Chamber Music

If Beethoven’s best-known and most widely performed works are the nine

symphonies, his chamber music represents the most far-reaching,

diversified, profound, original, spiritualized, and at the same time the

most problematic manifestations of his genius. It is through his

quartets, when all’s said, that his influence has been most felt. In

these dwell the germs of more or less everything out of which subsequent

music has, in one way or another, developed. If Beethoven may be called

a “musician of the future” it is by reason of his sixteen string

quartets more than by anything else. More than all else he composed they

continue, in great measure, to be in advance not only of the master’s

own time but even of our own.

It may be said that his chamber music spanned his life. The earliest

specimens of it date from his Bonn days, from around his fifteenth year.

From then on they continued (intermittently, it is true) almost up to

the time of his death—indeed, the last composition he completed was a

new finale for the B-flat Quartet, opus 130, to replace the original

one, the Great Fugue, now opus 133, which early audiences could not

grasp and which, to this very day, is a stumbling block for most hearers

although one of the most extraordinary and transcendent pages Beethoven

ever produced. And though at his demise he left a quantity of sketches

(including studies for a tenth symphony) there is every reason to assume

that an even more copious quantity of chamber music might have come from

his pen had he lived five or ten years longer.

The mass of such chamber music as he did bequeath us includes sonatas

for piano and violin as well as for piano and cello; a Quintet in C

major, opus 29, for two violins, two violas, and cello, dating from

1801; a quintet fugue in D, written in 1817 but published as opus 137; a

number of trios for a variety of instrumental combinations, several

duets and serenades, and other miscellany for more or less intimate

performance. Lastly, the famous Septet in E flat, for clarinet, horn,

bassoon, violin, viola, cello, and double-bass, opus 20. This septet was

composed about 1800 and was at one time so immeasurably popular that

Beethoven himself wearied of it. Despite the vogue it long enjoyed, it

is far from one of its creator’s most inspired flights.

The series of trios for piano and strings constitute something of a

counterpart to the great string quartets. Opus 1 consists of three such

trios, and the composer’s friend Ries wrote that “when the three were

first heard by the musical world at one of Prince Lichnowsky’s soirées

nearly all the foremost artists and amateurs of Vienna were invited,

among them Haydn, whose opinion was awaited with intense interest.” The

trios caused a sensation. Haydn, who was enthusiastic about them on the

whole, had reservations to make about the third, in C minor, and advised

the composer not to publish it. Beethoven took this advice in bad part,

the more so because he regarded this trio as the best, and imagined that

his famous contemporary was actuated by envy. The truth of the matter

was that Haydn, struck by the bold originality of the score, was

honestly afraid that the public might not understand it. But it is

precisely this quality that has lifted the C minor Trio far above the

other two of opus 1.

The other trios for piano and strings are the pair in D major and

E-flat, opus 70, and the supremely great one in B flat, opus 97, called

the “Archduke” Trio because it was dedicated to the composer’s friend

and pupil, the Archduke Rudolph. The Opus 70 creations are remarkable

for the somewhat restless, indeed forbidding, quality that fills some of

their pages. The first has been named the “Ghost” Trio on account of an

eerie figure that pervades the slow movement and lends it a strangely

weird and hollow sound. The “Archduke” Trio has a spaciousness and

elevation, particularly in its Largo, which is a series of five

variations on a theme in the character of a hymn. Wisely enough,

Beethoven placed the Scherzo before the profound slow movement, as he

was again to do in the “Hammerklavier” Sonata and the Ninth Symphony.

But this scherzo utilizes in its middle part a curious, winding

chromatic figure which ranks with the master’s most striking ideas at

this stage of his progress.

Between 1799 and 1802 Beethoven wrote eight of his ten sonatas for

violin and piano. The most famous of these eight are the fifth—the

so-called “Spring” Sonata in F, opus 24, which opens with a theme of

lovely grace and has an adorable serenity throughout its four

movements—and the set in A major, C minor, and G major, opus 30, which

was published with a dedication to Czar Alexander I of Russia. The C

minor Sonata reveals a heroic quality which lends it something of the

spirit of the “Eroica” Symphony, and the closing Presto of the finale

has about it an element of dramatic grandeur. However, none of these

sonatas quite reaches the level of the “Kreutzer” or the much later

Sonata in G major, opus 96. The A major, opus 47, derived its name from

the fact that it was dedicated to Rudolph Kreutzer. It was first played

by a mulatto violinist named Bridgetower, while the composer performed

the piano part. Despite the haste with which the work was composed

(Czerny spoke of “four days”), the sonata, “written in a very

concertante style,” has remained probably the best-known and most widely

popular of all Beethoven’s sonatas for violin and piano. The music has

an expansiveness and plenitude that surpass any other work Beethoven

designed for this instrumental combination. The finale, a whirlwind

Presto originally conceived for the first sonata of the opus 30 set,

influenced Schubert when he composed the last movement of his D minor

Quartet. Undoubtedly it is the most original, not to say the most

exciting, part of the work—more so, indeed, than the Andante, with its

series of variations so arranged that each artist is given his adroitly

balanced share.

The G major Sonata, composed in 1812 and first performed by the French

violinist Pierre Rode and the Archduke Rudolph, is unquestionably the

most intellectual and the subtlest of Beethoven’s violin sonatas. In any

case it has some of the unmistakable traits of the master’s later style

about it.

The sonatas for cello and piano, in F major and G minor, were composed

as early as 1796 and performed in Berlin before the King of Prussia by

Beethoven and the Court cellist, Duport. But the memorable cello sonatas

of Beethoven’s are the one in A major, opus 69, one of his most lavish

and magnificent works; and the C major and D major, opus 102. The first

named, like the “Kreutzer” Sonata or the “Appassionata” of the piano

series, is a creation that needs no defense and no far-fetched

explanations. On the other hand, the opus 102 pair, despite their

indisputable profundities, are among Beethoven’s more unapproachable and

recondite works. Indeed, they have about them a certain hard-shelled

quality which scarcely lends them an especially intimate or endearing

effect.

Ludwig van Beethoven · 第 17 / 24 题