Lintier has no disposition to make things out better than they were.

His account of the defeat at Virton, on August 22, is grave and calm

in its sad stoicism, it is even harsh in its refusal to overlook any

of the distressing features of the affair. But hope rises in his heart

like clear water in a troubled well, and it is just after this

melancholy set-back that the noble French spirit most vividly asserts

itself. In the very forefront of physical and moral misery, "quelle

émouvante compréhension de la Patrie s'est révélée à nous!" An army

which is instantly and completely victorious can never experience the

depth of this sentiment. It is necessary to have fought, to have

suffered, to have feared (if only for a moment) that all was lost, in

order to comprehend with passion what the mother-country means to a

man. Lying in the fog, soaked with rain, at the edge of the copses

from which the German guns had ejected them, it was at that wretched

moment that the full apprehension came to Paul Lintier that France

comprised for him all the charm of life, all the affections, all the

joys of the eyes and the heart and the brain. "Alors, on préfère

tomber, mourir là, parce qu'on sent que la France perdue, ce serait

pire que la mort." This is a feeling which animates the darkest pages

of his book--and many of them perforce are gloomy; through all the

confusion and doubt, the disquietude, the physical dejection, the

sense of a kind of blind-man's buff intolerably wearisome and

fatiguing--through all this, which the young author does not seek to

conceal, there runs the ceaseless bright thread of hope sustained by

love.

For us English the book has a curious interest in its unlikeness to

anything which an English lad of twenty would have dreamed of writing.

It strikes an English reader, in comparison with the equally gallant

and hardly less picturesque records which some of our own young

officers have produced, as extraordinarily "grown up." The new

generation which France sent into the war of defence was more simple

and more ardent at the outset than our own analogous generation was.

It was less dilettante and more intellectual. The evidences of

thought, of reasoned reflection carried out to its full extent, of an

adequate realization of the problems presented by life, are manifest,

though in various degree, in all these records of French officers

killed in the months which preceded Christmas 1914. These Frenchmen

did not go out light-heartedly, nor with a pathetic inability to

fathom the purpose for which they so generously went, but they had

given the matter a study which seemed beyond their years. They marched

to the blood-baths of Belgium and Lorraine with solemnity, as though

to a sacrament.

It must be remarked as an interesting point that this generation had

recovered a sense of the spirituality of a war of national defence. In

simpler words, it had recovered that honest pride which France, in

certain of its manifestations since the war of 1870, seemed to have

lamentably lost. Posterity will compare the serene simplicity of Péguy

and Lintier with the restlessness and bitter disenchantment of the

1880 generation, which arrived at manhood just when France was most

deeply conscious of her humiliation. If we seek for the sources of

this recovery of self-respect, which so beautifully characterized

French character at the immediate crisis of 1914, we have to find it,

of course, in the essential elasticity of the trained French mind. The

Frenchman likes the heroic attitude, which is unwelcome to us, and he

adopts it instinctively, with none of our national shyness and false

modesty. But, if we seek for a starting-point of influence, we may

probably find it in the writings of a soldier whose name is scarcely

known in England, but whose "Études sur le Combat," first published in

1880, have been the text-book of the young French officer, and were

never being so much read as just before the outbreak of the war.

The author of these "Études sur le Combat" was Colonel Ardent du Picq,

who fell at the battle of Longeville-les-Metz, on August 15, 1870. He

had predicted the calamity of that war, which he attributed to the

mental decadence of the French army, and to the absence of any

adequate General Staff organization. Ardent du Picq had received no

encouragement from within or from without, and the reforms which he

never ceased to advocate were treated as the dreams of an eccentric

idealist. He died, unrecognized, without having lived to see carried

out one of the reforms which he had so persistently advocated. His

tongue was rough and his pen was dipped in acid; the military critic

who ridiculed the "buffooneries" of his generals and charged his

fellow-officers with trying to get through their day's work with as

little trouble to themselves as possible, was not likely to carry much

weight at the close of the Second Empire. But the scattered papers of

the forgotten Colonel Ardent du Picq were preserved, and ten years

after his death a portion of them was published. Every scrap which

could be found of the work of so fruitful a military thinker was

presently called for, and at the moment of the outbreak of the present

war the "Études sur le Combat" had become the text-book of every

punctilious young officer. It is still unknown how much of the

magnificent effort of 1914 was not due to the shade of Ardent du Picq.

Although the name of that author does not occur in the pages of "Ma

Pièce," we are constrained to believe that Lintier had been, like so

many young men of his class, an infatuated student of the "Études." He

had comprehended the essence of military vitality and the secret of

military grandeur. He had perceived the paramount importance of moral

force in contending with formidable hostile organizations. Ardent du

Picq, who possessed the skill of his nation in the manufacture of

maxims, laid it down that "Vaincre, c'est d'être sûr de la victoire."

He assented to the statement that it was a spiritual and not a

mechanical ascendancy which had gained battles in the past and must

gain them in the future. Very interesting it is to note, in the

delicately scrupulous record of the mind and conscience of Paul

Lintier, how, side by side with this uplifted patriotic confidence,

the weakness of the flesh makes itself felt. At Tailly, full of the

hope of coming battle, waiting in the moonlit forest for the sound of

approaching German guns, suddenly the heroism drops from him, and he

murmurs the plaintive verses of the old poet Joachim du Bellay to the

echo of "Et je mourrai peut-être demain!" The delicate sureness with

which he notes these changes of mood is admirable; and quickly the

depression passes: "vite notre extraordinaire insouciance l'emporte,

et puis, jamais heure a-t-elle été plus favorable à la revanche?"

In defining the particular principles which have actuated the

magnificent French General Staff in the present crisis, Lord Haldane

has dwelt on the fact that the French have displayed throughout "that

moral effect which comes from certainty of purpose and which only

concentrated thought can give." The value which the higher authority

sets on the cultivation of moral enthusiasm is exemplified by the fact

that the French Ministry of War has encouraged the publication of

those personal records, from which we have here made a selection, on

the ground that they carry throughout the army a contagion of energy

and courage. We are far here from the obscure jealousy of thought

which made a military representative of the British War Office the

other day lay down the brilliant axiom "A hairdresser is of more value

to the country at war than a librarian!" Such a man could not exist in

a French community, where, at the very height of hostilities, so

prominent a military authority as Colonel Émile Manceau could pause to

say, "Let us read, let us give much time to reading!" It is a curious

reflection that the present struggle has been, for the French, the

most literary of all wars, the one in which the ordered expression of

clear thought in language has been most carefully and consciously

cultivated.

This was very far from being the case with the war of 1870, when the

absence of literature was strongly felt during and after the crisis.

The old satirist of the "Iambes," Auguste Barbier, wrote, immediately

after the declaration of peace, a poem in which he rehearsed the

incidents of the war, and commented on the absence from the list of

its victims of a single distinguished writer. He said--

_"La Muse n'a pas vu tomber un seul poète_,"

and it was out of any one's power to refute the sinister and prosaic

verse. The contrast with 1914 is painful and striking. In the existing

war the holocaust of victims, poets and historians, painters and

sculptors, musicians and architects, has been heartrending, and it can

never in future years be pretended that the Muses have this time

spared us their most poignant sacrifices. A year ago the _Revue

Critique_, one of the most serious and original of the learned

journals of Paris, announced the losses it had endured. It was

conducted by a staff of forty scholars; by the summer of 1916 this

number was reduced by twenty-seven; thirteen had been killed, eleven

severely wounded, three had disappeared.

Many writers have asked, and M. Maurice Barrès prominently among them,

what is the reason of the fact that intelligence has taken a front

place in this war? What has been the source of the spirit of

self-immolation which has driven the intellectual and imaginative section

of French youth to hold out both hands to catch the full downpour of

the rain of death? There is no precedent for it in French history, and

we may observe for ourselves how new a thing it was, and how

unexpected, by comparing with the ardent and radiant letters and poems

of the youngest generation the most patriotic expressions of their

elders. A single example may suffice. No man of letters has given a

nobler witness to the truth of his patriotism than Colonel Patrice

Mahon, known in letters as Art Roë. His novels, which dealt largely

with modern Russian life, in relation with the French army, were

virile and elevated productions, but he was a man of fifty at the time

of his heroic death at the head of his troops, in the battle of

Wisembach (August 22, 1914), and his tone was not that of such young

men as Camille Violand and Marcel Drouet. To read again the "Pingot et

moi" of Art Roë is to return to a book of the utmost sincerity and

valour, but it was published in 1893, and there is no touch of the

splendour of 1914 about it.

A figure which stands midway between the generation of Art Roë and

that of the adolescent comrades of a new Sophocles of whom we shall

presently speak, is Captain E.J. Détanger, who seems to be

transitional, and to share the qualities of both. This name has, even

now, scarcely grown familiar to the eye and ear, but it proves to have

been the real name of Émile Nolly, whose romances of modern life in

the Extreme East had been widely read just before the war. Nolly's

earliest books, "Hien le Maboul" and "La Barque Annamite" (but

particularly the latter), gave promise of a new Pierre Loti or a new

Rudyard Kipling, but totally distinct in manner from both. Détanger

was just thirty-four when the war broke out, and he was one of its

early victims, dying at Blainville-sur-l'Eau on September 5. He

greatly distinguished himself by his personal bravery, and the cross

of the Legion of Honour was pinned to his blood-stained uniform on his

last battle-field. The tribute of a fellow-officer to this devoted man

of letters may be quoted here. It is an example of the sudden and

complete transformation which turned artists into soldiers at the

first sound of the bugle:--

"Émile Nolly proved a magnificent soldier. He had a youthful, blithe,

fervent and resolute soul; he had the soul of a hero completely

prepared to sacrifice himself with joy for his country. After having

served valiantly and brilliantly in Indo-China, and then in Morocco,

it was with a radiant hope that he set out for the frontier of

Lorraine. 'What does the life of any one of us matter?' he said to me

just before he left. 'All that is essential is that France should

live, that she should be victorious.'"

Marcel Drouet, who has just been mentioned, was much younger. He was a

native of the invaded department of the Ardennes, and had not

completed his twenty-sixth year when he was killed in the trenches of

Consenvoye, in the Woëvre, when he was taking part in the outer

defence of Verdun. He seems to have been distinguished by a refinement

of spirit, which is referred to, in different terms, by every one who

has described him. He leaves behind him a volume of poems, "L'Ombre

qui tourne," and various essays and fragments. The journal of the last

days of his life has been edited by M. Maurice Barrès, and is a record

of singular delicacy and courage. We see him facing the dreadful

circumstances of the war, made the more dreadful to him because the

horrors are committed in the midst of the familiar scenes of his own

home, and we find him patiently waiting for the signal to lead his men

into action while he holds a volume of Chateaubriand open upon his

knee. The reflections of Marcel Drouët differ in some respects from

those of his most enthusiastic companions. There is a note of

tenderness in them which is unusual, and which is very pathetic. At

the very close of his brief and heroic life, the thoughts of Drouët

reverted to the historic town in which he was born, to Sedan which

still shuddered in his infancy at the recollection of the horrors of

1870. He thought of the dead who fell on that melancholy field; and

then his thoughts turned to those dear faces which he had so recently

left behind. The following passage, in its simplicity, in its

sweetness, deserves to live in the memorial literature of the war:--

"Je pense à vous, mes chers vivants, aux mains des barbares en ce

moment sans doute, mais en le coeur de qui j'ai foi, tant je connais

votre dévouement aux choses sublimes.

"Mais aussi je pense à vous, mon Dieu, qui avez voulu toutes ces

choses pour votre plus grand gloire et pour l'établissement de votre

justice. Tous ces malheurs, ces tristesses, tout ce sang répandu sont

imposés par vous, mon Dieu, en manière de rédemption. Mais votre

soleil glorieux éclairera bientôt, j'en suis absolument certain, la

victoire du bon droit qui attend depuis près d'un demi-siècle. J'y

coopère de toutes mes forces, de toute mon âme. Et si vous me retirez

de ce monde, ô Dieu de bonté, permettez que ce soit pour me joindre à

ceux qui m'out précédé dans votre séjour, et dont l'affection

terrestre me fut précieuse. C'est toute la prière ardente que je fais

devant le soleil levant, ce jour de Toussaint que sillonnent déjà les

obus semeurs de mort, en cette année 1914 qui verra rétablir la paix

du monde, par l'anéantissement du peuple barbare, et la régénérescence

de la nation française."

In most cases there rests an obscurity over the brief lives of these

gallant young officer-authors, whose nature was little observed until

the flash of battle illuminated them for one last brilliant moment. We

feel a strong desire, which cannot be gratified, to follow them from

their childhood to their adolescence, and to see for ourselves what

impulses directed them into the path of heroism. It is rarely that we

can do this, but one of these poets has left behind him two friends

who have recaptured the faint and shrouded impressions of his early

life. The piety of M. Henri Albert Besnard, who was his intimate

companion, and of that practised narrator M. Henri Bordeaux, who is

his biographer, enable us to form a clearer and fuller conception of

Camille Violand than of any of his compeers. Born in 1891, he was

typical of that latest generation of which we have spoken, in whom all

seemed to be unconsciously preparing for the great and critical

sacrifice. He was born at Lyons, but was brought up in the Quercy,

that wild and tortured district just north of the Pyrenees, where

nature seems to gather together all that she possesses of the

grotesque and violent in landscape; but he was educated at Alençon,

and trained at Vouziers, in the midst of the orchards of Normandy.

Thus both sides of France, the Midi and the Manche, were equally known

to him, but the ceaseless peregrinations which he underwent, so far

from enlarging his horizon, seem to have plunged his soul in

melancholy. At the age of twenty he struck M. Bordeaux as being the

typical _déraciné._

The letters of Camille Violand and the memories of his friends present

to us the record of a vague and uneasy boyhood. He began quite early

to exercise his mind in prose and verse, but without energy or aim. He

was not fixed in any plan of life. His letters--for he wrote with

abundance, and something undefined seems to have induced his family to

keep his letters--are steeped in sombre and objectless melancholy. He

was tormented by presentiments of misfortune; he indulged a kind of

romantic valetudinarianism. In the confusion of his spirit as he

passed uneasily from boyhood into manhood, the principal moral quality

we perceive is a peevish irritation at the slow development of life.

He was just twenty-one when the death of his mother, to whom he was

passionately attached, woke him out of this paralyzed condition, and

it is remarkable that, in breaking, like a moth from a chrysalis, out

of his network of futile and sterile sophisms, it was immediately on

the contingency of war that he fixed his thoughts. The news of his

mother's death, by a strange and rapid connexion of ideas, reminded

him of his future responsibility as an officer in the coming struggle.

He wrote, in 1913, "Je m'effraie en pensant à cette responsabilité qui

pèsera certainement un jour sur moi, car je considère la guerre comme

à peu près certaine à bref délai."

Having once formed this conviction, a complete revolution affected the

character of the young Violand. His melancholy ceased; his uncertainty

fell from him; it seemed as though his soul threw off her fetters.

From the close of 1913, when the chancelleries of Europe were still

profoundly unconscious of the tremendous upheaval which was in store

for them, this young man, hitherto so timorous and irresolute, is seen

to be filled with a species of prophetic ecstasy:--

_"The boundless, overflowing, bursting gladness!

The vaporous exultation not to be confined!

.........the animation of delight

Which wraps me, like an atmosphere of light,

And bears me as a cloud is borne by its own wind"_

This remarkable change of character was encouraged by the military

discipline which now regulated his life, and which he accepted with

rapture and devotion. His mother's one aim had been to make of Camille

a soldier and a Christian, and he became the very type of that

combination.

To use a striking phrase of M. Henri Bordeaux, the war found Camille

Violand in a state of preparedness. He saw it arrive, not with anxiety

or trepidation, but with solemn joy. His father was placed in command

of a brigade of dragoons, and he himself, at another part of the

frontier line, was given the rank of second lieutenant and a command

which filled him with the pride of responsibility. Three weeks later

he was wounded in the head at the battle of Virton, but not until he

had seen the Germans, after a hard fight, retire before the attack of

his men. "Il a connu l'ivresse de la victoire: il a vu fuir

l'ennemi"--so a friend announced it. He was taken back to the hospital

at Limoges, but the victory of the Marne intoxicated him, and it was

found impossible to hold him back. With a head still bandaged, he made

his appearance once more in his beloved regiment, which was now

fighting in the forest of the Argonne, but on the first occasion on

which he led his men, Violand was wounded again, now in the shoulder.

He was sent far back, into Brittany, to Quimper, where, a second time,

by a subterfuge he contrived to escape from the hospital before his

wound was properly healed. He was absolutely intractable in his

determination to get back promptly to the fighting line: "il était

comme ça, avec son air délicat et tranquille!" Again brought back, he

was set to training men at Quimper. But he could not endure the

restraint, and his nerves broke down.

It was found impossible to hold him back, and on October 8 the

military authorities consented to his return to his regiment, and with

the permission was combined the news that he had been nominated for

the cross of the Legion of Honour. The letter in which he announces

that fact to the ladies at home--"mes chères Grand'mère et Tante"--is

charming in its simplicity. "La croix gagnée sur un champ de bataille,

c'est à mes yeux le plus beau rêve qu'un jeune Français pût faire; je

regrette seulement de ne pas l'avoir méritée davantage; mais l'avenir

me permettra, j'espère, de justifier cette récompense, que je

considère comme anticipée." The official notification specifies the

wounds which he had received and the fact that, by the testimony of

all who saw him under fire, the young lieutenant gave evidence of very

great courage and of indomitable energy. That he was, by what he calls

a queer coincidence, the youngest officer of his regiment and its only

member of the Legion of Honour, afforded him an unaffected

satisfaction.

From this time--the end of October 1914--the letters of Camile Violand

testify to the rapid development of his mind and character. He loses a

certain childishness which had hitherto clung to him, and he expresses

himself with a more virile sobriety. Nothing could exceed the pathos

of his pictures of the terrible life in the Argonne, and we are made

to feel how rapidly the suffering and the responsibility of his

military life were bringing out all the deepest and most serious

elements in his character. There is a remarkable letter of January 7,

1915, describing an engagement in which he lost several of his best

men, and in particular an experienced corporal in whose skill he much

confided. The briefest fragment broken from this pathetic description,

addressed to his father, will give a notion of the tone of it:--

"J'étais absorbé par les blessés dans mon poste de commandement et

quand je pus me rendre dans la tranchée où il était, il tombait dans

le coma. Ses derniers mots avaient été: 'Adieu, ma Patrie!' Pourtant,

il me reconnut à la voix, me répondit faiblement. Je l'assistai dans

ses derniers moments. Ce fut bien rapide, bien simple et bien beau.

_J'étais pour lui le chef, ce qui est plus que le Père et le Prêtre

réunis_. Je l'ai bien senti là; quand ce fut presque fini, je

l'embrassai et le quittai pour retourner aux soucis que nous donne

l'ennemi."

Thus was this lad of three-and-twenty fortified and ripened by the

arduous warfare in the Argonne. He was now spending what leisure the

fighting gave him in a careful study of Homer. We gather that he had

just finished re-reading the "Iliad" when the end came. On March 4,

1915, at Mesnil-les-Hurlus, a ball pierced his heart, splintering in

its passage the cross of the Legion of Honour of which he was so

proud. In his pocket was found his last letter, still unposted, in

which he told his father of a fresh distinction for valour which he

had just received, and in the course of which, with a manifest

presentiment of his approaching end, he wrote, "Je mourrai, si Dieu

veut, en bon chrétien et en bon Français."

It is not to be denied that ordinary observers were not in any degree

prepared for the heroic devotion displayed by such young officers as

these at the beginning of the war. The general opinion in peace time

was expressed by M. Maurice Maeterlinck when he laid it down that

"courage, moral and physical endurance (if not abnegation,

forgetfulness of self, renunciation of all comfort, the faculty of

sacrifice, the power to face death) belong exclusively to the most

primitive, the least happy, the least intelligent of peoples, those

which are least capable of reasoning, of taking danger into account."

It was the common hypothesis among moralists that, as men's nerves

grew more sensitive and the means of destruction more cruel and

irresistible, no human being would be able to support the strain of

actual fighting. It seemed inevitable that soldiers would rapidly

become demoralized, when exposed to the multifarious horrors of modern

mechanical battle. Nothing, therefore, could have been more surprising

than the temper shown by thousands of young men, suddenly called up

from sedentary and safe pursuits, and confronted by the terrors of

shrapnel and liquid fire and mines and gas, and all the other horrible

ingenuities of an unseen enemy for killing and mutilating. Their

imaginations were unaccustomed to these terrors, it is true, but the

higher faculties of the human mind asserted themselves, and in the

vague collective battle of the trenches these young French officers;

despite the refinement and the security in which they had always been

acustomed to exist, instantly reverted to the chivalrous attitude

which their remote ancestors had adopted in a warfare that was

romantic and personal in its individualism.

Three French Moralists and The Gallantry of France · 第 9 / 10 段