SIR,

There arrived in this Neighbourhood two Days ago one of your gay

Gentlemen of the Town, who being attended at his Entry with a Servant

of his own, besides a Countryman he had taken up for a Guide, excited

the Curiosity of the Village to learn whence and what he might be. The

Countryman (to whom they applied as most easy of Access) knew little

more than that the Gentleman came from _London_ to travel and see

Fashions, and was, as he heard say, a Free-thinker: What Religion that

might be, he could not tell; and for his own Part, if they had not

told him the Man was a Free-thinker, he should have guessed, by his

way of talking, he was little better than a Heathen; excepting only

that he had been a good Gentleman to him, and made him drunk twice in

one Day, over and above what they had bargained for.

I do not look upon the Simplicity of this, and several odd Inquiries

with which I shall not trouble you to be wondered at, much less can I

think that our Youths of fine Wit, and enlarged Understandings, have

any Reason to laugh. There is no Necessity that every Squire in _Great

Britain_ should know what the Word Free-thinker stands for; but it

were much to be wished, that they who value themselves upon that

conceited Title were a little better instructed in what it ought to

stand for; and that they would not perswade themselves a Man is really

and truly a Free-thinker in any tolerable Sense, meerly by virtue of

his being an Atheist, or an Infidel of any other Distinction. It may

be doubted, with good Reason, whether there ever was in Nature a more

abject, slavish, and bigotted Generation than the Tribe of _Beaux

Esprits_, at present so prevailing in this Island. Their Pretension to

be Free-thinkers, is no other than Rakes have to be Free-livers, and

Savages to be Free-men, that is, they can think whatever they have a

Mind to, and give themselves up to whatever Conceit the Extravagancy

of their Inclination, or their Fancy, shall suggest; they can think as

wildly as they talk and act, and will not endure that their Wit should

be controuled by such formal Things as Decency and common Sense:

Deduction, Coherence, Consistency, and all the Rules of Reason they

accordingly disdain, as too precise and mechanical for Men of a

liberal Education.

This, as far as I could ever learn from their Writings, or my own

Observation, is a true Account of the _British_ Free-thinker. Our

Visitant here, who gave occasion to this Paper, has brought with him a

new System of common Sense, the Particulars of which I am not yet

acquainted with, but will lose no Opportunity of informing my self

whether it contain any [thing] [3] worth Mr. SPECTATORS Notice. In

the mean time, Sir, I cannot but think it would be for the good of

Mankind, if you would take this Subject into your own Consideration,

and convince the hopeful Youth of our Nation, that Licentiousness is

not Freedom; or, if such a Paradox will not be understood, that a

Prejudice towards Atheism is not Impartiality.

_I am, SIR, Your most humble Servant,_

The Spectator, Volume 2. · 第 70 / 384 题