My friend Madame de la F-------- has left us, and I fear is only gone

home to die. Her health was perfectly good when we were first arrested,

though vexation, more than confinement, has contributed to undermine it.

The revolution had, in various ways, diminished her property; but this

she would have endured with patience, had not the law of successions

involved her in difficulties which appeared every day more interminable,

and perplexed her mind by the prospect of a life of litigation and

uncertainty. By this law, all inheritances, donations, or bequests,

since the fourteenth of July 1789, are annulled and subjected to a

general partition among the nearest relatives. In consequence, a large

estate of the Marquise's, as well as another already sold, are to be

accounted for, and divided between a variety of claimants. Two of the

number being emigrants, the republic is also to share; and as the live

stock, furniture, farming utensils, and arrears, are included in this

absurd and iniquitous regulation, the confusion and embarrassment which

it has occasioned are indescribable.

Though an unlucky combination of circumstances has rendered such a law

particularly oppressive to Madame de la F--------, she is only one of an

infinite number who are affected by it, and many of whom may perhaps be

still greater sufferers than herself. The Constituent Assembly had

attempted to form a code that might counteract the spirit of legal

disputation, for which the French are so remarkable; but this single

decree will give birth to more processes than all the _pandects, canons,_

and _droits feodaux,_ accumulated since the days of Charlemagne; and I

doubt, though one half the nation were lawyers, whether they might not

find sufficient employment in demalgamating the property of the other

half.

This mode of partition, in itself ill calculated for a rich and

commercial people, and better adapted to the republic of St. Marino than

to that of France, was introduced under pretext of favouring the system

of equality; and its transition from absurdity to injustice, by giving it

a retroactive effect, was promoted to accommodate the "virtuous" Herault

de Sechelles, who acquired a considerable addition of fortune by it. The

Convention are daily beset with petitions from all parts on this subject;

but their followers and themselves being somewhat in the style of

Falstaff's regiment--"younger sons of younger brothers," they seem

determined, as they usually are, to square their notions of justice by

what is most conducive to their own interest.

An apprehension of some attempt from the Jacobins, and the discontents

which the scarcity of bread give rise to among the people, have produced

a private order from the Committees of government for arming and

re-organizing the National Guard.*

* Though I have often had occasion to use the term National Guard,

it is to be understood only as citizens armed for some temporary

purpose, whose arms were taken from them as soon as that service was

performed. The _Garde Nationale,_ as a regular institution, had

been in a great measure suppressed since the summer of 1793, and

those who composed it gradually disarmed. The usual service of

mounting guard was still continued, but the citizens, with very few

exceptions, were armed only with pikes, and even those were not

entrusted to their own care, each delivering up his arms when he

retired more exactly than if it were an article of capitulation with

a successful enemy.

--I remember, in 1789 and 1790, when this popular militia was first

instituted, every one, either from policy or inclination, appeared eager

to promote it; and nothing was discussed but military fetes, balls,

exercise, and uniforms. These patriotic levities have now entirely

vanished, and the business proceeds with languor and difficulty. One

dreads the present expence, another future persecution, and all are

solicitous to find cause for exemption.

This reluctance, though perhaps to be regretted, is in a great measure

justifiable. Where the lives and fortunes of a whole nation are

dependent on the changes of party, obscurity becomes the surest

protection, and those who are zealous now, may be the first sacrifices

hereafter. Nor is it encouraging to arm for the defence of the

Convention, which is despised, or to oppose the violence of a populace,

who, however misguided, are more objects of compassion than of

punishment.

Fouquier Tinville, with sixteen revolutionary Judges and Jurymen, have

been tried and executed, at the moment when the instigators of their

crimes, Billaud-Varennes, Collot, &c. were sentenced by the Convention to

a banishment, which is probably the object of their wishes. This

Tinville and his accomplices, who condemned thousands with such ferocious

gaiety, beheld the approach of death themselves with a mixture of rage

and terror, that even cowardice and guilt do not always exhibit. It

seems an awful dispensation of Providence, that they who were inhuman

enough to wish to deprive their victims of the courage which enabled them

to submit to their fate with resignation, should in their last moments

want that courage, and die despairing, furious, and uttering

imprecations, which were returned by the enraged multitude.*

--Yours, &c.

* Some of the Jurymen were in the habit of taking caricatures of the

prisoners while they condemned them. Among the papers of the

Revolutionary Tribunal were found blank sentences, which were

occasionally sent to the Committee of Public Safety, to be filled up

with the names of those intended to be sacrificed.--The name of one

of the Jurymen executed on this occasion was Leroi, but being a very

ardent republican, he had changed it for that of Citizen Tenth of

August.

Amiens, May 26, 1795.

Our journey to Paris has been postponed by the insurrection which

occurred on the first and second of Prairial, (20th and 21st of May,) and

which was not like that of Germinal, fabricated--but a real and violent

attempt of the Jacobins to regain their power. Of this event it is to be

remarked, that the people of Paris were at first merely spectators, and

that the Convention were at length defended by the very classes which

they have so long oppressed under the denomination of aristocrats. For

several hours the Assembly was surrounded, and in the power of its

enemies; the head of Ferraud, a deputy, was borne in triumph to the

hall;* and but for the impolitic precipitation of the Jacobins, the

present government might have been destroyed.

* The head of Ferraud was placed on a pole, and, after being paraded

about the Hall, stationed opposite the President. It is impossible

to execrate sufficiently this savage triumph; but similar scenes had

been applauded on the fourteenth of July and the fifth and sixth of

October 1789; and the Parisians had learned, from the example of the

Convention themselves, that to rejoice in the daily sacrifice of

fifty or sixty people, was an act of patriotism. As to the epithets

of Coquin, Scelerats, Voleurs, &c. which were now bestowed on the

Assembly, they were only what the members were in the constant habit

of applying to each other.

The assassin of Ferraud being afterwards taken and sentenced to the

Guillotine, was rescued by the mob at the place of execution, and

the inhabitants of the Fauxbourg St. Antoine were in revolt for two

days on this occasion, nor would they give him up until abandoned by

the cannoneers of their party.--It is singular, and does no honour

to the revolutionary school, or the people of Paris, that Madame

Elizabeth, Malsherbes, Cecile Renaud, and thousands of others,

should perish innocently, and that the only effort of this kind

should be exerted in favour of a murderer who deserved even a worse

death.

The contest began, as usual, by an assemblage of females, who forced

themselves into the national palace, and loudly clamoured for immediate

supplies of bread. They then proceeded to reproach the Convention with

having robbed them of their liberty, plundered the public treasure, and

finally reduced the country to a state of famine.*

* People.--_"Nous vous demandons ce que vous avez fait de nos

tresors et de notre liberte?"_--"We want to know what you have done

with our treasure and our liberty?"

President.--_"Citoyens, vous etes dans le sein de la Convention

Nationale."_--"Citizens, I must remind you that you are in the

presence of the National Convention."

People.--_"Du pain, du pain, Coquin--Qu'as tu fait de notre argent?

Pas tant de belles phrases, mais du pain, du pain, il n'y a point

ici de conspirateurs--nous demandons du pain parceque nous avons

saim."_--"Bread, bread, rogue!--what have you done with our money?--

Fine speeches won't do--'tis bread we want.--There are no

conspirators among us--we only ask for bread, because we are

hungry."

See Debates of the Convention.

--It was not easy either to produce bread, or refute these charges, and

the Deputies of the moderate party remained silent and overpowered, while

the Jacobins encouraged the mob, and began to head them openly. The

Parisians, however interested in the result of this struggle, appeared to

behold it with indifference, or at least with inactivity. Ferraud had

already been massacred in endeavouring to repel the croud, and the

Convention was abandoned to outrage and insult; yet no effectual attempt

had been made in their defence, until the Deputies of the Mountain

prematurely avowed their designs, and moved for a repeal of all the

doctrines since the death of Robespierre--for the reincarceration of

suspected persons--and, in fine, for an absolute revival of the whole

revolutionary system.

The avowal of these projects created an immediate alarm among those on

whom the massacre of Ferraud, and the dangers to which the Assembly was

exposed, had made no impression. The dismay became general; and in a few

hours the aristocrats themselves collected together a force sufficient to

liberate the Assembly,* and wrest the government from the hands of the

Jacobins.--

* This is stated as a ground of reproach by the Jacobins, and is

admitted by the Convention. Andre Dumont, who had taken so active a

part in supporting Robespierre's government, was yet on this

occasion defended and protected the whole day by a young man whose

father had been guillotined.

--This defeat ended in the arrest of all who had taken a part against the

now triumphant majority; and there are, I believe, near fifty of them in

custody, besides numbers who contrived to escape.*

* Among those implicated in this attempt to revive the revolutionary

government was Carnot, and the decree of arrest would have been

carried against him, had it not been suggested that his talents were

necessary in the military department. All that remained of

Robespierre's Committees, Jean Bon St. Andre, Robert Lindet, and

Prieur, were arrested. Carnot alone was excepted; and it was not

disguised that his utility, more than any supposed integrity,

procured him the exemption.

That the efforts of this more sanguinary faction have been checked, is

doubtless a temporary advantage; yet those who calculate beyond the

moment see only the perpetuation of anarchy, in a habit of expelling one

part of the legislature to secure the government of the other; nor can it

be denied, that the freedom of the representative body has been as much

violated by the Moderates in the recent transactions, as by the Jacobins

on the thirty-first of May 1793. The Deputies of the Mountain have been

proscribed and imprisoned, rather as partizans than criminals; and it is

the opinion of many, that these measures, which deprive the Convention of

such a portion of its members, attach as much illegality to the

proceedings of the rest, as the former violences of Robespierre and his

faction.*

* The decrees passed by the Jacobin members during their few hours

triumph cannot be defended; but the whole Convention had long

acquiesced in them, and the precise time when they were to cease was

certainly a matter of opinion. The greater part of these members

were accused of no active violence, nor could they have been

arrested on any principles but that of being rivals to a faction

stronger than themselves.

--It is true, the reigning party may plead in their justification that

they only inflict what they would themselves have suffered, had the

Jacobins prevailed; and this is an additional proof of the weakness and

instability of a form of government which is incapable of resisting

opposition, and which knows no medium between yielding to its

adversaries, and destroying them.

In a well organized constitution, it is supposed that a liberal spirit of

party is salutary. Here they dispute the alternatives of power and

emolument, or prisons and guillotines; and the sole result to the people

is the certainty of being sacrificed to the fears, and plundered by the

rapacity of either faction which may chance to acquire the superiority.--

Had the government any permanent or inherent strength, a party watching

its errors, and eager to attack them, might, in time, by these perpetual

collisions, give birth to some principles of liberty and order. But, as

I have often had occasion to notice, this species of republicanism is in

itself so weak, that it cannot exist except by a constant recurrence to

the very despotism it professes to exclude. Hence it is jealous and

suspicious, and all opposition to it is fatal; so that, to use an

argument somewhat similar to Hume's on the liberty of the press in

republics, the French possess a sort of freedom which does not admit of

enjoyment; and, in order to boast that they have a popular constitution,

are obliged to support every kind of tyranny.*

* Hume observes, that absolute monarchies and republics nearly

approach; for the excess of liberty in the latter renders such

restraints necessary as to make them in practice resemble the

former.

The provinces take much less interest in this event, than in one of a

more general and personal effect, though not apparently of equal

importance. A very few weeks ago, the Convention asseverated, in the

usual acclamatory style, that they would never even listen to a proposal

for diminishing the value, or stopping the currency, of any description

of assignats. Their oaths are not, indeed, in great repute, yet many

people were so far deceived, as to imagine that at least the credit of

the paper would not be formally destroyed by those who had forced its

circulation. All of a sudden, and without any previous notice, a decree

was issued to suppress the corsets, (or assignats of five livres,)

bearing the King's image;* and as these were very numerous, and chiefly

in the hands of the lower order of people, the consternation produced by

this measure was serious and unusual.--

* The opinion that prevailed at this time that a restoration of the

monarchy was intended by the Convention, had rendered every one

solicitous to amass assignats issued during the late King's reign.

Royal assignats of five livres were exchanged for six, seven, and

eight livres of the republican paper.

--There cannot be a stronger proof of the tyranny of the government, or

of the national propensity to submission, than the circumstance of making

it penal to refuse one day, what, by the same authority, is rendered

valueless the next--and that notwithstanding this, the remaining

assignats are still received under all the probability of their

experiencing a similar fate.

Paris now offers an interval of tranquillity which we mean to avail

ourselves of, and shall, in a day or two, leave this place with the hope

of procuring passports for England. The Convention affect great

moderation and gratitude for their late rescue; and the people, persuaded

in general that the victorious party are royalists, wait with impatience

some important change, and expect, if not an immediate restoration of the

monarchy, at least a free election of new Representatives, which must

infallibly lead to it. With this hope, which is the first that has long

presented itself to this harassed country, I shall probably bid it adieu;

but a visit to the metropolis will be too interesting for me to conclude

these papers, without giving you the result of my observations.

--Yours. &c.

Paris, June 3, 1795.

We arrived here early on Saturday, and as no stranger coming to Paris,

whether a native of France, or a foreigner, is suffered to remain longer

than three days without a particular permission, our first care was to

present ourselves to the Committee of the section where we lodge, and, on

giving proper security for our good conduct, we have had this permission

extended to a Decade.

I approached Paris with a mixture of curiosity and apprehension, as

though I expected the scenes which had passed in it, and the moral

changes it had undergone, would be every where visible; but the gloomy

ideas produced by a visit to this metropolis, are rather the effect of

mental association than external objects. Palaces and public buildings

still remain; but we recollect that they are become the prisons of

misfortune, or the rewards of baseness. We see the same hotels, but

their owners are wandering over the world, or have expired on the

scaffold. Public places are not less numerous, nor less frequented; but,

far from inspiring gaiety, we behold them with regret and disgust, as

proofs of the national levity and want of feeling.

I could almost wish, for the credit of the French character, to have

found some indications that the past was not so soon consigned to

oblivion. It is true, the reign of Robespierre and his sanguinary

tribunal are execrated in studied phrases; yet is it enough to adopt

humanity as a mode, to sing the _Revel du Peuple_ in preference to the

_Marseillois,_ or to go to a theatre with a well-powdered head, instead

of cropped locks a la Jacobin? But the people forget, that while they

permitted, and even applauded, the past horrors, they were also accessary

to them, and if they rejoice at their termination, their sensibility does

not extend to compunction; they cast their sorrows away, and think it

sufficient to exhibit their reformation in dressing and dancing--

"Yet hearts refin'd their sadden'd tint retain,

"The sigh is pleasure, and the jest is pain."

Sheridan.

French refinements are not, however, of this poetical kind.*

* This too great facility of the Parisians has been commented upon

by an anonymous writer in the following terms:

"At Paris, where more than fifty victims were dragged daily to the

scaffold, the theatres never failed to overflow, and that on the

Place de la Revolution was not the least frequented. The public, in

their way every evening to the Champs Ellisees, continued

uninterruptedly to cross the stream of blood that deluged this fatal

spot with the most dreadful indifference; and now, though these days

of horror are scarcely passed over our heads, one would suppose them

ages removed--so little are we sensible that we are dancing, as it

were, on a platform of dead bodies. Well may we say, respecting

those events which have not reached ourselves--

_'Le malheur Qui n'est plus, n'a jamais existe.'_

But if we desire earnestly that the same misfortunes should not

return, we must keep them always present in our recollection."

The practice of the government appears to depart every day more widely

from its professions; and the moderate harangues of the tribune are often

succeeded by measures as arbitrary as those which are said to be

exploded.--Perhaps the Convention begin to perceive their mistake in

supposing that they can maintain a government against the inclination of

the people, without the aid of tyranny. They expected at the same time

that they decried Robespierre, to retain all the power he possessed.

Hence, their assumed principles and their conduct are generally at

variance; and, divided between despotism and weakness, they arrest the

printers of pamphlets and newspapers one day, and are obliged to liberate

them the next.--They exclaim publicly against the system of terror, yet

secretly court the assistance of its agents.--They affect to respect the

liberty of the press, yet every new publication has to defend itself

against the whole force of the government, if it happen to censure a

single member of the reigning party.--Thus, the _Memoirs of Dumouriez_

had circulated nearly through all Europe, yet it was not without much

risk, and after a long warfare, that they were printed in France.*

*On this subject the government appears sometimes to have adopted

the maxim--that prevention is better than punishment; for, in

several instances, they seized on manuscripts, and laid embargoes on

the printers' presses, where they only suspected that a work which

they might disapprove was intended to be published.

I know not if it be attributable to these political inconsistencies that

the calm which has succeeded the late disorders is little more than

external. The minds of the people are uncommonly agitated, and every one

expresses either hope or apprehension of some impending event. The

royalists, amidst their ostensible persecutions, are particularly elated;

and I have been told, that many conspicuous revolutionists already talk

of emigration.

I am just returned from a day's ramble, during which I have met with

various subjects of unpleasant meditation. About dinner-time I called on

an old Chevalier de St. Louis and his lady, who live in the Fauxbourg

St. Germain. When I knew them formerly, they had a handsome annuity on

the Hotel de Ville, and were in possession of all the comforts necessary

to their declining years. To-day the door was opened by a girl of dirty

appearance, the house looked miserable, the furniture worn, and I found

the old couple over a slender meal of soup maigre and eggs, without wine

or bread. Our revolutionary adventures, as is usual on all meetings of

this kind, were soon communicated; and I learned, that almost before they

knew what was passing around them, Monsieur du G--------'s forty years'

service, and his croix, had rendered him suspected, and that he and his

wife were taken from their beds at midnight and carried to prison. Here

they consumed their stock of ready money, while a guard, placed in their

house, pillaged what was moveable, and spoiled what could not be

pillaged. Soon after the ninth of Thermidor they were released, but they

returned to bare walls, and their annuity, being paid in assignats, now

scarcely affords them a subsistence.--Monsieur du G-------- is near

seventy, and Madame is become helpless from a nervous complaint, the

effect of fear and confinement; and if this depreciation of the paper

should continue, these poor people may probably die of absolute want.

I dined with a relation of the Marquise's, and in the afternoon we called

by appointment on a person who is employed by the Committee of National

Domains, and who has long promised my friend to facilitate the adjustment

of some of the various claims which the government has on her property.

This man was originally a valet to the brother of the Marquise: at the

revolution he set up a shop, became a bankrupt, and a furious Jacobin,

and, in the end, a member of a Revolutionary Committee. In the last

capacity he found means to enrich himself, and intimidate his creditors

so as to obtain a discharge of his debts, without the trouble of paying

them.*

* "It was common for men in debt to procure themselves to be made

members of a revolutionary committee, and then force their creditors

to give them a receipt in full, under the fear of being imprisoned."

Clauzel's Report, Oct. 13, 1794.

I am myself acquainted with an old lady, who was confined four

months, for having asked one of these patriots for three hundred

livres which he owed her.

--Since the dissolution of the Committees, he has contrived to obtain the

situation I have mentioned, and now occupies superb apartments in an

hotel, amply furnished with the proofs of his official dexterity, and the

perquisites of patriotism.

The humiliating vicissitudes occasioned by the revolution induced Madame

de la F-------- to apply to this democratic _parvenu,_ [Upstart.] whose

office at present gives him the power, and whose former obligations to

her family (by whom he was brought up) she hoped would add the

disposition, to serve her.--The gratitude she expected has, however,

ended only in delays and disappointments, and the sole object of my

commission was to get some papers which she had entrusted to him out of

his possession.

A Residence in France During the Years 1792, 1793, 1794 and 1795, Part IV., 1795 Described in a Series of Letters from an English Lady: with General and Incidental Remarks on the French Character and Manners · 第 3 / 7 段