THE ORMONDE PEACE, 1646
[Sidenote: Glamorgan and the nuncio.]
[Sidenote: Digby in Dublin.]
[Sidenote: Rinuccini and the Confederates not in accord.]
[Sidenote: Attitude of Henrietta Maria.]
While at Rochelle waiting for his ship, Rinuccini had seen Geoffrey
Baron, treasurer of the Confederation, who told him that no peace had
yet been made in Ireland, and who brought a letter from Glamorgan.
Baron, 'a cavalier of excellent countenance and very affable manner,'
was on his way to Paris to succeed O'Hartegan, who seems to have
returned to Ireland a little later. Glamorgan returned from Dublin
to Kilkenny one week after the nuncio's arrival, and in due course
delivered the King's letter to him. Of that to the Pope he only showed
the address, but he disclosed the contents of two 'patents in which
the King gives him secret but full powers to conclude a peace with the
Irish, on whatever terms he thinks advisable.' In the meantime Lord
Digby, who bore the now empty title of principal secretary of state,
had arrived in Dublin. It was characteristic of Charles's diplomacy
that his English minister was even more ignorant of Glamorgan's
business than his Irish viceroy. Glamorgan was sanguine that the nuncio
would agree to everything required; but Ormonde calls him 'the Italian
bishop,' and an 'unbidden guest,' which he would not have done had he
known of the King's letter to him. Rinuccini found that the majority of
the Confederates were inclined to accept Ormonde's political articles,
and to leave the religious question for later consideration. Noblemen
and lawyers saw plainly enough that the King could not grant what would
satisfy the Pope without making his position in England hopeless, and
they wished to save their properties with the hope of later concessions
in church matters. The certain ruin of the royal cause was the worst
thing that could happen, for from the Parliament nothing but evil was
to be expected. Some, says Rinuccini, 'audaciously declare that the
Catholic interest could not fail to prosper under the government of a
nobleman so warmly attached to the cause of Ireland as the Marquis of
Ormonde; others are not ashamed to say that it is sufficient to perform
the Catholic service in secret, provided it can be done in safety, and
that to expect more than this from the King, restricted as he is at the
present moment in his liberty, would be open injustice; and finally,
that it is not lawful to contend with him in this cause. No one holds
forth more loudly in favour of this doctrine than that priest Leyburn
sent here six months ago by the Queen, and whose words almost amount to
sedition.' Leyburn's mission was known and feared at Rome, where it was
well understood that Henrietta Maria was willing to make peace 'without
one word concerning religion,' and considered 'the whole well-being of
the Catholics to depend on peace with the Protestants.' A still greater
obstacle to peace on Rinuccini's terms was the personal popularity of
Ormonde, and the fact that the Council 'were mostly relations, friends,
clients, or dependants of his house.'[82]
[Sidenote: Arrest of Glamorgan.]
[Sidenote: Examination of Glamorgan.]
[Sidenote: His answer.]
[Sidenote: The Irish Government horror-struck.]
A copy of the Glamorgan treaty came into Ormonde's hands, and was shown
to Digby, who was in Dublin before the end of November. Glamorgan
himself reached the Irish capital on Christmas Eve, and on St.
Stephen's Day he was arrested at Digby's instance, and closely confined
to the Castle, 'yet with needful attendance and accommodation,' and
not as Rinuccini heard, 'without even a servant left to attend him.'
The prisoner being brought before the Council, Digby produced copies
of the treaty, of the 'pretended authority' of March 12, 1644-5, and
of the oath taken by Glamorgan. The King complained at this time that
Ormonde had been long without writing, the fact probably being that
he knew just enough to make him cautious and not enough to enable
him to advise. The fatal papers were read to the Irish Council, Digby
declaring that the commission was either forged or obtained by fraud,
or at the very least limited by other instructions. It was 'destructive
both to his regality and religion,' and such as the King would
never grant to save his Crown or life, or the lives of his wife and
children. Next day Glamorgan was examined on interrogatories, framed
so as to shield Charles while accumulating blame upon his agent. It
was not sought to prove that he had forged the King's commissions of
January 12 and March 12, for probably both Ormonde and Digby knew in
their hearts that they were genuine, though they had not seen them
before the conclusion of the treaty. The fourth interrogatory was as
follows: 'Did your lordship grant, conclude, and agree, on the behalf
of his Majesty, his heirs and successors ... that the Roman Catholic
clergy of Ireland should and might from thenceforth for ever hold and
enjoy all and every such lands, tenements, tithes, and hereditaments
whatsoever by them respectively enjoyed within this kingdom, or by
them possessed at any time since October 23, 1641, and all other such
lands, tenements, tithes, and hereditaments belonging to the clergy
within this kingdom, other than such as are now actually enjoyed by his
Majesty's Protestant clergy?' In reply Glamorgan acknowledged the words
of the treaty, while considering them 'not obligatory to his Majesty.'
He was afterwards allowed to add the words 'and yet without any just
blemish of my honour, my honesty, or my conscience.' At the end of four
days Glamorgan was released from close imprisonment, but confined to
the walls of the Castle for more than three weeks longer. In reporting
to the King the Lord Lieutenant and Council confess that they were
'stricken with most wonderful horror and astonishment to find so sacred
a majesty so highly scandalled and dishonoured.' And, said Ormonde for
himself, 'it is manifest that the retarding of the peace is no way
on the part of me the Lieutenant, but ought rather to be attributed
to that underhand dealing of the said Earl, whereby that party have
been encouraged to hope for such concessions as they themselves had
before receded from, as wanting confidence to insist on matters so
unreasonable.' It was pointed out that Glamorgan had mis-recited
the commission authorising Ormonde to treat for peace, that he had
acknowledged Mountgarret's 'usurped style and title' as Lord President
of the Supreme Council, and that 'he had strangely misinterpreted the
facts of the case when he discerned the alacrity and cheerfulness of
the said Catholics to embrace honourable conditions of peace.' They had
shown their loyalty by 'entertaining a nuncio from the Pope,' and at
the same time negotiating with a messenger from the King of Spain, 'and
how comely it is that such treaty with foreigners should be held at the
same time that they are in treaty with his Majesty's commissioners we
humbly submit to his Majesty's high wisdom.'[83]
[Sidenote: Charles repudiates Glamorgan.]
[Sidenote: Negotiations for peace interrupted.]
[Sidenote: Glamorgan released on bail.]
As soon as Charles heard of the proceedings in Dublin, he proceeded
characteristically to repudiate Glamorgan, to whom, he said, he had
given a commission to raise and employ troops, 'and to that purpose
only.' All his other doings were without warrant, and 'framed of his
own head.' For himself the King was quite ready to go to London and to
confer with the two Houses on the basis of making no peace in Ireland
without their consent. Failing such a conference, Ormonde was to make
a treaty which would preserve the Irish Protestants and the Crown,
without being derogatory to the King's honour and public professions.
With chivalrous loyalty, which cannot be too much commended, Glamorgan
kept silence under this undeserved rebuke. He had already shown Ormonde
the original and given him an attested copy of a document which was
probably the patent of April 1, 1644, strictly charging him to keep
it secret. It might be useful to the Lord Lieutenant for his 'future
warrantry to his Majesty,' but publication would not be for the King's
service. Ormonde sent a copy of this paper to the King, describing it
as 'of an extraordinary nature and way of penning,' but expressing
no doubts of its genuineness. The Supreme Council at Kilkenny said
negotiations could not go on nor Chester be relieved until 'a nobleman,
so highly esteemed by the nation, and chosen general of that army
by the unanimous vote of the Confederate Catholics, were released.'
To Ormonde Charles averred 'on the word of a Christian' that he
never intended Glamorgan to do anything without his approbation. A
prosecution of the Earl was necessary to clear his Majesty's honour,
but he had been actuated by mistaken zeal. The King was quite satisfied
with the Lord Lieutenant, and begged him not to sentence Glamorgan,
unless he found it too dangerous not to do so. Glamorgan was liberated
after nearly a month's detention, but bound to appear within thirty
days after summons, bail being given for 40,000_l._, half on his own
part and half on that of the Earls of Clanricarde and Kildare. Both the
sureties had houses in Dame Street, where service was declared good.
Glamorgan went back to Kilkenny, entering the town late 'to avoid the
vanity' of popular demonstrations in his favour, and Rinuccini was
rather sorry to see him, because his return removed one obstacle to the
conclusion of peace. The interest of Rome was to continue the war, and
the nuncio pleaded hard for delay, at least until the articles came to
which the Pope had agreed.[84]
[Sidenote: Mission of Sir Kenelm Digby.]
[Sidenote: The Queen's religion.]
[Sidenote: The broken reed to be sacrificed.]
In the spring of 1645 Henrietta Maria sent Sir Kenelm Digby to Rome.
The choice of this fantastic genius was not a happy one, and the
cool-headed Italians soon found that he was not a serious diplomatist.
He could show no authority from the King, and that derived from an
exiled Queen, who was hated in England and not much loved in Ireland,
hardly afforded security enough. He received an order for 20,000
Roman crowns to be laid out in munitions of war, and carried with him
articles to which he undertook to get the royal consent. He left Rome
in December for Paris, where he was to see the Queen. After that he
proposed to visit the King in England and the nuncio in Ireland. He
was at Nantes at the end of January and on the point of sailing for
Ireland, but returned to Paris instead, whence he made his way back to
Rome a few months later. 'Let him say what he will,' wrote Bonaventure
Barron to Wadding, 'this is certainly true that excepting going to
mass, the Queen has no other religion than the Lord Jermyn's, and
that both are all agreeing in this, that while there is any hope of
relieving the King by a Protestant, a Catholic shall never be admitted
to his succour, and while they think the Scots can do it, the Irish
shall never be admitted to a communication in the work, much less to
any good conditions for our nation, which is equally hated by the King,
Parliament, Scots, Queen, and Jermyn.' This was written in May, after
Charles had left Oxford on that sad journey which ended in the Scotch
camp, but the learned Franciscan was well informed, and had perhaps
seen some of the letters received by the Queen. In January the King had
told his wife that Ireland 'must at all times be sacrificed to save the
crown of England, Montreuil assuring me that France, rather than fail,
will assist me in satisfying the Scots' arrears.' His later letters to
her are in the same spirit, and with some reason from his own point of
view, he declares the Irish wanting in generosity. Colepepper about the
same time pronounced Ireland to be a broken reed, and the same simile
was applied at Rome to the heretics upon whom King and Queen alike were
disposed to lean.[85]
[Sidenote: Sir Kenelm Digby's treaty.]
[Sidenote: Protestants to be excluded from office.]
[Sidenote: An Irish invasion of England.]
[Sidenote: The nuncio throws over Glamorgan,]
[Sidenote: who gives up his treaty.]
[Sidenote: Ormonde's reflections on the business.]
A copy of the articles agreed to with Digby was sent to Rinuccini
early in November 1645, and reached him in due course. This paper
was unsigned, and differed in some respects from the formally
authenticated version entrusted to Sir Kenelm himself, but the main
points were the same. Seven articles applied to Ireland, and by
them the King was required to grant the free and public exercise of
the Roman Catholic religion, and to restore the hierarchy, with all
churches and church property. The abbey lands 'pretended' to have been
confirmed to lay grantees by Cardinal Pole were to be left to a free
Parliament, and so were the bishoprics in the King's hands. All penal
laws passed since 'the defection of Henry VIII.' were to be first
abrogated by the King and then repealed by a free Irish Parliament,
'independent of that of England.' The viceroy and all the chief
placeholders were to be Catholics, and all towns, including Dublin,
to be placed in Catholic hands, and the King was to join his forces
with those of the Confederate Catholics so as to drive the Scots and
the Parliamentarians out of Ireland. When the King had done these
things, 'and whatever else Monsignor Rinuccini may add to or alter in
these articles,' the Pope would give the Queen 100,000 Roman crowns.
In England all penal laws were to be repealed and all disabilities
removed, and the kingdom was to be invaded by 12,000 infantry under
Irish chiefs, who were to be assisted by at least 2,500 English cavalry
with Catholic officers. As soon as a landing and junction had been
effected the Pope was to pay his money in twelve monthly instalments,
a like sum to be paid in the second and third year if circumstances
justified it. By an article added afterwards six months were given
for the ratification of the Irish articles, and ten for the English,
'after which his Holiness will not be bound by his present promise.'
Rinuccini received this document in February while the General Assembly
was sitting at Kilkenny. Glamorgan, not without some wry faces and
much to the disgust of his friends, at once agreed to abandon his own
treaty and to adopt Sir Kenelm Digby's. It was an excuse for delay that
the original had not yet come to hand, and that was the nuncio's main
object. Glamorgan was reminded that he had exceeded his instructions,
that he had talked at Dublin about what he had orders to keep secret,
that he had spoken of using an Irish army to force the King's hand,
and in short that he could only cast off his load of responsibility
by submitting to the Pope. It was evident that he could do nothing by
himself, and that his promises had melted into air, 'Lord Digby having
declared that the Protestants would rather throw the King out of window
than permit his Majesty to confirm them.' Speaking in the assembly
Rinuccini said that Glamorgan's treaty was worthless because its
confirmation depended on the will of another, and that the Roman treaty
was every way preferable. Both were really waste paper, and everyone
at Kilkenny knew it except the clergy and the clericals. Ormonde
reminded Glamorgan that the chief object of the peace was to relieve
Chester, and that could not be done unless troops were sent at once.
To this the poor man answered that the Queen's powerful hand effaced
the 'clandestine hopes' of his own endeavours. A burnt child, he said,
dreads the fire, and he would most willingly leave treaty-making to the
Lord Lieutenant, who could not as 'a great and public minister of State
and real Protestant' appear publicly, but who might give a hint to his
friends at Kilkenny to deal with the nuncio. For himself he proposed
to raise 100,000_l._ in Catholic countries, which was impossible if
the Pope were 'irritated,' or the nuncio 'disgusted.' Rinuccini, he
added, had agreed to let 3000 men go at once for the relief of Chester,
and he believed shipping could be readily had. When this was written
Chester had fallen, and a rumour had reached Ormonde when he penned
an answer in his best manner. 'My Lord,' he said, 'my affections and
interests are so tied to his Majesty's cause that it were madness in me
to disgust any man that hath power and inclination to relieve him, in
the sad condition he is in, and therefore your Lordship may securely
go on in the ways you have proposed to yourself to serve the King
without fear of interruption from me, or so much as inquiring into the
means you work by.' For himself he had a commission to treat with the
Confederates, and he intended to do so without venturing 'upon any new
negotiation foreign to the powers he had received.' In the meantime
the proposed succours were likely to be too late.[86]
[Sidenote: Glamorgan's oath of fealty.]
[Sidenote: Conclusion of peace.]
Glamorgan was not satisfied with abandoning as worthless the treaty
which had cost him so much, he must needs swear fealty to the nuncio in
terms such as perhaps no other English layman has ever used. 'I swear,'
he wrote, 'to obey all your commands readily without reluctance and
with a joyful mind. I make this perpetual protestation on my bended
knees to your most illustrious and reverend lordship, not only as the
Pope's minister but also as a remarkable personage, and as witnesses
of the purity of my intentions I invoke the Blessed Virgin and all the
Saints of Paradise.' The result of this alliance was the consent of the
Supreme Council to prolong the cessation till May 1, so as to give time
for the arrival of Sir Kenelm Digby's original articles. Neither Digby
nor the documents ever reached Ireland, for the Queen did not choose
that they should, and peace was concluded with Ormonde on March 28,
on the understanding that the terms were not to be divulged until May
1, Rinuccini failing to get a further postponement. 'I command you,'
Charles had written, 'to conclude a peace with the Irish, whatever it
cost; so that my Protestant subjects there may be secure, and my regal
authority preserved. But for all this, you are to make the best bargain
you can, and not to discover your enlargement of power till you needs
must.' This was early in 1645. Six months later, after Naseby, the King
'absolutely and without reply,' commanded Ormonde to make the peace,
with the consent of his Council if possible, but to make it anyhow.
The contracting parties were Ormonde alone on the King's part and the
following commissioners for the Confederate Catholics: Ormonde's uncle,
Viscount Mountgarret, and his brother-in-law, Viscount Muskerry, Sir
Robert Talbot, Tyrconnel's eldest brother; Colonel Dermot O'Brien;
Patrick Darcy of Plattin; Geoffrey Brown and John Dillon, two lawyers
who were designated as future judges. The conditions of a peace
which was no peace might seem hardly worth dwelling on, but that
they mark clearly the furthest point to which Charles would openly,
if not altogether willingly, go in his dealings with the Irish Roman
Catholics. A few weeks after the peace was signed, and before it was
published, he ceased to be a free agent, and the desperate expedients
of a prisoner scarcely count. The articles occupy twenty-two printed
pages, but the principal points may be clearly brought out in a short
abstract.
[Sidenote: Summary of the articles.]
1. The oath of supremacy to be abolished, so far as concerns Roman
Catholics, in the next Irish Parliament; and an oath of allegiance
substituted. All statutory penalties and disabilities to be repealed
by the same Act. 'That his Majesty's said Roman Catholic subjects be
referred to his Majesty's gracious favour and further concessions.'
2. An Irish Parliament to be held before November 30, when all the
articles were to be performed by law, the King undertaking to make no
alterations under Poynings' Act.
3. All legal acts done against Roman Catholics since August 7, 1641, to
be vacated. Debts to remain as they stood before the outbreak.
6. Titles to land to be confirmed under the graces of 1628.
7. All educational disabilities affecting Roman Catholics to be removed.
8. All offices, civil and military, to be open to Roman Catholics.
9. The Court of Wards to be abolished on payment of 12,000_l._
10, 11. Peers without estates in Ireland to have no votes. Irish
Parliament to be as independent as it ever had been.
12. Titles to land to be decided by law and not by the Council.
13. Acts in restraint of trade to be repealed.
14. Viceroys to hold for a limited term of years and not to acquire
estates.
15. An Act of oblivion for all offences civil and criminal since
October 23, 1641, with some exceptions to be hereafter specified.
16. Officials and judges to have no interest in the revenue.
17. Monopolies abolished.
18. To regulate the court of Castle-chamber.
19. 'That two Acts lately passed in this kingdom, prohibiting the
ploughing with horses by the tail, and the other prohibiting the
burning of oats in the straw, be repealed.'
20. Breakers of the cessation or of this peace to be punished.
21, 22. Simplification of legal remedies.
23, 24. Quit-rents increased by Strafford to be reduced again.
25. Commissioners named to raise and transport to England 10,000 men
for the King's service, and to collect overdue taxes.
26, 27. Commissioners named to appoint to judicial offices until
Parliament meets, but without power to decide questions of title, and
no other judges to have power within the Confederate quarters.
28. The _status quo_ as to garrisons.
29. Further details as to taxation.
30. The judicial commissioners to have jurisdiction in every case,
including murder, arising since September 15, 1643.[87]
[Sidenote: Delay fatal to Charles.]
[Sidenote: Digby repulsed from Scilly.]
[Sidenote: The nuncio's opinion of Charles I.]
[Sidenote: Glamorgan's forlorn condition.]
[Sidenote: The peace proclaimed at Dublin, July 30, 1646.]
These articles when duly executed were placed in Clanricarde's hands,
to be kept secret until such time after May 1 as Ormonde might choose
for their publication. Before that day the Parliamentary fleets had
begun their summer cruises and the sea was entirely at their mercy.
Chester having fallen, it was almost out of the question to land
men in Wales. Six thousand of the promised troops were ready, and
orders were given for levying the remainder, but shipping could not
be provided, and there was no money either at Dublin or Kilkenny. The
attempt to put down the English people with Irish troops failed as it
had failed in the days of Strafford, and as it was destined to fail
in the days of Tyrconnel. In the meantime Lord Digby found a plan of
his own for bringing the Prince of Wales to Ireland and rallying round
him there all the forces opposed to the Parliament. Rinuccini dreaded
the success of this scheme, but it was not he who prevented it. Digby
sailed with two small frigates and 300 men to Scilly, where the Prince
remained from March 4 to April 16, but did not get there till after the
latter date. 'The men of the island,' wrote Plunket to Ormonde, 'put
themselves in arms and loudly cried that no Irish rebels should land
there, the Lord Digby thereupon parted thence with one frigate, and one
hundred of the men to Guernsey or Jersey.' The other frigate with the
remaining men returned to Waterford. According to Daniel O'Neill, the
King's principal secretary was 'drunk nine days out of ten with white
wine' during the preparation of his little expedition, which may have
had something to do with its being late. The Confederates depended
on Glamorgan's treaty for relief to their religion further than that
promised by Ormonde. It was true that both sets of articles depended
really upon the King's word and upon his ability to keep it, but as
professed Royalists they could not reject the first nor assume the
permanent absence of the second. Rinuccini, who had no duties except to
the Church, very rightly held that Charles's word was worth nothing,
and it was evident to him that if the royal power was destroyed in
England it could not long survive in Ireland without foreign help. The
King had justified the nuncio's opinion by repudiating Glamorgan, and
when this was known at Kilkenny he lost all credit, 'with the merchants
in particular, so that he really had not enough to live upon.' He
spoke to the French agent Dumoulin about leading the troops intended
for England into Louis XIV.'s service, but there was no chance of that
being allowed. The nuncio's position was strengthened by a royal
letter to Ormonde written from Newcastle under Scotch influence. 'We
think fit,' the King said, 'to require you to proceed no further in
treaty with the rebels nor to engage us upon conditions with them after
sight hereof'; the alleged motive being anxiety for the safety of the
Irish Protestants. This came to Ormonde's hands three months after the
signature of the Dublin peace. A very few days later Digby returned
from France, where a letter had been received from the King in which he
declared that he was no longer free, and that Ormonde was to proceed
as before. Digby accordingly publicly declared the Newcastle letter to
be a forgery or written under duress. This satisfied the Council, and
the peace was proclaimed in Dublin on July 30. On August 3 the Supreme
Council at Kilkenny followed suit. 'We require,' they wrote, 'the
above proclamation to be printed, and do order and require the same
to be published, and due obedience to be given thereunto by all the
Confederate Catholics of Ireland.'[88]
[Sidenote: Siege of Bunratty, March-July, 1646.]
[Sidenote: The castle in its grandeur]
[Sidenote: Fight at Sixmilebridge, April 1.]
Barnabas O'Brien, sixth Earl of Thomond, had endeavoured to stand
neutral during the early years of the war, and to live quietly in
Clare. As a Protestant his natural leaning was to Ormonde, who could
not protect him; and in October 1644 the Kilkenny assembly, treating
neutrals as enemies, ordered his tenants to pay no rent, and took steps
to sequestrate his vast estates for the benefit of the Confederacy.
Finding his position intolerable, Thomond surrendered Bunratty to
the Parliament in March 1646, and soon went himself to England. A
Parliamentary fleet under Penn lay in the Shannon, and there was no
difficulty about putting a garrison of 700 men under Colonel MacAdam
into Bunratty Castle, which lies upon the estuary of the Ogarney river.
It is now the most melancholy of ruins; but Rinuccini, who beheld it
in its days of grandeur, thought it the finest thing he had ever seen,
and Bellings's description bears him out. 'It is,' he says, 'a noble
structure, reputed strong when engines of battery were not so frequent,
and before time and experience had brought the art of taking in places
to perfection. On the south it hath the river of the Shannon, distant
from it about a mile of marsh and meadow ground. On the east it is
washed by the river which falling to the Shannon at the end of a goodly
plain, ebbs and flows with it. To the north at some distance from the
castle it is environed with an eminent ridge of earth, which bounds a
goodly park, save that it wanted the ornament of timber trees; it was
then stored with the largest deer in the kingdom.' Glamorgan, who was
now entirely in the nuncio's hands, went to Limerick and busied himself
about preparations for the recovery of Bunratty; but the garrison were
at first successful. A party of Irish, consisting of 120 horse and 300
foot, came from Sixmilebridge and burned a few houses, but were routed
by a sally and lost eighty men, their commander, Captain Magrath,
and his lieutenant, being taken prisoners. In the afternoon of the
same day the victors, amounting to fifty horse and 600 foot, went to
Sixmilebridge and attacked the Irish camp. About 1400 men were strongly
entrenched there, but were driven out and took to the woods. A few were
slain, but a more important success was the capture of 250 barrels of
meal, which supplied the garrison of Bunratty with bread for six weeks.
Next day they went as far as Ballyquin, where the Irish had first
encamped, burned a large store of corn, and returned with some plunder
to Bunratty. Magrath and his subaltern both died of their wounds and
were buried with military honours.
[Sidenote: Muskerry presses the siege.]
[Sidenote: Rinuccini joins the besiegers.]
[Sidenote: Bunratty capitulates, July 14.]
It was not till the middle of May that the Irish began to press the
siege by taking the outlying castles of Cappagh and Rossmanagher. The
works of Bunratty itself were strengthened by the labour and skill
of the sailors, but it became difficult to supply the garrison with
food and ammunition. The besiegers encamped in the park, where the
underwood supplied material for gabions and fascines, and ate the deer,
which they roasted with the dry wood of the palings. Muskerry arrived
at the end of the month, and after that the siege became closer.
Letters were received from Broghill, but no relief came. Rinuccini came
to Limerick about the middle of May, where he had the satisfaction
of superintending the rejoicings for Benburb, but he found that the
siege of Bunratty was likely to be raised for want of money to pay the
soldiers. There were frequent sallies from the garrison, but nothing
decisive on either side. The nuncio went himself to the camp at the
end of June with all that remained of the Pope's money, to which he
added some of his own, and the attack was after that pressed with more
vigour. Colonel MacAdam was killed by a stray round shot which came in
at a window, and his loss proved fatal to the defence. Eighteen bags of
money and some of Thomond's plate had been guarded by the commandant;
but this treasure was now divided among themselves by the officers
who found it, in spite of Penn's remonstrances. When Muskerry's men
succeeded in getting heavy guns down to the shore where the action of
the defenders was weak, ships could no longer lie near, and want of
provisions soon became felt. On July 14 the garrison capitulated, and
were carried off in Penn's boats. Rinuccini was satisfied that his
presence and assistance during the siege would cause 'the people to
recognise it as an apostolic undertaking,' and a _Te Deum_ was sung in
the cathedral, where ten captured colours were displayed.[89]
[Sidenote: Battle of Benburb, June 5, 1646.]
While Rinuccini was at Limerick, and before Bunratty was taken, O'Neill
gained his great victory at Benburb. The tidings were peculiarly
grateful to the nuncio, in that success was entirely due to the Ulster
Irish, and in no sense to the Supreme Council or to any who favoured
Ormonde's peace. And, moreover, the efficiency of O'Neill's army
was mainly due to the Pope's money, brought over and distributed by
Rinuccini himself.
[Sidenote: Monro plans an attack on Kilkenny.]
[Sidenote: Over-confidence of the Scots.]
[Sidenote: Owen Roe's speech.]
In the early summer of 1646 the Confederacy was so weakened by internal
dissensions that Monro thought it possible to take Kilkenny. It was
arranged that Sir Robert Stewart's army should enter Connaught while
he engaged O'Neill. In the event of both attacks being successful, he
could then march southwards without any great probability of meeting
an enemy that could stop him. He had 3400 foot 'effective under
arms,' with eleven troops of horse and six field pieces. Campbell
of Auchinbreck was left in command at Carrickfergus. The general's
nephew, Colonel George Monro, was to join him at Glaslough in Monaghan,
bringing 240 musketeers and three troops of horse from Coleraine. Monro
left the neighbourhood of Belfast on June 2, and spent the night of the
3rd at or near Dromore. On the following morning he detached a troop
of horse, under Daniel Monro, with orders to cross the Blackwater at
Benburb and meet his namesake at Dungannon. At Armagh Daniel learned
from a prisoner that O'Neill was concentrating his forces at Benburb,
and the fear lest George Monro should be cut off probably accounts for
the Scottish general's subsequent proceedings. The army spent the night
of the 4th at Hamilton's Bawn, and in the morning Monro went through
Armagh to view the bridges and ford at Benburb. Both are commanded by
high rocks crowned by Shane O'Neill's castle, and it was impossible
to attempt the passage in front of the Irish army. Monro then marched
to Caledon, where he crossed the Blackwater, doubled back on the left
bank, and faced the enemy late in the afternoon. After the long march
it would have been prudent to halt till the morning; and, moreover, sun
and wind were in the eyes of the Scots, but they were overconfident of
victory. 'All our army,' says Monro, 'foot and horse, did earnestly
covet fighting, which was impossible for me to gainstand without being
reproached of cowardice.' Sir James Turner, however, declared that his
greatest fault as a general was a tendency to underrate his enemy.
O'Neill had with him about 5000 men, including 500 horse, 'such as they
were,' and took up a position on hilly ground to the west of Benburb.
He detached the greater portion of his mounted men to intercept George
Monro, but they scarcely did more than neutralise that skilful leader.
The two armies met at Drumflugh, between the Oona brook and Benburb.
O'Neill made a short speech to his men, reminding them that they
were the ancient inhabitants of Ulster, professing the same faith as
those who first brought Christianity into Ireland. 'You have arms in
your hands,' he said, 'you are as numerous as they are; and now try
your valour and your strength on those that have banished you and now
resolve to destroy you bud and branch. So let your manhood be seen by
your push of pike; and I will engage, if you do so, by God's assistance
and the intercession of His blessed mother and all the holy saints in
heaven, that the day will be your own. Your word is _Sancta Maria_; and
so, in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, advance, and give
not fire till you are within picket-length.'[90]
[Sidenote: The Scots completely defeated,]
[Sidenote: with great slaughter.]
[Sidenote: Monro's apology.]
[Sidenote: An old soldier's comments.]
The battle did not begin till about six in the evening, by which time
the sun was well in the eyes of the Scots. The wind was also against
them, and there were clouds of dust and smoke. Monro's guns were placed
on high ground, but they did little damage, the round shot going over
the heads of O'Neill's men as they descended into the plain, which
was full of bushes and scrubby timber. Monro's front was too narrow,
and there were no proper intervals for his rear divisions to come
out in front. So learned a general might have remembered something
about the Roman maniples. Overcrowding resulted in confusion, and
this was increased by a squadron of his own cavalry, 'consisting,'
as he says, 'for the most part of Irish riders, although under the
English command, who did not charge, but retreated disorderly through
our foot, making the enemies' horse for to follow them at least one
squadron.' He thought they were at least half traitors. The foot fought
on bravely till sunset, when they broke and fled. The majority sought
the neighbouring ford of the Blackwater, where Battleford Bridge now
is, and the slaughter there was frightful. Sir Phelim O'Neill, who
commanded the horse, specially charged his men to take no prisoners
and to give no quarter. Others fled towards Caledon, and many of them
were drowned in Knocknacloy Lake. Of those who crossed the river a
large number were killed in passing through the county of Armagh.
Most of the horse escaped with Monro, who acknowledges a loss of 500
or 600 men; but the Irish accounts say that from 3000 to 4000 bodies
were counted. A long train of carts followed the army, so that many
camp-followers were probably killed, and the truth is likely to be
somewhere between the two extremes. The Irish slain were under forty,
and the wounded under 250. George Monro got back to Coleraine without
the loss of a man. Monro's wig, cloak, sword, and cap fell into the
victor's hands with thirty-two colours and the standard of the cavalry.
Even those who escaped for the most part threw away their arms, which
enabled O'Neill to enrol fresh men. Lord Blayney, who commanded the
artillery, was killed, all his guns being taken. Lord Montgomery of
Ardes, who led the cavalry during the battle, was taken prisoner with
about twenty other officers. Monro's army was not annihilated, but it
was to a great extent disarmed, and ceased to be an aggressive force.
Over-confidence was certainly one main cause of his defeat. 'The Lord
of Hosts,' he says himself, 'had a controversy with us to rub shame
on our faces, as on other armies, till once we shall be humbled; for
a greater confidence did I never see.' The 'British Officer' agrees
that this was the chief cause of disaster; also mentioning the sun and
wind and the long march, and that the soldiers, who had had little
rest or refreshment since leaving Lisburn, stood to their arms for at
least five hours. Another reason, he adds, is 'that the Irish pikes
were longer by a foot or two than the Scottish pikes, and far better to
pierce, being four square and small, and the other pikes broad-headed,
which are the worst in the world. Withal to my knowledge, the soldiers,
I mean some that were not strong in the British army for his pike on a
windy day, would cut off a foot, and some two, of their pikes--which is
a damned thing to be suffered.'[91]
[Sidenote: Small results of the victory.]
[Sidenote: Rejoicings at Limerick,]
[Sidenote: and at Rome.]
[Sidenote: The nuncio's donative.]
Military authorities are agreed that the general who wins a great
victory ought to pursue his beaten enemy to the uttermost. One reason
why O'Neill did not do this may have been that he was afraid of Sir
Robert Stewart falling upon Tyrone in his absence; but he was a man of
few words, and it does not appear that he ever said as much. He raised
new regiments, which he armed with the spoils of victory, and waited
for orders from Kilkenny. Want of money was no doubt a cause of delay.
His appearance at Augher caused Stewart to retire towards Londonderry,
and O'Neill lay inactive, first at Tanderagee and then at Loughanlea in
Cavan. Four days after the battle he sent Boetius MacEgan, an eminent
Franciscan, to Limerick with a letter to Rinuccini, who was quite
certain that a miracle had taken place. The Jesuit O'Hartegan, who had
returned from France, followed with the captured colours, which were
carried in procession through Limerick to the cathedral. The people
filled the streets and windows, the _Te Deum_ was sung by the nuncio's
choir, and high mass afterwards by the Dean of Fermo in the presence of
four bishops and of the civic magistrates. When the news reached Rome,
Innocent X. attended at Santa Maria Maggiore and heard a _Te Deum_ sung
there also. Rinuccini was sure that if he had only money enough he
could make the greater part of Ireland obedient to the Pope. All his
letters declare that money would do almost everything in Ireland; but
it was a scarce commodity, and without it even the clergy could not
'keep the soldiers quiet and united.' The nuncio had still a little
left, and he despatched Dean Massari to Ulster, who gave three rials to
each soldier and larger sums to the officers. The donative was small,
but it tended to foster the notion that it was the nuncio's war, and
that little regard need be paid to the viceroy or to the Council at
Kilkenny, where Anglo-Irish influences were in the ascendant.
[Sidenote: Roscommon taken.]
[Sidenote: O'Neill forced to let his men plunder.]
Preston had also been successful in Connaught, but the capture of
Roscommon, though important, paled before the glories of Benburb.
Neither general was in a condition to attack Sligo. Preston had no
ammunition for a siege, no means of drawing his guns over the Curlew
hills, and no money to pay his men. Even the sums promised--for they
had not arrived at the end of July--were not enough to last for a week
on active service. The country was so wasted that everyone would have
to carry a month's provisions with him, and this could only be had
for ready money. Ormonde urged Preston to reduce Connaught before the
summer season slipped away, but admitted that little help in money
for the Leinster army could be expected from Leinster. Both Preston
and O'Neill offered Rinuccini to march on Dublin, looking no doubt to
him for the means; but he refused because Dumoulin, the French agent,
was there, lest the Pope might be embroiled with the Most Christian
King. The part of that province which bordered on Ulster was overrun
by O'Neill's men, who plundered all classes and creeds impartially, so
that they appeared as conquerors rather than allies. Ormonde attributed
it 'to the necessities imposed on General O'Neill for want of means to
go on or to keep his men in better order where he is.'[92]
[Sidenote: Rinuccini works against the peace.]
[Sidenote: The clergy at Waterford.]
[Sidenote: The peace not proclaimed at Waterford.]
Want of money and ill-feeling between the native and Anglo-Irish
notables prevented the greatest of Irish victories from having any
permanent results. Rinuccini left the Supreme Council at Limerick
under the impression that he would not object further to Ormonde's
peace, but he continued to counter-mine it while they despatched
Muskerry, who would have been more useful in Munster, to be present
at the proclamation in Dublin. Arriving at Waterford at the beginning
of August, the nuncio summoned the clergy to meet him there in order
to take steps for constituting a national synod. When he had got them
together, they immediately fell to debate the peace; and this had, no
doubt, been his real object. Scarampi, who had not yet sailed, was
authorised to write letters urging the municipalities of Limerick,
Cashel, Clonmel, Kilkenny, Galway, Wexford, and New Ross not to allow
the peace to be published. In the meantime, Ulster King-at-Arms had
arrived at Waterford with orders from Ormonde to proclaim the peace
there. The mayor and aldermen refused him permission on various
grounds. They had already been warned by the previous appearance of a
pursuivant, who had to give a little boy sixpence to show him the way
to the mayor's house, and who declared that there were 'by imagination
about a thousand priests and friars gazing' upon him and Ulster when
they had succeeded in getting an interview with the corporation. After
two days they were allowed to go in peace to Kilkenny, not without
covert threats of violence if their departure were longer delayed.
Scarampi's letters were written before they left Waterford, though the
attitude of the civic authorities was nominally due to the fact that
proclamation had not been first made at Kilkenny and by order of the
Supreme Council. Waterford was preferred on the ground that it was the
most ancient city of Ireland after Dublin; but perhaps Ormonde hoped
that his herald would create dissension enough to break up the clerical
assembly.[93]
[Sidenote: The clergy reject the peace.]
[Sidenote: Peace proclaimed at Kilkenny.]
[Sidenote: Callan, Fethard and Cashel follow Kilkenny.]
[Sidenote: Clonmel follows Waterford.]
The Supreme Council at Kilkenny transmitted the original articles of
the peace to Waterford by the hands of Nicholas Plunket and Patrick
Darcy. The nuncio had not seen them before, though he was, of course,
well acquainted with their substance. After several days' debate it
was decided 'that all and singular the Confederate Catholics, who
shall adhere to such a peace, or consent to the fautors thereof, or
otherwise embrace the same, be held absolutely perjured: especially
for this cause, that in these articles there is no mention made of
the Catholic religion, and the security thereof, nor any care had for
conservation of the privileges of the country as is found promised in
the oath [of association]; but rather all things are referred to the
will of the most serene King, from whom in his present state nothing
certain can be had.' In the meantime everything remained subject to the
authority of Protestant officials, 'to free ourselves from which we
took that oath.' And it was plainly hinted that excommunication would
follow in due course. The document was signed by the nuncio himself,
by two archbishops, ten bishops, and many vicars-general and heads
of religious houses. It professes to be absolutely unanimous; but
Archbishop Bourke of Tuam, Bishop Dease of Meath, and the Franciscan
Peter Walsh, whose stormy career in Ireland now begins, did not sign,
though they took part in the debates and were among those to whom the
question was referred. On the same day the peace was proclaimed at
Kilkenny 'in the presence of the mayor and the magistrates only, the
people not choosing to appear,' according to Rinuccini, who says the
Supreme Council terrorised the city with soldiers. At Callan, Fethard,
and Cashel proclamation was made in spite of clerical opposition, but
there was no popular enthusiasm. The corporation of Clonmel declared
that they would do as Waterford had done. The town had received
supplies of arms from the nuncio and was subservient to the clergy,
though some of the more prudent inhabitants would have complied. The
most the herald could obtain was a promise to reopen the question after
proclamation had been made at Limerick.[94]
[Sidenote: A herald's adventures at Limerick.]
[Sidenote: The drum ecclesiastic.]
[Sidenote: Gaol the only safe place.]
[Sidenote: The nuncio approves of the riot.]
The proclamation at Kilkenny was an open declaration of war with the
nuncio, who immediately sent Dean Massari to Rome to explain that both
clergy and people were against the peace, and that its few supporters
could do no harm. Meanwhile, Ulster went on his way to Limerick.
Arriving after the gates were shut, he was refused admittance, and had
to pass the night in an old house outside. Next day he was received by
Sir John Bourke, the mayor, and at first it seemed that all would go
smoothly; but the civic authorities went on arguing the question till
the following day was well advanced, and time was thus given for a
formidable agitation to grow. James Wolfe, a Dominican friar, harangued
a mob in the streets, and declared that all who adhered to the peace
would incur the penalties of excommunication. The chief citizens
assembled at the mayor's house, where Dr. Walter Lynch, warden of the
Galway college, employed his eloquence in the same cause. A third
priest 'carried a great crucifix through the streets on the top of a
pole.' The mayor, nevertheless, favoured the proclamation and tried to
protect the herald while doing his office, but stones flew like hail,
and his house was wrecked. He was himself knocked down and nearly
murdered, while Ulster was hunted from the room, the friars calling out
in Irish, 'Kill, kill! I will absolve you.' He received two serious
wounds on the head and one in the hand, while his body was covered
with cuts and bruises. Dr. Thomas Arthur, a famous physician, who had
succeeded twenty years before in curing Archbishop Ussher of a disease
which had puzzled the London faculty, did what he could to pacify his
co-religionists and to save the herald's life at the risk of his own.
Appeals to the law of nations which protects heralds were fruitless,
and the more moderate citizens were forced to carry Roberts to gaol for
safety and to give out that he was dead. He and his companions were
detained for ten days, when Rinuccini said they might be discharged.
Bourke was deposed from the mayoralty, and Thomas Fanning, a leader
of the rioters, was installed in his room. The new mayor received the
nuncio's thanks and apostolical benediction for his good conduct in the
matter.[95]
[Sidenote: Ormonde and the Protestant hierarchy.]
[Sidenote: Ormonde at Kilkenny.]
[Sidenote: Ormonde and Owen Roe O'Neill.]
While the Congregation at Waterford were fulminating their censures
against all who adhered to the peace with Ormonde, the Protestant
clergy who had taken refuge in Dublin were congratulating him on having
'preserved not only in this city, but also in all the out-garrisons,
the free and full exercise of the true reformed religion.' They
besought him to continue in this way as the only means to make Ireland
obedient to the King, and to provide them with some maintenance until
they could return to their benefices. 'If any of our number,' they
concluded, 'be found disaffected to the religion, book of service,
public worship, government of the Church, his Majesty's service, or
disturbers of the present peace, we do not supplicate for such, but
leave them to your lordship to be proceeded with as you shall find
convenient.' This was signed by eleven archbishops and bishops and by
seventy-seven other clergymen, many of whom afterwards rose high in the
Church. Ormonde's loyalty to the Church of England was incompatible
with Rinuccini's views; but it did not prevent the Council at Kilkenny
from inviting the King's representative to his own town and castle.
He left Dublin on August 28 and reached Kilkenny on the 31st, where
he was received with triumphal arches and many demonstrations of joy;
and even succeeded in collecting some of his long-lost rents. Ormonde
left 1500 foot at Gowran, under Sir Francis Willoughby, and took 500
horse on with him, whom he quartered about Bennetsbridge. In passing
Naas he took the precaution of borrowing eight barrels of powder from
Sir John Sherlock, the governor, and they proved very useful. Digby
and Clanricarde accompanied him to Kilkenny. His previous negotiations
with Preston led him to believe that that general would keep the
victorious Ulster army at a distance. Ormonde's last act before
leaving Dublin was to send Daniel O'Neill to his uncle, Owen Roe,
with power to make him great offers if he would adhere to the peace.
These included the custody of all lands in O'Neill-land belonging to
men who questioned the King's authority and of all Lord Caulfield's
estate, and confirmation in his command. These were promises, while the
nuncio was able to give hard cash, without which an army could not be
moved--4000_l._ at first out of the Pope's money, and 5000_l._ later
from the contributions of the faithful, or by means of an advance from
the Spanish agent.[96]
[Sidenote: Rinuccini denounces the peace.]
[Sidenote: O'Neill and Preston.]
[Sidenote: Limitation of Irish loyalty.]
After staying a few days at Kilkenny, Ormonde went to his other house
at Carrick, so that he might be near Waterford and in a position to
confer with the clergy; but they were past the reach of argument.
Rinuccini issued a decree ordering them all to denounce the peace
publicly and to threaten actual excommunication by himself of all
who favoured it. He had seen, he said, 'with grief of heart that the
Protestant ministers in some places appear, and threaten that they will
recover both the churches and the exercise of their religion.' Finding
that nothing could be done on the Waterford side, Ormonde set out for
Cashel, intending to encourage those who had proclaimed the peace
there; but he was met on the road by a messenger from the mayor begging
him not to draw down upon the town the vengeance of O'Neill, who was
already at Roscrea. Piers MacThomas Fitzgerald, with the Munster horse,
'appeared upon a hill to the left hand, near Clonmel.' Preston had been
summoned to attend, but he pleaded ill-health, and a few days later
declared that, though he distrusted the Ulster army, he had 'received a
positive inhibition from the clergy that neither myself nor any of my
commanders, upon pain of excommunication, shall obey any orders from
my Lord lieutenant.' The position of Ireland could scarcely be better
described than in this letter of Preston's. The Confederates had all
along professed loyalty to the Crown, and had never denied that Ormonde
was the King's representative. But when it came to a trial of strength
between the viceroy and the papal nuncio, it was the latter that they
were forced to obey.[97]
[Sidenote: Ormonde driven back to Dublin.]
[Sidenote: The many-headed monster.]
Castlehaven was sent to sound the clergy at Waterford, but he found
them impracticable, rejoined Ormonde near Cashel, and persuaded
him to get back to Dublin as quickly as possible, lest he should
be intercepted and captured. Castlehaven argued that the clerical
party was getting stronger every day, 'and that the Supreme Council
were dissolved on the proclamation of peace, and consequently of no
authority to make good the public faith.' Other advices were to the
same effect, and it seemed probable that O'Neill's object was to get
between the viceroy and his capital. Castlehaven tried in vain to gain
over MacThomas, who followed Ormonde as far as Callan, but without
coming to blows. Orders were sent to Willoughby to seize the fortified
pass over the Barrow at Leighlin Bridge with his infantry. Colonel
Walter Bagenal, who was in command there, offered no opposition, and
Ormonde joined the main body at Kilcullen. He had sent Castlehaven
and his brother-in-law, Sir George Hamilton, to the corporation of
Kilkenny, offering to stand by them if they wished it and would adhere
to the peace, but they begged him to pass on his way. The mob plundered
his baggage, and the very men, says Bellings, 'who a fortnight before
had employed both cost and invention in erecting statues and triumphal
arches adorned with inscriptions, setting forth his own actions, and
the trophies of his ancestors, were suddenly as busy in pulling them
down, and defacing the monuments of his solemn entry, lest the northern
army, which could have easily mastered, might be incensed to their
destruction.' Willoughby, when expecting an attack, found that the
bulk of his powder, which had been given in part payment of 30,000_l._
by the Confederates at the first cessation, was so bad as to be quite
useless, and but for the eight barrels lately borrowed from Sir John
Sherlock he would have been in no condition to fight.[98]
[Sidenote: Lord Digby's proposals.]
[Sidenote: Triumph of Rinuccini,]
[Sidenote: who imprisons the Supreme Council.]
[Sidenote: O'Neill and Preston at Kilkenny.]
[Sidenote: Ormonde ignores Glamorgan.]
Digby remained at Kilkenny and made one more effort for the King. He
proposed that the nuncio and three or four bishops should give an
undertaking in writing to support the peace and unite with Ormonde
against the common enemy, on condition of receiving a firm private
assurance that the penal laws should be repealed and that they should
not be disturbed in their church possessions until a meeting of a new
Parliament to carry out the articles. Rinuccini would hear of nothing
less than Glamorgan's treaty fortified by part of Sir Kenelm Digby's.
Of the latter he never received the official text, and his instructions
were not to proceed without it. He entered Kilkenny in triumph and took
the city into his protection, relieving it from the interdict which
Roth, Bishop of Ossory, had proclaimed. O'Neill's army encamped in the
immediate neighbourhood and made all resistance impossible. Rinuccini
then proceeded to imprison the old Supreme Council. Mountgarret's
eldest son Edmond, Bellings the secretary and historian, and Lord
Muskerry, the viceroy's brother-in-law, were among those confined
in the castle. Geoffrey Brown, who had been conspicuous among the
commissioners for concluding the peace, and was intended to be a judge,
was arrested at Galway, but the citizens refused to send him to the
nuncio. O'Neill and Preston both entered Kilkenny, and assisted 'the
lord nuncio and congregation of the clergy' in choosing a new council
of seventeen members. Four were bishops, Walsh of Cashel, Bourke of
Clonfert, Macmahon of Clogher, and French of Ferns; among the others
were Glamorgan, who was appointed general of Munster in Muskerry's
place, Owen Roe O'Neill, Preston, and Sir Phelim O'Neill. The great
object was now to take Dublin, and Ormonde was told that he had no
chance of defending himself against 17,000 foot and 1700 horse. If
the city was taken by assault it was likely that neither man, woman,
nor child would be spared, but this might be averted if Ormonde would
adhere to the Glamorgan treaty. 'If,' was the Lord-Lieutenant's answer,
'I could have assured the clergy my lord of Glamorgan's conditions, I
had not retired hither. They are things I have nothing to do with, nor
will have. If they be valid in themselves, they need no corroboration;
if invalid, I have no power to give them strength.' After this
Rinuccini concluded that if he wanted Dublin he would have to get it
taken, while Ormonde, who felt his weakness, opened communications with
the English Parliament.[99]
[Sidenote: O'Neill threatens Kilkenny.]
[Sidenote: His army.]
[Sidenote: O'Neill and Preston on bad terms.]
[Sidenote: A clerical commissary.]
[Sidenote: The nuncio and his generals.]
Rinuccini wished O'Neill to attack Dublin before Ormonde could return
thither; but the Ulster general excused himself on the ground that
he had no artillery, and came to Kilkenny instead. Benburb had been
fought and won by men who were defending a strong position in their own
country, and the means for a serious siege were wanting. An officer who
was with the northern army near Birr described it as consisting of 5000
infantry, of which rather more than half were pretty well armed, 'the
rest as the rabble used to be in the beginning of the distractions.'
The horse were under 400, good and bad, and there were only five
field-pieces 'of about a foot and a half long.' When O'Neill was at
Kilkenny a month later Ormonde learned that his army was composed of
8000 foot, more than half of them without muskets, and seventeen or
eighteen small troops of miserable horse 'whereof not above two armed
with pistol, and none with defensive arms.' About 8000 'of the Ulster
families, unarmed,' accompanied the troops. Preston's cavalry were
well appointed, but it was estimated that the combined armies could
not in any case exceed 13,000, with five pieces of artillery and very
few stores of any kind. The two generals acted quite independently.
O'Neill took all the castles and towns in Queen's County, and made
himself master of Athlone. Preston temporised, and both were much
more intent upon outwitting each other than upon taking Dublin. The
Leinster people did not like to see the hungry northerns devouring
their province, and they flocked to Preston's standard, so that he
became as least as strong as his rival. Early in October Rinuccini went
to Kilkea, then in the possession of Robert Nugent, provincial of the
Jesuits, to whom it had been granted for the use of the Society by his
kinswoman Elizabeth Countess of Kildare. Nugent lent 1500_l._ to the
nuncio, and voluntarily undertook the task of victualling the army;
but this clerical commissary was not more successful than a clerical
general proved to be later on. 'The good man,' says Bellings, 'how
perfect soever his mathematical demonstrations might have been, failed
in the practice, which affords a thousand circumstances that commonly
lie out of the road of divinity and speculation.' The two armies were
together, though not united, in the neighbourhood of Kilcock, whence
they advanced by Harristown and Naas to Lucan, within seven miles of
Dublin. The Leinster men thought O'Neill's object was to conquer them,
while he believed, or perhaps only professed to believe, that Preston
was conspiring with Ormonde to place him between two fires. Successful
joint action under these circumstances was impossible, and it appeared
to the nuncio that 'arms at first devoted to religion were about to
minister to private passions alone.' The two generals met at Lucan, but
could not agree, and Rinuccini joined them there in hopes of at least
preventing a collision between Leinster and Ulster.[100]
[Sidenote: Ulster and Leinster irreconcilable.]
[Sidenote: Dublin in danger.]
[Sidenote: Negotiations with the Scots,]
[Sidenote: and with the Parliament,]
[Sidenote: but nothing is settled.]
'Besides the hatred of the generals,' Digby wrote from the midst of
Rinuccini's partisans, 'their men have a greater animosity one against
another, than those at Dublin have against either.' But for this the
capital might probably have been taken, for the defences were very
weak, ammunition was scarce, and famine was always in sight. The
fortifications were, however, repaired as well as possible, the ladies,
with the Marchioness of Ormonde at their head, setting an example
to the citizens by carrying baskets of earth. Ormonde had destroyed
the bridges over the Liffey, and the mills, so that the Irish had
great difficulties about food. Negotiations were opened by the Lord
Lieutenant with the Ulster Scots, but they ended in nothing, for the
survivors of Benburb were too few and too much discouraged to play an
active part. Colonel George Monro, whose Royalist proclivities were
doubtless known to Ormonde, apologised for his enforced inactivity.
The Lord Lieutenant suggested that 500 Scots should come to Dublin,
but the officers did not see their way to go so far south, though they
were willing to act as a garrison for Drogheda. The Lord Lieutenant
was not likely to accept such an offer, for Drogheda was in no danger.
Negotiations had also been opened with the Parliament, whose fleet
lay out in the bay. Sir Francis Willoughby, Sir Gerald Lowther, Chief
Baron, and Sir Paul Davis, clerk of the Council, sailed on Michaelmas
Day, and reached London a fortnight later. They were heard by a
committee of the Commons, and five commissioners, of whom Sir John
Clotworthy was one, reached Dublin on November 12 with power to treat
for its surrender. The negotiations lasted for ten days, failing at
last mainly because Ormonde would not deliver up the sword of state
without actual orders from the King, and thus dissolve the remnant of
the Irish Parliament on which the Protestants relied. The other points
upon which the Lord Lieutenant insisted and the commissioners failed
to satisfy him, were that they could give him no assurance for their
estates 'to the Papists who adhered to his Majesty's Government since
October 22, 1641'; that the Covenant should not be pressed, nor the
Book of Common Prayer suppressed; and that official vested interests
should be preserved. Ormonde was perhaps less anxious to come to terms
because the mere appearance of the commissioners had averted the danger
of a siege, and because he had been allowed to procure powder from the
Parliamentary ships. The supplies intended for Dublin were carried by
Clotworthy and his colleagues to Ulster.[101]
[Sidenote: Vacillation of Preston.]
[Sidenote: One of Digby's schemes.]
[Sidenote: Preston's mental reservations.]
The conduct of Preston throughout the whole of these proceedings
showed the weakness of the Confederate position as well as of his
own character. First he gave Ormonde to understand that he would
prevent O'Neill from marching southwards, and then he let the nuncio
persuade him to join forces with the northern general in the attempt to
intercept Ormonde and in threatening Dublin. On August 26 he wrote to
invite the Lord Lieutenant's commands as to the disposition of troops
to prevent O'Neill from entering Leinster. On September 5 he excused
himself from personal attendance. On the 17th he lamented that clerical
threats of excommunication prevented him from obeying any of the Lord
Lieutenant's orders. On October 10 he found that the peace published
in his camp and by his authority was 'destructive to my religion and
liberty of the nation,' and contrary to his oath as a Confederate. On
the 21st he swore solemnly to aid O'Neill in attacking Dublin, to 'use
and exercise all acts of hostility against the Lord Marquis of Ormonde
and his party,' and to damage him in every possible way. Digby, who was
a sanguine man, thought it possible to kidnap O'Neill and Rinuccini
and carry them to Dublin, and to spike Preston's guns, and he was also
inclined to believe that something might be done with that vacillating
general. Ormonde was less hopeful, but his patience was inexhaustible,
and he resolved to make another effort, and Preston took care to let
him know privately that he was not really irreconcilable, and would not
join O'Neill, and that if he captured towns or castles it was only to
prevent the Ulster general from getting them. Clanricarde was sent for
from Portumna, and came to Luttrellstown, where he was in a position to
communicate with all parties.[102]
[Sidenote: Extreme demands of the nuncio.]
[Sidenote: Ormonde's distrust of the Confederates.]
[Sidenote: Agreement between Digby and Preston.]
[Sidenote: Ormonde does not adopt it.]
[Sidenote: Proposed treatment of Protestants.]
[Sidenote: Dublin cannot be taken.]
Preston never really co-operated with O'Neill, but he joined him
in making certain proposals to Ormonde in which the nuncio's hand
can be very clearly seen. The first was that the Roman Catholic
religion should be exercised in every part of Ireland as in Paris or
Brussels. The third was 'that Dublin, Drogheda, Trim, Newry, Carlow,
Carlingford, and all the garrisons within the Protestant quarters be
garrisoned by the Confederate Catholics.' They were to be held for
the King, but only in name. 'The madness of their propositions to
you,' Digby wrote to Ormonde after he had joined Clanricarde, 'makes
him almost despair of doing any good with Preston.' Ormonde did not
condescend to discuss the propositions at all, but contented himself
with asking who composed the Council of the Confederates and by whose
authority they were established. 'These questions,' says Bellings,
pithily, 'were too knotty to be resolved on the sudden, and therefore,
as it is the custom in such cases, they were not answered.' Four days
later Clanricarde was at Tecroghan, near Trim, and at once opened
communications with Preston. Safe-conducts were granted to him and
Digby, but to the latter, who was still nominally Secretary of State,
not without great difficulty. 'I conjure you,' said Ormonde, '(as you
expect to serve our master, or his hereafter) not to venture any more
among so faithless a generation, if you have any probable hope of
getting away from thence. For, if I have any judgment, your coming will
be fruitless.' And fruitless it was. Two days later the Parliamentary
commissioners reached Dublin, and O'Neill, probably fearing to be
caught in a trap, threw an extempore bridge over the Liffey at Leixlip,
collected his men by firing a gun, and passed them all over to the left
bank. It was thought that Sir Phelim O'Neill, who was jealous of Owen
Roe's supremacy in Ulster and who had married Preston's daughter, might
be induced to join the latter. Digby's plan was to make Clanricarde
general, who would thus be in a position to make the best terms for
his own Church, while loyally co-operating with the Lord Lieutenant.
Preston and his friends bound themselves most solemnly to embrace the
peace in consideration of such additional securities as Clanricarde
undertook to procure. These included the repeal of the penal laws and
enjoyment by Catholics of such churches and ecclesiastical possessions
as they held at the conclusion of the peace, until a settlement by
a free Irish Parliament, 'his Majesty being in a free condition
himself.' To confirm these promises Clanricarde was to procure an
engagement under the King's hand as well as from the Queen and Prince
of Wales and the French crown. The peace once concluded on these
terms the Catholics were to be 'forthwith invested in such commands
by his Majesty's authority, both in field and garrison, as may pass
for a very sufficient part of the security.' Ormonde was no party to
this treaty, which could not be performed without his help, and he
was not anxious for it after he had got rid both of O'Neill and the
Parliamentary commissioners. Rinuccini's influence was at work all the
time, and it was insisted that the first thing should be the admission
of a Prestonian garrison into Dublin. Ormonde insisted on the original
peace being first accepted, and so the negotiations fell through.
Digby thought that if Preston had been promptly dealt with he would
have attacked O'Neill, but his judgment is not for a moment to be
set against Ormonde's. Preston was satisfied, and in a letter to the
mayor and citizens of Kilkenny, urged the acceptance of Clanricarde's
terms. What the ultimate position of the Protestants would have been
may be judged from this document. 'We have,' he said, 'by the divine
Providence, wrought the splendour of religion to that extension as
from Bunratty to Dublin there is Catholic religion publicly professed
and exercised, and from Waterford to the lower parts of Tyrone,
and confined heresy in this province to Dublin, Drogheda, Dundalk,
and Trim, these places which in four days will be garrisoned by my
army, by God's help; and then think you in what posture of religion
these parts are in, for us and ours, having all penal laws against
Catholics repealed; all in our own hands, churches and church livings
secured till the King in a free Parliament declare the same for us;
the government in the Catholics' hands; petitions of right allowed
the parties grieved; and, to make this good, our arms in our own
hands.' This was written under the impression that Dublin would soon
be in his hands, though in the same letter he admits that he could
not take it even with O'Neill's help. Rinuccini and his council had
already left the camp, and Preston's officers were soon induced to
break with Clanricarde on the ground that no concessions would be of
any use without a garrison in Dublin. 'That being denied did beget a
desperation of future performances.'[103]
[Sidenote: The popular tide turns against Rinuccini.]
[Sidenote: The Supreme Council released.]
[Sidenote: The Confederate constitution breaks down.]
[Sidenote: Officers not 'excommunication-proof.']
[Sidenote: Preston submits to the nuncio.]
[Sidenote: Ormonde in Westmeath.]
The nuncio, says Bellings, entered Kilkenny, 'very incognito in his
single litter without guards or attendance, and the council and
congregation dropped in one after another without pomp or ceremony.'
The tide had turned, and the odium which so often attaches to authority
in Ireland, especially when it fails to make itself feared, was borne
by the clerical party. Rinuccini, yielding very unwillingly to Nicholas
Plunket and fearing lest the mob should do it without his leave,
allowed the old council to be liberated, and devoted his attention
to the elections for the next general assembly. All over the country
the clergy administered oaths to candidates binding them to reject
the peace. Absolution for other sins was denied to those who refuse
to take such an oath, and O'Neill's soldiers were everywhere called
in to enforce the clerical decrees. The vacant places in the Ulster
returns were filled up from the creaghts or nomad herdsmen whom Owen
Roe had planted in the Queen's County--'nay,' says Bellings, 'with
such an overcharge of supernumeraries, as for some boroughs three
have been returned and actually voted.' When the session began, the
verification of these returns proved to be impossible, and after much
wrangling the assembled members turned as they were to other business,
'and all formalities, how necessary soever, were quite omitted.' In
the meantime Preston had again gone over to the nuncio. On December
10 Walter Bagenal wrote by his orders to Ormonde, pressing him to
advance at once so as to join forces against the northern army, all
the nobility and gentry being ready to support him. 'If you fail or
delay,' Bagenal concluded, 'you ruin us all and yourself in us.' On the
same day that this was written, Preston made his submission to the
nuncio, who had threatened excommunication. Ormonde advanced to the
neighbourhood of Gowran, which was to be the place of meeting. He found
reason to believe that there was another plot to cut him off. A letter
from Preston to Clanricarde was brought to him at Grangebeg in which
the general said that 'his officers not being excommunication-proof,
were fallen from him to the nuncio's party.' On first receiving this
Clanricarde had so far forgotten his usual serenity as to call Preston
traitor. It was followed by a similar letter to Ormonde, and by an
abject declaration of obedience to the nuncio's commands. Ormonde
professed to believe that the letter, which was printed and circulated,
was 'a forgery, as also the reports raised that some of your army
are gathered in a body at Castle Dermot, with intent to intercept
my return, or destroy the remainder of my quarters.' He withdrew
into Westmeath and Longford, where there was still some country
undevastated by O'Neill, and where he maintained good discipline among
his men. Dublin was relieved for a short time without distressing
the country, and the Westmeath gentry actually scraped together a
voluntary contribution of 1000_l._ At Kells an attack was made upon
some of Ormonde's men by a party of O'Neill's soldiers. Ormonde
says two officers were barbarously murdered. Bellings admits that a
very bad impression was made, but O'Neill was hardly a party to the
negotiations. After conferring with the Lord Lieutenant, Clanricarde
went to Kilkenny in the vain hope that he might to some extent
counteract the nuncio and induce the assembly to embrace moderate
ideas. Ormonde soon found it necessary to reopen communications with
the English Parliament.[104]
[Sidenote: Discord at Kilkenny.]
[Sidenote: A clerical majority.]
[Sidenote: The things that are Cæsar's.]
[Sidenote: Mazarin supports the peace,]
[Sidenote: but it is rejected publicly, Feb. 2, 1646-7.]
The Confederate assembly met at Kilkenny on January 10, 'with all those
signs,' said Rinuccini, 'of discord and intrigues which generally
reign in such meetings.' The tempers of the old council had not been
improved by imprisonment, while the clergy, knowing that they had a
majority, were in no conciliatory mood. Bellings admits that former
assemblies had been turbulent 'and loud in their ayes and noes, yet now
it was grown clean another thing.' Edmond Dempsy, Bishop of Leighlin,
who was a famous preacher, and had probably a good voice, sat upon a
lofty bench which recalls the revolutionary Mountain. He had only to
wave his hat to raise a storm, the mass of members, 'like a set of
organ-pipes, as senseless and louder, depending for their squeaking,
or being still, on the hand of another.' After a few days the turmoil
partially subsided, and then the nuncio demanded an audience. He was
received with the same ceremony as at first, and proceeded to justify
his assumption of dictatorial power. He declared in plain terms that
the ecclesiastical authority was superior to the temporal, 'and that
ignorance of the true source of power had ruined the neighbouring
kingdom.' Above all things he urged the assembly to reject the peace
with Ormonde, and to take a fresh oath adverse to it. A letter was
read from Dumoulin, the French agent, who had positive orders from
his government to press for confirmation of the peace, but this had
no effect, though a letter from Mazarin had been previously received
urging them to merit help from France by re-establishing the King of
England. A remarkable speech of Walter Bagenal's has been preserved by
Bellings, in which he urged them to remember how strong England was
and how certainly they would be overwhelmed if they did not support
the King. Ormonde sent Lord Taaffe and Colonel John Barry to represent
him at Kilkenny, but the clericals would listen to nothing, and it
soon became evident that the peace would be rejected publicly. This
was done after three weeks' wrangling, but by no means unanimously,
and Scarampi started at once to carry the news to Rome. It was found
necessary at the same time to declare that the commissioners and others
who had a hand in the peace had 'faithfully and sincerely carried and
demeaned themselves in their said negotiation pursuant and according to
the trust reposed in them, and given thereof a due acceptable account
to this assembly.' This important matter being settled, a new and
stringent oath of association was taken by which all bound themselves
to make no peace without the consent of the General Assembly. One of
the conditions precedent was that the Roman Catholic clergy should
enjoy all churches and church property in as ample a manner as the
Protestants enjoyed them on October 1, 1641, in all places which the
Confederates should at any time possess 'saving the rights of Roman
Catholic laymen according to the laws of this kingdom.' The law, in
other words, was to protect Roman Catholics, but not Protestants.
All this referred to the secular clergy only, for the question of
abbey-lands was too dangerous to touch. To avoid the appearance of an
open breach with the Lord Lieutenant, Dr. Fennell and Geoffrey Baron,
who had just returned from France, were deputed to see him. Their
proposals for a sort of offensive and defensive alliance with Ormonde
came to nothing, but successive truces were patched up until April
10.[105]
FOOTNOTES:
[82] _Embassy in Ireland_, November and December, 1645, pp. 98,
103, 554, 569. Correspondence between Glamorgan and Ormonde in
_Confederation and War_, v. 197-200; 208-210. It appears from
Dumoulin's letters to Mazarin that Leyburn was at Limerick in April
1645, _ib._ 314, 325.
[83] Lord Lieutenant and Council to Secretary Nicholas, January 5,
1645-6, printed in appendix to Carte's _Ormonde_ and in _Confederation
and War_, v. 234. Interrogatories, etc., _ib._ 211-222. Digby's letter
to Nicholas, January 4, 1645-6, was one of those which Fairfax rescued
from the sea at Padstow, _Husband_, p. 816.
[84] The King's declaration, January 24, 1645-6, printed (from Reliquiæ
Sacræ Carolinæ) in _Confederation and War_, v. 252. Glamorgan to
Ormonde, January 7, 20 and 29, _ib._ 244, 255; Supreme Council to
Ormonde, January 16, _ib._ 246; _Embassy_, p. 115; the King to Ormonde,
January 30, _Carte MSS._ vol. lxiii. _f._ 386.
[85] Rinuccini to Pamphili, March 5, 1645-6, in _Embassy_; Fr. Barron
to Wadding, May 11, 1646, in _Spicilegium Ossoriense_, ii. 24; Charles
I. to Henrietta Maria, January 8 and February 8, 1645-6. Nuncio's
Memoirs (April or May) in Birch's _Inquiry_--"Pamphilius et nuncius
in hoc negotio caste et sincere partes egerunt suas; alii vero Regem
Reginamque impulerunt ad deferendum tractatum pontificium, et spem in
baculo arundineo, hæreticorum brachio, collocandam." Colepepper to
Ashburnham, Feb. Cal. of _Clarendon S.P._ 2135.
[86] Sir Kenelm Digby's articles were printed by Birch, and are also
in _Embassy_, pp. 573, 577. The nuncio's advice to Glamorgan, _ib._ p.
120, and his speech, p. 122; Ormonde to Glamorgan, February 3, 1645-6,
_Carte MSS._, vol. lxiii. f. 354; Glamorgan to Ormonde, February 8, in
_Confederation and War_, v. 258, and Ormonde's answer, February 11, in
appendix to Carte's _Ormonde_. Chester surrendered on February 3.
[87] The articles were printed in London in September 1646, and are
reprinted in _Confederation and War_, v. 286. Glamorgan's oath of
allegiance to Rinuccini, February 16, 1645-6, is given (Latin) in
Gardiner's _Civil War_, ii. 420. The King to Ormonde, February 27,
1644-5; May 22, 1645, in Carte's _Ormonde_, iii. and July 31 in
Halliwell's _Letters of the Kings of England_. On August 24, 1646,
Charles wrote to his wife: 'I have returned two messengers into Ireland
with my approving the peace there, to which I shall firmly stick,'
_Charles I. in 1646_.
[88] N. Plunket to Ormonde, May 7, 1646, in _Confederation and War_ v.
335; Digby's Declaration, July 28, and Proclamation of Peace, July 30
and August 3, _ib._ vi. 55-60; Daniel O'Neill to Ormonde, April 18, in
_Contemp. Hist._, i. 671; Rinuccini's letter, March 22, in _Embassy_,
p. 153; the Newcastle letter, June 11, in Birch's _Inquiry_, p. 208.
[89] There are accounts of this siege in _Bellings_, v. 20-24; in
Penn's _Memorials_, i. 165-210; and in Rinuccini's _Embassy_, pp.
182-191; and see Frost's _Hist. of Clare_, pp. 371-376.
[90] All the contemporary accounts mention O'Neill's short speech,
which evidently made a great impression. None say whether it was in
English or Irish. The 'British Officer' has been followed in the
text, 'MacArt spoke in the front of his own men these words, as I was
told, or to that effect.' The much longer speech in the _Aphorismical
Discovery_ is obviously a mere grammarian's figment containing allusion
to Gratian, Hannibal, Scipio, Plutarch, Polybius, the Maccabees, etc.
The number of Monro's army are given from his account, but the 'British
Officer' thinks the foot were near 5000. The numbers of the Irish are
from O'Neill's journal, and O'Mellan says nearly the same.
[91] The battle is described by Bellings and in the _Aphorismical
Discovery_. In _Contemp. Hist. of Affairs in Ireland_, i. 676-686, are
printed (1) a short notice from _Carte Papers_, xvii. 25; (2) Monro's
despatch to the Scotch estates; (3) a London tract dated June 15, 1646;
(4) Rinuccini's account (Italian) published as a tract at Rome and
Florence; (5) the 'British Officer's' account from _Hist. of the Wars
in Ireland_. An eighth account is in Colonel O'Neill's journal, _ib._
iii. 204. A ninth--not the least valuable--is in Young's _Old Belfast_,
being a translation from the Irish of O'Mellan the Franciscan, who was
chaplain to Sir Phelim O'Neill. The Rev. W. T. Latimer, in his _Hist.
of Irish Presbyterians_ (Belfast, 1893) identifies the localities from
O'Mellan and from his own local knowledge. I have satisfied myself by
actual inspection that he is right. A tenth account is in O'Neill's
letter (Latin) to Rinuccini printed in _Confederation and War_, v.
[92] Officers of Preston's army to the Supreme Council, July 27, 1646;
Ormonde to Preston, August 3, and to Bellings, August 10--all in
_Confederation and War_, vi. Rinuccini's _Embassy_, pp. 173, 181, 189;
_Bellings_, v. 16; O'Mellan's _Narrative_.
[93] William Roberts, Ulster, to Ormonde, August 11, 1646; Declaration
of William Kirkby, pursuivant; Letters by Scarampi--all in
_Confederation and War_, vi. 67, 110, 126. Rinuccini in _Embassy_, pp.
192, 197; _Bellings_, vi. 16.
[94] Decree of Ecclesiastical Congregation, August 12, 1646, in
_Confederation and War_, vi. 69; _Bellings_, _ib._ 17; Roberts to
Ormonde, August 17, _ib._ 115; _Embassy_, p. 198.
[95] Narratives of Roberts and Kirkby in _Confederation and War_, vi.
119-130; Rinuccini's letter, August 22, _ib._ 96; _Embassy_, p. 200.
[96] Carte's _Ormonde_, i. 580-587; Remonstrance of the bishops and
clergy, August 13, 1646, _ib._ ii. appendix No. 471.
[97] _Bellings_, vi. 18; Decree of Excommunication, September 1, 1646,
in _Confederation and War_, vi. 132; Sall, Mayor of Cashel, to Ormonde,
September 10, _ib._ 134; Preston to Ormonde September 5 and 17, _ib._
132, 139.
[98] _Castlehaven_, p. 66; _Bellings_, vi. 19; _Aphorismical
Discovery_, i. 125; Carte's _Ormonde_, iii. 580-583.
[99] _Bellings_, vi. 21. Order by Rinuccini and the generals, September
26, 1646, in _Confederation and War_, vi. 144; Carte's _Ormonde_, iii.
583.
[100] Rinuccini's letters, September 21 to December 29, 1646, in
_Embassy_, pp. 204, 224 _sqq._ The nuncio was with the two generals
at Lucan on November 11. Sir Robert Talbot to Ormonde, September 10;
Captain Cadogan to same, September 12; Ormonde to the Council, October
11--all in _Contemp. Hist._, i. 703-713. Digby to Ormonde, October 13,
in Carte's _Ormonde_, iii. 506. _Bellings_, vi. 22, 36.
[101] The negotiations between Ormonde and the Parliamentary
commissioners are given fully in _Rushworth_, vi. 418-444. Bellings
(vi. 28-35) gives the correspondence with the Ulster Scots. Digby to
Ormonde, October 13, 1646; Ormonde to Digby, October 12 and November
20, in Carte's _Ormonde_, vol. iii.
[102] Preston's letters, of which the dates are in the text, are all in
_Confederation and War_, vol. vi. Ormonde to Digby, October 22, 1646,
and all Digby's letters at this time in Carte's _Ormonde_, vol. iii.
[103] Preston and O'Neill to Ormonde, November 2, 1646, and the answer,
November 4, in _Contemp. Hist._ i. 713; Ormonde to Digby, November 10,
in Carte's _Ormonde_, iii. 512, and all the letters there till November
26. Negotiations between Preston and Clanricarde in _Confederation and
War_, vi. 151-162. Preston's letters to the mayor of Kilkenny (from
Lucan), November 24, _ib._ 162; Theobald Butler to Ormonde, _ib._ 165.
[104] _Bellings_, vi. 46; vii. 18. Papers of December 1646, in
_Confederation and War_, vi. 164-168, and in Carte's _Ormonde_, vol.
iii. _Embassy_, p. 347; Walter Bagenal to Ormonde, December 10, _Carte
MSS._, vol. lxiii.
[105] Rinuccini's narrative and speech in _Embassy_, pp. 241, 244,
250; _Bellings_, vii. 1-12. The new oath of the Confederacy in
_Confederation and War_, vi. 168; Declaration by the General Assembly
against the peace, February 2, 1646-7, _ib._ 177; overtures of Fennell
and Baron, March 3, _ib._ 185.