T.

[Footnote 1: Thus far Steele.]

[Footnote 2: [hollow'd]]

[Footnote 3:

[Before him Death, the grisly Tyrant, flies;

He wipes the Tears for ever from our Eyes.]

This was an alteration which Steele had suggested, and in which young

Pope had acquiesced. Steele wrote:

I have turned to every verse and chapter, and think you have preserved

the sublime, heavenly spirit throughout the whole, especially at "Hark

a glad voice," and "The lamb with wolves shall graze." There is but

one line which I think is below the original:

He wipes the tears for ever from our eyes.

You have expressed it with a good and pious but not so exalted and

poetical a spirit as the prophet: The Lord God shall wipe away tears

from off all faces. If you agree with me in this, alter it by way of

paraphrase or otherwise, that when it comes into a volume it may be

amended.]

[Footnote 4: Cap. 9. v. 6.]

[Footnote 5: Cap. 2. v. 4.]

[Footnote 6: Cap. 65. v. 21, 22.]

[Footnote 7: Cap 35. v. 1, 7.]

[Footnote 8: Cap. 41. v. 19. and Cap. 55. v. 13.]

[Footnote 9: Cap. 11. v. 6, 7, 8.]

[Footnote 10: Cap. 60. v. 1.]

[Footnote 11: Cap. 60. v. 4.]

[Footnote 12: Cap. 60. v. 3.]

[Footnote 13: Cap. 60. v. 6.]

[Footnote 14: Cap. 60. v. 19, 20.]

[Footnote 15: Cap. 51. v. 6. and Cap. 64. v. 10.]

* * * * *

No. 379. Thursday, May 15, 1712. Budgell.

'Scire tuum nihil est nisi te scire hoc sciat alter.'

Pers.

I have often wondered at that ill-natur'd Position which has been

sometimes maintained in the Schools, and is comprizd in an old Latin

Verse, namely, that A Man's Knowledge is worth nothing, if he

communicates what he knows to any one besides. [1] There is certainly no

more sensible Pleasure to a good-natur'd Man, than if he can by any

means gratify or inform the Mind of another. I might add, that this

Virtue naturally carries its own reward along with it, since it is

almost impossible it should be exercised without the Improvement of the

Person who practices it. The reading of Books, and the daily Occurrences

of Life, are continually furnishing us with Matter for Thought and

Reflection. It is extremely natural for us to desire to see such our

Thoughts put into the Dress of Words, without which indeed we can scarce

have a clear and distinct Idea of them our selves: When they are thus

clothed in Expressions, nothing so truly shews us whether they are just

or false, as those Effects which they produce in the Minds of others.

I am apt to flatter my self, that in the Course of these my

Speculations, I have treated of several Subjects, and laid down many

such Rules for the Conduct of a Man's Life, which my Readers were either

wholly ignorant of before, or which at least those few who were

acquainted with them, looked upon as so many Secrets they have found out

for the Conduct of themselves, but were resolved never to have made

publick.

I am the more confirmed in this Opinion from my having received several

Letters, wherein I am censur'd for having prostituted Learning to the

Embraces of the Vulgar, and made her, as one of my Correspondents

phrases it, a common Strumpet: I am charged by another with laying open

the Arcana, or Secrets of Prudence, to the Eyes of every Reader.

The narrow Spirit which appears in the Letters of these my

Correspondents is the less surprizing, as it has shewn itself in all

Ages: There is still extant an Epistle written by Alexander the Great to

his Tutor Aristotle, upon that Philosopher's publishing some part of his

Writings; in which the Prince complains of his having made known to all

the World, those Secrets in Learning which he had before communicated to

him in private Lectures; concluding, That he had rather excel the rest

of Mankind in Knowledge than in Power. [2]

Luisa de Padilla, a Lady of great Learning, and Countess of Aranda, was

in like manner angry with the famous Gratian, [3] upon his publishing

his Treatise of the Discrete; wherein she fancied that he had laid open

those Maxims to common Readers, which ought only to have been reserved

for the Knowledge of the Great.

These Objections are thought by many of so much weight, that they often

defend the above-mentiond Authors, by affirming they have affected such

an Obscurity in their Style and Manner of Writing, that tho every one

may read their Works, there will be but very few who can comprehend

their Meaning.

Persius, the Latin Satirist, affected Obscurity for another Reason; with

which however Mr. Cowley is so offended, that writing to one of his

Friends, You, says he, tell me, that you do not know whether Persius be

a good Poet or no, because you cannot understand him; for which very

Reason I affirm that he is not so.

However, this Art of writing unintelligibly has been very much improved,

and follow'd by several of the Moderns, who observing the general

Inclination of Mankind to dive into a Secret, and the Reputation many

have acquired by concealing their Meaning under obscure Terms and

Phrases, resolve, that they may be still more abstruse, to write without

any Meaning at all. This Art, as it is at present practised by many

eminent Authors, consists in throwing so many Words at a venture into

different Periods, and leaving the curious Reader to find out the

Meaning of them.

The Egyptians, who made use of Hieroglyphicks to signify several things,

expressed a Man who confined his Knowledge and Discoveries altogether

within himself, by the Figure of a Dark-Lanthorn closed on all sides,

which, tho' it was illuminated within, afforded no manner of Light or

Advantage to such as stood by it. For my own part, as I shall from time

to time communicate to the Publick whatever Discoveries I happen to

make, I should much rather be compared to an ordinary Lamp, which

consumes and wastes it self for the benefit of every Passenger.

I shall conclude this Paper with the Story of Rosicrucius's Sepulchre. I

suppose I need not inform my Readers that this Man was the Founder of

the Rosicrusian Sect, and that his Disciples still pretend to new

Discoveries, which they are never to communicate to the rest of Mankind.

[4]

A certain Person having occasion to dig somewhat deep in the Ground

where this Philosopher lay inter'd, met with a small Door having a Wall

on each side of it. His Curiosity, and the Hopes of finding some hidden

Treasure, soon prompted him to force open the Door. He was immediately

surpriz'd by a sudden Blaze of Light, and discover'd a very fair Vault:

At the upper end of it was a Statue of a Man in Armour sitting by a

Table, and leaning on his Left Arm. He held a Truncheon in his right

Hand, and had a Lamp burning before him. The Man had no sooner set one

Foot within the Vault, than the Statue erecting it self from its leaning

Posture, stood bolt upright; and upon the Fellow's advancing another

Step, lifted up the Truncheon in his Right Hand. The Man still ventur'd

a third Step, when the Statue with a furious Blow broke the Lamp into a

thousand Pieces, and left his Guest in a sudden Darkness.

Upon the Report of this Adventure, the Country People soon came with

Lights to the Sepulchre, and discovered that the Statue, which was made

of Brass, was nothing more than a Piece of Clock-work; that the Floor of

the Vault was all loose, and underlaid with several Springs, which, upon

any Man's entering, naturally produced that which had happend.

Rosicrucius, says his Disciples, made use of this Method, to shew the

World that he had re-invented the ever-burning Lamps of the Ancients,

tho' he was resolvd no one should reap any Advantage from the Discovery.

The Spectator, Volume 2. · 第 321 / 384 题