FOR LOVE OF BEASTS

§ 1.

We had left my rooms, and were walking briskly down the street towards

the river, when my friend stopped before the window of a small shop and

said:

“Gold-fish!”

I[1] looked at him very doubtfully; one had known him so long that one

never looked at him in any other way.

“Can you imagine,” he went on, “how any sane person can find pleasure

in the sight of those swift things swimming for ever and ever in a bowl

about twice the length of their own tails?”

“No,” I said, “I cannot--though, of course, they’re very pretty.”

“That is, no doubt, the reason why they are kept in misery.”

Again I looked at him; there is nothing in the world I distrust so much

as irony.

“People don’t think about these things,” I said.

“You are right,” he answered, “they do not. Let me give you some

evidence of that.... I was travelling last spring in a far country,

and made an expedition to a certain woodland spot. Outside the little

forest inn I noticed a ring of people and dogs gathered round a grey

animal rather larger than a cat. It had a sharp-nosed head too small

for its body, and bright black eyes, and was moving restlessly round

and round a pole to which it was tethered by a chain. If a dog came

near, it hunched its bushy back and made a rush at him. Except for

that it seemed a shy-souled, timid little thing. In fact, by its eyes,

and the way it shrank into itself, you could tell it was scared of

everything around. Now, there was a small, thin-faced man in a white

jacket holding up a tub on end and explaining to the people that

this was the little creature’s habitat, and that it wanted to get

back underneath; and, sure enough, when he held the tub within its

reach, the little animal stood up at once on its hind legs and pawed,

evidently trying to get the tub to fall down and cover it. The people

all laughed at this; the man laughed too, and the little creature went

on pawing. At last the man said: ‘Mind your back-legs, Patsy!’ and let

the tub fall. The show was over. But presently another lot came up; the

white-coated man lifted the tub, and it began all over again.

“‘What is that animal?’ I asked him.

“‘A ’coon.’

“‘How old?’

“‘Three years--too old to tame.’

“‘Where did you catch it?’

“‘In the forest--lots of ’coons in the forest.’

“‘Do they live in the open, or in holes?’

“‘Up in the trees, sure; they only gits in the hollows when it rains.’

“‘Oh! they live in the open? Then isn’t it queer she should be so fond

of her tub?’

“‘Oh,’ he said, ‘she do that to git away from people!’ and he

laughed--a genial little man. ‘She not like people and dogs. She too

old to tame. She know _me_, though.’

“‘I see,’ I said. ‘You take the tub off her, and show her to the

people, and put it back again. Yes, she _would_ know you!’

“‘Yes,’ he repeated, rather proudly, ‘she know me--Patsy, Patsy!

Presently, you bet, we catch lot more, and make a cage, and put them

in.’

“He was gazing very kindly at the little creature, who on her grey hind

legs was anxiously begging for the tub to come down and hide her, and I

said: ‘But isn’t it rather a miserable life for this poor little devil?’

“He gave me a very queer look. ‘There’s lots of people,’ he said--and

his voice sounded as if I’d hurt him--‘never gits a chance to see a

’coon’--and he dropped the tub over the racoon....

“Well! Can you conceive anything more pitiful than that poor little

wild creature of the open, begging and begging for a tub to fall over

it and shut out all the _light and air_? Doesn’t it show what misery

caged things have to go through?”

“But, surely,” I said, “those other people would feel the same as you.

The little white-coated man was only a servant.”

He seemed to run them over in his memory. “Not one!” he answered

slowly. “Not a single one! I am sure it never even occurred to

them--why should it? They were there to enjoy themselves.”

We walked in silence till I said:

“I can’t help feeling that your little white-coated man was acting

good-heartedly according to his lights.”

“Quite! And after all what are the sufferings of a racoon compared

with the enlargement of the human mind?”

“Don’t be extravagant! You know he didn’t mean to be cruel.”

“Does a man ever mean to be cruel? He merely makes or keeps his living;

but to make or keep his living he will do anything that does not

absolutely prick to his heart through the skin of his indolence or his

obtuseness.”

“I think,” I said, “that you might have expressed that less cynically,

even if it’s true.”

“Nothing that’s true is cynical, and nothing that is cynical is

true. Indifference to the suffering of beasts always comes from

over-absorption in our own comfort.”

“Absorption, not over-absorption, perhaps.”

“Ha! Let us see that! Very soon after seeing the racoon I was staying

at the most celebrated health resort of that country, and, walking in

its grounds, I came on an aviary. In the upper cages were canaries,

and in the lower cage a splendid hawk. It was as large as our buzzard

hawk, brown-backed and winged, light underneath, and with the finest

dark-brown eyes of any bird I ever saw. The cage was quite ten feet

each way--a noble allowance for the very soul of freedom! The bird

had every luxury. There was water, and a large piece of raw meat that

hadn’t been touched. Yet it was never still for a moment, flying from

perch to perch, and dropping to the ground again and again so lightly,

to run, literally run, up to the bars to see if perhaps--they were not

there. Its face was as intelligent as any dog’s----”

My friend muttered something I couldn’t catch, and then went on:

“That afternoon I took the drive for which one visits that hotel, and

it occurred to me to ask my chauffeur what kind of hawk it was. ‘Well,’

he said, ‘I ain’t just too sure what it is they’ve got caged up now;

they changes ’em so often.’

“‘Do you mean,’ I said, ‘that they die in captivity?’

“‘Yes,’ he answered, ‘them big birds soon gits moulty and go off.’

Well, when I paid my bill I went up to the semblance of proprietor--it

was one of these establishments where the only creature responsible is

‘Co.’--and I said:

“‘I see you keep a hawk out there?’

“‘Yes. Fine bird. Quite an attraction!’

“‘People like to look at it?’

“‘Just so. They’re uncommon--that sort.’

“‘Well,’ I said ‘I call it cruel to keep a hawk shut up like that.’

“‘Cruel? Why? What’s a hawk, anyway--cruel devils enough!’

“‘My dear sir,’ I said, ‘they earn their living just like men,

without caring for other creatures’ sufferings. You are not shut up,

apparently, for doing that. Good-bye.’”

As he said this, my friend looked at me, and added:

“You think that was a lapse of taste. What would _you_ have said to a

man who cloaked the cruelty of his commercial instincts by blaming a

hawk for being what Nature had made him?”

There was such feeling in his voice that I hesitated long before

answering.

“Well,” I said, at last, “in England, anyway, we only keep such

creatures in captivity for scientific purposes. I doubt if you could

find a single instance nowadays of its being done just as a commercial

attraction.”

He stared at me.

“Yes,” he said, “we do it publicly and scientifically, to enlarge

the mind. But let me put to you this question. Which do you consider

has the larger mind--the man who has satisfied his idle curiosity by

staring at all the caged animals of the earth, or the man who has been

brought up to feel that to keep such indomitable creatures as hawks and

eagles, wolves and panthers, shut up, to gratify mere curiosity, is a

dreadful thing?”

To that singular question I knew not what to answer. At last I said:

“I think you underrate the pleasure they give. We English are so

awfully fond of animals!”

§ 2.

We had entered Battersea Park by now, and since my remark about

our love of beasts we had not spoken. A wood-pigeon which had been

strutting before us just then flew up into a tree and began puffing out

its breast. Seeking to break the silence, I said:

“Pigeons are so complacent.”

My friend smiled in his dubious way, and answered:

“Do you know the ‘blue rock?’”

“No.”

“Ah! there you have a pigeon who has less complacency than any living

thing. You see, it depends on circumstances. Suppose, for instance,

that we happened to keep Our Selves--perhaps the most complacent class

of human beings--in a large space enclosed by iron railings, feeding

them up carefully, until their natural instincts caused them to run up

and down at a considerable speed from side to side of the enclosure.

And suppose when we noticed that they had attained the full speed and

strength of their legs we took them out, holding them gingerly in order

that they might not become exhausted by struggling, and placed them in

little tin compartments so dark and stuffy that they would not care of

their own accord to stay there, and then stood back about thirty paces

with a shot gun and pressed a spring which let the tin compartment

collapse. And then, as each one of Our Selves ran out, we let fly with

the right barrel and peppered him in the tail, whereon, if he fell, we

sent a dog out to fetch him in by the slack of his breeches, and after

holding him idly for a minute by the neck we gave it a wring round;

or, if he did not fall, we prayed Heaven at once and let fly with the

left barrel. Do you think in these circumstances Our Selves would be

complacent?”

“Don’t be absurd!” I said.

“Very well,” he replied, “I will come to ‘blue rocks’--do you still

maintain that they are so complacent as to deserve their fate?”

“I don’t know--I know nothing about their fate.”

“What the eyes do not swallow, the heart does not throw up! There are

other places, but--have you been to Monte Carlo?”

“No, and I should never think of going there.”

“Oh, well,” he answered, “it’s a great place; but there’s just one

little thing about it, and that’s in the matter of those ‘blue rocks.’

You’ll agree, I suppose, that one can’t complain of people amusing

themselves in any way they like so long as they hurt no one but

themselves----”

Abracadabra & other satires · 第 33 / 46 题