I confess that I was puzzled for awhile, and had to pause and reflect.

Not very long, however; I was soon able to get over this trifling

obstacle.

The plan that first suggested itself was to cut a third piece of stick

of a little over two feet in length, which I could easily guess at

within a few inches. This I could apply alongside of my four-foot rule,

beginning at the end, and proceeding as if I was measuring the latter

with the former. Of course, on the first application, two lengths would

reach from the end of the rule to the notch that marked the four feet

length, and perhaps extend a little beyond. I should then shorten the

measure and apply it again. This time its end would have approached

nearer to the aforesaid notch. Another bit cut off would bring it still

nearer; and the process being repeated, by shaving gradually from the

end of the stick, I should at last find that two lengths of it would

exactly correspond with the length of my four-foot rule. I should then

have a piece exactly two feet in length, and by the help of this I could

find the middle part of the longer piece, and could mark it with a

"nick."

By cutting the short piece into two nearly equal parts, I could then

take the larger of them, and, by a similar process, obtain the standard

of a foot, and mark it also upon my rule; and so on till I had succeeded

in arriving at the inches.

Of course, to do all this would require time, patience, and the nicest

precision; but I had plenty of time upon my hands, and it was my

interest to be both patient and precise.

Although I regarded not the time, just as I was about to carry out the

plan described, another suggested itself that promised to lead me sooner

to the issue; it would call for less patience, though an equal amount of

precision.

This new plan was a sort of corollary of the former one, the only

difference being, that instead of a _stick_ I should perform my

subdivision and graduation with a _string_.

The thongs of my buskins came into my mind--the very thing!

I could not have found a better string for the purpose. They were

strips of best calfskin, cut with the grain, and could not have been

stretched the eighth part of an inch. They would, therefore, measure as

accurately as a rule of boxwood or ivory.

One would not be long enough; so I knotted the two together, taking care

to make a neat, firm knot of it. They made a string of over four feet,

and having laid it along the four-foot rule, I cut it with my knife to

that length exactly. I was not satisfied till I had measured it over

and over again, each time pulling the thong with all my strength, lest

some "kink" might be lurking in it. A slight error would derange my

intended scale, though there is less danger in graduating four feet down

to inches than in going from the less to the greater standard. In the

former, each subdivision naturally lessens the error, while in the

latter it is continually doubled.

When convinced that I had got the thong to the precise length, I placed

its two ends together, and then drawing it with a firm pull through my

fingers, I creased it exactly in the middle. Holding it taut upon the

blade of my knife, I cut through at the crease, and thus divided it into

two moieties of equal length, each two feet long. The part with the

knot I laid aside as being no longer needed, and the remaining half I

again doubled, and cut into two. This gave me two pieces each a foot in

length.

One of these I next folded in triple, and creased for cutting as before.

This was a delicate operation, and required all the skill of my fingers

to accomplish, for it is much easier to divide a string into two equal

parts than into three. I was a good long time before I could get it

trebled to my satisfaction; but I succeeded at length, and then severed

the parts.

My object in thus cutting into three, was to get the pieces in even

fractions of four inches each, in order that by two more doublings I

might arrive more accurately at the inch.

And in two more doublings I found it.

To make sure that I had committed no error, I took up the knotted piece,

which I had laid aside, and after placing the other fragments where they

could be got at, I reduced the second half of the string as I had done

the first.

To my gratification, the inch I obtained from both exactly corresponded.

There was not a hair's breadth of difference.

I was now in possession of a guide to the true graduation of my

measuring-stick. I had pieces of one foot, of four inches, of two, and

of one; and by the help of these I proceeded to mark my rod after the

manner of a draper's yard-stick.

It occupied some time, for I worked with care and caution; but my

patience was rewarded by finding myself in possession of a measure upon

which I could rely, even in a calculation involving the question of my

life.

I was not much longer in deciding the point. The diameters were now

measured by feet and inches, and the _mean_ of the two taken. This was

reduced to surface measure by the usual method of squaring the circle

(multiplying by eight, and dividing by ten). This gave the base of the

hollow cylinder, which would be equal to the frustum of a cone of like

altitude; and another multiplication by the length produced the entire

cubic content.

Dividing by sixty-nine, I got the number of quarts, and so gallons.

The butt, when full, had contained somewhat above 100 gallons--as near

as I could calculate, about 108--and therefore it was in all likelihood

an old pipe that had once contained sherry.

The Boy Tar · 第 67 / 136 题