CONCLUSION

In the preceding pages an attempt has been made to trace the

chronological sequence of pottery symbols in Hopiland by pointing out

distinct epochs in cultural history and correlating the sociology of the

tribe. This takes for granted that the pottery symbols characteristic of

this people are directly connected with certain clans. There have from

time to time been sudden changes in symbols, or previous designs have

suddenly disappeared and others have taken their places, as well as a

slow development of existing symbols into more complicated forms. There

persist everywhere survivals of old prepuebloan symbols inherited from

the past and a creation of new products of Hopi environment not found

elsewhere.

The author will close this paper with a brief theoretical account of the

unwritten culture history of Hopi, part of which explains certain pottery

symbols. If we take that segment of southwestern history extending

from the earliest to the present, we find evidences of the existence

of a prepuebloan culture existing before terraced houses were built or

circular kivas had been used for ceremonial purposes. This epoch was

antecedent to the construction of the great walled compounds of the

Gila, illustrated by Casa Grande. At that epoch known as the prepuebloan

there extended from Utah to the Mexican boundary and from the Colorado

to the Rio Grande a culture architecturally characterized by small

fragile-walled houses not united or terraced. These houses were sometimes

like pit dwellings, either partially or wholly subterranean. When above

ground their walls were supported by upright logs in which canes or

brushes were woven and covered with mud, the roofs being made of cedar

bark or straw overlaid with adobe.

The pottery of this early prehistoric epoch was smooth, painted mainly

with geometric patterns, corrugated, or indented. Rectilinear or

curved lines constituted the majority of the superficial decorations

and life designs were few or altogether wanting. In addition to these

architectural and ceramic characteristics, this prepuebloan cultural

stage was distinguished by many other features, to mention which would

take us too far afield and would be out of place in this article.

Evidences of this stage or epoch occur everywhere in the Southwest

and survival of the archaic characters enumerated are evident in all

subsequent epochs.

The so-called “unit type” or pure pueblo culture grew out of this early

condition, and was at first localized in northern New Mexico and southern

Colorado, where it was autochthonous. Its essential feature is the

terraced communal house and the simplest form of the pueblo, the “unit

type,” first pointed out by Dr. T. Mitchell Prudden—a combination of

dwelling houses, with a man’s house or kiva and a cemetery. The dwellings

are made of stone or clay and are terraced, the kiva is subterranean

and circular, embedded in or surrounded by other rooms. The “unit type”

originated in Colorado and, spreading in all directions, replaced the

preexisting houses with fragile walls. Colonists from its center extended

down the San Juan to the Hopi country and made their way easterly

across the Rio Grande and southerly to the headwaters of the Gila and

Little Colorado, where they met other clans of specialized prepuebloan

culture who had locally developed an architecture of Great House style

characteristic of the Gila and Salt River Valleys.

The essential differences between the terraced pueblo and the previously

existing fragile-walled house culture are two: The terraced architecture

results from one house being constructed above another, the kiva or

subterranean ceremonial room being separated or slightly removed from the

secular houses.

An explanation of the origin of the terraced pueblo is evident. This form

of house implies a limited site or a congestion of houses on a limited

area. An open plain presents no limitation in lateral construction;

there is plenty of room to expand in all directions to accommodate the

enlargement which results as a settlement increases in population. In

a cave conditions are otherwise; expansion is limited. When the floor

of the cavern is once covered with rooms the only additions which can

possibly be made must be vertically. In protection lies the cause of the

development of a terraced architecture such as the pueblos show, for the

early people constructed their fragile-walled habitations in a cavern,

and as an enlargement of their numbers occurred they were obliged to

construct the terraced pueblos called cliff-dwellings, with rooms closely

approximated and constructed in terraces. In the course of time these

cliff-dwellers moved out of their caverns into the river valleys or to

the mesa summits, carrying with them the terraced architecture, which,

born in caverns, survived in their new environment. This explanation

is of course hypothetical, but not wholly without a basis in fact, for

we find survivals of the prepuebloan architecture scattered throughout

the Southwest, especially on the periphery of the terraced house area,

as well as in the area itself. The ancient terraced house architecture

is confined to a limited area, but around its ancient border are people

whose dwellings are characterized by fragile-walled architecture. These

are the survivals of the prepuebloan culture.

The environmental conditions along the San Juan and its tributaries

in Colorado and New Mexico render it a particularly favorable culture

center from which the pure pueblo type may have originated, and although

observations have not yet gone far enough to prove that here was the

place of origin of the unit type, and therefore of pueblo culture, there

are strong indications that a fable of the Pueblos, that they came from

the caves in the north, is not without legendary foundation so far as

their origin is concerned.

The term “cliff-dwelling,” once supposed to indicate a distinct stage

of development, refers only to the site and is a feature inadequate for

classification or chronology. All cliff-dwellings do not belong to the

same structural type. There is little similarity save in site between

Spruce-tree House on the Mesa Verde, and Montezuma Castle in the Verde

Valley; the former belongs to the “pure pueblo type,” the latter to

another class of buildings related to “compounds” of the tributaries of

the Gila and Salt River valleys.

Designs on prehistoric Hopi pottery · 第 70 / 72 题