed over 250 planks, both for the roof and for

the sides of the cabin, twenty rafters, and hewn over twenty-five

large pieces necessary for the erection of the cabin. These are

very happy beginnings, thank God; but, considering my imperfections

still continue, I do not know how much progress will be made.

Further, there is no security for our lives among these Savages.

If a Frenchman has in some way offended them, they take revenge

by killing the first one they meet, without any regard for favors

which they may have received from the one whom they attack. If

during the night they dream they must kill a Frenchman, woe to the

first one whom they meet alone. They attach great faith to their

dreams. Some of them will tell you two days before the coming of

a ship the hour of its arrival, and will give no other explanation

except that they have seen it while asleep. These are reputed

among them to have intercourse with the Devil. Their conversion

will give us no little trouble. Their licentious and lazy lives,

their rude and untutored minds, able to comprehend so little, the

scarcity of words they have to explain our mysteries, never having

had any form of divine worship, will tax our wits. And yet we do

not lose courage, thank God; trusting in this truth, that God will

not have so much regard to the fruits that we produce, as to our

good will and the trouble we take; and besides, the greater the

difficulty in their conversion, and the more distrust we have in

ourselves, so much the greater will be our trust in God. If I can,

I shall go among some of the other tribes; and, in that event, no

further news need be expected from me, because I shall be so far

away that it will be very hard to communicate with you; and if

that should happen, I say farewell to you and to every one until

we meet in Heaven. Do not forget the prayers for our souls, and

make them from time to time. In any case when you remember us

in your holy sacrifices, offer them up for such and such a one,

living or dead. The help which has reached us from France is a good

beginning for this Mission, but things [14] are not yet in such

a condition that God can be faithfully served here. The heretic

holds as complete dominion here as ever, and therefore I send back

Father Noiroit, according to the permission that I have received

from the Superiors, in order that he may finish what he has begun;

he is the most capable one for this affair. If our Fathers wish

the strengthening and the success of this Mission, it is by all

means proper that they should allow him to proceed.[32] He returns

very much against his inclination, principally on account of his

sufferings upon the sea. I send his companion[31] with Father

Brebeuf, 300 leagues from here, to one of those tribes which has a

permanent location. They will soon be there if they find Savages

to conduct them, otherwise they will be obliged to return here; I

am expecting news from them daily. I have just learned that they

have gone. The Devil, who feared their approach, tried to play

some of his tricks on them, for, when our Fathers had embarked,

the Savages tried two or three times to make them go ashore,

asserting that their canoes were too heavily loaded; but at last

God triumphed over him, and the Savages were won by means of

presents. If it please God to give success to this mission, it will

open a way, so to speak, to an infinite number of tribes which have

permanent settlements. I should have been very glad to be one of

the party; but our Fathers did not deem it expedient, considering

it well that I should remain here, both for the establishment of

our little home and for the welfare of the French. Your Reverence

will be astonished, perhaps, at my having sent Father Brebeuf, who

already had some knowledge of the language of this tribe; but the

talents that God has given him influenced me, the fruits which are

expected from those tribes being very different from those hoped

for here. If it please God to bless their labors, we shall have

great need of workers; the disposition on the part of the Savages

is such that something good may be looked for. When the interpreter

asked one of their Captains in my presence, if they would all

be glad if some one of us should go among them to teach them to

know God, he answered that it was not necessary to ask that, that

they desired nothing better; then, having examined the house of

the Recollets where we were, he added that they indeed could not

build us a stone house like that one; [15] "But ask them," said he

to the interpreter, "if they will be satisfied upon their arrival

to find a cabin made similar to ours." He could not manifest more

affection for us than he did. Moreover, there was a drought in

their country this year, and they attributed it to the fact that

they had no Religious among them; all this gives us strong hopes.

As to the people of this Tribe, I had them called together to say

whether they wanted to be instructed, and to give us their children

for the same purpose. They all answered that they did. They are

waiting for us to build; and it is for us, in the meantime, to

cultivate their affection and to learn their language. Meanwhile,

I would request those who are interested in this country not

to be disappointed if they do not promptly receive news of the

hoped-for converts. The conversion of the Savages takes time. The

first six or seven years will appear sterile to some; and, if I

should say ten or twelve, I would possibly not be far from the

truth. But is that any reason why all should be abandoned? Are

not beginnings necessary everywhere? Are not preparations needed

for the attainment of every object? For my part, I confess that,

if God shows me mercy, although I expect no fruits as long as it

will please him to preserve my life, provided that our labors are

acceptable to him, and that he may be pleased to make use of them

as a preparation for those who will come after us, I shall hold

myself only too happy to employ my life and my strength, and to

spare nothing in my power, not even my blood, for such a purpose.

However, if our Superiors do not think we should go farther, I

am ready to submit to their will and to follow their judgment. A

little Huron is going to see you; he longs to see France. He is

very fond of us and manifests a strong desire to be instructed;

nevertheless, his father and the Captain of the nation wishes to

see him next year, assuring us that, if he is satisfied, he will

give him to us for some years. It is of importance that he should

be thoroughly satisfied; for, if this child is once instructed,

it will open the way to many tribes where he will be very useful.

And the return of the interpreter of that tribe to France is very

opportune,--the Interpreter whom he loves so much, that he calls

him his father. I pray our Lord to be pleased to bless his voyage.

I also thank Your Reverence for the courage [16] you have given

me. I have read your letters four or five times, and I have not

been able to keep the tears from my eyes for several reasons;

but especially in reflecting upon my imperfections (_coram Deo

loquor_) which are far from the merit necessary for this vocation,

and inspire me with grave fears that I am opposing the purposes of

God's grace in the establishment of Christianity in this country.

After that, I fear nothing. I beseech you, in the name of all

you hold most dear in Heaven, not to become weary in appealing

to the divine goodness, either to do me the favor of removing me

from here, or, if my unworthiness is so great that I must yet be

chastened, let it not be to the disadvantage of our poor Savages;

let not my shortcomings prevent the effects of his mercy, nor my

weak will be a hindrance to the order that his goodness wishes

to establish in this country. Our sympathetic relations with Father

Joseph[26] are stronger than ever. He is the only Priest of his

Order here, one having gone with our Fathers to the Hurons, and the

other now returning to France; he has two good brothers with him.

Mr. Champlain is always very kind to us, and has chosen me as his

confessor. Gaumont has done the same, and I shall take special care

of him, according to the recommendations of your Reverence. The

advice which your Reverence gives me in regard to the dedication

of our first Church, is in thorough harmony with my views. If the

Superiors leave it to me, it will never be otherwise named than

"N. Dame des Anges." Therefore I beg Your Reverence to send us a

beautiful Picture surrounded by Angels. It is one of the great Fête

days of the Recolet Fathers, who have dedicated their Chapel to St.

Charles; the River upon which they and we live is called the river

St. Charles, so called some time before our arrival. As to sending

letters, I think I have not passed over any one, either of our

well-known benefactors or any of those who have written to me; and

I confess to you that I am a little tired; this is the 68th, and it

is not the last. May it please our good God that everything may be

done here for his glory. Our Reverend Father Assistant manifests a

great deal of affection for this Mission; I send him a map of this

country. With assurances that I will be, during my life, of Your

Reverence,

The very affectionate servant in Our Lord,

CHARLES L'ALLEMANT.

Kebec, this 1st of

August, 1626.

XIX

CHARLES LALEMANT'S

Lettre au R.P. Supérieur du Collége des Jésuites à Paris

BORDEAUX: Nouembre 22, 1629

SOURCE: The Title-page and Avant-Propos follow O'Callaghan's Reprint,

No. 3; but the Text has been compared with the original publication

in Champlain's _Voyages_ (Paris, 1632), part ii., pp. 275-279. The

bracketed pagination in the Text is that of Champlain.

LETTRE

du Reuerend

PÈRE L'ALLEMAND,

_Supérieur de la Mission des Pères Iésuites_,

en la

_NOUUELLE FRANCE_

Enuoyée de Bordeaux au R.P. Supérieur du Collége des Iésuites à PARIS,

et datée du 22 _Nouembre_, 1629.

[Illustration]

Imprimée d'après l'exemplaire que l'on trouve dans les Voyages du

Sieur Champlain.

A PARIS,

M. DC. XXXII.

LETTER

from the Reverend

FATHER L'ALLEMAND,

_Superior of the Mission of Jesuit Fathers_,

in

_NEW FRANCE_

Sent from Bordeaux to the Reverend Father Superior of the Jesuit

College at PARIS,

and dated 22nd _November_, 1629.

Reprinted from the copy to be found in the Voyages of

Sieur Champlain.

PARIS,

M. DC. XXXII.

Avant-Propos.

L_E R. Père CHARLES LALLEMANT, qui a écrit la Lettre suivante, entra

à l'âge de vingt ans dans la Compagnie de Jésus. En 1613, il avait

accompagné M. de la Saussaye, à Pentagouët. Argal s'étant emparé de

cet établissemement, le P. Lallemant s'en retourna en France, d'où il

partit pour le Canada en 1625. C'estoit la première fois que des Pères

Jésuites entrerent dans ce Pays. Quelques années aprés, il fût envoyé

avec le P. Philibert Noyrot, Procureur de la Mission, chercher en

France du secours pour la Colonie, et ayant trouvé de quoi fretter un

batiment avec des vivres, ils s'y étoient embarqués vers la fin du mois

de Juillet, 1629. Le vaisseau fit naufrage sur la côte de l'Acadie, et

c'est de cet naufrage et d'autres événements qui suivirent que traitte

la presente lettre._ [O'Callaghan.]

Preface.

T_HE Reverend Father CHARLES LALLEMANT, who wrote the following

Letter, entered the Society of Jesus at the age of twenty years.

In 1613, he accompanied M. de la Saussaye to Pentagoüet.[44] Argal

took possession of this settlement, and Father Lallemant returned

to France, whence he departed for Canada in 1625. This was the

first time that the Jesuit Fathers had entered that Country.

Several years later, he was sent with Father Philibert Noyrot,

Agent for the Mission, to France, to seek aid for the Colony;

and, having secured the means to load a ship with supplies,

they embarked upon it toward the end of July, 1629. The ship

was wrecked upon the Acadian coast; and it is this shipwreck

and other subsequent events that the present letter describes._

[O'Callaghan.]

Lettre du Reuerend P. l'Allemand, au R.P. Supérieur, à Paris.

[275] A_ÃYT sejourné deux iours à Dieppe ie m'acheminay à Rouën, où ie

m'arrestay deux autres iours, & appris comme le vaisseau des Reuerends

Peres l'Allemand & Noyrot s'estoient perdus vers les Isles de Canseau,

& me fit-on voir vne lettre dudit Reuerend Pere l'Allemand, Superieur

de la Mission des Peres Iesuites, en la nouuelle France, enuoyée de

Bordeaux au R.P. Superieur du College des Iesuites à Paris, & dattée du

22. Nouembre 1629. comme il s'ensuit._ [Champlain.]

Letter from the Reverend Father l'Allemand to the Reverend Father

Superior, at Paris.

[275] A_FTER having sojourned two days at Dieppe, I journeyed to

Rouën, where I remained two more days, and learned how the ship of

the Reverend Fathers l'Allemand and Noyrot had been wrecked upon

the Canseau Islands; and I was shown a letter from the Reverend

Father l'Allemand, Superior of the Mission of the Jesuit Fathers

in new France, sent from Bordeaux to the Reverend Father Superior

of the Jesuit College at Paris, and dated November 22nd, 1629, as

follows._ [Champlain.]

[276] MON REVEREND PERE,

Pax Christi.

Castigans castigauit me Dominus & morti non tradidit me, _Chastiment

qui m'a esté d'autant plus sensible que le naufrage a estè accompagné

de la mort du R.P. Noyrot & de nostre frere Louys, deux hõmes qui

deuoient, ce me semble grandem[~e]t seruir à nostre Seminaire. Or

neantmoins puis que Dieu a disposé de la sorte, il nous faut chercher

nos contentements dans ses sainctes volontez, hors desquelles il n'y

eut iamais esprit solide ny content, & ie m'asseure que l'experience

aura fait voir à vostre reuerence que l'amertume de nos ressentiments

détrempée dans la douceur du bon plaisir de Dieu, auquel vne ame

s'attache inseparablement, perd (ou le tout) ou la meilleure partie

de son fiel; Si que s'il reste encore quelques souspirs pour les

souffrances, ou passées ou presentes, ce n'est que pour aspirer

dauantage vers le Ciel, & perfectionner auec merite ceste conformité

dans laquelle l'ame a pris resolution de passer le reste de ses iours;

De quatre des nostres que nous estions dans la barque, Dieu partageant

à l'esgal, en a pris deux, & a laissé les deux autres. Ces deux bons

Religieux tresbien disposez & resignez à la mort, seruiront de victime

pour appaiser la colere de Dieu iustement iettée contre nous pour nos

deffauts, & pour nous rendre deformais sa bonté fauorable au succeds du

dessein entrepris._

[276] MY REVEREND FATHER,

The peace of Christ be with you.

Castigans castigavit me Dominus & morti non tradidit me, _a

Chastisement all the more keenly felt by me, as the shipwreck was

accompanied by the death of the Reverend Father Noyrot and of our

brother Louys,[20] two men who were destined, it seems to me, to

be of great service to our Seminary. But nevertheless, since God

has so ordained, we must seek our consolation in his holy will,

outside of which there never was a peaceful or contented mind; and

I feel sure that experience will have shown your reverence that the

bitterness of our grief, tempered with the sweetness of doing the

will of God, to whom a soul is inseparably attached, loses (either

all) or the greater part of its sting. And yet, if there still

remain some sighs for the sufferings either of the past or of the

present, it is only to make us aspire more earnestly to Heaven, and

to perfect with merit this harmony in which the soul is determined

to pass the rest of its days. Of the four of us who were in the

barque, God equally divided them, taking two and leaving two. These

two good Religious, who were thoroughly prepared and resigned to

die, will serve as victims to appease the wrath of God, justly

provoked against us for our shortcomings, and to cause him to grant

in the future his goodness, that it may be favorable to the success

of the project undertaken._

_Ce qui nous perdit fut vn grand coup de vent de Suest, qui s'efleua

lors que nous estions à la riue des terres, vent si impetueux que

quelque soin & diligence que peust apporter nostre Pilote auec ses

Matelots, Quelques voeux & prieres que nous peussions faire pour

destourner ce coup, iamais nous ne peusmes faire en sorte que nous

n'allassions heurter contre les rochers: ce fut le 26. iour d'apres

nostre depart, iour de sainct Barthelemy, enuiron sur les neuf heures

du soir; De 24. que nous estions dans la barque, dix seulement

eschapperent, les autres furent estouffez dans les eaux. Les deux

nepueux du Pere Noyrot tindrent compagnie à leur oncle, leurs corps

ont esté enterrez,_ [277] _entre autres celuy du P. Noyrot & de

nostre frere, des sept autres nous n'en auons eu aucune nouuelles,

quelque recherche que nous en ayons peu faire. De vous dire comment

le Pere de Vieuxpont & moy auons eschappé du naufrage, il me seroit

bien difficille, & croy que Dieu seul en a cognoissance, qui suiuans

les desseins de sa diuine prouid[~e]ce nous a preseruez, car pour

mon regard ne iugeant pas dans les apparences humaines qu'il me fust

possible d'éuiter ce danger, i'auois pris resolution de me tenir dans

la chambre du nauire auec nostre frere Louys, nous disposans tous

deux à receuoir le coup de la mort, qui ne pouuoit tarder plus de

trois_ Miserere, _lors que i'entendis qu'on m'appelloit sur le haut

du nauire, ie croyois que c'estoit quelqu'vn qui auoit affaire de mon

secours, ie montay en haut, & trouuay que c'estoit le P. Noyrot qui

me demandoit derechef l'absolution: Apres luy auoir donnée, & chanté

tous ensemble le_ Salue Regina, _ie fus contrainct de demeurer en

haut; car de descendre il n'y auoit plus de moyen, la mer estoit si

haute, & le vent si furieux, qu'en moins de rien le costé qui panchoit

sur le rocher fut mis en pieces, i'estois proche du P. Noirot lors

qu'vn coup de mer vint si impetueusement donner contre le costé sur

lequel nous estions qui rompit tout, & me separa du P. Noyrot, de la

bouche duquel i'entendis ces dernieres paroles_, In manus tuas Domine,

&c. _Pour moy de ce coup ie me trouuay engagé entre quatre pieces de

bois, deux desquelles me donnerent si rudement contre la poictrine,

& les deux autres me briserent si fort le dos que ie croyois mourir

auparauant que d'estre enueloppé des flots, mais voicy vn autre coup

de mer qui me desengageant de ces bois m'enleua, & mon bonnet & mes

pantoufles, & mist le reste du nauire tout à plat dans la mer: Ie

tombay heureusement sur vne planche que ie n'abandonnay point, de

rencontre elle estoit liée auec le reste du coste de ce nauire. Nous

voilà doncques à la mercy des flots, qui ne nous espargnoient point;

ains s'esleuans ie ne sçay combien de couldées au dessus de nous,

tomboient par apres sur nos testes. Apres auoir flotté longtemps de

la sorte dans l'obscurité de la nuict, qui estoit desia commencée,

regardant à l'entour de moy ie m'apperceus que nous estions enfermez

d'espines & sur tout enuironnez & prest du costau qui sembloit vne

isle, puis regardant vn peu plus attentiuement ie contay six personnes

qui n'estoient pas fort esloignées de moy, deux desquels m'apperceuans

m'exciterent à faire tous mes efforts pour m'approcher, ce ne_ [278]

_fut pas sans peine, car les coups que i'auois receus dans le debris

du vaisseau m'auoient fort affoiblis: Ie fis tant neantmoins, qu'auec

mes planches i'arriuay au lieu où ils estoient, & auec leur secours

ie me trouuay assis sur le grand mast, qui tenait encore ferme auec

vne partie du vaisseau, ie n'y fus pas long-temps car comme nous

approchions plus prés de cette isle, nos Matelots se lancerent

bien-tost à terre, & auec leur assistance tous ceux qui estoient sur

le costé du nauire y furent bien tost apres. Nous voilà donc sept de

compagnie, ie n'auois bonnet ny souliers, ma soutane & habits estoient

tous deschirez, & si moulus de coups que ie ne pouuois me soustenir, &

de faict il fallut qu'on me soustint pour aller iusques dans le bois,

aussi auois-ie receu deux rudes coups aux deux jambes, mais sur tout à

la dextre, dont ie me ressens encore, les mains fenduës auec quelque

contusion, la hanche escorchée, la poitrine sur tout fort offencée,

nous nous retirasmes donc tous sept dans le bois, moüillez comme ceux

qui venoient d'estre trempez dans la mer: la premiere chose que nous

fismes fut de remercier Dieu de ce qu'il nous auoit preseruez, & puis

le prier pour ceux qui pourroi[~e]t estre morts. Cela faict pour nous

eschauffer nous nous couchasmes les vns proches des autres, la terre

& l'herbe qui auoient esté moüillez de la pluye du iour n'estoient

encore propre pour nous seicher, nous passasmes ainsi le reste de la

nuict, pendant laquelle le P. de Vieuxpont (qui graces à Dieu n'estoit

point offencé) dormit fort bien. Le l'endemain si tost qu'il fut iour

nous allasmes recognoistre le lieu où nous estions, & trouuasmes que

c'estoit vne isle de laquelle nous pouuions passer à la terre ferme,

sur le riuage nous trouuasmes force choses que la mer y auoit ietté,

i'y trouuay deux pantoufles, vn bonnet, vn chappeau, vne soutanne, &

plusieurs autres choses necessaires. Sur tout Dieu nous y enuoya pour

viures cinq bariques de vin, quelques dix pieces de lard, de l'huile,

du pain, des fromages, & vne harquebuse, & de la pouldre tout à propos

pour faire du feu. Apres qu'on eut ainsi tout retiré, le iour de sainct

Louys tous s'employerent à faire le possible pour bastir vne chalouppe

du desbris du vaisseau, auec laquelle nous irions rangeant la coste

chercher quelque nauire de pescheurs: On se mit doncques à trauailler

auec meschans ferremens que l'on trouua, elle estoit bien aduancée le

quatriesme iour, lors que nous eusmes cognoissance d'vne chalouppe qui

estoit sous voile venant vers le lieu où nous estions, ils receurent

dedans vn de nos matelots qui alla tout seul plus proche du lieu_ [279]

_où elle deuoit passer, ils le menerent dans leur vaisseau parler au

Maistre, auquel il racõta nostre disgrace, le maistre tout aussi-tost

s'embarqua dans vne chalouppe & nous vint trouuer, nous offrit à tous

le passage: Nous voila en asseurance, car le lendemain tous les hommes

coucherent dans son vaisseau: C'estoit vn vaisseau Basque qui faisoit

pesche â vne lieuë & demie du rocher, où nous fismes naufrage, & pour

autãt qu'il restoit encores bien du temps pour acheuer leur pesche,

nous demeurasmes auec eux ce qui restoit du mois d'Aoust, & tout le

mois de Septembre. Le premier d' Octobre arriua vn Sauuage qui dist au

Maistre que s'il ne s'en alloit il y auroit danger que les Anglois ne

le surprissent. Cette nouvelle le disposa au depart: Le mesme Sauuage

nous dist que le Capitaine Daniel estoit â vingt-cinq lieuës de là qui

bastissoit vne maison, & y laissoit des François auec vn de nos Peres:

Cela me donna occasion de dire au P. de Vieuxpont qui me pressoit fort

que ie luy accordasse de demeurer auec ce Sauuage dans ceste coste,

qui estoit bien l'vn des meilleurs Sauuages qui se puisse rencontrer,

Mon Pere voicy le moyen de contenter vostre reuerence, le Pere Vimond

fera bien aise d'auoir vn compagnon. Ce Sauuage s'offre de mener

vostre Reuerence iusques au lieu où est Monsieur Daniel, si elle veut

demeurer là elle y demeurera, si elle veut aller quelque mois auec les

Sauuages, pour apprendre la langue elle le pourra faire, & ainsi le R.

Pere Vimond & vostre Reuerence auront leur contentement: le bon Pere

fut extresmement ioyeux de ceste occasion qui se presentoit, ainsi il

s'embarque dans la chalouppe du Sauuage, ie luy laissay tout ce que

nous auions sauué, horsmis le grand Tableau duquel le matelot Basque

s'estoit saisi, mais i'auois bien pensé au retour de luy faire rendre,

si vne autre disgrace ne nous fut arriuée. Nous partismes donc de la

coste le 6. Octobre, & apres auoir enduré de si furieuses tempestes

que nous n'auions encores experim[~e]tées, le quarantiesme iour de

nostre depart entrãt dãs vn port proche de S. Sebasti[~e], nous fismes

de rechef vn second naufrage, le Nauire rompu en mille piéces, toute

la moluë perduë, ce que ie peus faire ce fut de me sauuer dans vne

chalouppe, dans laquelle ie me iettay auec des pantoufles aux pieds, &

vn bonnet de nuict en teste, & en ceste esquippage m'en aller trouuer

nos Peres à S. Sebastien, d'où ie partis il y a huict iours, & suis

arriué à Bourdeuac proche de Bordeaux le 20. de ce mois. Voila le

succeds de nostre voyage, par lequel vostre Reuerence peut iuger des

obligations que i'ay à D I E V._

_Our wreck was caused by a heavy gust of wind from the Southeast,

which arose when we were near the shore,--a wind so strong that

in spite of all the diligence of our Pilot and his Sailors, and

the vows and prayers which we made to avert the disaster, we could

not avoid striking upon the rocks. This was on the 26th day after

our departure, saint Barthelemy's day, about nine o'clock in the

evening. Of the 24 who were in the barque, ten only escaped, the

others being suffocated in the water. The two nephews of Father

Noyrot kept company with their uncle, and there the bodies were

buried,_ [277] _among others that of Father Noyrot and our brother;

of the seven others we have no tidings, notwithstanding the search

that has been made. It would be difficult for me to tell you how

Father de Vieuxpont[45] and I escaped shipwreck, and I believe it

is known only to God, who, in harmony with the purposes of his

divine providence, has preserved us; for in regard to myself, not

thinking it within the bounds of human possibility that I could

escape this danger, I had resolved to remain in the ship's cabin

with our brother Louys. We were preparing ourselves to meet death,

which could not be farther away than three_ Miserere's, _when I

heard some one call me on the deck of the ship. I thought it might

be some one who was planning my rescue. I went up and found it

was Father Noyrot, who asked me to again give him absolution. After

having given it to him, and having all sung together the_ Salve

Regina, _I was obliged to remain above, for there was no means of

descending; the sea being so high and the wind so furious, that,

in less than no time, the side which leaned toward the rocks was

broken in pieces. I was near Father Noyrot, when a wave struck the

ship so hard on the side where we were that it broke everything,

separating me from Father Noyrot, from whose lips I heard these

last words_: In manus tuas Domine, &c. _I found myself after this

blow entangled in four pieces of wood, two of which struck me so

hard on the chest and the other two hit me so heavily upon the

back, that I thought I should die before being engulfed in the

waves; but then came another sea, which, freeing me from these

pieces of wood, carried me off, and my cap and slippers, and

scattered the rest of the ship over the sea. Fortunately, I fell

upon a plank to which I clung, and which happened to be attached

to the rest of the side of the ship. We were then at the mercy

of the waves, which did not spare us, but which rose, I know not

how many cubits above us, and then fell forward over our heads.

After having floated about a long time in this manner, in the

darkness of the night, which had already set in, looking around

me I saw that we were surrounded on all sides by pine trees, and

everywhere environed by, and near the shores of what seemed to

be an island; then examining a little more closely I counted six

persons who were not far from me, two of whom noticed me, and

motioned for me to try and come near them. This_ [278] _was not

without difficulty, for the blows I had received from the debris

of the ship had weakened me. I did so well, however, that with

the aid of my planks, I reached the place where they were, and,

with their assistance, I found myself sitting upon the mainmast,

which was still firmly fastened to a part of the ship. I did not

remain there long, for as we neared the island our Sailors soon

leaped to the land; and, with their assistance, all those who were

on the side of the ship were soon brought to the shore. There

were then seven of us together; I had neither cap nor shoes, my

cassock and clothes were all torn, and I was so bruised by blows

from the wreck, that I could not stand up; and, in fact, some one

had to support me while I was trying to reach the woods; for I

had received two hard blows upon both legs, but especially upon

the right one, which I still feel; my hands were cut and bruised,

the flesh torn from my hips; above all I was badly wounded in the

chest. All seven of us withdrew into the woods, as wet as those who

have just been soaked in the sea. The first thing we did was to

thank God for having preserved us, and then we prayed to him for

those who might be dead. This done, we lay down very near to each

other to keep warm; the ground and the grass, which had been wet

by the rain of the previous day, were not yet in a condition to

dry us; thus we spent the rest of the night, during which Father

de Vieuxpont (who, thank God, was unharmed) slept well. The next

morning, at day-break, we reconnoitered the place where we were,

and discovered that it was an island, from which we could go to the

mainland. We found many things upon the shore that had been thrown

up by the sea; I found there two slippers, a cap, a hat, a cassock,

and several other necessary articles. Best of all, God sent us as

food, five barrels of wine, about ten pieces of lard; oil, bread,

and cheese; also an arquebuse, powder, and everything necessary

to make a fire. After having drawn all these upon the shore, on

saint Louis's day, everybody went to work in earnest to build a

boat out of the wreck of the ship, in which we might sail along

the coast in search of some fishing boat. So we began to work with

the poor tools at our disposal, and considerable progress was made

by the fourth day, when we learned of a boat under sail, coming

towards the place where we were. They received on board one of our

sailors, who went alone to the place_ [279] _near which it was to

pass. They took him into their ship to speak with their Captain,

to whom he related our misfortune. The captain immediately entered

a boat and came in search of us, offering a passage to all of us.

Behold us then in safety, for the next night we all slept in his

ship. It was a Basque, which was fishing a league and a half from

the rock where we were wrecked; and, as they would not finish their

fishing for some time, we stayed with them during the remainder of

the month of August and the entire month of September. On the first

of October a Savage arrived, and told the Master that if he did not

leave he would be in danger of being surprised by the English. This

news decided his departure. The same Savage told us that Captain

Daniel[46] was twenty-five leagues away, and was building a house,

and that he had left the French with one of our Fathers there.

This led me to say to Father de Vieuxpont, who urged me earnestly

to permit him to remain with this Savage upon this coast, for he

was one of the best Savages that could be found; "My Father, here

is the way we can satisfy your reverence; Father Vimond[47] will

be very happy to have a companion. This Savage offers to conduct

your Reverence to the place where Monsieur Daniel is; if you wish

to remain there, you may do so; if you wish to go to spend a

few months with the Savages to learn their language, you may do

so; and so the Reverend Father Vimond and your Reverence will

be satisfied." The good Father was very happy at this opportunity

which offered itself, so he embarked in the Savage's boat. I gave

him all that we had saved, except the large Painting, which the

Basque sailor had taken possession of; but I had intended to make

him surrender it upon our return, if another misfortune had not

overtaken us. So we left the coast on the 6th of October; and

after having suffered the most furious tempests that we had yet

experienced, we entered, the fortieth day after our departure, the

port near St. Sebastien, where we were wrecked a second time, the

Ship being broken into a thousand pieces and all the codfish being

lost. All I could do was to escape in a shallop into which I threw

myself, in my slippers and nightcap, and in this outfit I went to

find our Fathers at St. Sebastien, whence I departed eight days

later, and arrived at Bourdevac, near Bordeaux, the 20th of this

month. This is the result of our voyage, from which your Reverence

can judge of my obligations to G O D._

BIBLIOGRAPHICAL DATA: VOL IV

XIV

Chapters xxvi.-xxxvii., completing the document, are given in the

present volume. The preceding chapters, with Bibliographical Data, are

found in our Volume III.

XV-XVII

Documents XV. and XVI. are letters from Charles Lalemant to Sieur de

Champlain and the provincial of the Récollets, respectively, dated

at Quebec, July 28, 1625. They are taken from Sagard's _Histoire du

Canada_ (Paris, 1636), pp. 868, 869, 870; in the Tross reprint of

Sagard (Paris, 1865), they are in vol. iii., pp. 789, 790.[48]

Document XVII. is a letter from Lalemant to his general, at Rome, dated

New France, August 1, (presumably 1626). It was written in Latin, the

original being preserved in the Archives of the Gesù at Rome. This

is one of the letters copied for Carayon, by Father Martin, in 1858,

and translated by the latter into French, for the _Première Mission_,

where it appears on pp. 117-121,--see Bibliographical Data for Document

XIII., in our Volume III. We follow the Martin apograph, in Latin

(preserved at St. Mary's College, Montreal), and our translation into

English is made therefrom.[49]

The above three letters by Lalemant were selected by O'Callaghan from

Sagard and Carayon,--the third being, of course, Martin's French

translation,--and published at Albany in 1870, with a brief "Avis"

giving the sources of the documents. This publication, known in the

Lenox Catalogue as "O'Callaghan Reprint No. 2," bears the following

title-page:

Copie de Trois | Lettres | escrittes ès années 1625. et 1626. | Par

le P. Charles Lallemant | Superieur des Missions de la Compagnie | de

Iesvs en la | Novvelle France. | A Albanie | De l'Imprimerie de J.

Munsell | M.DCCC.LXX.

_Collation of O'Callaghan's Reprint._ Title, 1 p.; reverse of title,

with inscription: "Edition tirée à vingt cinq exemplaires. O'C.," 1 p.;

"Avis" (by O'Callaghan), 1 p.; text, pp. 5-14.

For further references, see Brown, vol. ii., no. 316 and p. 166;

Harrisse, nos. 426, 427, 429; Sabin, vol. x., no. 38679; O'Callaghan,

nos. 1209, 1250; Winsor, p. 301; Lenox, p. 18.

XVIII

We follow the original publication (Paris, 1627), now in the Lenox

Library, of Lalemant's letter to his brother, Jerome; it is described

in the Lenox Catalogue, p. 4, under "H. 41."

There are extant, four different reprints of this document, as follows:

1. It appears to have first been reprinted in _Mercure François_, tome

xiii., pp. 12-34; the portion of the journal wherein this is found, is

devoted to the events of the year 1626, but the royal Privilege for

the volume was "Donné au camp de la Rochelle le 28. de Septembre, l'an

de grace 1628." The original publication appeared without statement of

Privilege; it is, therefore, impossible to say when in 1627 permission

to print was granted. In the Quebec edition of the _Relations_ (1858),

it is inadvertently stated (vol. i.) that this letter commences on p.

1 (instead of p. 12) of tome xiii. of _Mercure_, an error which Sabin,

Harrisse, and others have repeated. As will be seen by a comparison

of our text with that of issues which follow the _Mercure_, the

differences between the original and this first reprint are slight.

2. The next reprint appears in Danjou's _Archives Curieuses_, 2nd

series, tome iii. (Paris, 1838), pp. (405-426). This follows the text

of the original, and not that of the _Mercure_. The following clause in

the Lenox Catalogue, p. 19,--the final sentence of note under "7(b)" in

list of O'Callaghan's Reprints,--is misleading: "The copy in the Astor

Library of that work is printed from the original letter of 1627." The

"copy in the Astor" is simply this reprint in _Archives Curieuses_, of

which rare collection the Astor has a set.

3. The third reprint, but the first in separate form, was issued by

O'Callaghan at Albany, 1870, and is the one designated in the Lenox

Catalogue (p. 19) as "7(b)." The text of the _Mercure_ reprint is

followed, with a made-up title-page, as follows:

Relation | de ce qvi s'est passé | en la | Novvelle France | en l'annee

M.DC.XXVI. | Enuoyée au Père Hierosme L'Allemant | par le P. Charles

L'Allemant Superievr de | la Mission de la Compagnie de Iesvs | en |

Canada. | D'après la Copie dans le Mercure François | Tome 13. | A

Paris | Chez Estienne Richer ruë S. Iean de Latran | M.DC.XXIX.

_Collation of same._ Title, 1 p.; reverse of title, with inscription:

"Edition tirée a vingt-cinq exemplaires, O'C.," 1 p.; Tables des

Matieres, 2 pp.; text, pp. 1-51; Table, pp. 53-59.

4. A second separate reprint was issued by O'Callaghan in 1871, and is

that referred to in the Lenox Catalogue (p. 19) as "7(a)." This follows

the original text, and not that of the _Mercure_; it is set in small

type in imitation of the original (Paris, 1627), and comes into the

same number of pages. Upon the otherwise blank page facing the last

page of the text, is the inscription: "Calqué sur l'exemplaire dans

la collection | de Mr. James Lenox, de New York." The title-page is

apparently photo-lithographed from the original.

For further references to this document, which has had a curious

bibliographical history, see Harrisse, no. 41; Sabin, vol. x., no.

38680 (original), and no. 38682 (reprint); Carayon, nos. 1254, 1255,

and p. 1179; Ternaux, no. 496; Winsor, pp. 300, 301; _Historical

Magazine_, vol. iii., p. 19; Brown, vol. ii., p. 166; Lenox, p. 4 (H.

41), 19; and the Barlow (no. 1272), Murphy (no. 1480), and O'Callaghan

(nos. 1250, 1982) sale catalogues.

_Title-page._ We give a photographic facsimile of original.

_Collation of Original._ Title, 1 p.; text, pp. 1-16.

XIX

Charles Lalemant's letter of Nov. 22, 1629, to the superior of

the Jesuit College at Paris, originally appeared without title or

headlines, in _Les voyages du Sieur de Champlain_ (Paris, 1632), 2nd

part, pp. 275-279. O'Callaghan reprinted it in what is known in the

Lenox list as "No. 3," of which,--as with others of the O'Callaghan

series,--but twenty-five copies were published. He omitted the

preliminary editorial note, on p. 275, made up a title-page of his

own, and furnished the Avant-Propos. In the present issue, we

reproduce the O'Callaghan title-page and Avant-Propos, but in all

other respects strictly follow the original publication. See further

references in Winsor, p. 301; Sabin, vol. x., no. 38681; Lenox, p. 18.

_Title-page._ We imitate O'Callaghan's Reprint.

_Collation of O'Callaghan's Reprint._ Title, 1 p.; reverse of title,

with inscription: "Tirée à vingt cinq exemplaires, lesquels ne font |

pas à vendre. O'C.," 1 p.; Avant-Propos (by O'Callaghan), 1 p.; blank,

1 p.; text, pp. 5-15; colophon, 1 p.: "Achevé d'Imprimer à Albany, N.

Y., par | J. Munsell, çe 14 Juin, 1870."

NOTES TO VOL. IV

(_Figures in parentheses, following number of note, refer to pages of

English text._)

1 (p. 15).--_The pilot_: see vol. ii., _note_ 88.

2 (p. 15).--_Pretended Religion_: see vol. iii., _note_ 31.

3 (p. 21).--On Turnell, see vol. i, _note_ 66.

4 (p. 33).--_The Marshal_: Sir Thomas Dale (spelled Deel, by Biard).

See vol. i, _note_ 64.

5 (p. 33).--_The General_: this was Sir Thomas Gates, one of the

prominent men of his time in both military and civil service. He was of

Devonshire, and probably at this time a little over 50 years of age;

had been an officer in the Drake-Sidney expedition to America (1585-86)

and published an account of it in 1589; later, had military commands in

Spain and Holland; was commander of the English expedition to Virginia

in 1608, and appointed the first sole and absolute governor to the

colony there; returned to England in April, 1614. He lived about six

years longer, and took much interest in the affairs of Virginia. Both

he and Dale were men of energy and executive ability; to their efforts

are mainly ascribed the establishment and continuance of the Jamestown

colony.

6 (p. 69).--The French name for the English Channel; given on account

of its shape, resembling a sleeve (Fr. _manche_). It gives its name to

the maritime department of France in which are situated Cherbourg and

St. Lô.

7 (p. 75).--_The ambassador_: see vol. ii., _note_ 94.

8 (p. 85).--On Betsabes, see vol. iii., _note_ 16.

9 (p. 91).--_River of smelts_: the Liesse River of Lescarbot (see vol.

ii., _note_ 37).

10 (p. 95).--On this point, cf. Maurault (_Hist. Abenakis_, p. 95,

_note_ 4): "The Abnakis always exhibited profound grief at the death of

a child; the parents were inconsolable. The cause of this great sorrow

was the belief of the savages that a child was wretched in the other

world, because it was too young and weak to procure for itself the

necessities of life there."

11 (p. 101).--The letters patent here referred to were those issued

to Sir Thomas Gates and others, for the establishment of colonies in

Virginia, and constituted the colonial charter. This document, dated

April 10, 1606, granted some 20,000 square miles to the two companies,

but claimed for the crown all of North America between 34° and 45°

north latitude, presumably amounting to some 2,000,000 square miles, as

the width of the continent was then understood. The text is given, with

collateral and illustrative papers, in Brown's _Genesis_, pp. 52 _et

seq._

12 (p. 105).--For a graphic account of the colonial enterprises of Jean

Ribaut and René de Laudonnière in Florida (1562-65), consult Parkman's

_Pioneers_, pp. 33-150. Cf. Laudonnière's own narrative, and Ribaut's

journal, as given in Goldsmid's _Hakluyt_, vol. xiii., pp. 407-507;

also Guérin's _Navigateurs Français_, (Paris, 1846), pp. 180-204.

13 (p. 105).--Concerning these early discoveries by the French, see

vol. ii., _notes_ 49, 72; and vol. iii., _notes_ 5, 9.

14 (p. 107).--Biard here refers to the colony established in 1610

by John Guy and others at Cupids Harbor (opening into Conception

Bay), N. F. Lord Bacon was prominent in this enterprise, and it was

his influence that secured the charter and subsidies granted to the

Newfoundland Colonization Company, as it was called. The company seems

to have existed till at least 1628. For Guy's charter, and letters

written by him, with an account of his enterprise and of other early

colonies in that region, see Prowse's _Hist. N.F._, pp. 92-133.

15 (p. 107).--The map of Ortelius (1570) shows New France as extending

southward to 40°. Van der Aa's "Canada" (1619, _ca._) and Blaeu's

"Extrema Americæ" (1620), give the Kennebec river as the dividing line

between New England and New France; the latter region is extended

by Van der Aa to the south of the Great Lakes, and as far as the

Mississippi river. Winsor gives (_Cartier to Frontenac_, p. 9), a

sketch reduced from a tracing of the alleged map of Denis (1506),

mentioned in vol. iii, of the present series, _note_ 4.

16 (p. 109).--Reference is here made to the "Pandects," or _Corpus

Juris Civilis_, a collection of the Roman civil law, made in the

sixth century by Emperor Justinian. The "law of Alluvions" has

two branches,--the law of abandonment, and that of accretion

(_acquirendo_). Biard's reference is to the _Corpus Juris Civilis_,

Digest, book 41 ("_De adquirendo rerum dominio_"), 29 and 30. The sign

ff, used in our text, was employed by early jurisconsults to signify

the Digest, and even the Pandects as a whole; it is supposed to be

a corruption of the Greek character [^p] (or perhaps of [th]).--See

Hermann Hugo's _De Prima Scribendi Origine_ (Antwerp, 1617), p. 153.

17 (p. 109).--Regarding the Count de Soissons, see vol. ii., _note_ 24.

18 (p. 109).--Cf. with these arguments of Biard, Champlain's "_Abregé

des decovvertvres de la Nouuelle France_," in his _Voyages_ (ed. 1632),

part 2, pp. 290-296; and Hinsdale's "Right of Discovery," in _Ohio

Archæol. and Hist. Quarterly_, Dec., 1888.

19 (p. 113).--Concerning the French fisheries in Newfoundland, which,

with the neighboring Banks, furnished the greater part of the Canadian

product, see Prowse's _Hist. N.F._, pp. 49-50; and Dionne's _Nouv.

France_, chaps. viii., ix. For a detailed account of the Canadian

fisheries at the present time, see Joncas's "Fisheries of Canada," in

_Canadian Economics_ (Montreal, 1884), pp. 41-73.

Lalemant says (doc. no. xviii., _post_) that the usual exportation

of beaver skins from New France was 12,000 to 15,000 annually; and

that it had, in one year, been 22,000. These skins were sold in

France at a pistole each, or ten livres. The Company of Merchants

is said to have realized an annual dividend of 40 per cent on its

investment. Garneau cites De Caen as saying, when Quebec was restored

to him by Kirk, in 1632: "But as for our settlement, my people have

found it utterly consumed, along with 9,000 beaver skins, valued at

40,000 livres."--_Histoire du Canada_ (4th ed., Montreal, 1882),

vol. i., p. 127, _note_ *. See, also, chapter on "New France and the

Fur-trade," in H. H. Bancroft's _N.W. Coast_, vol. i., pp. 378-403; and

Dionne's _Nouv. France_, chap. xiii. Gagnon's _Essai de bibliographie

canadienne_ (Quebec, 1895), p. 128, mentions Bruslons's _Dictionnaire

universel de commerce_ (Savary's ed., Paris, 1723) as "an immense

compilation, containing highly valuable information in regard to

Canadian commerce in the seventeenth century."

20 (p. 171).--Charles Lalemant (also written L'Alemand, L'Almand,

Lallemant, and Allemand) was born at Paris Nov. 17, 1587, and became a

novice of the Jesuits July 29, 1607, at Rouen. He studied philosophy

at La Flèche, 1609-12; during the following three years, he was an

instructor in the college of Nevers; four years more he devoted to

the study of theology at La Flèche, and one year at Paris. He was a

professor in the college at Bourges, 1620-22; and, for three years

more, principal of the boarding school of Clermont, Paris. In March,

1625, he was appointed superior of the mission at Quebec, whither he

went with his brethren Massé and Brébeuf, and the Récollet missionary

Joseph La Roche-Daillon, arriving in June of that year. Here Lalemant

remained till November, 1627, when he went to France to procure

supplies. Returning in the following May, the ship was captured by

Admiral Kirk, the Jesuits being sent to England, and later to France.

In June, 1629, Lalemant, with several other Jesuits, made a second

attempt to return to Canada; but they were shipwrecked on the rocks

near Canso. Noyrot and Malot perished in the waves, Vieuxpont joined

Father Vimont at Grand Cibou, and Lalemant was taken back to France by

a Basque fishing vessel, arriving at St. Sebastien after still another

shipwreck. Quebec having been meanwhile captured by the English, the

Canadian missions were interrupted until 1632, when the region was

restored to France. Lalemant, upon his return to France, in 1629, was

appointed rector of the college at Eu; and, later, of that at Rouen.

In April, 1634, his superiors granted his earnest request that he

might again go to Canada. He was placed in charge, with Massé and De

Nouë, of the chapel "Notre-Dame de Récouvrance" (built by Champlain on

his return to New France), and was the latter's friend and spiritual

director, attending him at his death. Lalemant returned to France in

1639, and there, during several years, acted as agent for the Canadian

missions; he was afterwards successively rector of the colleges at

Rouen, La Flèche, and Paris, and at the last place superior of the

Maison Professe. There he died, Nov. 18, 1674.

21 (p. 171).--_The General._ This was Emery de Caen, who, with his

uncle, Guillaume de Caen, was placed by Montmorency in charge of

commercial affairs in New France; both were Huguenots--the latter a

merchant, the former a naval captain.

It is necessary, in this connection, to outline the commercial

monopolies that successively dominated New France in its infancy. For

an account of the first of these, granted to De Monts, see vol. i.,

_note_ 2. His patent was finally canceled in 1609; and in January,

1611, he gave up his claims in America to Madame de Guercheville.

Meanwhile, Champlain (see vol. ii., _note_ 42) was continued as

lieutenant of the King in New France, with personal command over the

Quebec colony, which was sustained mainly through his efforts, with the

aid of the Rouen merchants who had been associated with De Monts.

_Company of Associates._--The Rouen associates withdrew from the

enterprise, toward the close of 1611; and, in the following year,

Champlain undertook the formation of a new company, to be composed of

merchants from Rouen, Havre, St. Malo and La Rochelle. It was open to

all who were willing to share both the profits and the losses, thus

avoiding the jealousies that had been aroused against the limited

membership of De Monts's company. The Rochelle men finally declined

to enter the company, which afterwards lost heavily by the illicit

trade in which the former engaged with the savages. Champlain also

accuses these merchants of selling arms and ammunition to the natives,

and exciting their hostility against the Quebec colonists.--See his

_Voyages_ (1632), part 2, pp. 2, 3. The Count de Soissons (vol. ii,

of this series, _note_ 24) was appointed governor of New France, with

Champlain as his lieutenant. After considerable delay, the Company of

Associates was organized (1613-14); among its members were, besides De

Monts and Champlain, Thomas Porée, Lucas Legendre, Mathieu Dusterlo,

and Daniel Boyer. Quarrels arose among the associates, caused by

commercial and even religious differences of opinion; and some of

them tried to eject Champlain from his command. Although this attempt

failed, his work was greatly hindered and embarrassed, until the Duke

of Montmorency, Condé's successor as viceroy, came to his aid (1620).

_Company of De Caen._--Dissensions and complaints still arising,

the Company of Associates was summarily dissolved by Montmorency,

in November, 1620, and a new company formed. At its head were the

De Caens; there were, also, Guillaume Robin, Jacques de Troyes, and

François Hervé, merchants; François de Troyes, chief of royal finance

at Orléans; Claude Le Ragois, receiver-general of finance at Limoges;

Pierre de Verton, counselor and secretary of the King; and others. The

old company had resented Montmorency's order of dissolution; but within

a year its membership and interests were consolidated with those of

the new association. The latter received a monopoly for eleven years,

to which the King added eleven more; but it also was dissolved by

Richelieu, early in 1627, to make room for his "Company of New France,"

also known as the "Company of the Hundred Associates."

_Company of New France._--This association was personally controlled

and managed by Richelieu; and had members in official positions about

the court, and in Paris, Rouen, and other cities of France. Among

these were Marquis Deffiat, superintendent of finance; Champlain;

Claude de Roquemont; the Commander de Razilly; Sebastian Cramoisy, the

Parisian publisher; Jean de Lauson, long the president of the company,

and intendant of Canada; Louis Houel, secretary of the King, and

controller of the salt works at Brouage; and several leading merchants

of Paris, Rouen, Dieppe, and Bordeaux. The reasons for the formation

of this company, the royal charter granted to it, and its articles of

association, are given in _Mercure François_, vol. xiv. (1628), pp.

232-267. For a complete list of the (107) members, see Creuxius' _Hist.

Canad._; for a copy of the list, with the company's charter, and other

interesting particulars, see Sulte's _Histoire des Canadiens-Français_

(Montreal, 1882-84), vol. ii., pp. 27-33. The company was granted

jurisdiction over the territory extending from Florida to the Arctic

Circle, and from Newfoundland to the "great fresh lake" (Huron). Only

Catholics were permitted to join this association, or to settle in its

colonies; and no Huguenot or foreigner might enter Canada. The capture

of Quebec by the English (1629) temporarily broke up this monopoly; but

it resumed operations when that region was retroceded to France (vol.

ii., _note_ 42). The charter of the company obliged it to send 4,000

colonists thither before 1643; to lodge and support them during three

years; and then to give them cleared lands for their maintenance. The

vast expense attending this undertaking was beyond the ability of the

Associates; therefore, in 1645, they transferred to the inhabitants

of Quebec their monopoly of the fur trade, with their debts and other

obligations,--retaining, however, their seigniorial rights. Finally

(Feb. 24, 1663), the Hundred Associates abandoned their charter, and

New France again became the property of the crown.

All these monopolies appear to have sought mainly their own financial

interests. They sustained the Quebec settlement, but in penurious

fashion, and only so far as it aided their trade with the natives; but

they did nothing to make it an agricultural community, or to forward

Champlain's schemes for the permanent colonization of Canada,--neither

of which objects could well be attained under the feudal tenure by

which the colonists held land under the companies.

For more extended accounts of these enterprises, see Parkman's

_Pioneers_, pp. 364-366, 419-432; his _Jesuits_, pp. 155-157, 194, 195,

331; Ferland's _Cours d'Histoire_, vol. i, pp. 161, 162, 167, 185, 189,

197-201, 215, 217, 220, 226, 338-340; Rochemonteix's _Jésuites_, vol.

i., pp. 128-135, 159, 163, 164, and vol. ii., pp. 65-66; Slafter's

"Memoir of Champlain," in _Voyages_ (Prince Soc.), vol. i., pp.

110-114, 122, 144-158, 187; Faillon's _Colon. Fr._, vol. i., pp.

132-136, 150, 160-175, 189-232, 268-272, 333-352; Winsor's _Cartier to

Frontenac_, pp. 130, 131, 167, 168; Garneau's _Canada_, vol. i., pp.

63-75; and Margry's _Collection de manuscrits relatifs à la Nouvelle

France_ (Quebec, 1883), vol. i., pp. 62-85.

The losses of the De Caens at the capture of Quebec (referred to _note

ante_, 19) were heavy; and, as some compensation therefor, they were

granted a monopoly of the fur trade in the Gulf of St. Lawrence for

one year. Emery De Caen was therefore appointed provisional governor

of Canada for that period, upon the restitution of the province by the

English; and on July 13, 1632, he took formal possession of Quebec in

the name of his King. Laverdière gives (_Champlain_, close of vol. ii.)

numerous "Pièces justificatives;" see pp. 6-31 of these, for documents

showing De Caen's losses through Kirk's attack, and his attempts to

secure redress from the latter through the English government. L'Abbé

H. A. B. Verreau, in _Report on Canadian Archives_ (1874), p. 197,

mentions that in Paris he found documents granting islands in the West

Indies to De Caen, in 1633 and 1640.

22 (p. 171).--Champlain, in thorough accord with the policy then

dominant at the court of France, was fully as desirous of establishing

the Christian religion among the savages of America as of gaining

new possessions for France. He had tried, in 1612, to induce Madame

de Guercheville to send the Jesuits to Quebec, and to aid De Monts in

establishing a colony there; see his _Voyages_ (1632), pt. i., pp. 112,

113. This proposal was rejected, on account of De Monts's Calvinistic

faith. But when the Company of Merchants was formed, two years later,

Champlain at once made plans for the establishment of missions in New

France. Consulting Louis Houel, of Brouage, the latter advised him to

apply to the Récollets (vol. ii., of the present series, _note_ 41),

who had already won renown from their successful missions in Spanish

America.

That Order gladly responded to the appeal; and, having secured the

consent of the King of France and of the Pope, and assurances of

aid from the Company of Merchants, the first Récollet missionaries

to Canada departed from France, April 24, 1615.--See Introduction,

vol. i., pp. xx., xxi. Other Récollets were sent over, from time to

time; and, in 1620-21, they built a convent and chapel (the first in

Canada) on St. Charles River, about half a French league from the

fort of Quebec. This they named Notre-Dame des Anges; it was situated

(according to Laverdière) on the spot where now stands the General

Hospital.

By 1624, five Récollet missions had been established--at Tadoussac,

Quebec, and Three Rivers; at Carhagouha, in the Huron country; and

among the Nipissings. There was another, in Acadia, on St. John River,

founded in 1619, conducted by three Récollets from Aquitaine, and

supported by certain commercial companies at Bordeaux. This mission was

closed in July, 1624; and, immediately thereafter, its priests joined

their brethren at Quebec.

Just before their arrival, a conference of the Récollet missionaries

was held at Quebec, at which they resolved to ask the coöperation of

the Jesuits (also noted for the success of their foreign missions)

in the Canadian field, which was far too large and arduous for their

limited resources, hoping that the latter order would send some

missionaries at its own expense. The Récollets, even more austere

than the other Franciscan orders, were forbidden by their rules to

own property; hence their missionaries could not look to their own

order for aid. The Company of Merchants had agreed with Champlain

to support six of the Récollets; but, as many of its members were

Protestants, this outlay was probably an unwelcome burden to them.

Moreover, the religious dissensions constantly arising between the

Huguenots and the Catholics were felt to be a hindrance to the labors

of the missionaries, who would have preferred that Protestants should

be entirely excluded from the management of affairs. Sagard says

(_Canada_, pp. 860, 861) that he complained to Montmorency of the

disorders in Canada, for which he blamed the Huguenots; and that

the Récollet provincial at Paris, with Father Irenæus Piat (envoy

from the Canadian missionaries, to negotiate with the Jesuits), made

formal charges against them in the council, to the same effect. The

viceroy (in Rochemonteix's phrase, "a man of the world, who loved

pleasures quite as well as honors") had meanwhile gladly disposed

of his troublesome Canadian dignities (January, 1625) to his nephew

Henri de Lévis, duke of Ventadour, a pious man who cared not for trade

or conquest, but only for the conversion of the savages. De Lévis's

spiritual director was a Jesuit; the application of the Récollets

for aid from the Society of Jesus came at an opportune time for both

orders. It is also probable that the influences of the court, at that

time strongly inclined toward the Jesuits, helped to bring about

the arrangement. There was, however, considerable opposition to its

consummation, especially from the Company of Merchants; but, according

to Faillon, the new viceroy asserted his authority over them, and

obliged them to yield. In accordance with the agreement, the Jesuit

fathers Lalemant, Massé, and Brébeuf, with the coadjutors François

Charreton, Jean Goffestre, and Gilbert Burel, were sent to New France

in April, 1625. There they pursued their missionary labors until the

capture of Quebec by the English, four years later. After that event,

Kirk sent all the missionaries back to France, by way of England. When

the French returned (1632), they were accompanied solely by Jesuit

priests, for Richelieu would not allow the Récollets to resume their

Canadian missions.

For accounts of this transaction, from a Récollet standpoint, see

Shea's _Le Clercq_, pp. 224-233; and Sagard's _Canada_, pp. 860-865.

The Jesuit view is given in Rochemonteix's _Jésuites_, vol. i., pp.

137-153. Cf. Faillon's _Colon. Fr._, vol. i., pp. 206-212.

23 (p. 171).--This was Joseph de la Roche-Daillon (written also

d'Allion), a Récollet priest of the province of St. Denis, allied to

the house of the counts du Lud (or Lude). He accompanied the Jesuit

missionaries to Canada, and, after remaining at Quebec for a year, went

to the Huron country with Brébeuf and De Nouë. In October, 1626, he

visited the Neutral Nation, and spent the winter there. In the summer

of 1628, he returned from the Huron mission to Quebec, remaining there

until its capture; Champlain mentions his visit to "Father la Roche,"

just before that event, to ask if the Récollets could supply any grain

to the colony. Sagard gives (_Canada_, pp. 880-892) a letter written

to a friend by Daillon, describing his visit to the Neutrals; it is

reproduced by Le Clercq (Shea's ed., vol. i., pp. 263-272). Harris

(citing Noiseux's _Liste chronologique_) gives the date of Daillon's

death as July 16, 1656.--_Early Missions in Western Canada_ (Toronto,

1893), p. 56, _note_.

24 (p. 171).--_The trading station_: Three Rivers (see vol. ii.,

_note_ 52). This point was long a favorite fur-trade rendezvous for

the Indians. The Récollet missionaries established a residence here

in June, 1615, which was maintained until 1628. The fortified French

settlement at Three Rivers was established by Champlain in July, 1634,

to protect the Huron and Algonkin fur trade from the incursions of

the Iroquois, and to serve as an outpost of defence for Quebec. The

first colonist was Jacques Hertel, who in 1633 had obtained a grant of

land there. The Jesuit missionaries were also among the proprietors

of the new town, having obtained from the Company of New France (see

_note_ 21, _ante_), by a grant dated Feb. 15, 1634, six arpents of

land at Three Rivers; but they did not secure possession of this till

Montmagny delivered it to them (1637). However, within two months

after La Violette, Champlain's lieutenant, had erected his stockade at

Three Rivers, two of the Jesuit fathers,--Le Jeune and Buteux,--had

established a residence there, which was for many years an important

center of missionary work.--See Sulte's _Can.-Français_, vol. ii., pp.

48-54: he gives a list; containing also much genealogical information,

of the early inhabitants of Three Rivers; and the document granting

land there to the Society of Jesus, copied from _Titres seigneuriaux_

(Quebec, 1852), p. 70. Cf. Ferland's _Cours d'Histoire_, vol. i., p.

270; he states that the church registers of Three Rivers are continuous

since February, 1635; and that these records are the oldest existing in

Canada. The first entry gives the exact date on which the settlement

was begun--July 4, 1634.

Sulte has published, at Montreal, several works concerning this

town: _Histoire de la ville des Trois-Rivières_ (1870), _Chronique

trifluvienne_ (1879), and _Album de l'Histoire des Trois-Rivières_

(1881).

25 (p. 171).--Father Nicholas Viel, then stationed at Montargis,

France, was sent to the Canadian mission of the Récollets, with Brother

Gabriel Sagard (see _note_ 48, _post_), in 1623. Arriving at Quebec,

June 28 of that year, they at once accompanied Father Joseph Le Caron

to the Huron country, which they reached in August, and settled at

the residence already established at Quieunonascaran. At the end of

ten months, Le Caron and Sagard returned to Quebec, leaving Viel in

charge of the mission. In the summer of 1625, he went with the Hurons

on their annual trading voyage to Quebec, taking with him an Indian lad

named Ahautsic, whom he had baptized and confirmed. A storm scattering

the fleet, the three Hurons in his canoe viciously threw him and his

disciple into the water, at the last rapid above Montreal, which from

that time has borne the name of Sault au Récollet. Sagard and Le Clercq

give full accounts of Father Viel's missionary work, and of his tragic

death. The latter states that Viel left a dictionary of the Huron

language, with other memoirs, in the hands of certain Frenchmen then

living in the Huron country, who, later, conveyed the MSS. to Father Le

Caron, at Quebec.

26 (p. 171).--Joseph Le Caron was one of the four Récollets who began

the mission of that order in Canada (see _note_ 22, _ante_). Verbal

permission to engage in this work was given them by the papal nuncio

at Paris, that their departure might not be delayed by waiting for

the usual brief; for some unknown reason the issue of this paper was

delayed until March 20, 1618. The original document is now in the

departmental archives of France, according to Faillon (_Col. Fr._, vol.

i., p. 146). It is addressed to Father Le Caron and other Récollet

brothers and priests: Sagard copies it in his _Canada_, pp. 12-17.

Upon arriving at Tadoussac, May 25, 1615, Jamay (the superior) went

with Le Caron to Three Rivers, where they at once proceeded to

establish a sedentary mission for the Indians. Leaving this in the care

of Jamay (whose headquarters were at Quebec), Le Caron departed for

the Huron country, living with the savages at their town of Carhagouha

(near Thunder Bay; later known as Toanché). Here he remained until the

following May, meanwhile visiting with Champlain the Tobacco Nation

and adjoining tribes. By these Indians he was cruelly treated, at the

instigation of the medicine men (whom the French missionaries styled

"sorcerers").

In July, 1616, the Récollet missionaries held at Quebec a conference

with Champlain and other friends of their work, at which it was

decided that they needed more missionaries, more French colonists,

and a seminary for the education of Indian children. To obtain aid

in these directions, Jamay and Le Caron soon afterwards went with

Champlain to France, where at first they received but little help or

encouragement. Jamay remained to forward the interests of the mission;

while Le Caron, now appointed its superior, returned to Canada in the

spring of 1617, accompanied by Father Paul Huet. A year later, desiring

to work personally among the savages, Le Caron delegated to Father

d'Olbeau his authority as superior, and spent a year at Tadoussac,

with the Montagnais. During 1619-22, he labored at Quebec, then again

wintered with the Montagnais; and in July, 1623, returned to the Huron

mission, accompanied by Viel and Sagard (see _notes_ 25, 48). During

his year's stay there, he did much to aid Champlain in securing the

temporary treaty of peace which, in July, 1624, was concluded between

the Iroquois, on one part, and the French and their savage allies on

the other.

In August, 1625, Le Caron went to France on the affairs of the

mission, and returned the following year with Brother Gervase Mohier

and a reinforcement of Jesuit missionaries. He remained at Quebec, as

superior of his mission, until 1629, when all the priests were sent

back to France by Kirk. As the Récollets expected to resume work on the

Canadian mission, Le Caron was appointed its procurator in France; but

he died on March 29, 1632,--according to Le Clercq--through grief at

the exclusion of his order from Canada.

Upon the invasion of Canada by the English, the Récollet missionaries

had been urged by their savage disciples to take refuge with them in

their towns, where they would be safe from attack, and could minister

to the religious wants of the natives until the French should return.

The fathers wished to accept this proposal; but as it was opposed by

the council of Quebec, Le Caron felt obliged to decline it, for which

he was afterwards blamed by some of his brethren in France.

Full details of his work are given by Le Clercq and Sagard: the

former copies a letter written by La Caron to his provincial at

Paris, Aug. 7, 1618; also fragments of memoirs sent by him to that

officer in 1624.--See Shea's _Le Clercq_, vol. i., pp. 134-137,

and 213-224. He is said to have prepared a dictionary of the Huron

language (_Ibid._, p. 249). Other MSS. of his were burned in March,

1631, as a result of sanitary measures then taken against a contagious

disease in the convent of St. Margaret, near Gisors, Normandy, of

which he was superior.--See "Memorial of the Récollets, 1637," in

Margry's _Découvertes et établissements des Français dans l'Amérique

septentrionale_ (Paris, 1876-86), vol. i., p. 11.

27 (p. 173).--_The purpose of his voyage._ Sagard tells us (_Canada_,

p. 871) that this was to improve the condition of Canada, and to ask

the King for funds to support the children and new converts in the

seminary planned by the Récollets. Le Clercq asserts that it was

through Le Caron's influence that Emery de Caen was recalled from

Canada, and replaced by a Catholic, Raymond de la Ralde (who had been

De Caen's lieutenant); also that the same influence had much to do

with the formation of Richelieu's Company of New France.--See Shea's

_Le Clercq_, vol. i., pp. 253-259. Rochemonteix, however, claims

(_Jésuites_, vol. i., p. 165) that Richelieu's determination to replace

Montmorency's company by that of the Hundred Associates was due mainly

to Father Noyrot's influence, and to his representations of the state

of affairs in Canada.

28 (p. 177).--Mutio Vitelleschi was born at Rome, in 1565; on Nov.

15, 1615, he became Aquaviva's successor as general of the Society

of Jesus; his death occurred Feb. 9, 1645. Ranke, in _History of

the Popes_ (Foster's tr., London, 1871), vol. ii., p. 388, says:

"Vitelleschi was by nature mild, indulgent, and conciliatory; his

intimates called him the angel of peace; and he found consolation

on his deathbed from the conviction that he had never injured any

one. These were admirable qualities of a most amiable man, but did

not suffice to fit him for the government of an order so widely

extended, active, and powerful. He was unable to enforce strictness of

discipline, even with regard to dress; still less could he oppose an

effectual resistance to the demands of determined ambition." Daurignac,

in _History of the Society of Jesus_ (Clements's tr., Baltimore,

1878), vol. i., p. 398, says that he was designated "the Angel" by

Pope Urban VIII., on account of his docility and humility. It was

under his generalship (Feb. 12, 1622) that Loyola, the founder of the

Jesuit order, and Francis Xavier, were canonized by Gregory XV.; that

the first centenary of the society was held (Sept. 25, 1639), when its

reports showed that it occupied 36 provinces, and had 800 houses and

15,000 members; and that the great controversy between the Jansenists

and Jesuits began. Even more important, according to Ranke, was the

change which occurred, during this administration, in the government

and discipline of the society, by which the "professed" members

attained supremacy, and occupied positions in business, administration,

and other affairs of the world, which before had belonged mainly to the

coadjutors,--those of provincials, rectors, and superiors of colleges.

The former ascetic strictness of discipline was relaxed; and the

society became less ardent in its devotion to the interests of the Holy

See. Vitelleschi and his immediate successors strove, but with little

success, to correct these tendencies.--See Ranke, _ut supra_, pp.

387-393; he obtains most of his information from a MS. in the Corsini

library at Rome, entitled _Discorso sopra la religione de' padri

Gesuiti, e loro modo di governare_ (1681-86, _circa_). Cf. Daurignac's

account (_ut supra_, pp. 324-398) of the order under Vitelleschi's

administration.

29 (p. 177).--During the seventeenth century, all navigated seas were

infested with pirates. Lescarbot mentions (vol. ii. of the present

series, p. 131) that Poutrincourt met, in the English Channel, a ship

of "Forbans" or pirates; the word "forban" means, literally, one

banished, an outlaw, and characterizes most of the European pirates

of the time. Sagard (_Canada_, 115, 120, 121), relates that, on his

journey to New France, his ship was threatened by a Dutch pirate, in

the very harbor of Rochelle. Sulte (_Can.-Français_, vol. ii., p. 20,

_note_) cites the case of one of De Caen's vessels, which was captured

(September, 1624) while en route from Gaspé to Bordeaux, by Turks, near

the coast of Brittany; the Frenchmen were carried away as slaves.

Brown (_Cape Breton_, p. 110), who says he obtained his information

from original documents in the Public Record office at London, writes:

"The fishermen of Newfoundland were cruelly harassed by pirates. In

eight years (1612-20), the damage done by the pirates was estimated

at 40,800 _l._; besides the loss of 180 pieces of ordnance, and 1,080

fishermen and mechanics carried off by force. On August 8, 1625,

the Mayor of Poole wrote to the Privy Council, saying that, unless

protection were afforded to the Newfoundland fleet of 250 sail, 'of the

Western Ports,' they would be surprised by the Turkish pirates; and, on

the 12th of the same month, the Mayor of Plymouth informed the Council

that twenty-seven ships and 200 men had been taken by pirates in ten

days." Brown also cites _Discourse and Discovery of Newfoundland_

(London, 1623), written by one Captain Whitbourne, who was sent out in

1615, to hold a court of admiralty for inquiry into certain abuses; and

who says that Peter Easton, a pirate, had ten sail of well-appointed

ships, that he was master of the seas, and levied a regular tax on

fishing vessels.

As early as 1620, John Mason, then governor of Newfoundland, received

a commission from the English admiralty to suppress pirates; and he

captured, among others, a Sallee (or Moorish) pirate in the Irish

harbor of Crookhaven (1625). Prowse (_Hist. N.F._, pp. 108, 174, 182),

gives the text of this commission; he also states that Placentia

was raided five times previous to 1685, by English buccaneers, who

plundered the town of all movable property.

30 (p. 177).--Jean de Brébeuf was born March 25, 1593, at

Condé-sur-Vire, Normandy. He belonged to a noble family, from which,

according to the _Biographie Universelle_ (Paris, 1843-66), the English

family of Arundel had its descent. Entering the Society of Jesus Nov.

8, 1617, at Rouen, he was ordained five years later; and in 1625 was

sent to Canada as one of the first Jesuit missionaries (_note_ 22,

_ante_). The first year he spent among the Montagnais; but in 1626

went, with De Nouë, to the Huron country, where they settled at Toanché

(known to the Récollets as Carhagouha; see _note_ 26, _ante_), in

the bark cabin which Le Caron had erected eleven years before. Here

Brébeuf remained (alone, after the first year) until the capture of

Quebec. Returning to Canada with Champlain (1633), he at once resumed

work in the Huron country, where he labored until his death (excepting

1641-44, when at Quebec). During the winter of 1640-41, he endeavored

(but without success) to establish a mission in the Neutral Nation.

He lived successively at Ihonatiria, a new village built not far from

the deserted Toanché; Teanaustayé, called by the missionaries St.

Joseph, in the present township of Médonte, Simcoe county, Ontario;

and St. Ignace and St. Louis, about half-way between the former towns.

In March, 1649, a thousand Iroquois attacked and destroyed the two

last-named villages capturing there Brébeuf and Gabriel Lalemant,

both of whom were put to death with cruel tortures,--the former dying

March 16, the latter on the day following. Their bodies were rescued

by their brethren and their bones afterwards taken to Quebec,--where,

in the Hôtel Dieu, Brébeuf's head is still preserved, inclosed in a

silver bust sent from France by his family. A minute account of this

martyrdom is given by one of the lay brothers of the Huron mission,

Christophe Regnaut (Regnault), in a MS. written at Caen in 1678. A copy

of this document, with an English translation, is given by Brymner, in

_Canadian Archives_, 1884, pp. lxiii.-lxvii., and will in due course be

reproduced in the present series.

Harris (_Miss. West. Canada._, p. 212, _note_) states that he has seen

in St. Martin's church (Ritualist), Brighton, England, a figured window

in memory of Father Brébeuf. A memorial church, in honor of all the

Jesuit martyrs in the Huron country, is now (January, 1897) approaching

completion at Penetanguishene, Ontario; an illustration thereof will

appear in vol. v. of this series.

Brébeuf's _Relations_ of the Huron mission will appear in succeeding

volumes of our series; that for 1636 contains an elaborate account

of the social condition, manners, and customs of that nation, and a

treatise on their language--this last being reproduced, in an English

translation, by Albert Gallatin in _Transactions of Amer. Antiquarian

Society_, vol. ii., (Cambridge, 1836), pp. 236-238. At the close

of Champlain's _Voyages_ (ed. 1632) may be found translations into

Montagnais of Ledesma's "_Christian Doctrine_," by Brébeuf; and of the

Lord's Prayer, Apostles' Creed, etc., by Massé.

31 (p. 181).--Anne de Nouë was born Aug. 7, 1587; his father was the

seigneur of Prières and of Villers, near Rheims, France. Anne's early

years were spent at court, first as a page, then as an officer of the

King's bedchamber; but at the age of twenty-five he devoted himself to

a religious life, and entered the Jesuit novitiate (Sept. 20, 1612).

He spent ten years in the study of philosophy and theology, at the

Jesuit colleges of Paris, La Flèche, and Nevers; then became acting

rector at Bourges, where he remained until sent to Canada (1626).

Accompanying Brébeuf to the Huron country, he came back to Quebec in

the following spring, apparently remaining there until the English

invasion. During this time he essayed to spend a winter with the

Montagnais, but suffered so greatly from cold and hunger that he was

obliged to leave them. Returning to Canada with De Caen (1632), his

first care was to repair the convent and other buildings destroyed

by the English. Unable, after repeated efforts, either to learn the

native languages, or to endure the hardships of life among the savages,

he spent the remainder of his life in the French settlements on the

St. Lawrence,--ministering to the sick and dying, instructing the

colonists, supplying the temporal needs of his brethren, directing

workmen who repaired buildings or cultivated the ground,--as

Rochemonteix says, "he became, in the mission, the servant of all." His

disposition was enthusiastic and impetuous, yet gentle, lovable, and

self-sacrificing. On a journey to Fort Richelieu, to administer the

sacraments to the garrison there, he was frozen to death on the St.

Lawrence river, Feb. 1, 1646.

32 (p. 181).--Philibert Noyrot was born October, 1592, in the diocese

of Autun; he entered the Jesuit order Oct. 16, 1617, and spent four

years in study at Paris and Bourges. Four years later, having been

ordained as a priest, he was appointed procuror of the latter college,

retaining this office until his death. It was by his advice, according

to Rochemonteix, that Ventadour (whose confessor he was) bought the

viceroyalty of Canada from Montmorency. In 1626, Noyrot went to Quebec,

taking with him twenty workmen to build a residence for the Jesuit

missionaries there. Lalemant immediately sent him back to France, to

report to Richelieu on the affairs of Canada, and to secure the removal

of the Huguenots from the direction of the mercantile company. This

resulted in the formation of the Company of New France (see _note_ 27,

_ante_). In order to relieve the scarcity at Quebec, Noyrot loaded a

ship with a year's supply of provisions for the missionaries and their

workmen; but, according to Le Clercq, these supplies were stopped

at Honfleur by De Caen and La Ralde, from resentment at Noyrot's

complaints about their conduct. In consequence of this disappointment,

the workmen of the mission were taken back to France by Lalemant. Twice

again did Noyrot seek to convey supplies to his brethren at Quebec:

the first time (July, 1628), he was driven back by Admiral Kirk; the

second (June, 1629), he perished by shipwreck near Canso (see _note_

20, _ante_).

33 (p. 181).--Regarding Cotton, (Coton) see vol. ii., _note_ 68.

34 (p. 183).--For sketch of Massé, see vol. i., _note_ 39.

35 (p. 191).--Le Clercq, apparently without good reason, mentions

this letter as "falsely attributed to Lalemant."--See Rochemonteix's

_Jésuites_, vol. i., p. 155, _note_.

36 (p. 191).--A younger brother of Charles Lalemant; a sketch of his

life will be given in a later volume.

37 (p. 193).--_Meslin_ (or _maslin_; derived from Latin _miscere_):

mixed grain, especially a mixture of rye and wheat.

38 (p. 195).--Champlain wished to make Quebec an agricultural colony,

but his efforts were thwarted by the narrow and selfish policy of the

mercantile companies, who cared only to develop the fur trade. They

gave the colonists no means for cultivating the soil, and, according to

Champlain, "had not themselves cleared an arpent and a half of land

in the 22 years during which they were, according to his Majesty's

intention, to have peopled and cultivated the colony of Quebec."

Sagard says (_Canada_, p. 168) that the space cleared was not even

one arpent. The merchants even oppressed Hébert (vol. ii., _note_

80),--"the only colonist who supported his family from the produce of

his land, making many illegal claims upon him for his yearly harvests,

and compelling him to sell only to the company, and that at a specified

rate."--Champlain's _Voyages_ (1632), part 2, pp. 144, 183, 184. Cf.

_Mercure François_, vol. xiv. (1628), p. 234. The Récollet missionaries

were cultivators, and, desirous of leading the savages from a nomadic

to a sedentary life, even induced a few of the latter to imitate their

example. The Jesuits also paid much attention to agriculture.--See

Faillon's _Col. Fr._, vol. i., pp. 161-164; Rochemonteix's _Jésuites_,

vol. i., pp. 154-157; and Sulte's _Can.-Français_, vol. ii., p. 18.

Champlain says (Laverdière's ed., pp. 1144, 1155) that the plow was

first used in Canada, April 27, 1628; this was doubtless by Couillard,

Hébert's son-in-law.

_Arpent_: a word of Celtic derivation, according to Columelle and

Littré; it occurs as early as the eleventh century (e.g., _Chanson de

Roland_). An old French land measure, containing 100 square perches,

but varying in different provinces. The linear arpent of Paris was 180

French feet (variously computed at from 191.83 to 192.3 English feet),

the common arpent 200, and the standard arpent 220. The first of these

was the one used in New France, under the _Coutume de Paris_, and it

still remains the legal measure in all the seigniories of Quebec.

The Quebec Department of Crown Lands, which we adopt as preferable

authority, translates the arpent into 191.85 English feet.

Bourdon's map of the settlements on the St. Lawrence, from Quebec to

Cape Tourmente (1641; reproduced at end of Tanguay's _Dict. Généal._,

vol. i.), indicates that each lot had seven arpents of river frontage,

and a depth of a French league or more (84 arpents to the league).

Giffard's concession at Beauport (the first of the seigniories)

was 1½ leagues along the river, and the same in depth.--Sulte's

_Can.-Français_, vol. ii., pp. 47-48. Duralde's survey of the Illinois

country (1770) assigned to each inhabitant a lot, measuring from one

to four arpents wide, and forty arpents deep.--See H. W. Williams's

chapter on "St. Louis Land Titles," in Scharf's _History of St. Louis_

(Phila., 1883), vol. i., pp. 316-329. Williams, whom Scharf indorses as

an authority, computes the arpent at 192 feet 6 inches, English measure.

The assignment of lands throughout New France in long, narrow strips,

was obviously made to secure for each settler a frontage on the river,

then the main highway; and to bring the inhabitants of each settlement

into close neighborhood, for social and defensive purposes. The same

reasons, of course, governed the allotment of lands in Roger Williams's

colony at Providence (1640),--an interesting similarity to French

Canadian custom. The "home-lots" at Providence had an (estimated) river

frontage of 105 to 120 English feet, all running up to a common highway

along the crest of the back-lying ridge; each lot contained from 4½ to

5½ acres. For description and plats, see Charles W. Hopkins's _Home

Lots of the Early Settlers of Providence Plantations_ (Providence,

1886).

39 (p. 201).--Cf. vol. iii., _note_ 22.

40 (p. 201).--See vol. ii., _note_ 21.

41 (p. 205).--Cf. vol. iii., _note_ 19.

42 (p. 209).--For value of écu, see vol. i., _note_ 34. The livre was a

money of account, in value somewhat less than the modern franc; but in

ordinary speech, both terms signified the same value; six livres = one

crown. The livre of Tours was worth 20 sous; that of Paris, 25 sous.

The pistole was a money of account, equal to ten livres tournois, and

worth ten francs of the present currency.

43 (p. 211) _Anti-Coton_: a sarcastic pamphlet, published in September,

1610; it attacked the Jesuits, and especially Father Coton, the

confessor of Henry IV., of whose murder the Jesuits had been accused

by their enemies. Daurignac says (_Hist. Soc. Jesus_, vol. i., p. 205)

that this pamphlet was attributed to Pierre Dumoulin, a Protestant

minister of Charenton. This and other like attacks on the Jesuits had

been circulated in Canada, and had prejudiced against them even many

Catholics.

44 (p. 233).--This mention of Lalemant being at Pentegoët in 1613, has

been copied by some later writers; but it is apparently an oversight.

Biard would certainly have included Lalemant in his account of the

Acadian missions, if the latter had been there.

45 (p. 237).--Alexander Vieuxpont was born Dec. 25, 1599, at Auxeville,

Normandy. He became a Jesuit novice Sept. 13, 1620, at Rouen, and for

seven years pursued his studies there, at Rennes, and at La Flèche.

Thence he was sent to Alençon, and two years later (June, 1629), he

went with Noyrot to Canada. Cast ashore near Canso, in the shipwreck

wherein the latter perished, Vieuxpont went to Grand Cibou, to join

Father Vimont, then laboring among the savages of Cape Breton. In 1630,

recalled to France by his superiors, he became a traveling preacher in

the rural districts near Rouen; he did not return to Canada.

46 (p. 243).--After the destruction of Port Royal (1613), the English

took no immediate steps to secure possession of Acadia. Eight years

later, Sir William Alexander (afterwards secretary of state for

Scotland) obtained from James I. a grant of all the lands from the St.

Croix River to the St. Lawrence, under the title of "Nova Scotia;" thus

were ignored all French rights in that region. In 1625, this grant

was renewed by Charles I., with considerable additions. Alexander,

not having the necessary funds, was unable to establish any colonies

there until 1627; when (having associated with himself Gervase Kirk

and his sons, William Berkley, John Love, and others, under the title

of "Merchant Adventurers of Canada"), he sent his son, as governor of

Nova Scotia, with a few Scotch emigrants, to form a settlement at Port

Royal. David Kirk, whose vessel had conveyed them, returned to England

for reinforcements; and, in the following year, he seized Miscou, and

all the French fishing vessels in the Gulf; threatened Quebec; and

captured De Roquemont's squadron, sent by the Hundred Associates with

supplies and artillery for Champlain's succor. In 1629, he captured

Quebec. Early in that year, Sir James Stewart, who had purchased a

tract of land from Alexander, brought a colony to Port Baleines, Cape

Breton (near the present Louisburg); he also began to seize the French

vessels fishing on that coast. This excited the anger of Captain

Charles Daniel (one of the Hundred Associates, and a brother of the

Jesuit Antoine Daniel), who had recently come from France; he seized

and demolished Stewart's fort, and proceeded to erect another at Grand

Cibou. (This name, meaning "the great river," was doubtless applied by

the natives to the estuary now known as Great Bras d'Or; but Daniel's

colony was planted at St. Anne's Bay,--thus named by him,--just north

of the Bras d'Or). Charles Leigh, who made a voyage to Cape Breton

in 1597, mentions "the harborow of Cibo;" see Goldsmid's _Hakluyt_,

vol. xiii., p. 69. Here he left a garrison of forty men, with the two

Jesuits Vimond and Vieuxpont, and took the English colonists back

to their own country (except a few, whom he carried to France as

prisoners). Champlain, arriving in Dieppe Dec. 31, 1629, met Daniel

there, and obtained from him his "Relation" of the above enterprise,

which is given in Champlain's _Voyages_ (1632), part 2, pp. 271-275.

In the following year, Daniel returned to this fort, and settled

certain disorders that had arisen during his absence. It is not

definitely known how long the garrison was kept here; but, when De Caen

took possession of Canada (1632), the Jesuits Davost and Antoine Daniel

also came to Cape Breton (probably with Charles, the latter's brother),

and carried on the mission begun by Vimont. Denys, a few years later,

had an important settlement at St. Anne's.

47 (p. 243).--Vimont remained at Cape Breton but a year, and did

not return to Canada until 1639. A sketch of his life will appear

hereafter.

48 (p. 247).--Gabriel Sagard Theodat, a lay brother, was one of the

Récollet missionaries to Canada, where he arrived June 24, 1623, in

company with Father Nicholas Viel. He states, in his _Canada_, p. 11,

that he desired to go on this mission in 1615, at which time he was in

a Récollet convent in Paris; but his superiors would not then consent.

Sagard's missionary labors were among the Hurons, with whom he remained

nearly one year; returning then to France, he wrote and published two

books,--_Grand voyage du pays des Hurons_ (Paris, 1632), and _Histoire

du Canada_ (Paris, 1636). In these works he minutely describes the

customs, social condition, religion, etc., of the Indian tribes; and

gives a history of the missionary labors of the Récollets, up to their

expulsion in 1629. To the _Grand Voyage_ he appends a dictionary of the

Huron language. He died in 1650.

There is some confusion among historians in regard to the dates of

Sagard's sojourn in New France, which apparently arises from his own

inaccuracy of statement, or possibly from a typographical error. In his

_Histoire_ (Tross ed., 1866), p. 115, he says that he left France in

1623; but, in the _Grand Voyage_ (Tross ed., 1865), p. 5, he gives the

year as "vingt-quatre;" while, in the former work, p. 759, he gives in

full the letter of his provincial recalling him to France, dated March

9, 1625. Champlain, however, says that Sagard arrived at Quebec in

June, 1623, and returned from the Huron country in July, 1624.

Sagard's works are rare, and command high prices. Brunet says (in

Michaud's _Biog. Univ._) that five and even eight guineas were paid for

a copy at public sales in London; and that, in France, one was valued

in 1851 at 210 francs. Chevalier says, in his edition of the _Histoire_

(Paris, 1866), p. iii., _note_, that 1,200 francs had in vain been

offered for a copy of that work. Gagnon (_Bibliog. Canad._) states that

a copy brought $38 at the Fraser sale in Quebec, 1860; and that one had

been offered by a Paris bookseller, in 1890, for 1,200 francs.

49 (p. 247).--Father Felix Martin was born Oct. 4, 1804, at Auray,

in Bretagne, France; in September, 1823, he became a novice in the

Jesuit order, entering the convent of Montrouge, at Paris. During

nearly twenty years, he was employed in various colleges and missions

throughout Western Europe; and, early in 1842, was sent to Canada.

There he labored, especially in Montreal, until August, 1851, when he

became the first rector of St. Mary's College in that city; he was its

founder, and the designer of its building. In this position he remained

until 1857, when he became superior of the residence at Quebec. Four

years later, he returned to France, where he was, successively, rector

of St. Francis Xavier's college at Vannes, and superior at Poitiers

and Rouen. He died at Paris, Nov. 25, 1892.

Father Martin published (Montreal, 1852) a French translation of

Bressani's _Breve Relatione_ (1653), accompanied by explanatory notes

and a biographical sketch of Bressani. Later, he wrote the lives

of Jogues, Brébeuf, and other early missionaries; and, in 1886, a

biography of his sister, Mother St. Stanislas, a French nun. He was

also noted as an antiquarian and collector, especially in regard

to the Jesuit _Relations_ and the history of Canada. Carayon's

_Première Mission des Jésuites au Canada_ (Paris, 1864), described in

Bibliographical Data for Doc. xiii. in vol. iii., p. 285, a valuable

collection of documents, all of which are embodied in our series,

consists of manuscripts collected by Father Martin, chiefly in 1858,

while on a visit to Europe.

Transcriber's Note.

Variable spelling and hyphenation have been retained. Minor punctuation

inconsistencies have been silently repaired.

Corrections.

The first line indicates the original, the second the correction.

p. 58:

il ne luy peut iamais defraciner

il ne luy peut iamais desraciner

p. 138:

Femmes Candoises peu fecondes à cause de leurs trauaux continuels.

Femmes Canadoises peu fecondes à cause de leurs trauaux continuels.

p. 268:

from a nomadic to a sendentary life

from a nomadic to a sedentary life

Errata.

The first line indicates the original, the second how it should read.

p. 8:

nostre Capitaine de tous tous costés,

nostre Capitaine de tous costés,

p. 22:

la chaloupe se trouua conpetemment

la chaloupe se trouua completemment

p. 42:

qu'il estoit estoit indigne que les Anglois

qu'il estoit indigne que les Anglois

p. 126:

Canadois ont honne memoire des choses sensibles.

Canadois ont bonne memoire des choses sensibles.

p. 162:

cause de de la perte de S. Sauueur.

cause de la perte de S. Sauueur.

The Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents, Vol. 4: Acadia and Quebec, 1616-1629 · 第 8 / 8 章