GERMANY: A SELF-PORTRAIT

When Sinclair’s Lanny Budd goes to the week-long Nazi Party orgy at

Nüremberg, he sees before him a people who have surrendered personal

responsibility to a father image quite as fully as did Silone’s simple

peasants. A people smarting from humiliating defeat had accepted the

dream of a thousand year Reich. And it had been sold to them by a man

as possessed as any of Dostoyevsky’s characters. Roderich Stamm in

_Heaven Pays No Dividends_ is oblivious to much of the transition that

takes place in Germany during the late twenties and early thirties.

Through his father’s conversations, however, he senses some of the

problems soon to be expressed in political action: “They contained

the whole uncertainty of our age. There was something intangible and

threatening in the air. It had all started with the world crisis and

the huge unemployment figures, and then the Nazis had come, and then

the Communists.” These forces and the movements which they precipitate

are too strong for a republic barely fifteen years old. A people used

to authoritarian rule reverts to it. When war comes Roderich realizes

“we were all involved, because all of us had capitulated before HIM

during all these years. We had all given HIM permission to start a war

at HIS discretion, when HE decided it was necessary.” One is justified

in distrusting stereotypes as inaccurate generalizations. But in this

case the stereotype is borne out and emphasized in the novel.

Many areas of these national portraits are only roughed in, with the

fine-line detail missing. In other places there are gaps. This is

partly because some of the groups of novels are small. It is also

due to the fact that the novelist does not exhaustively examine

voting trends, statistically analyze attitudinal changes, or plot the

frequency of government realignments. Sinclair frequently approaches

this method and Dos Passos gives some of the raw data upon which such

estimates can be made. But generally the novelist tends to proceed from

individuals to groups, extrapolating group behavior from individual

behavior. This is the method used by Koestler and Conrad. While it

does not have the statistical validity of the political scientist’s

work, it has advantages which complement it. The novelist, with his

artistic insight and his ability to shape his material as he wishes,

can highlight his concept of a particular national character with drama

and human interest to make this hard-to-define quality come memorably

alive on the printed page.

chapter five

The Novelist as Analyst of Group Political Behavior

The economic criterion is one of two means used by the political novel

for classifying groups. The other index identifies groups by means of

overt political behavior--party membership, acceptance of discipline,

performance of specific acts. These two means of classification are

not parallel but complementary. The first, in a sense, serves as a

background for the second. Although the first is economic, its validity

lies in the fact that party lines tend to follow economic ones, that

modern political theory, particularly that of revolution, has been

based increasingly upon economic facts as well as political ones. The

approach of this chapter differs from that of the previous one in

tracing behavior patterns which cut across national lines.

The political novel · 第 40 / 51 题