CHAPTER V

SOME SOCIAL MEMORIES

My Thursdays in Russia--Khalil Pasha's Death--Lord Napier and the

Lady-in-Waiting--Madame Volnys--My Parents-in-law's _ménage_--An

Exceptional Type--Prince Vladimir Dolgorouki's Embarrassment--The Grand

Duchess Helen--A Brilliant Woman--The Emperor's Enjoyment--The

Campbell-Bannermans--A Royal Diplomatist--Mark Twain on Couriers--In

Serious Vein--Verestchagin--"The Retreat from Moscow"--The Kaiser's

Remarkable Utterance

I must say I was very fortunate with my Thursday receptions in Russia.

In the first place, my husband, who was not particularly fond of

singing or playing, never opposed either. Diplomatists like Lord

Napier, the English Ambassador at Petrograd, and the Turk, Khalil

Pasha, Turkish Ambassador (but brought up in France and devoted to

French theatres), also used to come and be as silent as mice if music

was already going on. That poor Khalil had a very dramatic end. He

returned to Constantinople, as he thought for a short time, but fell

ill. His European doctors insisted on an immediate cure at Carlsbad,

but his Sultan, for some reason unknown to me, opposed his leaving

Turkey. The poor man died mysteriously, and his enormous wealth as

mysteriously disappeared.

At one of my little receptions there happened a {73} very disagreeable

duel between Lord Napier and a lady-in-waiting belonging to the Court

of the Grand Duchess Helen. She was the sister of an ambassador, with

whom, however, she was not on very affectionate terms. Undoubtedly

pretty, she was occasionally rude and almost ill-bred. On seeing him,

Mademoiselle de ---- exclaimed: "Lord Napier, I spent last evening at

the Winter Palace with old Countess Bludoff. We talked of you and

laughed very much."

I felt simply horrified at that speech, but Napier remained quite

self-possessed.

"I know," said he, "you were asked there to be shown to my new

secretary, Mitford." Here, fortunately, the dialogue was interrupted

by Rubinstein, who started a sonata. A fortunate interruption!

Soon after that in came Madame Volnys, the celebrated French actress,

who promised to give us some scenes of Molière's _Tartuffe_, which she

did to perfection.

Madame Volnys was a remarkable woman, not only possessing great

histrionic talent, but also very superior character. She lost her only

child, whom she adored. This brought her into contact with our Empress

Marie Alexandrovna (very particular in her choice of associates), the

consort of our "Emperor Liberatas," who used to invite her to the

Palace as her lecturer fairly often.

In the same year something quite unexpected happened to me. My

husband's parents, very old people, but who had never been abroad,

suddenly decided to go to Paris, and I was asked to join them {74}

later on. Off they went, after having paid us in Petrograd a visit of

two or three weeks. They travelled in quite exceptional comfort. They

had a lady travelling-companion, my mother-in-law had her maid, my

father-in-law his valet, and to crown all there was a Russian cook,

whom my mother-in-law declared to be far superior to any foreigner,

including even the French. Whatever my mother-in-law declared was law

to the whole family, not only to her docile husband and her two sons,

but to her two daughters-in-law, and anybody coming to her house.

I remember one day my brother-in-law, who was already Ambassador at

Vienna, and my husband, who at that time was a lieutenant-general

attached to the Grand Duke Nicolas, father of the present head of our

troops, were sitting and talking together. Their mother entered the

room and they both got up and stood until she told them to sit down

again.

My mother-in-law was an exceptional type. She was the daughter of

Prince Vladimir Dolgorouki, the poet, and tremendously proud of her

origin, but in Russia all the princes Dolgorouki descended from Rurick,

who came to Russia in the ninth century, and having all the same origin

are surely fairly equal. But such was not my mother-in-law's idea, and

she once upbraided the governor-general of Moscow, having the same name

as her own, for belonging to the younger branch. The poor man looked

very much embarrassed.

Another pleasant memory is that of the Grand Duchess Helen. A woman

who loses her youth, {75} beauty and gaiety, and remains in possession

only of her immortal soul, may naturally expect to be forgotten by her

so-called "friends." But a Russian Grand Duchess enjoying an

exceptionally high position, with palaces and a numerous court at her

disposal, is a privileged person. No need for her to "request the

favour" of So-and-so's company to tea, dinner or reception. She

dictates her list, including the names of wits, artists or ministers,

whose attendance she desires. The courier transmits her orders, and

the guests arrive. _Voilà tout!_

Permission to attend service in Palace private chapels is generally

received through a lady-in-waiting or the "Grande Maitresse"--as, at

least, I know from personal experience.

The dear Grand Duchess Helen remained to the last day of her life, to

me, always brilliant and clever, and I was sincerely attached to her.

I shall never forget, however, the difficulty I had to execute one of

her orders. She was giving a ball to their Majesties, at which,

punctually at midnight, dominoes were to appear in a prearranged set.

I was asked to secure these mysterious apparitions. But this proved a

far from easy task. For not only had I to find ladies who were witty,

amusing and sprightly, but also those who would be willing to deprive

themselves of being seen as invited guests, in order to pass through

the rooms as apparitions--carefully masked.

Now one of my candidates had the misfortune to possess very ugly

prominent egg-like eyes, "but"--thought I--"there is the mask, it will

conceal all sorts of imperfections." Nevertheless, I thought {76} it

prudent to warn her. "Remember," said I, "the orders are that identity

must be _strictly_ concealed."

"Oh, that is quite impossible in my case," she proudly replied, "for my

bright and almost oriental eyes are well known and would certainly be

recognised by everyone."

So I dropped the oriental-eyed creature and secured a substitute.

The Emperor assured his aunt afterwards that he had greatly enjoyed her

party.

The Grand Duchess, as well as her other nephew--the Grand Duke

Constantine Nicolaevitch--was devoted to the Emperor's reforms,

especially to his scheme concerning the abolition of Serfdom in Russia.

That plan, no doubt, was of tremendous magnitude. It not only granted

personal freedom to forty-eight millions of serfs, but half the number

of them had to become freeholders.

That reform, by the by, was carried out in two years' time. Was it not

a miraculous rapidity?

There was another detail of this measure, which was really a very noble

and grand one; we, the nobility of all the country, have lost, through

that measure, nearly half of all we possessed. An important fact, no

doubt, but I never heard any indignation, protest or murmur evoked by

that change. Everybody felt its urgency, and a feeling of justice

prevailed with all the others.

Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman was very much interested in that question,

and plied me with many questions. Not being able to satisfy his

curiosity during our meetings at Carlsbad, I promised to {77} procure

from Russia the desired information, and did so eventually on my

arrival at London.

It was at the Grand Duchess Helen's villa at Carlsbad, where we were

invited every evening during her stay, that I met the

Campbell-Bannermans for the first time. Those were immensely

interesting evenings, when one met only people worth knowing.

One of the charming characteristics of these gatherings was their

unpretentiousness and simplicity. Many of the guests were invalids,

melancholy slaves to all sorts of hygienic regulations. Fortunately, I

was not one of these, and could enjoy my moral food as well as the

beautiful fruit that the rest of the world could only contemplate. My

friend, Count Alexander Keyserling, was attached to the Grand Duchess

Helen's court during her foreign trip of that year, and he alone could

make any gathering most interesting.

Before leaving Carlsbad, the Campbell-Bannermans insisted upon my

promising to see them often in London, and they soon became a new

attraction for me during my stays in England.

The first years of my travels, my winter visits to London were of very

short duration--but dear England grows upon one, and little by little

my sojourns extended themselves from October till May.

Few people have left me such dear memories as Sir Henry

Campbell-Bannerman and his wife. I visited them in their English

country house, but never in Scotland, as I was always afraid of being

too much carried away from my work, which required unremitting

perseverance and study.

{78}

Contrary to what often happened to me, I liked them both almost

equally, though dear Lady C.-B.'s moral qualities prevailed over her

physical charms. She had excellent qualities, greatly appreciated by

her husband and her friends. Thus, for instance, she knew her Blue

Books almost better than did her husband, and when the conversation

turned on some particular events with dates and detail she could

surpass everybody with her memory. I must add that both husband and

wife were very hospitable, and I was allowed, no, even pressed, to

lunch with them whenever I liked. I did so fairly often on Sundays, as

I frequently wanted Sir Henry's advice on different subjects, and this

he never failed to give. More than once I said to him: "I recognise

your wisdom and your prudence in all you say and do, I feel sure the

day will come when you will be Prime Minister."

Though I am neither a clairvoyante nor a prophetess--still, my prophecy

turned out to be true. He always (was it simply out of modesty?)

denied the possibility of such a happening. But I was right after all,

and he was wrong.

To be with Sir Henry was always a particular pleasure to me. It was

such a delight to see a man so staunch to his principles, so firm with

people about him, and so kind to those depending on him.

He certainly, _pace_ Sydney Smith, appreciated a joke. We were talking

one day about the head of a Royal House. I related how I, along with

some diplomatists, was presented to the Court in question.

"I think I am right," said the Royal Hostess, to {79} one of the

latter, smiling graciously, "you are the successor of your

predecessor?" He bowed very deeply, and seemed quite pleased with that

platitude. I was somewhat taken aback and rather amused, but when the

reception was over, a lady-in-waiting said to me: "Is not Her Highness

admirably clever and gracious? How well she talks!" Court people are

sometimes very easily pleased. I did not commit myself to much

admiration!

Sir Henry was greatly amused at the story. The last time I saw Sir

Henry and had a long talk with him, was when he dined with me after his

return from France. He came to meet the Russian Ambassador on the 23rd

of January.

"Do you know," I said, "people assure me that you are going to the

House of Lords. I am rather surprised to hear it," I added frankly.

But he simply ridiculed the idea of such a step.

"You are quite right in being sceptical," he said. "I love my work,

and I am not going to lay it down." That was the last time he dined

out. He made a further brief appearance in the House of Commons, but

it speedily became evident that his days were numbered. Still, he

clung to the hope that he would regain strength. His colleagues, Mr.

Asquith in particular, did everything a man could to ease his burden.

Doctors declared that dropsy had set in as the result of heart

weakness. But his courage was unabated, and his faith undimmed. My

impression is that his wife's death undoubtedly accelerated his own

end. Strange reports have been spread about his last days. People who

were allowed to watch {80} around his bed heard the dying man speak

from time to time, as of old, to the life-long companion of all his

joys and sorrows, his beloved wife, as if she were present before him,

and that he would soon rejoin her in the land of another life.

Tennyson had the same experience with his son Lionel. If these visions

are actually granted, would it not be a great consolation and a reward

for deep affection?

In those days I had many friends who possessed very little in common

with each other. Carlyle and Froude would sometimes call on me, but

generally when I was likely to be alone. To me Carlyle showed only the

lovable and affectionate side of his nature. He was a dear old man,

and I loved nothing better than to see opposite me his rugged old face,

and hear his broad Scots accent.

When the publication in book form of my articles was under discussion,

he said, "You must publish all your articles."

"But who will write a preface?" I enquired. "Will you do so?" The

dear old man shook his head dolefully, and, looking at his trembling

hand, said:

"I could not, I am too old, but here is a young man"--and he looked at

Froude who was with him. "He can do it."

Froude protested very gallantly that my articles did not require a

preface, but nevertheless he most kindly wrote one which, no doubt,

induced a large number of people to make themselves acquainted with my

views.

[Illustration: SEMINARY FOR 125 SCHOOL TEACHERS BUILT BY ALEXANDER

NOVIKOFF AT NOVO-ALEXANDROFKA]

Carlyle and I had one great thing in common: {81} our distrust of

Disraeli and our sympathy with the oppressed Slavs. In 1878, when the

jingoes were shouting their loudest over the Russian Mission to

Afghanistan, which had precipitated the Afghan War, Carlyle referred to

politics as "a sore subject nowadays with our damnable premier," as he

called him.

He was always generous with regard to the humble efforts of the

"Rooshian Leddy" as he called me. He knew that whatever my literary

shortcomings I was sincere, and that was the one golden key to dear old

Carlyle's heart.

When death came within sight, almost within touch, he regarded it not

as an enemy but rather as a magician who was to open to him a new world

of wonder. It might almost be said that he went part of the way to

meet it. We, his friends, were always being thrilled by false alarms.

One day, two and a half years before his death, he solemnly warned

those about him of his approaching death.

I recall on another occasion I was told the end was very near; the next

I heard was that he was as devoted as ever to his omnibus rides. In

those days one never knew whether Carlyle were dying or riding in an

omnibus.

When two years later the end was slowly approaching, I refrained from

going to see him, thinking it a greater act of friendship to remain

away rather than to make any claim upon his fast-ebbing vitality. I

was deeply touched when he enquired of those about him: "Why does not

Madame Novikoff come to see me?"

I went and found him very weak, but genuinely {82} glad to see me. He

talked slowly and carefully, showing that the breaking-up of the body

had in no way affected his magnificent mind. I remember his

complaining to me that Froude wanted him to correct proofs on his

death-bed; but that he had refused!

I am not what would be described as emotional, having perhaps more than

the average amount of control over myself; but I felt at the bedside of

that dear old man that I could not keep my self-possession.

His last words to me were:

"Ay, ay, when you come back here (from Russia) you will not find me

alive."

As to my other old friends, like Kinglake, Froude, Charles Villiers and

Count Béust--who were, in fact, my daily visitors--I need not more than

mention their names, having written of them so fully elsewhere.

Among the many interesting personalities whom I have at various times

met, there comes to my mind the remembrance of Mark Twain. The society

of the great American humorist was always greatly sought after--a very

natural circumstance--for, unlike many famous wits who keep all their

brilliancy exclusively at the points of their pens, Mark Twain was

sociable and talkative and seemed to have an inexhaustible supply of

delightful anecdotes, ever ready and at the disposition of his friends.

He called on me one day, and, speaking of his approaching departure on

some pleasure trip with his wife and two daughters, remarked with a

humorous twinkle in his eye:

{83}

"It is fortunate that we have no courier to make a muddle with our

tickets----"

"Why should couriers make muddles?" I asked. "Have you had tragic

experiences of that kind?"

"Not personally," he answered; "but there was a millionaire who

travelled with all his huge family, the kind of family that is

described in the Old Testament. They gave themselves great airs, and

of course arrived at the station one minute before the departure of the

train, having left everything to their courier. The latter, however,

had evidently been otherwise occupied, and was late too, arriving

almost at the same moment as the family.

"'How late you are!' shouted the irate millionaire. 'Give me the

tickets--quick!' The courier, in great haste, fumbled nervously among

a confusion of papers in his pocket-book, and thrust into his

employer's hand a packet of tickets. The engine was already getting up

steam, and there was not a moment to be lost. My poor friend passed

the packet on to a guard and asked excitedly for his reserved carriage,

only to receive in reply a questioning stare. Alas! The tickets

turned out to be of little use on the railway, for they were--concert

tickets! The courier, you see, was a singer, and had been thinking too

much about his own affairs!"

Mark Twain often amused his hearers by describing in the most humorous

manner his own past jokes.

"Some time ago," he told me on one occasion, "everyone went mad about

table turning! I wrote a long article on the subject, but in spite of

the remonstrances of my publisher, refused to sign it.

"Don't you see?" he added, "I wanted to be {84} taken seriously--had I

disclosed my identity, everyone would have taken all I said for a joke!"

So there is something in a name after all, in spite of Shakespeare!

I have, indeed, seen Mark Twain very much in earnest. That was on the

Negro question. What seemed to me a great prejudice, represented, in

his eyes, a regular danger to the civilised world. Not long ago, a

very cultivated woman, just arrived from America, spoke to me with

dread about the impudence and self-conceit of the negroes. How

different her pictures were from those of Mrs. Beecher-Stowe in _Uncle

Tom's Cabin_!

Another great personality was Verestchagin, the Russian painter, a very

dear friend of mine. I have elsewhere described him as the Count

Tolstoy of painters. He had the same genius, the same fearlessness and

the same craving for what he conceived to be the truth, and possibly

occasionally the same exaggerated touch of realism. We Russians have a

way of regarding our great artists as artists, and if they

injudiciously dabble in politics, we forgive it when considering their

genius.

Verestchagin took part in many wars, and it is not strange that he

should say, as he once did to me, that men were everywhere the same,

"all animals, combatant, pugnacious, murderous animals."

His remarks upon war are peculiarly interesting at the present time,

for he was not an arm-chair philosopher, but, like Francisco Goya, had

seen the real horrors of war. He pointed out that the actual killing

of the enemy was only a very small part of war, which means hunger and

thirst and great {85} hardship, sleepless nights, marches beneath

blazing suns, or drenched by rain.

Verestchagin was a great friend of Skobeleff, and this drew us closely

together. The two had been through the same war together; and I

remember that but for the wisdom of certain Russian officials that war

might have been prolonged.

It is well known that Skobeleff was a man of very independent

character. On the eve of the Russo-Turkish War some difficulty arose

between him and the authorities, and he determined to resign his

commission and enlist as a private, as he was determined to fight, no

matter in what capacity. He was saved from this by a prudent act on

the part of the officials known in England as "climbing down." Who

knows what would have happened had the brave and glorious Skobeleff

been one of the led instead of the idolised leader?

Skobeleff was indeed one of the most charming, captivating men I ever

met. I was acquainted with his mother at a time when the son was only

known to me by his brilliant reputation. Madame Skobeleff, passing

through Moscow, once invited me to accompany her on a journey to the

Balkans, which tempting invitation, however, I did not accept, owing to

the fact that my husband was at the time ill, and I did not venture to

leave him. My matrimonial scruples probably saved my life, as Madame

Skobeleff met her death during that journey, and had I been with her I

should probably have shared her fate. To be more precise, she was

assassinated by her Montenegrin guide, Uzatis, who immediately

committed suicide, so that the motives {86} of the murder remained an

inscrutable mystery, as he did not touch her jewellery or her money.

One day I received a letter from Skobeleff, asking permission to call

on me. He came and talked, which he did to perfection. And

I--listened: the only thing _I_ do to perfection! My heart was

throbbing all the time, to a point that made me wonder whether it would

not burst, as he kept on talking of his determination to go to Egypt,

or anywhere, for some fighting, no matter in what capacity, be it even

as a humble private.

"Are you not ashamed of yourself," I exclaimed, "to risk a life so

precious to Russia? Stay at home, exercise your influence on our

foreign policy--that is also a noble work."

"Oh," he answered, "as to that I am convinced that death will find me,

not on the battlefield, but at home, in Russia. Every day I receive

scores of anonymous letters, predicting the nearness of my end."

On leaving me, he asked if I would accept his photograph, which he

afterwards sent me, with charmingly encouraging inscription: "To Mme.

Olga Novikoff from an enthusiastic admirer of her patriotic work." I

may add that this fine portrait is now in Moscow in the Roumiantzoff

Museum.

Two weeks later he was no more.

Verestchagin described to me some of the horrors of the Bulgarian war.

I would willingly have closed my ears to them, but there is a strange

and grim fascination in horror, especially when described by a man of

Verestchagin's personality.

He saw the Turkish prisoners being driven northward {87} to Russia and

the agonies they suffered. To add to the frightfulness an early frost

set in and the poor fellows, worn out through the long siege, dropped

by the wayside and were frozen to death.

These scenes enabled him to paint Napoleon's "Retreat from Moscow." It

is of peculiar interest now to recall the Kaiser's comments when he saw

Verestchagin's picture exhibited at Berlin. He looked long and

earnestly at the canvas, in particular at the figure of Napoleon

tramping through the snow. He is said to have remarked that such

pictures were our safest guarantees against war. "Yet," he added, "in

spite of that there will still be men who want to govern the world, but

they will all end the same."

Was this a prophecy, or merely a remark uttered with the object of

blinding his contemporaries to his real purpose? It is certainly very

interesting to note that the Kaiser would not allow the students of the

military schools to see the "Retreat from Moscow." People must draw

from that their own conclusions.

Verestchagin came to London on the occasion of his Exhibition, when I

saw a good deal of him. Suddenly he was called back to Russia, and he

came to me and announced his intention of returning immediately.

"But," I said, "you cannot leave your pictures."

"There are my two servants," he replied. "They will look after them."

"But," expostulated I, "they can speak only Russian, and that will not

be of much assistance to them in London. How can they look after your

{88} affairs when they cannot speak either English or French?"

"Oh, that will be all right," he replied. "They will manage."

That was Verestchagin all over. The upshot of it was that I

volunteered to look after his interests, and every morning I would go

down to the gallery to see if there was anything demanding attention,

and the people at the gallery, apparently marvelling at such devotion

in a friend, insisted upon addressing me as Madame Verestchagin.

Verestchagin was one of the first victims of the Russo-Japanese war.

{89}

Russian Memories · 第 5 / 20 章