In regard to their marriage customs, their mode of naming children,

etc., I have not been able to gather much information as yet. The old

marriage customs are supplanted by those of the church. Still, they may

be traced up eventually. Every Pecos Indian had, besides his Spanish

name, an Indian name; and there is, according to Mr. Ritch, still a

Pecos Indian at Jemez whose aboriginal appellation is "Huaja-toya"

(Spanish pronunciation). I heard of him this morning (Sept. 17) through

an Indian of Jemez. What I know of their burials is already stated.

Of their agriculture, or rather horticulture, I have also spoken; the

modes of cultivation have not been explained to me as yet. Irrigation is

therefore the only part of their tillage system upon which I have been

able to gather any information. In addition to what the preceding pages

may contain, Sr. Vigil has assured me that they also irrigated their

_huerta_ from the _arroyo_. This thin fillet of clear water, now

scarcely 0.50 m.--20 in.--in width, fills at times its entire gravelly

bed, 100 m. to 150 m.--327 ft. to 490 ft.--from bank to bank. This does

not occur annually, but at irregular intervals. Sr. Ruiz said that while

the Pecos Indians were living at their pueblo the streams were filled

with water ("en ese tiempo, corrieron los arroyos con agua, muy

abundante"). It is further said that the tribe worked other "gardens"

besides, on the banks of the river Pecos, two miles to the east.

For their arts and industry I must refer to the collections, however

meagre and unsatisfactory they are; a condition for which I have already

apologized. Nowhere did I find a trace of iron nor of copper, although

they used the latter for ornaments (bracelets, etc.), and there can be

no doubt that they had the former metal also,--after the Spanish

conquest, of course. The squaring of timbers, the scroll-work and

friezes in the church, could only be done with instruments of iron. But

all traces of these implements have disappeared from the ruins, as far

as the surface is concerned. I cannot refrain, however, from dwelling

at greater length upon two products of industry, so common among the

ruins as hardly to attract the attention of curiosity-hunters any more.

These are the flakes of obsidian and lava and the painted pottery.

I have called these flakes a product of industry; while the material

itself is of course a mineral, the fragments scattered about are

undoubted products of skill. They are chips and splinters. There is

neither lava nor obsidian cropping out in or about the valley,[182] but

highly volcanic formations are abundantly found to the north, within

fifty miles from Pecos, in the high Sierra de Mora; perhaps, also,

nearer yet. At all events, the mineral has been brought to the pueblo

and chipped there. The same is the case with the flint flakes, agates,

jaspers, and moss-agates, with the difference, however, that, in the

case of these, water has done a great part of the carrying, if not all;

whereas the drift of the _arroyo_ contains no obsidian nor lava, except

such as has clearly been washed into it from the ruins. Among the flakes

there will be noticed several which may have been used for knives,

whereas still others approximate to the arrow-head. A small perfect

arrow-head was found and transmitted by me to the Institute,--the only

one I met with on the premises.[183]

The fact that several localities at Pecos are completely devoid of

obsidian has already been mentioned. These are the oldest ruins. In the

case of the ruins along the mesa and those south of the church, I can

only speak of the surface; but where the corrugated pottery was found

the whole section of the bluff was exposed for more than 100 m.--327

ft.,--and still not a trace of the mineral appeared, while flint, agate,

and jasper were rather conspicuous.[184] This may be accidental, but it

is certainly suspicious and suggestive.

The painted pottery is scattered in wagon-loads of fragments over the

ruins. There are two places, however, where, as already stated, the

surface is utterly devoid of them. Whether or not this deficiency

extends to the soil, I cannot tell. I doubt it, however. These

localities are, again, the apron along the _mesa_ and the ruins south of

the church. For the rest, it is very equally distributed everywhere.

Still there are two distinct kinds at least. One is exactly similar to

the kind now made and sold: it is coarse, soft; the ground is painted

gray or yellow; the ornaments show, in few instances, traces of animal

shapes (they are either black or brown); and the vessels must have been

thick, and with a thicker coarse rim. Out of the grave in the mound _V_,

the pottery was more perfect. There are pieces of a _tinaja_ (bowl) with

a vertical rim, yellow outside, white inside, with black geometrical

ornamentation, not vitrified. This kind of pottery is still made by the

Indians of Nambe, of Tezuque, and of Cochiti. (The former two are

Tehuas, the latter is Queres.) But there I also found fragments of a

plain black pottery, of dark red, and of dark red with black ornaments,

which are thinner and much superior in "ring," and therefore in quality,

to any now made. This pottery is older in date, and appears to be almost

a lost art. There was, however, no distinction in distribution. Both

kinds have one point in common, namely, the varnishing of the

ornamental surfaces. I say varnishing,[185] and not "glazing;" for,

although I believe the glassy appearance of the painted lines to be due

to some admixture of the coloring material, and not to a separate glossy

exterior coating, I do not as yet find a reason for admitting that the

Indians knew the process of vitrification.

Of the military manufactures of the Pecos, a small arrow-head of

obsidian found near the church is the only trace. It is even too small

for a war-arrow. They had stone hatchets, and may have had the dart,

and, later on, the spear. Pebbles convenient for hurling are

promiscuously observed on the _mesilla_, but they are not numerous; and

nowhere along the circumvallation did I notice any trace of heaps.[186]

The military constructions, however, become very interesting through

their connection with the system of drainage and a comparison with the

ancient Mexicans. Around the ancient pueblo of Mexico ("Tenuchtitlan")

the water formed the protective circumvallation; at Pecos, the defensive

wall collected the water and conducted it where it was needed for

subsistence for the irrigation of crops.

That this great circumvallation, 983 m.--3,225 ft.--in circuit, was a

wall for protection also there is no doubt, although the main strength

of the pueblo lay in the construction of its houses, where the

inhabitants could simply shut themselves in and await quietly until the

enemy was tired of prowling around it. By Indians it could only be

carried by surprise or treachery.[187] Hence it was customary for the

young men to leave the pueblo at times in a body, abandoning it to the

old men and women, etc., without concern.[188] As long as these kept

good watch they were safe, even if the Comanches should appear. Roaming

Indians cannot break open a pueblo house if well guarded. For that

purpose alone the mounds near the great gate, and the mound _H_, Pl.

IV., were erected. They were watch-towers for special purposes, for

particular sections, where the lookouts from the wall-tops were not

sufficient.[189] These two mounds--one on each side of the

gateway--overlooked the fields and the creek-bank: in the morning, when

the people went out to work, or to carry drinking water from the spring

opposite; during the day, while they attended to their simple labor of

tillage.

The mound and tower _H_ performed a similar office towards the steep

ledge of rocks there descending, among whose fragments Indians could

hide for hours from the scouts on the house tops. Thus the great

enclosure with its details served a triple purpose. It was the reservoir

which held and conducted the waters precipitated on the _mesilla_ to the

useful purpose of irrigation. It was a preliminary defensive line,--a

first obstruction to a storming foe, and a shelter for its defenders.

But it was also in places an admirable post of observation. It formed

the necessary complement to the houses themselves,[190] and both

together composed a system of defences which, inadequate against the

military science of civilization, was still wonderfully adapted for

protection against the stealthy, lurking approach, the impetuous but

"short-winded" dash, of Indian warfare.

In conclusion of this lengthy report, I may be permitted to add a few

lines concerning the great houses themselves. Their mode and manner of

construction and occupation I have already discussed; it is their

abandonment and decay to which I wish to refer. This decay is the same

in both houses; the path of ruin from S.S.E. to N.N.W. indicates its

progress. It shows clearly that, as section after section had been

originally added as the tribe increased in number, so cell after cell

(or section after section) was successively vacated and left to ruin as

their numbers waned, till at last the northern end of the building alone

sheltered the poor survivors. They receded from south to north; for the

church, despoiled and partly destroyed in 1680, was no protection to

them. Its own ruin kept pace with that of the tribe.[191] The northern

extremity of the pueblo was their best stronghold, and thither they

retired step by step in the face of inevitable doom.

A. F. BANDELIER.

SANTA FE, Sept. 17, 1880.

To PROFESSOR C. E. NORTON, _President of the Archaeological Institute of

America, Cambridge, Mass._

GRANT OF 1689 TO THE PUEBLO OF PECOS.

* * * * *

The following is a literal copy of the original grant, now (Sept. 25,

1880) on file at the United States Surveyor-General's office at Santa

Fe, made to the inhabitants of the Indian pueblo of Pecos in New Mexico.

The language of the document is not altogether clear, but the essential

terms are distinct:--

[Sidenote: Ano de 1689]

[Sidenote: MERCED CONCEDIDA A PECOS.]

En el Pueblo de nu. S.^a de Guadalupe del Paso del Rio del Norte en

veinte y cinco dias del mes de Sep.^te de mil seiscientos y ochenta y

nueve anos el Senor Gov.^or y Cap.^n Gen.^l D.^a Domingo Jironza Petroz

de Cruzate dijo que por quanto en el alcanze que se dio en los de la

Nueva Mex.^co de los Yndios Queres y los Apostatas y los Teguas y de la

nacion Thanos y despues de haber peleado con todos los demas Yndios de

todos Pueblos un Yndio del Pueblo de Zia llamado Bartolome de Ojeda que

fue el que mas se senalo en la vatalla acudiendo a todas partes se

rindio viendose herido de un balazo y un flechaso lo cual como dicho es

mando que debajo de juram.^to declare como se halla el Pu.^o de Pecos

aunque queda muy metido a donde el sol sale y fueron unos Yndios

Apostatas de aquel Reyno de la Nueva Mexico.

Preguntado que si este Pu.^o volvera en algun tiempo como ha sido

constumbre en ellos y dice el confesante que no que ya esta muy metido

en terror que aunque estaban abilantados con lo que les habia susedido a

los de el Pu.^o de Zia el ano pasado juzgaba que era un imposible que

dejaran de dar la obediencia; por lo cual se concedieron por el Senor

Governador y Capitan General D.^a Domingo Jironza Petroz de Cruzate los

linderos que aqui anoto; para el. Norte una legua; y para el Oriente una

legua; y para el Poniente una legua; y para el Sur una legua; y medidas

estas cuatro lineas de las cuatro esquinas del Pu.^o dejando a salvo el

templo que queda al medio dia del Pu.^o y asi lo proveyo mando y firmo

susc^a [?] a mi el presente Secretario de Gov.^on y Guerra que de ello

doy fe.

D.^a Domingo Jironza

Petroz de Cruzate.

Ante mi

Don Pedro Ladron de Guitara

Sc.^o de G.^n y Gu.^a

[TRANSLATION.]

[Sidenote: In the year 1689.]

[Sidenote: GRANT GIVEN TO PECOS.]

In the Pueblo of Our Lady of Guadalupe of El Paso del Rio del Norte, on

the twenty-fifth day of the month of September, in the year sixteen

hundred and eighty nine, the Governor and Captain-General, Don Domingo

Jironza Petroz de Cruzate, said that inasmuch as during the pursuit of

the men of New Mexico, [namely], of the Queres Indians, and the

Renegades, and the Teguas, and those of the Thanos nation, and after the

fight with all the rest of the Indians of all the Pueblos--an Indian of

the Pueblo of Zia, named Bartholome de Ojeda, who had greatly

distinguished himself in the fight, assisting at every point,

surrendered, having been wounded by a bullet and by an arrow; he [the

Governor] ordered that he should declare, under oath, how the Pueblo of

Pecos is disposed, although it lies far off toward the sunrise, and [its

people] are renegade Indians of that kingdom of New Mexico.

Being asked whether [the inhabitants of] this Pueblo will ever return to

their old ways, he, the deponent, says that they will not, since they

are now in great terror, and though they were very much emboldened by

what had happened to those of the Pueblo of Zia the year before, he

thought it was impossible that they should fail to give in their

submission. Wherefore there were granted by the Governor and

Captain-General, Don Domingo Jironza Petroz de Cruzate, the boundaries

here noted: to the north a league, and to the east a league, and to the

west a league, and to the south a league; and these four lines measured

from the four corners of the Pueblo, reserving the temple, which lies to

the south of the Pueblo; and thus did his Excellency provide, command,

and sign before me, the present Secretary of the Interior and of War,

who attest it.

DON DOMINGO JIRONZA

PETROZ DE CRUZATE.

Before me,

Don Pedro Ladron de Guitara,

Secretary of the Interior and of War.

[87] Lieut.-Col. W. H. Emory, _Notes of a Military Reconnoissance from

Fort Leavenworth, in Missouri, to San Diego, in California, Executive

Document_ 41, Washington, 1848. _Meteorological Observations_, p. 163.

Camp 44, half-mile south of the Pecos, Aug. 17, 1846, altitude six

thousand three hundred and forty-six feet. Camp 45, on the Pecos, near

Pecos village, August 18, six thousand three hundred and sixty-six feet.

[88] This is the lowest height of the peaks seen from the valley. Some

of the other tops are much higher yet. The altitude of Santa Fe Baldy,

for instance, exceeds twelve thousand feet.

[89] Not to be confounded with the Rio de Pecos proper. The _arroyo_ is

not found on most of the maps. Its width is about 100 m.--330 ft.--but

there is scarcely ever more than a mere fillet of very clear, limpid

water in it.

[90] This is, however, only accidental, and exclusively due to nine

months of consecutive drouth. Generally the strips of bottom-land have a

rich soil, and grow fine corn, wheat, and oats.

[91] They are very picturesque objects, and stand out boldly, appearing

to rise directly from the plain. Their height is stated to be about

thirteen thousand feet. In this vicinity are the Placitas, now famous

for mineral wealth (gold and silver), and the Cerrillos, also rich in

ore, and containing beautiful green and blue turquoises, of which I saw

excellent specimens in possession of His Excellency Governor L. Wallace.

[92] Baughl's Sidings is a switch and large storing-place for ties. Even

the Spaniards call it La Switcha. It is about 800 m.--2,620 ft.--from

the foot of the _mesa_, in a belt of fine large pine timber, very high,

and gives glimpses of splendid views over the valley of Pecos to the

Sierras beyond. Climate fine, but nights very cold. The buildings are as

yet nearly all temporary; it is more a camp than a place as is it now. I

spent ten very happy days here, from the 28th of August to the 6th of

September,--or rather nights, since the days were, with two exceptions

(5th and 6th of September, when I visited Pecos town and explored the

high _mesa_), devoted to the study of the ruins. I shall always

gratefully remember the uniform kindness and attention with which its

inhabitants and transient guests have treated me, and assisted me in my

work. Aside of those whom I shall have occasion to name in the body of

my report, I take occasion to express my thanks here to Messrs.

McPherson & Co., and to their obliging manager, Mr. Wright; also to the

station agent.

[93] On the right side of the Arroyo de Pecos, there is a wide

amphitheatre bottom, which was filled with red clay, like that of which

the adobe at the church is made, and which appears to have been partly

dug out. The place is to the right of the road also, which there crosses

the creek. The only objection to the surmise is in the fact that along

this entire bottom I found not the slightest trace of obsidian. Pottery,

however, is scattered everywhere. On the left side of the creek, unless

more than a mile below, there is no place where the soil is sufficiently

thick or sufficiently free from ruins and scattered stones, to permit

the enormous quantity of clay needed for the church to be secured.

[94] Lieut.-Col. Emory, _Notes of a Military Reconnoissance_, p. 30, and

two plates.

[95] The walls, or foundations rather, appear as follows:--The

interstices are often filled with tufts of _grama_, and the stones

themselves look very old and worn, covered with lichens and moss.

[Illustration: Stone Wall]

[96] According to Mariano Ruiz and to Mrs. Kozlowski. The former has

lived in Pecos since 1837. But few, if any, of the dead are buried

there; the majority were entombed within the church itself.

[97] P. Jose Amando Niel, _Apuntamientos que sobre el Terreno hizo el

... Annotations to the history of_ Fray Geronimo Zarate Salmeron, in

_Documentos para la Historia de Mexico_, 3 series, vol. i. p. 99.

[98] Called by the Spaniards Plaza de Pecos. It is a comparatively new

place, the only church-book still in possession of Rev. Father Leon

Mailluchet, the present priest, commences in 1862. Including the

scattered _casitas_ several miles around, its population is not over

five hundred souls. It is situated in a narrow vale or hollow, not far

west from the Rio Pecos itself, and has a modest but clean and tidy

church, with a small belfry. All the houses are of adobe.

Lieutenant-Colonel Emory (_Notes, Executive Document_ 41, p. 30) speaks

of it in 1846 as "the modern village of Pecos, ... with a very

inconsiderable population." As yet there are but very few Americans in

the plaza. My recollections of Pecos are highly pleasant (5th

September), owing to the friendly reception tendered me by Mr. E. K.

Walters, Sr. Juan Bacay Salazar, and Father L. Mailluchet. According to

Colonel Emory, its altitude is nearly 6,366 ft. (p. 163). Lat. about 35 deg.

30' N.

[99] See Plate I.

[100] See Plate IX.

[101] See Plate I., Fig. 5.

[102] When Mr. Louis Felsenthal of Santa-Fe came to New Mexico in 1855,

and still later, in 1858, the time of the arrival of Mrs. Kozlowski, the

roofs were still perfect in part.

[103] Pl. II., Fig. 6.

[104] Pedro de Castaneda de Nagera, _Relation du Voyage de Cibola_,

French translation, by Ternaux-Compans, 1838. Original written about

1560. Introduction, p. ix; part ii. cap. v. p. 176.

[105] Castaneda, _Relation_, i. cap. xii. p. 71; ii. cap. v. p. 176.

Juan Jaramillo, _Relation du Voyage fait a la Nouvelle Terre_, app. vi.

to _Voyage de Cibola_, p. 371. Fray Agustin de Vetancurt, _Cronica de la

Provincia del Santo Evangelio de Mexico_ (edition of 1871), p. 323.

Gaspar Castano de la Sosa, _Memoria del Descubrimiento que ... hizo en

el Nuevo Mexico, siendo teniente del Gobernador y Capitan General del

Nuevo-Reino de Leon_, July 27, 1590, in vol. xv. of _Documentos Ineditos

de los Archivos de Indias_, p. 244. The latter though, as well as

Castaneda and Jaramillo, mentions evidently building _A_, but there

cannot be the slightest doubt that _B_ was erected for the same purpose;

to wit, as a dwelling.

[106] They are evidently moulded. Their size is about 0.28 m. x 15

m.--11 in. x 6 in.--and straw is mixed with the soil. The appearance is

very much as if the adobe had been put in as a "mending;" and I am

decidedly of the opinion that the northern section is the latest, and

erected after 1540.

[107] It is very much like the stone-work of the Moqui Pueblos in

Arizona, according to the photographs in possession of the Bureau of

Ethnology at Washington, D. C.; and in some respects to the walls of the

great house described by the Hon. L. H. Morgan, _On the Ruins of an

Ancient Stone Pueblo on the Animas River, Eleventh and Twelfth Reports

of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology_, etc.; also to those figured by Dr.

William H. Jackson, _Tenth Annual Report of the United States Geological

and Geographical Survey of the Territories_, 1878, plate lxii. fig. 1,

from the Ruins of the Rio Chaco. Compare photograph No. 6. I am led to

suspect that the greater or less regularity of the courses was entirely

dependent upon the kind of stone on hand, and not upon the mechanical

skill employed.

[108] I am just (Sept. 9) informed by Governor Wallace, that the Sierra

de Tecolote, east of the ruins, contains probably gypsum, even in the

form of alabaster. It is certain that nothing like lime-kilns or places

where lime might have been burnt are found at any moderate distance from

the ruins. The surrounding rocks, up to head of the valley and to the

_mesa_, contain deposits of white, yellow, and red carbonates of lead,

often copper-stained, and very impure, therefore proportionately light

in weight. However, we have very positive information as to how they

made their plaster, etc., in Castaneda, _Voyage de Cibola_, ii. cap. iv.

pp. 168, 169. He says: "They have no lime, but make a mixture of ashes,

soil, and of charcoal, which replace it very well; for although they

raise their houses to four stories, the walls have not more than half an

ell in width. They form great heaps of pine [thym] and reeds, and set

fire to them; whenever this mass is reduced to ashes and charcoal, they

throw over it a large quantity of soil and water, and mix it all

together. They knead it into round blocks, which they dry, and of which

they make use in lieu of stones, coating the whole with the same

mixture." Substituting for the "round blocks" the stones found at Pecos,

we have the whole process thoroughly explained, for indeed the mud

contains bits of charcoal, as the specimens sent prove. The white coat,

however, is not explained. I must state here, however, that I found the

latter only in such parts of _A_, as well as of _B_, as appeared to be

most recent in occupation and in construction. Further investigations at

other pueblos may yet solve the mystery.

[109] See Plate VIII.

[110] Compare, in regard to the outer (western) wall of B, and also in

regard to the inner wall, Lieut. James H. Simpson, _Journal of a

Military Reconnoissance from Santa Fe, New-Mexico, to the Navajo

Country, Executive Document 64_, 31st Congress, 1st section, 1850; plate

41, no. 5. Also, L. H. Morgan, _On an Ancient Stone Pueblo on the Animas

River, Peabody Museum Reports_, 1880. The latter is particularly

suggestive.

[111] Compare Castaneda, _Voyage de Cibola_, ii. cap. iv. pp. 171, 172.

"There is a piece reserved for the kitchen, and another one for to grind

the corn. This last one is apart; in it is found an oven and three

stones sealed in masonry." Simpson, _Journal_, etc, p. 62, description

of a fireplace.

[112] Simpson, p. 62, _Fireplace and Smoke-escape at the Pueblo of Santo

Domingo_. The vent was directly over the hearth. I expect to visit Santo

Domingo shortly.

[113] Mr. Thomas Munn found about the church a stone hatchet, a fragment

of a stone pipe (?), and many arrow-heads. These he kindly promised to

me, even authorizing me to get them at the place where he had deposited

them, and which lay on the line of my daily tramp to the ruins.

Unfortunately, when I reached the place, the objects were already gone.

Historical Introduction to Studies Among the Sedentary Indians of New Mexico; Report on the Ruins of the Pueblo of Pecos Papers Of The Archæological Institute Of America, American Series, Vol. I · 第 9 / 10 段