The American navy list is as follows:--

+=========================+===+=================+===+

YCaptains or Commodores Y 50YPassed MidshipmenY181Y

+-------------------------+---+-----------------+---+

YMasters Commandant Y 50YMidshipmen Y227Y

+-------------------------+---+-----------------+---+

YLieutenants Y279YSailing-Masters Y 27Y

+-------------------------+---+-----------------+---+

YSurgeons Y 50YSail-makers Y 25Y

+-------------------------+---+-----------------+---+

YPassed Assistant SurgeonsY 24YBoatswains Y 22Y

+-------------------------+---+-----------------+---+

YAssistant Surgeons Y 33YGunners Y 27Y

+-------------------------+---+-----------------+---+

YPursers Y 45YCarpenters Y 26Y

+-------------------------+---+-----------------+---+

YChaplains Y 9Y Y Y

+=========================+===+=================+===+

The pay of these officers is on the following scale. It must be

observed, that they do not use the term "half pay;" but when unemployed

the officers are either attached to the various dockyards or on leave.

I have reduced the sums paid into English money, that they may be better

understood by the reader:

+======================================================+===+

YSenior captain, on service Y960Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YOn leave i.e. half-pay Y730Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YCaptains, squadron service Y830Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YNavy Yard and other duty, half pay Y730Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YOff duty, ditto Y525Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YCommanders on service Y525Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YNavy-yard and other duty, half pay Y440Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YOn leave, ditto Y380Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YLieutenants commanding Y380Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YNavy-yard and other duty, half pay Y315Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YWaiting orders, ditto Y250Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YSurgeons, according to their length of servitude, fromY210Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YTo Y500Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YAnd half pay in proportion Y Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YAssistant Surgeons, from Y200Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YTo Y250Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YChaplains; sea service Y250Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YOn leave, half pay Y170Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YPassed midshipmen, duty Y156Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YWaiting orders, half pay Y125Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YMidshipmen; sea service Y 33Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YNavy-yard and other duty, half pay! Y 72Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YLeave, ditto! Y 63Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YSailing-masters; ships of the line Y228Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YOther duty, half pay Y200Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YLeave, ditto Y156Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YBoatswains, carpenters, sailmakers, and gunners Y Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YShips of the line Y156Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YFrigate Y125Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YOther duty, half pay Y105Y

+------------------------------------------------------+---+

YOn leave, ditto Y 75Y

+======================================================+===+

The navy yard at Washington, in the district of Columbia, is situated on

the eastern branch of the Potomac, contains thirty-seven acres, and cost

4,000 dollars. In this yard are made all the anchors, cables, blocks,

and almost all things requisite for the use of the navy of the United

States.

The navy-yard at Portsmouth, near Norfolk in Virginia, is situated on

the south branch of Elizabeth river contains sixteen acres, and cost

13,000 dollars.

There is also a navy-yard at Pensacola in Florida, which is merely used

for repairing ships on the West India station.

It will be perceived by the above list how very much better all classes

in the American service are paid in comparison with those in our

service. But let it not be supposed that this liberality is a matter of

choice on the part of the American government; on the contrary, it is

one of necessity. There never was, nor never will be, anything like

liberality under a democratic form of government. The navy is a

favourite service, it is true, but the officers of the American navy

have not one cent more than they are entitled to, or than they

absolutely require. In a country like America, where any one may by

industry, in a few years, become an independent, if not a wealthy man,

it would be impossible for the government to procure officers if they

were not tolerably paid; no parents would permit their children to enter

the service unless they were enabled by their allowances to keep up a

respectable appearance; and in America everything, to the annuitant or

person not making money, but living upon his income, is much dearer than

with us. The government, therefore, are obliged to pay them, or young

men would not embark in the profession; for it is not in America as it

is with us, where every department is filled up, and no room is left for

those who would crowd in; so that in the eagerness to obtain respectable

employment, emolument becomes a secondary consideration. It may,

however, be worth while to put in juxtaposition the half-pay paid to

officers of corresponding ranks in the two navies of England and

America:

+=====================================================+=======+=======+

YOfficers YAmericaYEnglandY

+-----------------------------------------------------+-------+-------+

YHalf-pay post-captains, senior, on leave Y Y Y

+-----------------------------------------------------+-------+-------+

Ycorresponding to commodore or rear-admiral in EnglandY 730Y 456Y

+-----------------------------------------------------+-------+-------+

YPost captains off duty - that is duty on shore Y 730Y Y

+-----------------------------------------------------+-------+-------+

YOn leave Y 525Y 191Y

+-----------------------------------------------------+-------+-------+

Ycommanders off sea duty Y 440Y Y

+-----------------------------------------------------+-------+-------+

YIn yards and on leave Y 380Y 155Y

+-----------------------------------------------------+-------+-------+

YLieutenants, shore duty Y 315Y Y

+-----------------------------------------------------+-------+-------+

YWaiting orders or on leave Y 250Y 90Y

+-----------------------------------------------------+-------+-------+

YPassed midshipmen, full pay Y 156Y 25Y

+-----------------------------------------------------+-------+-------+

YHalf-pay Y 125Y 0Y

+-----------------------------------------------------+-------+-------+

YMidshipmen, full pay Y 83Y 25Y

+-----------------------------------------------------+-------+-------+

YHalf-pay Y 63Y 0Y

+=====================================================+=======+=======+

My object in making the comparison between the two services is not to

gratify an invidious feeling. More expensive as living in America

certainly is, still the disproportion is such as must create surprise;

and if it requires such a sum for an American officer to support himself

in a creditable and gentlemanlike manner, what can be expected from the

English officer with his miserable pittance, which is totally inadequate

to his rank and station! Notwithstanding which, our officers do keep up

their appearance as gentlemen, and those who have no half pay are

obliged to support themselves. And I point this out, that when Mr Hume

and other gentlemen clamour against the expense of our naval force, they

may not be ignorant of one fact, which is, that not only on half-pay,

but when on active service, a moiety at least of the expenses

necessarily incurred by our officers to support themselves according to

their rank, to entertain, and to keep their ships in proper order, is,

three times out of four, paid out of their own pockets, or those of

their relatives; and that is always done without complaint, as long as

they are not checked in their legitimate claims to promotion.

In the course of this employment in the Mediterranean, one of our

captains was at Palermo. The American commodore was there at the time,

and the latter gave most sumptuous balls and entertainments. Being very

intimate with each other, our English captain said to him one day, "I

cannot imagine how you can afford to give such parties; I only know that

I cannot; my year's pay would be all exhausted in a fortnight." "My

dear fellow," replied the American commodore, "do you suppose, that I am

so foolish as to go to such an expense, or to spend my pay in this

manner; I have nothing to do with them except to give them. My purser

provides everything, and keeps a regular account, which I sign as

correct, and send home to government, which defrays the whole expenses,

under the head of _conciliation_ money." I do not mean to say that this

is requisite in our service: but still it is not fair to refuse to

provide us with paint and other articles, such as leather, etcetera,

necessary to fit out our ships; thus, either compelling us to pay for

them out of our own pockets, or allowing the vessels under our command

to look like anything but men-of-war, and to be styled, very truly, a

disgrace to the service. Yet such is the well-known fact. And I am

informed that the reason why our admiralty will not permit these

necessary stores to be supplied is that, as one of the lords of the

admiralty was known to say, "if we _do not_ provide them, the captains

_most assuredly will_, therefore let us save the government the

expense."

During my sojourn in the United States I became acquainted with a large

portion of the senior officers of the American navy, and I found them

gifted, gentleman-like, and liberal. With them I could converse freely

upon all points relative to the last war, and always found them ready to

admit all that could be expected. The American naval officers certainly

form a strong contrast to the majority of their countrymen, and prove,

by their enlightened and liberal ideas, how much the Americans, in

general, would be improved if they enjoyed the same means of comparison

with other countries which the naval officers, by their profession, have

obtained. Their partial successes during the late war were often the

theme of discourse, which was conducted with candour and frankness on

both sides. No unpleasant feeling was ever excited by any argument with

them on the subject, whilst the question, raised amongst their "free and

enlightened" brother citizens, who knew nothing of the matter, was

certain to bring down upon me such a torrent of bombast, falsehood, and

ignorance, as required all my philosophy to submit to with apparent

indifference. But I must now take my leave of the American navy, and

notice their merchant marine.

Before I went to the United States I was aware that a large proportion

of our seamen were in their employ. I knew that the whole line of

packets, which is very extensive, was manned by British seamen; but it

was not until I arrived in the states that I discovered the real state

of the case.

During my occasional residence at New York, I was surprised to find

myself so constantly called upon by English seamen, who had served under

me in the different ships I had commanded since the peace. Every day

seven or eight would come, touch their hats, and remind me in what

ships, and in what capacity, they had done their duty. I had frequent

conversations with them, and soon discovered that their own expression,

"We are all here, sir," was strictly true. To the why and the

wherefore, the answer was invariably the same. "Eighteen dollars

a-month, sir." Some of them, I recollect, told me that they were going

down to New Orleans, because the sickly season was coming on; and that

during the time the yellow fever raged they always had a great advance

of wages, receiving sometimes as much as thirty dollars per month. I

did not attempt to dissuade them from their purpose; they were just as

right to risk their lives from contagion at thirty dollars a-month, as

to stand and be fired at a shilling a day. The circumstance of so many

of my own men being in American ships, and their assertion that there

were no other sailors than English at New York, induced me to enter very

minutely into my investigation, of which the following are the

results:--

The United States, correctly speaking, have no common seamen, or seamen

bred up as apprentices before the mast. Indeed a little reflection will

show how unlikely it is that they ever should have; for who would submit

to such a dog's life (as at the best it is), or what parent would

consent that his children should wear out an existence of hardship and

dependence at sea, when he could so easily render them independent on

shore? The same period of time requisite for a man to learn his duty ay

an able seaman, and be qualified for the pittance of eighteen dollars

per month, would be sufficient to establish a young man as an

independent, or even wealthy, land-owner, factor, or merchant. That

there are classes in America who do go to sea is certain, and who and

what these are I shall hereafter point out; but it may be positively

asserted that, unless by escaping from their parents at an early age,

and before their education is complete, they become, as it were, lost,

there is in the United States of America hardly an instance of a white

boy being sent to sea, to be brought up as a foremast man.

It may be here observed that there is a wide difference in the

appearance of an English seaman and a portion of those styling

themselves American seamen, who are to be seen at Liverpool and other

seaports; tall, weedy, narrow-shouldered, slovenly, yet still athletic

men, with their knives worn in a sheath outside of their clothes, and

not with a lanyard round them, as is the usual custom of English seamen.

There is, I grant, a great difference in their appearance, and it

arises from the circumstance of those men having been continually in the

trade to New Orleans and the South, where they have picked up the

buccaneer airs and customs which are still in existence there; but the

fact is, that, though altered also by climate, the majority of them were

Englishmen born, who served their first apprenticeship in the coasting

trade, but left it at an early age for America. They may be considered

as a portion of the emigrants to America, having become in feeling, as

well as in other respects, _bona fide_ Americans.

The whole amount of tonnage of the American mercantile manner may be

taken, in round numbers, at 2,000,000 tons, which may be subdivided as

follows:

+===============+==========+

Y YRegisteredY

+---------------+----------+

Y YTons Y

+---------------+----------+

YForeign trade Y 700,000Y

+---------------+----------+

YWhale fishery Y 130,000Y

+---------------+----------+

YEnrolled Y Y

+---------------+----------+

YCoasting trade Y 920,000Y

+---------------+----------+

YSteam Y 150,000Y

+---------------+----------+

YCoast FisheriesY 100,000Y

+---------------+----------+

YTotal Y 2,000,000Y

+===============+==========+

The American merchant vessels are generally sailed with fewer men than

the British calculate five men to one hundred tons, which I believe to

be about the just proportion. Mr Carey, in his work, estimates the

proportion of seamen in American vessels to be 44 to every one hundred

tons, and I shall assume his calculation as correct. The number of men

employed in the American mercantile navy will be as follows:--

+===============+======+

Y YMen Y

+---------------+------+

YForeign trade Y30,333Y

+---------------+------+

YWhale fishery Y 5,000Y

+---------------+------+

YCoasting trade Y39,000Y

+---------------+------+

YSteam Y 6,500Y

+---------------+------+

YCoast fisheriesY 4,333Y

+---------------+------+

YTotal Y85,790Y

+===============+======+

And now I will submit, from the examinations I have made, the

proportions of American and British seamen which are contained in this

aggregate of 85,799 men.

In the foreign trade we have to deduct the masters of the ships, the

mates, and the boys who are apprenticed to learn their duty, and rise to

mates and masters (not to serve before the mast). These I estimate

at:--

+==============================================+=====+

YMasters Y1,500Y

+----------------------------------------------+-----+

YMates Y3,000Y

+----------------------------------------------+-----+

YApprentices Y1,500Y

+----------------------------------------------+-----+

YDitto, co'ld men, as cooks, stewards, etceteraY2,000Y

+----------------------------------------------+-----+

YTotal Y8,000Y

+==============================================+=====+

which, deducted from 30,333, will leave 22,333 seamen in the foreign

trade; who, with a slight intermixture of Swedes, Danes, and, more

rarely, Americans, may be asserted to be all British seamen.

The next item is that of the men employed in the whale fishery; and, as

near as I can ascertain the fact, the proportions are two-thirds

Americans to one-third British. The total is 5,633; out of which 3,756

art Americans, and 1,877 British seamen.

The coasting trade employs 39,000 men; but only a small proportion of

them can be considered as seamen, as _it_ embraces all the internal

river navigation.

The steam navigation employs 6,500 men, of whom of course not one in ten

is a seaman.

The fisheries for cod and herring employ about 4,333 men; they are a

mixture of Americans, Nova Scotians, and British, but the proportions

cannot be ascertained; it is supposed that about one-half are British

subjects, i.e. 2,166.

When, therefore, I estimate that the Americans employ at least _thirty

thousand of our seamen_ in their service, I do not think, as my

subsequent remarks will prove, that I am at all overrating the case.

The questions which are now to be considered are, the nature of the

various branches in which the seamen employed in the American marine are

engaged, and how far they will be available to America in case of a war.

The coasting trade is chiefly composed of sloops, manned by two or three

men and boys. The captain is invariably part, if not whole, owner of

the vessel, and those employed are generally his sons, who work for

their father, or some emigrant Irishmen, who, after a few months

practice, are fully equal to this sort of fresh-water sailing. From the

coasting trade, therefore, America would gain no assistance. Indeed,

the majority of the coasting trade is so confined to the interior, that

it would not receive much check from a war with a foreign country.

The coast fisheries might afford a few seamen, but very few; certainly

not the number of men required to man her ships of war. As in the

coasting trade, they are mostly owners or partners. In the whale

fishery much the same system prevails; it is a common speculation; and

the men embarking stipulate for such a proportion of the fish caught as

their share of the profits. They are generally well to do, are

connected together, and are the least likely of all men to volunteer on

board of the American navy. They would speculate in privateers, if they

did anything.

From steam navigation, of course, no seamen could be obtained.

Now, as all service is voluntary, it is evident that the only chance

America has of manning her navy is from the thirty thousand British

seamen in her employ, the other branches of navigation either not

producing seamen, or those employed in them being too independent in

situation to serve as foremast men. When I was at the different

seaports, I made repeated inquiries as to the fact, if ever a lad was

sent to sea as foremast-man, and I never could ascertain that it ever

was the case. Those who are sent as apprentices, are learning their

duty to receive the rating of mates, and ultimately fulfil the office of

captains; and it may here be remarked, that many Americans, after

serving as captains for a few years, return on shore and become opulent

merchants; the knowledge which they have gained during their maritime

career proving of the greatest advantage to them. There are a number of

free black and coloured lads who are sent to sea, and who, eventually,

serve as stewards and cooks; but it must be observed, that the masters

and mates are not people who will enter before the mast and submit to

the rigorous discipline of a government vessel, and the cooks and

stewards are not seamen; so that the whale dependence of the American

navy, in case of war, is upon the British seamen who are in her foreign

trade and whale fisheries, and in her men-of-war in commission during

the peace.

If America brings up none of her people to a seafaring life before the

mast, now that her population is upwards of 13,000,000, still less

likely was she to have done it when her population was less, and the

openings to wealth by other channels were greater: from whence it may be

fairly inferred, that, during our continued struggle with France, when

America had the carrying trade in her hands, her vessels were chiefly

manned by british seamen; and that when the war broke out between the

two countries, the same British seamen who were in her employ manned her

ships of war and privateers. It may be surmised that British seamen

would refuse to be employed against their country. Some might; but

there is no character so devoid of principle as the British sailor and

soldier. In Dibdin's songs, we certainly have another version, "True to

his country and king," etcetera, but I am afraid they do not deserve it:

soldiers and sailors are mercenaries; they risk their lives for money;

if is their trade to do so; and if they can get higher wages they never

consider the justice of the cause, or whom they fight for. Now, America

is a country peculiarly favourable for those who have little conscience

or reflection; the same language is spoken there; the wages are much

higher, spirits are much cheaper, and the fear of dejection or

punishment is trifling: nay, there is none; for in five minutes a

British seaman may be made a _bona fide_ American citizen, and of course

an American seaman. It is not surprising, therefore, that after sailing

for years out of the American ports, in American vessels, the men, in

case of war, should take the oath and serve. It is necessary for any

one wanting to become an American citizen, that he should give notice of

his intention; this notice gives him, as soon as he has signed his

declaration, all the rights of an American citizen, excepting that of

voting at elections, which requires a longer time, as specified in each

state. The declaration is as follows:--

"That it is his _bona fide_ intention to become a citizen of the United

States, and to renounce forever all allegiance and fidelity to any

foreign power, potentate, state, or sovereignty whatever, and

particularly to Victoria, the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great

Britain and Ireland, to whom he is now a subject." Having signed this

document, and it being publicly registered, he becomes a citizen, and

may be sworn to as such by any captain of merchant vessel or man-of-war,

if it be required that he should do so.

During the last war with America, the Americans hit upon a very good

plan as regarded the English seamen whom they had captured in our

vessels. In the daytime the prison doors were shot and the prisoners

were harshly treated; but at night, the doors were left open: the

consequence was, that the prisoners whom they had taken added to their

strength, for the men walked out, and entered on board their men-of-war

and privateers.

This fact alone proves that I have not been too severe in my remarks

upon the character of the English seamen; and since our seamen prove to

be such "Dugald Dalgettys," it is to be hoped that, should we be so

unfortunate as again to come in collision with America, the same plan

may be adopted in this country.

Diary in America, Series One · 第 78 / 104 题