PREFACE

In this book are embodied the ideas which, as a parliamentarian, as

head of the Italian Government, and as a writer, I have upheld with

firm conviction during the last few years.

I believe that Europe is threatened with decadence more owing to the

Peace Treaties than as a result of the War. She is in a state of daily

increasing decline, and the causes of dissatisfaction are growing

apace.

Europe is still waiting for that peace which has not yet been

definitely concluded, and it is necessary that the public should be

made aware that the courses now being followed by the policy of the

great victorious States are perilous to the achievement of serious,

lasting and useful results. I believe that it is to the interest of

France herself if I speak the language of truth, as a sincere friend

of France and a confirmed enemy of German Imperialism. Not only did

that Imperialism plunge Germany into a sea of misery and suffering,

covering her with the opprobrium of having provoked the terrible War,

or at least of having been mainly responsible for it, but it has

ruined for many years the productive effort of the most cultured and

industrious country in Europe.

Some time ago the ex-President of the French Republic, R. Poincaré,

after the San Remo Conference, _à propos_ of certain differences of

opinion which had arisen between Lloyd George and myself on the one

hand and Millerand on the other, wrote as follows:

"Italy and England know what they owe to France, just as France

knows what she owes to them. They do not wish to part company with

us, nor do we with them. They recognize that they need us, as we

have need of them. Lloyd George and Nitti are statesmen too shrewd

and experienced not to understand that their greatest strength

will always lie in this fundamental axiom. On leaving San Remo

for Rome or London let them ask the opinion of the 'man in the

street.' His reply will be: '_Avant tout, restez unis avec la

France_.'"

I believe that Lloyd George and I share the same cordial sentiments

toward France. We have gone through so much suffering and anxiety

together that it would be impossible to tear asunder links firmly

welded by common danger and pain. France will always remember with a

sympathetic glow that Italy was the first country which proclaimed her

neutrality, on August 2, 1914; without that proclamation the destinies

of the War might have taken a very different turn.

But the work of reconstruction in Europe is in the interest of France

herself. She has hated too deeply to render a sudden cessation of her

hate-storm possible, and the treaties have been begotten in rancour

and applied with violence. Even as the life of men, the life of

peoples has days of joy and days of grief: sunshine follows the storm.

The whole history of European peoples is one of alternate victories

and defeats. It is the business of civilization to create such

conditions as will render victory less brutal and defeat more

bearable.

The recent treaties which regulate, or are supposed to regulate,

the relations among peoples are, as a matter of fact, nothing but a

terrible regress, the denial of all those principles which had been

regarded as an unalienable conquest of public right. President Wilson,

by his League of Nations, has been the most responsible factor in

setting up barriers between nations.

Christopher Columbus sailed from Europe hoping to land in India,

whereas he discovered America. President Wilson sailed from America

thinking that he was going to bring peace to Europe, but only

succeeded in bringing confusion and war.

However, we should judge him with the greatest indulgence, for his

intentions were undoubtedly sincere and honest.

France has more to gain than any other country in Europe by reverting

to those sound principles of democracy which formed her erstwhile

glory. We do not forget what we owe her, nor the noble spirit which

pervades some of her historic deeds. But _noblesse oblige_, and all

the more binding is her duty to respect tradition.

When France shall have witnessed the gradual unfolding of approaching

events, she will be convinced that he who has spoken to her the

language of truth and has sought out a formula permitting the peoples

of Europe to rediscover their path in life, towards life, is not only

a friend, but a friend who has opportunely brought back to France's

mind and heart the deeds of her great ancestors at the time when fresh

deeds of greatness and glory await accomplishment. The task which we

must undertake with our inmost feeling, with all the ardour of our

faith, is to find once more the road to peace, to utter the word of

brotherly love toward oppressed peoples, and to reconstruct Europe,

which is gradually sinking to the condition of Quattrocento Italy,

without its effulgence of art and beauty: thirty States mutually

diffident of each other, in a sea of programmes and Balkan ideas.

Towards the achievement of this work of civilization the great

democracies must march shoulder to shoulder. At the present moment I

hear nothing but hostile voices; but the time is not far distant when

my friends of France will be marching with us along the same road.

They already admit in private many things which they will presently be

obliged to recognize openly. Many truths are the fruit of persuasion;

others, again, are the result of former delusions.

Peaceless Europe · 第 4 / 44 题