THE SAVAGE JOHN AND THE CIVILIZED JESUS

Jesus went beyond it very rapidly, according to Matthew. Though, like

John, he became an itinerant preacher, he departed widely from John's

manner of life. John went into the wilderness, not into the synagogues;

and his baptismal font was the river Jordan. He was an ascetic, clothed

in skins and living on locusts and wild honey, practising a savage

austerity. He courted martyrdom, and met it at the hands of Herod. Jesus

saw no merit either in asceticism or martyrdom. In contrast to John

he was essentially a highly-civilized, cultivated person. According

to Luke, he pointed out the contrast himself, chaffing the Jews for

complaining that John must be possessed by the devil because he was a

teetotaller and vegetarian, whilst, because Jesus was neither one nor

the other, they reviled him as a gluttonous man and a winebibber,

the friend of the officials and their mistresses. He told straitlaced

disciples that they would have trouble enough from other people without

making any for themselves, and that they should avoid martyrdom and

enjoy themselves whilst they had the chance. "When they persecute you in

this city," he says, "flee into the next." He preaches in the synagogues

and in the open air indifferently, just as they come. He repeatedly

says, "I desire mercy and not sacrifice," meaning evidently to clear

himself of the inveterate superstition that suffering is gratifying to

God. "Be not, as the Pharisees, of a sad countenance," he says. He is

convivial, feasting with Roman officials and sinners. He is careless of

his person, and is remonstrated with for not washing his hands before

sitting down to table. The followers of John the Baptist, who fast, and

who expect to find the Christians greater ascetics than themselves, are

disappointed at finding that Jesus and his twelve friends do not fast;

and Jesus tells them that they should rejoice in him instead of being

melancholy. He is jocular and tells them they will all have as much

fasting as they want soon enough, whether they like it or not. He is

not afraid of disease, and dines with a leper. A woman, apparently to

protect him against infection, pours a costly unguent on his head, and

is rebuked because what it cost might have been given to the poor.

He poohpoohs that lowspirited view, and says, as he said when he was

reproached for not fasting, that the poor are always there to be helped,

but that he is not there to be anointed always, implying that you should

never lose a chance of being happy when there is so much misery in the

world. He breaks the Sabbath; is impatient of conventionality when it is

uncomfortable or obstructive; and outrages the feelings of the Jews

by breaches of it. He is apt to accuse people who feel that way

of hypocrisy. Like the late Samuel Butler, he regards disease as

a department of sin, and on curing a lame man, says "Thy sins are

forgiven" instead of "Arise and walk," subsequently maintaining, when

the Scribes reproach him for assuming power to forgive sin as well as

to cure disease, that the two come to the same thing. He has no modest

affectations, and claims to be greater than Solomon or Jonah. When

reproached, as Bunyan was, for resorting to the art of fiction when

teaching in parables, he justifies himself on the ground that art is

the only way in which the people can be taught. He is, in short, what we

should call an artist and a Bohemian in his manner of life.

On the Prospects of Christianity Bernard Shaw's Preface to Androcles and the Lion · 第 26 / 91 题