PART II

I was then in Germany, attracted thither by the wars in that country,

which have not yet been brought to a termination; and as I was

returning to the army from the coronation of the emperor, the setting

in of winter arrested me in a locality where, as I found no society to

interest me, and was besides fortunately undisturbed by any cares or

passions, I remained the whole day in seclusion, with full opportunity

to occupy my attention with my own thoughts. Of these one of the very

first that occurred to me was, that there is seldom so much perfection

in works composed of many separate parts, upon which different hands

had been employed, as in those completed by a single master. Thus it is

observable that the buildings which a single architect has planned and

executed, are generally more elegant and commodious than those which

several have attempted to improve, by making old walls serve for

purposes for which they were not originally built. Thus also, those

ancient cities which, from being at first only villages, have become,

in course of time, large towns, are usually but ill laid out compared

with the regularity constructed towns which a professional architect

has freely planned on an open plain; so that although the several

buildings of the former may often equal or surpass in beauty those of

the latter, yet when one observes their indiscriminate juxtaposition,

there a large one and here a small, and the consequent crookedness and

irregularity of the streets, one is disposed to allege that chance

rather than any human will guided by reason must have led to such an

arrangement. And if we consider that nevertheless there have been at

all times certain officers whose duty it was to see that private

buildings contributed to public ornament, the difficulty of reaching

high perfection with but the materials of others to operate on, will be

readily acknowledged. In the same way I fancied that those nations

which, starting from a semi-barbarous state and advancing to

civilization by slow degrees, have had their laws successively

determined, and, as it were, forced upon them simply by experience of

the hurtfulness of particular crimes and disputes, would by this

process come to be possessed of less perfect institutions than those

which, from the commencement of their association as communities, have

followed the appointments of some wise legislator. It is thus quite

certain that the constitution of the true religion, the ordinances of

which are derived from God, must be incomparably superior to that of

every other. And, to speak of human affairs, I believe that the

pre-eminence of Sparta was due not to the goodness of each of its laws

in particular, for many of these were very strange, and even opposed to

good morals, but to the circumstance that, originated by a single

individual, they all tended to a single end. In the same way I thought

that the sciences contained in books (such of them at least as are made

up of probable reasonings, without demonstrations), composed as they

are of the opinions of many different individuals massed together, are

farther removed from truth than the simple inferences which a man of

good sense using his natural and unprejudiced judgment draws respecting

the matters of his experience. And because we have all to pass through

a state of infancy to manhood, and have been of necessity, for a length

of time, governed by our desires and preceptors (whose dictates were

frequently conflicting, while neither perhaps always counseled us for

the best), I farther concluded that it is almost impossible that our

judgments can be so correct or solid as they would have been, had our

reason been mature from the moment of our birth, and had we always been

guided by it alone.

It is true, however, that it is not customary to pull down all the

houses of a town with the single design of rebuilding them differently,

and thereby rendering the streets more handsome; but it often happens

that a private individual takes down his own with the view of erecting

it anew, and that people are even sometimes constrained to this when

their houses are in danger of falling from age, or when the foundations

are insecure. With this before me by way of example, I was persuaded

that it would indeed be preposterous for a private individual to think

of reforming a state by fundamentally changing it throughout, and

overturning it in order to set it up amended; and the same I thought

was true of any similar project for reforming the body of the sciences,

or the order of teaching them established in the schools: but as for

the opinions which up to that time I had embraced, I thought that I

could not do better than resolve at once to sweep them wholly away,

that I might afterwards be in a position to admit either others more

correct, or even perhaps the same when they had undergone the scrutiny

of reason. I firmly believed that in this way I should much better

succeed in the conduct of my life, than if I built only upon old

foundations, and leaned upon principles which, in my youth, I had taken

upon trust. For although I recognized various difficulties in this

undertaking, these were not, however, without remedy, nor once to be

compared with such as attend the slightest reformation in public

affairs. Large bodies, if once overthrown, are with great difficulty

set up again, or even kept erect when once seriously shaken, and the

fall of such is always disastrous. Then if there are any imperfections

in the constitutions of states (and that many such exist the diversity

of constitutions is alone sufficient to assure us), custom has without

doubt materially smoothed their inconveniences, and has even managed to

steer altogether clear of, or insensibly corrected a number which

sagacity could not have provided against with equal effect; and, in

fine, the defects are almost always more tolerable than the change

necessary for their removal; in the same manner that highways which

wind among mountains, by being much frequented, become gradually so

smooth and commodious, that it is much better to follow them than to

seek a straighter path by climbing over the tops of rocks and

descending to the bottoms of precipices.

Hence it is that I cannot in any degree approve of those restless and

busy meddlers who, called neither by birth nor fortune to take part in

the management of public affairs, are yet always projecting reforms;

and if I thought that this tract contained aught which might justify

the suspicion that I was a victim of such folly, I would by no means

permit its publication. I have never contemplated anything higher than

the reformation of my own opinions, and basing them on a foundation

wholly my own. And although my own satisfaction with my work has led me

to present here a draft of it, I do not by any means therefore

recommend to every one else to make a similar attempt. Those whom God

has endowed with a larger measure of genius will entertain, perhaps,

designs still more exalted; but for the many I am much afraid lest even

the present undertaking be more than they can safely venture to

imitate. The single design to strip one’s self of all past beliefs is

one that ought not to be taken by every one. The majority of men is

composed of two classes, for neither of which would this be at all a

befitting resolution: in the first place, of those who with more than a

due confidence in their own powers, are precipitate in their judgments

and want the patience requisite for orderly and circumspect thinking;

whence it happens, that if men of this class once take the liberty to

doubt of their accustomed opinions, and quit the beaten highway, they

will never be able to thread the byway that would lead them by a

shorter course, and will lose themselves and continue to wander for

life; in the second place, of those who, possessed of sufficient sense

or modesty to determine that there are others who excel them in the

power of discriminating between truth and error, and by whom they may

be instructed, ought rather to content themselves with the opinions of

such than trust for more correct to their own reason.

For my own part, I should doubtless have belonged to the latter class,

had I received instruction from but one master, or had I never known

the diversities of opinion that from time immemorial have prevailed

among men of the greatest learning. But I had become aware, even so

early as during my college life, that no opinion, however absurd and

incredible, can be imagined, which has not been maintained by some on

of the philosophers; and afterwards in the course of my travels I

remarked that all those whose opinions are decidedly repugnant to ours

are not in that account barbarians and savages, but on the contrary

that many of these nations make an equally good, if not better, use of

their reason than we do. I took into account also the very different

character which a person brought up from infancy in France or Germany

exhibits, from that which, with the same mind originally, this

individual would have possessed had he lived always among the Chinese

or with savages, and the circumstance that in dress itself the fashion

which pleased us ten years ago, and which may again, perhaps, be

received into favor before ten years have gone, appears to us at this

moment extravagant and ridiculous. I was thus led to infer that the

ground of our opinions is far more custom and example than any certain

knowledge. And, finally, although such be the ground of our opinions, I

remarked that a plurality of suffrages is no guarantee of truth where

it is at all of difficult discovery, as in such cases it is much more

likely that it will be found by one than by many. I could, however,

select from the crowd no one whose opinions seemed worthy of

preference, and thus I found myself constrained, as it were, to use my

own reason in the conduct of my life.

But like one walking alone and in the dark, I resolved to proceed so

slowly and with such circumspection, that if I did not advance far, I

would at least guard against falling. I did not even choose to dismiss

summarily any of the opinions that had crept into my belief without

having been introduced by reason, but first of all took sufficient time

carefully to satisfy myself of the general nature of the task I was

setting myself, and ascertain the true method by which to arrive at the

knowledge of whatever lay within the compass of my powers.

Among the branches of philosophy, I had, at an earlier period, given

some attention to logic, and among those of the mathematics to

geometrical analysis and algebra,--three arts or sciences which ought,

as I conceived, to contribute something to my design. But, on

examination, I found that, as for logic, its syllogisms and the

majority of its other precepts are of avail--rather in the

communication of what we already know, or even as the art of Lully, in

speaking without judgment of things of which we are ignorant, than in

the investigation of the unknown; and although this science contains

indeed a number of correct and very excellent precepts, there are,

nevertheless, so many others, and these either injurious or

superfluous, mingled with the former, that it is almost quite as

difficult to effect a severance of the true from the false as it is to

extract a Diana or a Minerva from a rough block of marble. Then as to

the analysis of the ancients and the algebra of the moderns, besides

that they embrace only matters highly abstract, and, to appearance, of

no use, the former is so exclusively restricted to the consideration of

figures, that it can exercise the understanding only on condition of

greatly fatiguing the imagination; and, in the latter, there is so

complete a subjection to certain rules and formulas, that there results

an art full of confusion and obscurity calculated to embarrass, instead

of a science fitted to cultivate the mind. By these considerations I

was induced to seek some other method which would comprise the

advantages of the three and be exempt from their defects. And as a

multitude of laws often only hampers justice, so that a state is best

governed when, with few laws, these are rigidly administered; in like

manner, instead of the great number of precepts of which logic is

composed, I believed that the four following would prove perfectly

sufficient for me, provided I took the firm and unwavering resolution

never in a single instance to fail in observing them.

The first was never to accept anything for true which I did not clearly

know to be such; that is to say, carefully to avoid precipitancy and

prejudice, and to comprise nothing more in my judgement than what was

presented to my mind so clearly and distinctly as to exclude all ground

of doubt.

The second, to divide each of the difficulties under examination into

as many parts as possible, and as might be necessary for its adequate

solution.

The third, to conduct my thoughts in such order that, by commencing

with objects the simplest and easiest to know, I might ascend by little

and little, and, as it were, step by step, to the knowledge of the more

complex; assigning in thought a certain order even to those objects

which in their own nature do not stand in a relation of antecedence and

sequence.

And the _last_, in every case to make enumerations so complete, and

reviews so general, that I might be assured that nothing was omitted.

The long chains of simple and easy reasonings by means of which

geometers are accustomed to reach the conclusions of their most

difficult demonstrations, had led me to imagine that all things, to the

knowledge of which man is competent, are mutually connected in the same

way, and that there is nothing so far removed from us as to be beyond

our reach, or so hidden that we cannot discover it, provided only we

abstain from accepting the false for the true, and always preserve in

our thoughts the order necessary for the deduction of one truth from

another. And I had little difficulty in determining the objects with

which it was necessary to commence, for I was already persuaded that it

must be with the simplest and easiest to know, and, considering that of

all those who have hitherto sought truth in the sciences, the

mathematicians alone have been able to find any demonstrations, that

is, any certain and evident reasons, I did not doubt but that such must

have been the rule of their investigations. I resolved to commence,

therefore, with the examination of the simplest objects, not

anticipating, however, from this any other advantage than that to be

found in accustoming my mind to the love and nourishment of truth, and

to a distaste for all such reasonings as were unsound. But I had no

intention on that account of attempting to master all the particular

sciences commonly denominated mathematics: but observing that, however

different their objects, they all agree in considering only the various

relations or proportions subsisting among those objects, I thought it

best for my purpose to consider these proportions in the most general

form possible, without referring them to any objects in particular,

except such as would most facilitate the knowledge of them, and without

by any means restricting them to these, that afterwards I might thus be

the better able to apply them to every other class of objects to which

they are legitimately applicable. Perceiving further, that in order to

understand these relations I should sometimes have to consider them one

by one and sometimes only to bear them in mind, or embrace them in the

aggregate, I thought that, in order the better to consider them

individually, I should view them as subsisting between straight lines,

than which I could find no objects more simple, or capable of being

more distinctly represented to my imagination and senses; and on the

other hand, that in order to retain them in the memory or embrace an

aggregate of many, I should express them by certain characters the

briefest possible. In this way I believed that I could borrow all that

was best both in geometrical analysis and in algebra, and correct all

the defects of the one by help of the other.

And, in point of fact, the accurate observance of these few precepts

gave me, I take the liberty of saying, such ease in unraveling all the

questions embraced in these two sciences, that in the two or three

months I devoted to their examination, not only did I reach solutions

of questions I had formerly deemed exceedingly difficult but even as

regards questions of the solution of which I continued ignorant, I was

enabled, as it appeared to me, to determine the means whereby, and the

extent to which a solution was possible; results attributable to the

circumstance that I commenced with the simplest and most general

truths, and that thus each truth discovered was a rule available in the

discovery of subsequent ones Nor in this perhaps shall I appear too

vain, if it be considered that, as the truth on any particular point is

one whoever apprehends the truth, knows all that on that point can be

known. The child, for example, who has been instructed in the elements

of arithmetic, and has made a particular addition, according to rule,

may be assured that he has found, with respect to the sum of the

numbers before him, and that in this instance is within the reach of

human genius. Now, in conclusion, the method which teaches adherence to

the true order, and an exact enumeration of all the conditions of the

thing sought includes all that gives certitude to the rules of

arithmetic.

But the chief ground of my satisfaction with thus method, was the

assurance I had of thereby exercising my reason in all matters, if not

with absolute perfection, at least with the greatest attainable by me:

besides, I was conscious that by its use my mind was becoming gradually

habituated to clearer and more distinct conceptions of its objects; and

I hoped also, from not having restricted this method to any particular

matter, to apply it to the difficulties of the other sciences, with not

less success than to those of algebra. I should not, however, on this

account have ventured at once on the examination of all the

difficulties of the sciences which presented themselves to me, for this

would have been contrary to the order prescribed in the method, but

observing that the knowledge of such is dependent on principles

borrowed from philosophy, in which I found nothing certain, I thought

it necessary first of all to endeavor to establish its principles. And

because I observed, besides, that an inquiry of this kind was of all

others of the greatest moment, and one in which precipitancy and

anticipation in judgment were most to be dreaded, I thought that I

ought not to approach it till I had reached a more mature age (being at

that time but twenty-three), and had first of all employed much of my

time in preparation for the work, as well by eradicating from my mind

all the erroneous opinions I had up to that moment accepted, as by

amassing variety of experience to afford materials for my reasonings,

and by continually exercising myself in my chosen method with a view to

increased skill in its application.

Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting One's Reason and of Seeking Truth in the Sciences · 第 2 / 6 章