The root of family life is not mutual affection between man and woman,

because that, alas!--whether it be founded on physical attraction or

mental affinity--is subject to change. Age withers, and custom stales

it: circumstance blights it, a diversity of spiritual growth rends

it apart, and no man or woman can say with certainty that it will

endure for a lifetime. But the fluctuations to which wedded love is

subject are unknown to the self-abnegating instinct of parenthood.

Mutual affection for the offspring will hold together the most opposite

natures; it will rivet for all existence two lives that must otherwise

inevitably spring asunder by instinctive repulsion.

Love of offspring is in man a cultivated emotion; in woman an instinct.

There are women lacking the instinct as there are calves born with

two heads, but for purposes of generalization these exceptions may be

ignored. In many of the lower orders of life the female is obliged to

protect the young from the enmity of the male parent. The alligator

finds no meal so refreshing as a light lunch off his newly hatched

children, and the male swine shares this epicurean taste for tender

offspring. The stallion is a dangerous companion for the mare with colt

at foot, though the colt be of his own get, and many species of male

appear to experience a similar jealousy of the young while absorbing

the attentions of the female. Speaking generally of the animal world,

the young are obliged to look to the mother entirely for food and care

during the period of helplessness. With savage man of the lower grade

the paternal instinct is still faint and rudimentary, and even where

the woman has, through long ages of endeavour, succeeded in cultivating

in the heart of the other parent a fair imitation of her own affection,

this affection, being a cultivated emotion and not an instinct,

frequently breaks down under stress of misbehaviour or frowardness on

the part of the child.

To this end, then,--that end "toward which the whole creation

moves,"--to effect this result of an equal care and affection for the

offspring, all the energies of women have been bent for ages.

She has fought polygamy with incessant hatred; not only for its injury

to herself, but its constant menace to her children. The secret strings

of the woman's heart are wrapped about the fruit of her own flesh,

but the desire of the man is to the woman, and this desire she has

used as a lever to work her will--not consciously, perhaps, not with

reasoned forethought, but with the iron tenacity of blind instinct.

Reasoned will may be baffled or deflected, but water can by no means

be induced to run up hill; and so while woman has been apparently as

fluidly yielding as water--to be led here and driven there according

to the will of her master--she has stuck to her own ends with a silent

persistency that has always tired out opposition at last. She has,

like Charity, suffered all things, endured all things; she has been

all things to all men. She has yielded all outward show of authority;

she has submitted to be scoffed at as an inferior creation, to be

sneered at for feebleness and shallow-mindedness, to be laughed at for

chattering inconsequence, and to be regarded as a toy and trifle to

amuse man's leisure hours, or as a dull drudge for his convenience, for

ends are not achieved by talking about them. All the ages of masculine

discussion of the Eternal Feminine show no reply from her, but to-day

the world is a woman's world. Civilization has, under the unrelaxing

pressure of endless generations of her persistent will, been bent to

her ends. Polygamy is routed, and the errant fancy of the male tamed

to yield itself to a single yoke. She has, "with bare and bloody feet,

climbed the steep road of wide empire," but to-day she stands at the

top--mistress of the world. Man, with his talents, his strength, and

his selfishness, has been tamed to her hand. The sensual, dominant

brute with whom she began what Max Nordau calls "the toilsome, slow

ascent of the long curve leading up to civilization," stands beside her

to-day, hat in hand, her lover--husband; tender, faithful, courteous,

and indulgent.

This is the conquest that has been made, the crown and throne achieved

by the silent, uneducated woman of the past.

Monogamous marriage is the foundation stone on which has been built her

power; a power which, while it has endured to her own benefit, has not

been exercised for selfish ends. She has raised the relation between

man and herself from a mere contract of sensuality or convenience to

a spiritual sacrament within whose limits the purest and most exalted

of human emotions find play. For the coarse indulgence and bitter

enmities of polygamy has been substituted the happiest of bonds, in

which the higher natures find room for the subtlest and completest

felicities, and within which the man, the woman, and the child form a

holy trinity of mutual love and well-being.

To this jewel, so hardly won, so long toiled for, it would be natural

to suppose that woman would cling with all the force of her nature;

all the more as education broadened her capacity for reflection and

deepened her consciousness of self. On the contrary, the little

learning she has so far acquired seems, as usual, a dangerous thing,

and with the development of self-consciousness the keen, unerring

_flair_ of her instinct for the one thing needful has been blunted and

enfeebled. It is not necessary to give undue weight to the blatant and

empty-headed crew who announce marriage to be a failure, and that women

are tired of, and will no longer submit to, child-bearing. There are

crowing hens in all barnyards, and their loud antics never materially

affect the price of eggs.

But that the women of our own time should treat marriage--that

hard-won, dear-bought triumph--with such profligate recklessness amazes

me. We are making ducks and drakes of the treasure heaped up for us by

our mothers. How long will this imperfectly monogamous animal respect

an institution which is all for our benefit, if we ourselves regard it

so lightly?

The modern woman is so spoiled, so indulged, that she does not realize

how much a man gives and how little he gets in marriage. He gives a

half, sometimes--indeed often--more than half, of his earnings, his

name and its honour, his protection and defence of her person, and a

lifelong responsibility for her and her children, and he gets--what?

Her person, and it is to be hoped her affection. The woman of the

present day lays too much stress upon this gift of her person. She

appears to think that this gift alone renders man her eternal debtor.

To speak a little brutally, he knows that he can easily buy a like gift

elsewhere and for a less price.

I remember that last year Alice complained of some of Ned's small

foibles.

"Oh, you must be patient with him," I said. "Think how much he gives

you; home, name, support, protection--everything. He works hard for you

every day. You are under tremendous obligations to him."

"Well, if you put it that way--" she answered resentfully, "but don't I

give him love and affection in return?"

"Yes," I countered triumphantly, "but he gives you equal love and all

these other things beside. It seems to me there's no question who gives

most."

She opened her eyes rather wide and looked thoughtful.

July 17.

The Ideal Husband.

It being the "silly season" a controversy is raging in the daily papers

as to the ideal wife and the ideal husband, and much correspondence is

occurring under various anonyms.

Alas!--the only ideal husband who ever lived married the only ideal

wife ever born. They were cut off in the flower of their youth--some

time during the first years of the Pliocene Period--and minute fossil

fragments of their bones are now worn as relics by pious celibates,

and are said to have worked miracles.

Of so potent an essence are their mere memories, it is said his

knightly ghost haunts the rosy chambers of all maiden dreams, and men

seeking Her like find all other women less desirable because of her

fabled virtues.

I suppose all girls see him more or less in their lovers. Imagination

deceptively moulds their features to a similacrum of that noble

legendary person, until the fierce light which beats upon the married

reveals the unprepossessing traits of plain everyday humanity. Yet

every woman begins her sentimental life with hopes unabated by the

depressing failures of others.

A most quaint and charming creature--this ideal who haunts the dreams

of maidenhood! Compounded all of purity and passion, of chivalry and

grace, of vigour and beauty. He can in moments of excitement tie the

poker into love-knots, and has a hand of velvet with which to touch the

dreamer's curls. A ruler of men, he is to be led by a single golden

hair. Capable of volcanic passion, which renders him indifferent to

meals or to fatigue, he can yet be moved to these ecstasies by but

a single member of the sex, and despite snubs or coquetry can live

for decades upon the mere hope of her favour. He excels in all manly

prowess and diversions, and yet is never guilty of causing the loved

one to mourn his absence during a golf widowhood. He adores poetry

and is superior to all vulgar commercialism, and yet manages--in that

simple fashion known only to ideals--to accumulate a fortune and be

generous in the matter of diamonds. He combines in one stalwart person

all the virtues of Galahad, Arthur, Launcelot, and Baron Rothschild.

Later on the wife develops an ideal less magnificently ornamental than

this choice collection of bric-à-brac virtues. The married idol must

be thoroughly domesticated: prepared to throw himself with enthusiasm

into the study of croup and measles; is deeply versed in the matter

of female domestic service, and yet so full of tact as to be able

to obliterate himself at moments of domestic crisis. Like the ideal

servant, he must be never in the way and never out of it. He must be

uncritical of failure, yet capable of enthusiasm for success; unselfish

as a saint, yet commanding the secret of worldly achievement; and above

all he must be hopelessly blind to the virtues and charms of every

woman but his wife.

Taste as to details may differ according to temperament, nationality,

and social condition, but, broadly speaking, this delightful person

with his eccentric combination of qualities figures in the abstract

affections of all women.

But these are dreams; diversions of those pleasant moments when the

human moth allows itself, with futile richness of imagination, to

consider the star as a possible companion, and it seems useless to hope

that such a person will ever appear in this sinful and unworthy world.

Perhaps from time to time a man who faintly reflects the luminous

charms of this knightly husband-saint does arise to cheer and comfort

the weaker sex and keep their hopes and ideals alive, but the "Mauds,"

and "Charlottes," and "Mrs. S. F. J.s," who have been extolling his

attractions in print, seem not to have prayerfully considered whether

they themselves were fit mates for, or capable of satisfying the ideals

of, this wholly impossible he. There is far less talk about the ideal

wife--for two reasons, I suppose. One is that men have less time for

chattering generalizations, and the other--alas!--is that men are far

less interested in women than are women in men.

The American is supposed to more nearly approach this high standard

than the men of any other nationality, but that typical American

husband of novels has, I must confess, always seemed to me a paltry,

bourgeois creature, with the soul of a bank clerk, a neglected mind,

and with a low estimate and a sort of amused indulgence of women as

pretty, fantastic, inconsequent children with an insane greed of luxury.

Of course, it is heresy to say so, but my observation leads me to

think that American women hold a general position far inferior to the

women of Europe. The American man is pre-eminently generous to them

in material things. Often while he slaves and goes shabby himself

he is willing to metaphorically back a van up to the coal-hole and

fill the cellar full of jewels, but he denies to his women that whose

price is above rubies--his own society. Why is American society made

up of women? What is the cause of our superfluity of women's clubs,

committees, and classes? What place has the middle-aged or elderly

woman in America except as the mother of her daughters, or the

dispenser of her husband's hospitalities and charities?

After the period of sex-attraction has passed women have no power in

America. Who ever sees here, as is so often seen in Europe, an elderly

woman's drawing-rooms filled with politicians, financiers, artists, who

come for the refreshment and stimulation of her ideas and conversation?

Mentally American women do not interest American men.

July 23.

A New Law of Health.

Louisa has become a raging Christian Scientist.

A distant memory returns to me. Once upon a time there was a little

girl who, after the manner of her sex, feared greatly all and sundry

of certain fierce beasts, among which were to be enumerated rats, mice,

bumblebees, and more vividly and especially _DOGS_--whose culminating

direfulness was only to be expressed in italicized capitals. On a day,

being bidden to go across the village street to deliver a note to an

opposite neighbour, she set out, radiating the pleasing results of

soap, brushes, and a clean pinafore, but on reaching the gate came to

a sudden pause. A specimen of the worst of enemies, who seemed to the

perspective of an eye only three feet from the ground to easily rival

an elephant in size, lay prone across the path, lolling an intimidating

tongue, and rolling an eye which, though outwardly calm, might be

guessed to conceal a horrid intent. There was a swish of short starched

skirts, a twinkle of bare knees, and appeal was made to that infallible

power and knowledge which Providence has so wisely placed in mothers.

Being a person of nimble imagination this particular parent, realizing

that a mastiff as large in proportion to her own inches as this one was

to the normal height of five years might well daunt her own courage,

forbore to remonstrate or use reason.

"Here," she said placidly, "is a lump of sugar. Put it on your tongue

and hold it there. Of course, no dog will touch a person who has sugar

on her tongue."

And so fortified, Five Years set forth with a conviction of immunity

that carried her triumphantly past the source of terror. The

incident is not in itself, perhaps, of historic importance, but is a

particularly vivid example of the absolute divorce in the undeveloped

mind between the laws of cause and effect, and in no department of

human thought has that divorce continued so long as in the science

of health. Every one of us can revive out of childhood a memory of

the balm that overspread the injured temple when a sympathetic nurse

bestowed the richly deserved spanking upon the offending chair corner

that had caused the pain, or applied the clearly indicated plaster of

a kiss; and medicine in its long career has followed the intelligent

example of the nursery. But while medicine as a science has passed

out of this stage with the general growth of knowledge, the bulk of

mankind still continues to put sugar on the tongue as a protection

against dogs, to castigate chair corners, and to apply remedies as

unknown to the pharmacopœia as the feminine kiss. Perhaps the

stolen potato carried in the pocket, or the bit of red flannel bound

on the left wrist, are not so trusted a remedy for the pangs of

rheumatism as they were fifty years ago, and the dried heart of a mouse

worn in a bag about the neck seems to have lost its potency against

epileptic seizures, yet the very large sums spent annually upon patent

medicines--rivalling in amount what is known in temperance circles as

the "Drink Bill"--and the rise and popularity of innumerable mushroom

"cures" and systems, proves that the laws of health are still as

heterogeneous from the intelligence of the majority of mankind as are

the laws of the differential calculus.

It would be diverting, were it not so pathetic, to see the constant

endeavour on the part of the multitude to lift itself by its own

hygienic boot-straps in the form of barefoot cures, mind cures, prayer

cures, cures by clairvoyance, by magnetism, red or blue lights, or by

pilgrimages and relics. The child moving about in worlds unrealized is

still the father and epitome of the man, and sees no reason why his own

will, or that of some Power wishing him individually well, should not

break through the immutable sequence of cause and effect, or upset the

machinery of the universe in his behalf. His childish "Let's pretend"

sweeps away for the moment the dull persistency of facts and opens a

world where it is possible to eat one's cake and have it too, and after

dancing escape the bill for the fiddling.

Speaking accurately there is, of course, no such thing as a new

law of health--such laws being of their very nature eternal--but a

consciousness of the hygienic code is as new as was the discovery

not more than a century ago of the forces of electricity, which had,

though the most powerful agent upon the earth, lain ready to our hands

unrecognized throughout recorded time.

The unfortunate fact that the world of knowledge is not a globe is

shown by this--that if, in setting out toward a fixed goal of truth,

one's face is turned in the wrong direction, no length of travel, no

miracle of persistency, ever conducts to the haven where one would

be. A truth of moral geography by no means universally accepted as

yet, and indeed certain inherent tendencies of human nature, will

forever prevent its unanimous acceptance, a chronic childishness of

mind being so common that one would almost despair of the acceptance

of any new truth, were it not that the adult intelligence of the few

eventually imposes its conclusions upon the multitude, or enforces

at least an outward concurrence. The immature-minded many are always

lusting after a sign of the wonderful, and kicking against the pricks

of plain truth. Bullied out of crediting the existence of ghosts and

fairies, they earnestly engage in burning witches, and shamed out of

such mistaken zeal fling themselves into the arms of spiritualist

mediums, flirt with the theosophists, or die under the ministrations

of Christian Scientists. The whole history of supernaturalism has been

the history of travel in the wrong direction--a wrong turning that had

its beginning in a childish impatience that would attain to its end by

sudden leaps in lieu of dusty plodding along the highway that led by

slow windings to the desired end.

Man found painful barriers of time, space, and physical decay

fencing him out of his Eden of gratified desire, and like a child

he straightway fell to dreaming of flying carpets, of magic lamps,

of transmutable metals, of fountains of youth and elixirs of life.

At first these miracles were thought to be the gifts of shadowy,

higher powers, who were happily superior to the cruel limits of

material existence, and might give their assistance according to their

capricious elfin fancy. Later, man began to believe that in himself

lay the powers which were to break the chains that bound him the

unhappy slave of distance, of the need for labour, of the tyrannies

of nature, with her resistless heat and cold, storm and flood, pain

and age. A glimmering of the truth, this, at last, but only a faint

reflection on the horizon of the rising sun, on which he had turned his

back. There followed a period of fasts and macerations whose courage

and persistency was to make the gods tremble in respectful terror--a

triumph over material passions which should give an occult power over

material limitations. The Buddhists stood moveless and speechless until

the birds reared their young in their hair, and thereby were supposed

to grow so mighty that the mountains rocked beneath the weight of their

thoughts, and space and time were annihilated.

Superb energies, passionate patience and ardour, master intellects,

were wasted in the long endeavour to find some means by which nature

could be conquered and man made master of circumstance--all given

fruitlessly; thrown into that bottomless pit of error never to be

filled. And these earnest, misguided travellers--so blinded were

they--when one of their number turned about in the other direction

promptly fell upon him and beat him into submission, as one who would

check the struggle towards light and knowledge. Even now that the

fact is accepted that nature is to be conquered by her own natural

means only, and that supernaturalism is a waste and quaking morass

upon which no edifice of truth is to be reared, there are many--sadly

many--descendants of Lot's wife casting longing glances back to the

Sodom of their intellectual sins. It is nothing to them that having

once faced about in the right direction the same amount of effort,

properly directed, has achieved that for which the supernaturalists had

for ages striven in vain.

Eating his due amount of food and attaching no mystical significance

to anything, man tore his way through the heart of mountains, flashed

his thoughts under the wastes of ocean, sent his voice across a

thousand miles, sailed into the teeth of the wind, devoured space with

steam, reared palaces more lofty than Aladdin dreamed of, and--his own

Kobold--dived into the darkness and fetched up gold and gems more than

the fairy tales ever knew. He made himself lord of the visible earth,

of time, of distance, of wave and wind. He laid his hands upon all the

forces which had awed his childhood and forced them to work miracles

beside which the fables of the Kabbalists seemed tame and feeble. And

in spite of this there remain men and women who are more awed by a

banjo flying through a dark room than by the telephone; who find the

untying of knots in a cabinet, or the clutches of damp hands when the

lights are turned down, more important than the automobile. It is the

attitude of mind of a child, who is more interested by rabbits coming

out of a conjurer's hat than by wireless telegraphy.

There is as great an inequality in the inheritance of health as in

the heirship of wealth or brains. Some are born with a fortune of

vigour and soundness so large that not a lifetime of eager squandering

will leave them poor, and others enter the world paupers of so dire a

need that no charity of medicine will ever raise them to comfort; but

most of us have just that mediocre legacy of vitality which makes us

indistinguishable units in the mass. It lies in the hands of each to

improve or waste that property as he chooses, for there are self-made

men physically as well as financially, and spendthrifts of health

come to as sorrowful an end as prodigals of gold. The body is a realm

where a wise ruler brings happiness as surely as a foolish one ensures

distress, and wisdom here, as elsewhere, lies in the observance of

natural laws.

The Secret Life: Being the Book of a Heretic · 第 5 / 13 段