CHAPTER XI

SOME FRENCH POEMS ABOUT INSECTS

Last year I gave a lecture on the subject of English poems about insects,

with some reference to the old Greek poems on the same subject. But I did

not then have an opportunity to make any reference to French poems upon

the same subject, and I think that it would be a pity not to give you a

few examples.

Just as in the case of English poems about insects, nearly all the French

literature upon this subject is new. Insect poetry belongs to the newer

and larger age of thought, to the age that begins to perceive the great

truth of the unity of life. We no longer find, even in natural histories,

the insect treated as a mere machine and unthinking organism; on the

contrary its habits, its customs and its manifestation both of

intelligence and instinct are being very carefully studied in these times,

and a certain sympathy, as well as a certain feeling of respect or

admiration, may be found in the scientific treatises of the greatest men

who write about insect life. So, naturally, Europe is slowly returning to

the poetical standpoint of the old Greeks in this respect. It is not

improbable that keeping caged insects as pets may again become a Western

custom, as it was in Greek times, when cages were made of rushes or straw

for the little creatures. I suppose you have heard that the Japanese

custom is very likely to become a fashion in America. If that should

really happen, the fact would certainly have an effect upon poetry. I

think that it is very likely to happen.

The French poets who have written pretty things about insects are nearly

all poets of our own times. Some of them treat the subject from the old

Greek standpoint--indeed the beautiful poem of Heredia upon the tomb of a

grasshopper is perfectly Greek, and reads almost like a translation from

the Greek. Other poets try to express the romance of insects in the form

of a monologue, full of the thought of our own age. Others again touch the

subject of insects only in connection with the subject of love. I will

give one example of each method, keeping the best piece for the last, and

beginning with a pretty fancy about a dragonfly.

MA LIBELLULE

En te voyant, toute mignonne,

Blanche dans ta robe d'azure,

Je pensais à quelque madone

Drapée en un pen de ciel pur.

Je songeais à ces belles saintes

Que l'on voyait au temps jadis

Sourire sur les vitres peintes,

Montrant d'un doigt le paradis:

Et j'aurais voulu, loin du monde

Qui passait frivole entre nous,

Dans quelque retraite profonde

T'adorer seul à deux genoux.

This first part of the poem is addressed of course to a beautiful child,

some girl between the age of childhood and womanhood:

"Beholding thee, Oh darling one, all white in thy azure dress, I thought

of some figure of the Madonna robed in a shred of pure blue sky.

"I dreamed of those beautiful figures of saints whom one used to see in

olden times smiling in the stained glass of church windows, and pointing

upward to Paradise.

"And I could have wished to adore you alone upon my bended knees in some

far hidden retreat, away from the frivolous world that passed between us."

This little bit of ecstasy over the beauty and purity of a child is

pretty, but not particularly original. However, it is only an

introduction. Now comes the pretty part of the poem:

Soudain un caprice bizarre

Change la scène et le décor,

Et mon esprit au loin s'égare

Sur des grands prés d'azure et d'or

Où, près de ruisseaux muscules

Gazouillants comme des oiseaux,

Se poursuivent les libellules,

Ces fleurs vivantes des roseaux.

Enfant, n'es tu pas l'une d'elles

Qui me poursuit pour consoler?

Vainement tu caches tes ailes;

Tu marches, mais tu sais voler.

Petite fée au bleu corsage,

Que j'ai connu dès mon berceau,

En revoyant ton doux visage,

Je pense aux joncs de mon ruisseau!

Veux-tu qu'en amoureux fidèles

Nous revenions dans ces prés verts?

Libellule, reprends tes ailes;

Moi, je brulerai tous mes vers!

Et nous irons, sous la lumière,

D'un ciel plus frais et plus léger

Chacun dans sa forme première,

Moi courir, et toi voltiger.

"Suddenly a strange fancy changes for me the scene and the scenery; and my

mind wanders far away over great meadows of azure and gold.

"Where, hard by tiny streams that murmur with a sound like voices of

little birds, the dragon-flies, those living flowers of the reeds, chase

each other at play.

"Child, art thou not one of those dragon-flies, following after me to

console me? Ah, it is in vain that thou tryest to hide thy wings; thou

dost walk, indeed, but well thou knowest how to fly!

"O little fairy with the blue corsage whom I knew even from the time I was

a baby in the cradle; seeing again thy sweet face, I think of the rushes

that border the little stream of my native village!

"Dost thou not wish that even now as faithful lovers we return to those

green fields? O dragon-fly, take thy wings again, and I--I will burn all

my poetry,

"And we shall go back, under the light of the sky more fresh and pure than

this, each of us in the original form--I to run about, and thou to hover

in the air as of yore."

The sight of a child's face has revived for the poet very suddenly and

vividly, the recollection of the village home, the green fields of

childhood, the little stream where he used to play with the same little

girl, sometimes running after the dragon-fly. And now the queer fancy

comes to him that she herself is so like a dragon-fly--so light, graceful,

spiritual! Perhaps really she is a dragon-fly following him into the great

city, where he struggles to live as a poet, just in order to console him.

She hides her wings, but that is only to prevent other people knowing. Why

not return once more to the home of childhood, back to the green fields

and the sun? "Little dragon-fly," he says to her, "let us go back! do you

return to your beautiful summer shape, be a dragon-fly again, expand your

wings of gauze; and I shall stop trying to write poetry. I shall burn my

verses; I shall go back to the streams where we played as children; I

shall run about again with the joy of a child, and with you beautifully

flitting hither and thither as a dragon-fly."

Victor Hugo also has a little poem about a dragon-fly, symbolic only, but

quite pretty. It is entitled "La Demoiselle"; and the other poem was

entitled, as you remember, "Ma Libellule." Both words mean a dragon-fly,

but not the same kind of dragon-fly. The French word "demoiselle," which

might be adequately rendered into Japanese by the term _ojosan_, refers

only to those exquisitely slender, graceful, slow-flitting dragon-flies

known to the scientist by the name of Calopteryx. Of course you know the

difference by sight, and the reason of the French name will be poetically

apparent to you.

Quand la demoiselle dorée

S'envole au départ des hivers,

Souvent sa robe diaprée,

Souvent son aile est déchirée

Aux mille dards des buissons verts.

Ainsi, jeunesse vive et frêle,

Qui, t'égarant de tous côtés,

Voles ou ton instinct t'appele,

Souvent tu déchires ton aile

Aux épines des voluptes.

"When, at the departure of winter, the gilded dragon-fly begins to soar,

often her many-coloured robe, often her wing, is torn by the thousand

thorns of the verdant shrubs.

"Even so, O frail and joyous Youth, who, wandering hither and thither, in

every direction, flyest wherever thy instinct calls thee--even so thou

dost often tear thy wings upon the thorns of pleasure."

You must understand that pleasure is compared to a rose-bush, whose

beautiful and fragrant flowers attract the insects, but whose thorns are

dangerous to the visitors. However, Victor Hugo does not use the word for

rose-bush, for obvious reasons; nor does he qualify the plants which are

said to tear the wings of the dragon-fly. I need hardly tell you that the

comparison would not hold good in reference to the attraction of flowers,

because dragon-flies do not care in the least about flowers, and if they

happen to tear their wings among thorn bushes, it is much more likely to

be in their attempt to capture and devour other insects. The merit of the

poem is chiefly in its music and colour; as natural history it would not

bear criticism. The most beautiful modern French poem about insects,

beautiful because of its classical perfection, is I think a sonnet by

Heredia, entitled "Épigramme Funéraire"--that is to say, "Inscription for

a Tombstone." This is an exact imitation of Greek sentiment and

expression, carefully studied after the poets of the anthology. Several

such Greek poems are extant, recounting how children mourned for pet

insects which had died in spite of all their care. The most celebrated one

among these I quoted in a former lecture--the poem about the little Greek

girl Myro who made a tomb for her grasshopper and cried over it. Heredia

has very well copied the Greek feeling in this fine sonnet:

Ici gît, Etranger, la verte sauterelle

Que durant deux saisons nourrit la jeune Hellé,

Et dont l'aile vibrant sous le pied dentelé.

Bruissait dans le pin, le cytise, ou l'airelle.

Elle s'est tue, hélas! la lyre naturelle,

La muse des guérets, des sillons et du blé;

De peur que son léger sommeil ne soit troublé,

Ah, passe vite, ami, ne pèse point sur elle.

C'est là. Blanche, au milieu d'une touffe de thym,

Sa pierre funéraire est fraîchement poseé.

Que d'hommes n'ont pas eu ce suprême destin!

Des larmes d'un enfant la tombe est arrosée,

Et l'Aurore pieuse y fait chaque matin

Une libation de gouttes de rosée.

"Stranger, here reposes the green grasshopper that the young girl Helle

cared for during two seasons,--the grasshopper whose wings, vibrating

under the strokes of its serrated feet, used to resound in the pine, the

trefoil and the whortleberry.

"She is silent now, alas! that natural lyre, muse of the unsown fields, of

the furrows, and of the wheat. Lest her light sleep should be disturbed,

ah! pass quickly, friend! do not be heavy upon her.

"It is there. All white, in the midst of a tuft of thyme, her funeral

monument is placed, in cool shadow; how many men have not been able to

have this supremely happy end!

"By the tears of a child the insect's tomb is watered; and the pious

goddess of dawn each morning there makes a libation of drops of dew."

This reads very imperfectly in a hasty translation; the original charm is

due to the perfect art of the form. But the whole thing, as I have said

before, is really Greek, and based upon a close study of several little

Greek poems on the same kind of subject. Little Greek girls thousands of

years ago used to keep singing insects as pets, every day feeding them

with slices of leek and with fresh water, putting in their little cages

sprigs of the plants which they liked. The sorrow of the child for the

inevitable death of her insect pets at the approach of winter, seems to

have inspired many Greek poets. With all tenderness, the child would make

a small grave for the insect, bury it solemnly, and put a little white

stone above the place to imitate a grave-stone. But of course she would

want an inscription for this tombstone--perhaps would ask some of her

grown-up friends to compose one for her. Sometimes the grown-up friend

might be a poet, in which case he would compose an epitaph for all time.

I suppose you perceive that the solemnity of this imitation of the Greek

poems on the subject is only a tender mockery, a playful sympathy with the

real grief of the child. The expression, "pass, friend," is often found in

Greek funeral inscriptions together with the injunction to tread lightly

upon the dust of the dead. There is one French word to which I will call

attention,--the word "guérets." We have no English equivalent for this

term, said to be a corruption of the Latin word "veractum," and meaning

fields which have been ploughed but not sown.

Not to dwell longer upon the phase of art indicated by this poem, I may

turn to the subject of crickets. There are many French poems about

crickets. One by Lamartine is known to almost every French child.

Grillon solitaire,

Ici comme moi,

Voix qui sors de terre,

Ah! réveille-toi!

J'attise la flamme,

C'est pour t'égayer;

Mais il manque une âme,

Une âme au foyer.

Grillon solitaire,

Voix qui sors de terre,

Ah! réveille-toi

Pour moi.

Quand j'étais petite

Comme ce berceau,

Et que Marguerite

Filait son fuseau,

Quand le vent d'automne

Faisait tout gémir,

Ton cri monotone

M'aidait à dormir.

Grillon solitaire,

Voix qui sors de terre,

Ah! réveille-toi

Pour moi.

Seize fois l'année

A compté mes jours;

Dans la cheminée

Tu niches toujours.

Je t'écoute encore

Aux froides saisons.

Souvenir sonore

Des vieilles maisons.

Grillon solitaire,

Voix qui sors de terre,

Ah! réveille-toi

Pour moi.

It is a young girl who thus addresses the cricket of the hearth, the house

cricket. It is very common in country houses in Europe. This is what she

says:

"Little solitary cricket, all alone here just like myself, little voice

that comes up out of the ground, ah, awake for my sake! I am stirring up

the fires, that is just to make you comfortable; but there lacks a

presence by the hearth; a soul to keep me company.

"When I was a very little girl, as little as that cradle in the corner of

the room, then, while Margaret our servant sat there spinning, and while

the autumn wind made everything moan outside, your monotonous cry used to

help me to fall asleep.

"Solitary cricket, voice that issues from the ground, awaken, for my sake.

"Now I am sixteen years of age and you are still nestling in the chimneys

as of old. I can hear you still in the cold season,--like a

sound--memory,--a sonorous memory of old houses.

"Solitary cricket, voice that issues from the ground, awaken, O awaken for

my sake."

I do not think this pretty little song needs any explanation; I would only

call your attention to the natural truth of the fancy and the feeling.

Sitting alone by the fire in the night, the maiden wants to hear the

cricket sing, because it makes her think of her childhood, and she finds

happiness in remembering it.

So far as mere art goes, the poem of Gautier on the cricket is very much

finer than the poem of Lamartine, though not so natural and pleasing. But

as Gautier was the greatest master of French verse in the nineteenth

century, not excepting Victor Hugo, I think that one example of his poetry

on insects may be of interest. He was very poor, compared with Victor

Hugo; and he had to make his living by writing for newspapers, so that he

had no time to become the great poet that nature intended him to be.

However, he did find time to produce one volume of highly finished poetry,

which is probably the most perfect verse of the nineteenth century, if not

the most perfect verse ever made by a French poet; I mean the "Emaux et

Camées." But the little poem which I am going to read to you is not from

the "Emaux et Camées."

Souffle, bise! Tombe à flots, pluie!

Dans mon palais tout noir de suie,

Je ris de la pluie et du vent;

En attendant que l'hiver fuie,

Je reste au coin du feu, rêvant.

C'est moi qui suis l'esprit de l'âtre!

Le gaz, de sa langue bleuàtre,

Lèche plus doucement le bois;

La fumée en filet d'albàtre,

Monte et se contourne à ma voix.

La bouilloire rit et babille;

La flamme aux pieds d'argent sautille

En accompagnant ma chanson;

La bûche de duvet s'habille;

La sève bout dans le tison.

* * * * *

Pendant la nuit et la journée

Je chante sous la cheminée;

Dans mon langage de grillon

J'ai, des rebuts de son aînée,

Souvent console Cendrillon.

* * * * *

Quel plaisir? Prolonger sa veille,

Regarder la flamme vermeille

Prenant à deux bras le tison,

A tous les bruits prêter l'oreille,

Entendre vivre la maison.

Tapi dans sa niche bien chaude,

Sentir l'hiver qui pleure et rôde,

Tout blême, et le nez violet,

Tachant de s'introduire en fraude

Par quelque fente du volet!

This poem is especially picturesque, and is intended to give us the

comfortable sensations of a winter night by the fire, and the amusement of

watching the wood burn and of hearing the kettle boiling. You will find

that the French has a particular quality of lucid expression; it is full

of clearness and colour.

"Blow on, cold wind! pour down, O rain. I, in my soot-black palace, laugh

at both rain and wind; and while waiting for winter to pass I remain in my

corner by the fire dreaming.

"It is I that am really the spirit of the hearth! The gaseous flame licks

the wood more softly with its bluish tongue when it hears me; and the

smoke rises up like an alabaster thread, and curls itself about (or

twists) at the sound of my voice.

"The kettle chuckles and chatters; the golden-footed flame leaps, dancing

to the accompaniment of my song (or in accompaniment to my song); the

great log covers itself with down, the sap boils in the wooden embers

("duvet," meaning "down," refers to the soft fluffy white ash that forms

upon the surface of burning wood).

"All night and all day I sing below the chimney. Often in my

cricket-language, I have consoled Cinderella for the snubs of her elder

sister.

"Ah, what pleasure to sit up at night, and watch the crimson flames

embracing the wood (or hugging the wood) with both arms at once, and to

listen to all the sounds and to hear the life of the house!

"Nestling in one's good warm nook, how pleasant to hear Winter, who weeps

and prowls round about the house outside, all wan and blue-nosed with

cold, trying to smuggle itself inside some chink in the shutter!"

Of course this does not give us much about the insect itself, which

remains invisible in the poem, just as it really remains invisible in the

house where the voice is heard. Rather does the poem express the feelings

of the person who hears the cricket.

When we come to the subject of grasshoppers, I think that the French poets

have done much better than the English. There are many poems on the field

grasshopper; I scarcely know which to quote first. But I think you would

be pleased with a little composition by the celebrated French painter,

Jules Breton. Like Rossetti he was both painter and poet; and in both arts

he took for his subjects by preference things from country life. This

little poem is entitled "Les Cigales." The word "cigales," though really

identical with our word "cicala," seldom means the same thing. Indeed the

French word may mean several different kinds of insects, and it is only by

studying the text that we can feel quite sure what sort of insect is

meant.

Lorsque dans l'herbe mûre ancun épi ne bouge,

Qu'à l'ardeur des rayons crépite le frement,

Que le coquelicot tombe languissament

Sous le faible fardeau de sa corolle rouge,

Tous les oiseaux de l'air out fait taire leur chants;

Les ramiers paresseux, au plus noir des ramures,

Somnolents, dans les bois, out cessé leurs murmures

Loin du soleil muet incendiant les champs.

Dans le blé, cependant, d'intrépides cigales

Jetant leurs mille bruits, fanfare de l'été,

Out frénétiquement et sans trève agité

Leurs ailes sur l'airaine de leurs folles cymbales.

Trémoussantes, deboutes sur les longs épis d'or,

Virtuoses qui vont s'eteindre avant l'automne,

Elles poussent au del leur hymne monotone

Que dans I'ombre des nuits retentisse encore.

Et rien n'arrêtera leurs cris intarissables;

Quand on les chassera de l'avoine et des blés.

Elles émigreront sur les buissons brulés

Qui se meurent de soif dans les deserts de sable.

Sur l'arbuste effeuillé, sur les chardons flétris

Qui laissent s'envoler leur blanche chevelure,

On reverra l'insecte à la forte encolure,

Pleine d'ivresse, toujours s'exalter dans ses cris.

Jusqu'à ce qu'ouvrant l'aile en lambeaux arrachée,

Exasperé, brulant d'un feu toujours plus pur,

Son oeil de bronze fixe et tendu vers l'azur,

II expire en chantant sur la tige séchée.

For the word "encolure" we have no English equivalent; it means the line

of the neck and shoulder--sometimes the general appearance of shape of the

body.

"When in the ripening grain field not a single ear of wheat moves; when in

the beaming heat the corn seems to crackle; when the poppy languishes and

bends down under the feeble burden of its scarlet corolla,

"Then all the birds of the air have hushed their songs; even the indolent

doves, seeking the darkest part of the foliage in the tree, have become

drowsy in the woods, and have ceased their cooing, far from the fields,

which the silent sun is burning.

"Nevertheless, in the wheat, the brave grasshoppers uttering their

thousand sounds, a trumpet flourish of summer, have continued furiously

and unceasingly to smite their wings upon the brass of their wild cymbal.

"Quivering as they stand upon the long gold ears of the grain, master

musicians who must die before the coming of Fall, they sound to heaven

their monotonous hymn, which re-echoes even in the darkness of the night.

"And nothing will check their inexhaustible shrilling. When chased away

from the oats and from the wheat, they will migrate to the scorched bushes

which die of thirst in the wastes of sand.

"Upon the leafless shrubs, upon the dried up thistles, which let their

white hair fall and float away, there the sturdily-built insect can be

seen again, filled with enthusiasm, even more and more excited as he

cries,

"Until, at last, opening his wings, now rent into shreds, exasperated,

burning more and more fiercely in the frenzy of his excitement, and with

his eyes of bronze always fixed motionlessly upon the azure sky, he dies

in his song upon the withered grain."

This is difficult to translate at all satisfactorily, owing to the

multitude of images compressed together. But the idea expressed is a fine

one--the courage of the insect challenging the sun, and only chanting more

and more as the heat and the thirst increase. The poem has, if you like,

the fault of exaggeration, but the colour and music are very fine; and

even the exaggeration itself has the merit of making the images more

vivid.

It will not be necessary to quote another text; we shall scarcely have the

time; but I want to translate to you something of another poem upon the

same insect by the modern French poet Jean Aicard. In this poem, as in the

little poem by Gautier, which I quoted to you, the writer puts his thought

in the mouth of the insect, so to say--that is, makes the insect tell its

own story.

"I am the impassive and noble insect that sings in the summer solstice

from the dazzling dawn all the day long in the fragrant pine-wood. And my

song is always the same, regular as the equal course of the season and of

the sun. I am the speech of the hot and beaming sun, and when the reapers,

weary of heaping the sheaves together, lie down in the lukewarm shade, and

sleep and pant in the ardour of noonday--then more than at any other time

do I utter freely and joyously that double-echoing strophe with which my

whole body vibrates. And when nothing else moves in all the land round

about, I palpitate and loudly sound my little drum. Otherwise the sunlight

triumphs; and in the whole landscape nothing is heard but my cry,--like

the joy of the light itself.

"Like a butterfly I take up from the hearts of the flowers that pure water

which the night lets fall into them like tears. I am inspired only by the

almighty sun. Socrates listened to me; Virgil made mention of me. I am the

insect especially beloved by the poets and by the bards. The ardent sun

reflects himself in the globes of my eyes. My ruddy bed, which seems to be

powdered like the surface of fine ripe fruit, resembles some exquisite

key-board of silver and gold, all quivering with music. My four wings,

with their delicate net-work of nerves, allow the bright down upon my

black back to be seen through their transparency. And like a star upon the

forehead of some divinely inspired poet, three exquisitely mounted rubies

glitter upon my head."

These are fair examples of the French manner of treating the interesting

subject of insects in poetry. If you should ask me whether the French

poets are better than the English, I should answer, "In point of feeling,

no." The real value of such examples to the student should be emotional,

not descriptive. I think that the Japanese poems on insects, though not

comparable in point of mere form with some of the foreign poems which I

have quoted, are better in another way--they come nearer to the true

essence of poetry. For the Japanese poets have taken the subject of

insects chiefly for the purpose of suggesting human emotion; and that is

certainly the way in which such a subject should be used. Remember that

this is an age in which we are beginning to learn things about insects

which could not have been even imagined fifty years ago, and the more that

we learn about these miraculous creatures, the more difficult does it

become for us to write poetically about their lives, or about their

possible ways of thinking and feeling. Probably no mortal man will ever be

able to imagine how insects think or feel or hear or even see. Not only

are their senses totally different from those of animals, but they appear

to have a variety of special senses about which we can not know anything

at all. As for their existence, it is full of facts so atrocious and so

horrible as to realize most of the imaginations of old about the torments

of hell. Now, for these reasons to make an insect speak in poetry--to put

one's thoughts, so to speak, into the mouth of an insect--is no longer

consistent with poetical good judgment. No; we must think of insects

either in relation to the mystery of their marvellous lives, or in

relation to the emotion which their sweet and melancholy music makes

within our minds. The impressions produced by hearing the shrilling of

crickets at night or by hearing the storm of cicadæ in summer woods--those

impressions indeed are admirable subjects for poetry, and will continue to

be for all time.

When I lectured to you long ago about Greek and English poems on insects,

I told you that nearly all the English poems on the subject were quite

modern. I still believe that I was right in this statement, as a general

assertion; but I have found one quaint poem about a grasshopper, which

must have been written about the middle of the seventeenth century or,

perhaps, a little earlier. The date of the author's birth and death are

respectively 1618 and 1658. His name, I think, you are familiar

with--Richard Lovelace, author of many amatory poems, and of one

especially famous song, "To Lucasta, on Going to the Wars"--containing the

celebrated stanza--

Yet this inconstancy is such

As you too shall adore;

I could not love thee, Dear, so much,

Loved I not honour more.

Well, as I said, this man wrote one pretty little poem on a grasshopper,

which antedates most of the English poems on insects, if not all of them.

THE GRASSHOPPER

O Thou that swing'st upon the waving ear

Of some well-filled oaten beard,

Drunk every night with a delicious tear

Dropt thee from heaven, where now th'art rear'd!

The joys of earth and air are thine entire,

That with thy feet and wings dost hop and fly;

And when thy poppy works, thou dost retire

To thy carved acorn-bed to lie.

Up with the day, the Sun thou welcom'st then,

Sport'st in the gilt plaits of his beams,

And all these merry days mak'st merry men

Thyself, and melancholy streams.

A little artificial, this poem written at least two hundred and fifty

years ago; but it is pretty in spite of its artifice. Some of the conceits

are so quaint that they must be explained. By the term "oaten beard," the

poet means an ear of oats; and you know that the grain of this plant is

furnished with very long hair, so that many poets have spoken of the

bearded oats. You may remember in this connection Tennyson's phrase "the

bearded barley" in the "Lady of Shalott," and Longfellow's term "bearded

grain" in his famous poem about the Reaper Death. When a person's beard is

very thick, we say in England to-day "a full beard," but in the time of

Shakespeare they used to say "a well filled beard"--hence the phrase in

the second line of the first stanza.

In the third line the term "delicious tear" means dew,--which the Greeks

called the tears of the night, and sometimes the tears of the dawn; and

the phrase "drunk with dew" is quite Greek--so we may suspect that the

author of this poem had been reading the Greek Anthology. In the third

line of the second stanza the word "poppy" is used for sleep--a very

common simile in Elizabethan times, because from the poppy flower was

extracted the opiate which enables sick persons to sleep. The Greek

authors spoke of poppy sleep. "And when thy poppy works," means, when the

essence of sleep begins to operate upon you, or more simply, when you

sleep. Perhaps the phrase about the "carved acorn-bed" may puzzle you; it

is borrowed from the fairy-lore of Shakespeare's time, when fairies were

said to sleep in little beds carved out of acorn shells; the simile is

used only by way of calling the insect a fairy creature. In the second

line of the third stanza you may notice the curious expression about the

"gilt plaits" of the sun's beams. It was the custom in those days, as it

still is in these, for young girls to plait their long hair; and the

expression "gilt plaits" only means braided or plaited golden hair. This

is perhaps a Greek conceit; for classic poets spoke of the golden hair of

the Sun God as illuminating the world. I have said that the poem is a

little artificial, but I think you will find it pretty, and even the

whimsical similes are "precious" in the best sense.

Books and Habits, from the Lectures of Lafcadio Hearn · 第 11 / 15 章