Thus, then--

When I said just a little ago that I had no standard about my person, I

spoke the truth only literally. Although not exactly _about_ my person,

I had one in my person--I was myself that standard! You will now

remember my having submitted myself to a measurement, which showed me to

be four feet in length. Of what value that knowledge now proved to me!

Knowing, then, my own height to be very nearly four feet, I could notch

off that measure upon one of the sticks, which would give me a

measuring-rule of four feet in length.

I proceeded to obtain this result without delay. The process was simple

and easy. Laying myself horizontally, I planted my feet against one of

the great ribs of the ship, and rested the end of the stick between

them. I now stretched myself out at full length, and guiding the rod so

as to keep it parallel to the axis of my body, I brought it across my

forehead, and beyond. With my fingers I could tell the point that was

opposite the crown of my head, and carefully marking this point, I

afterwards notched it with the knife. I now possessed a four-foot rule,

exact enough for my purpose.

But there were difficulties yet to be encountered. With a four-foot

rule, I was but little advanced towards my computation. I might make a

nearer approach to the measurement of my diameters, but that would not

avail. I must know them _exactly_. I must know them in inches, and

even fractions of inches; for, as I have said, an error of half an inch

in some of my _data_ would make a difference of gallons in the result.

How, then, was I to divide a four-foot stick into inches, and register

the inches upon its edge? How was this to be done?

It seems simple enough. The half of my four feet--already ascertained--

would give me two feet; and the half of that again would reduce the

standard to a foot. This again notched in the middle would make two

lengths of six inches each. Then I could subdivide those into lengths

of three inches, which, if not small enough for my calculation, could be

still further subdivided into three equal parts, each of which would be

the desired minimum of an inch.

Yes, all this seems easy enough in theory, but how was it to be put in

practice upon a piece of plain straight stick, and in the midst of as

perfect darkness as that which surrounds a blind man? How was I to find

the exact middle--for it must be exact--of even the four feet, much less

divide and subdivide till I got down to the inches?

The Boy Tar · 第 66 / 136 题