CHAPTER VII.

IN THE NORTH.

In 1837 Dickens’s thoughts were concentrated upon a new serial story,

“Nicholas Nickleby,” in which he determined to expose the shortcomings

of cheap boarding-schools then flourishing in Northern England, his

first impressions of which were picked up when, as a child, he sat “in

by-places, near Rochester Castle, with a head full of Partridge, Strap,

Tom Pipes, and Sancho Panza.” The time had arrived (he thought) when, by

means of his writings, he could secure a large audience, to whom he

might effectively present the actual facts concerning the alleged

cruelties customarily practised at those seminaries of which he had

heard so much. Having thus resolved to punish the culprits by means of

his powerful pen, and, if possible, to suppress the evils of the system

they favoured, the novelist and his illustrator, “Phiz,” departed from

London by coach on a cold winter’s day in January, 1838, for Greta

Bridge, in the North Riding, with the express intention of obtaining

authoritative information regarding the subject of the schools, for in

that locality were situated some of the most culpable of those

institutions. Greta Bridge takes its name from a lofty bridge of one

arch, erected on the line of Watling Street, upon the site of a more

ancient structure, over the river Greta, a little above its junction

with the Tees.

The parish of Rokeby, in the petty sessional division of Greta Bridge,

is celebrated as the scene of Sir Walter Scott’s poem, “Rokeby,” which

was written on the spot, and does no more than justice to the beautiful

scenery of the neighbourhood.

Dickens and “Phiz” broke their journey at Grantham, at which town they

arrived late on the night of January 30, and put up at the George—“the

very best inn I have ever put up at.” Early the next morning they

continued their journey by the Glasgow mail, “which charged us the

remarkably low sum of £6 fare for two places inside.” Snow began to

fall, and the drifts grew deeper, until there was “no vestige of a

track” over the wild heaths as the coach approached the destination of

the two fellow-travellers, who were half frozen on their arrival at

Greta Bridge. In the story the author gives the name of the hostelry

where Squeers and his party alighted from the coach as the George and

New Inn; but, in so doing, he indulges in an artistic license, for he

thus bestows upon one house the respective signs of two distinct inns at

Greta Bridge, situated about half a mile from each other. The George

stands near the bridge already referred to, the public portion of the

premises having since been converted into a private residence. The New

Inn has also been changed, and is now a farmhouse called Thorpe Grange;

built before the railway era for Mr. Morrit, the landlord of the George,

it not only rivalled the older establishment, but absorbed its custom,

the owner claiming it as the veritable inn of Dickens’s story.[67] It

seems very probable that the novelist himself put up at the New Inn

during his brief tour of investigation in 1838; writing thence to his

wife at this date, he said that at 11 p.m. the mail reached “a bare

place with a house standing alone in the midst of a dreary moor, which

the guard informed us was Greta Bridge. I was in a perfect agony of

apprehension, for it was fearfully cold, and there were no outward signs

of anybody being up in the house. But to our great joy we discovered a

comfortable room, with drawn curtains and a most blazing fire. In half

an hour they gave us a smoking supper and a bottle of mulled port (in

which we drank your health), and then we retired to a couple of capital

bedrooms, in each of which there was a rousing fire halfway up the

chimney. We have had for breakfast toast, cakes, a Yorkshire pie, a

piece of beef about the size and much the shape of my portmanteau, tea,

coffee, ham and eggs, and are now going to look about us....”[68] After

exploring the immediate neighbourhood, Dickens, accompanied by “Phiz,”

went by post-chaise to Barnard Castle, four miles from Greta Bridge, and

just over the Yorkshire border, there to deliver a letter given to him

by Mr. Smithson (a London solicitor, who had a Yorkshire connection),

and to visit the numerous schools thereabouts. This letter of

introduction bore reference (as the author explains in his preface to

“Nicholas Nickleby”) to a supposititious little boy who had been left

with a widowed mother who didn’t know what to do with him; the poor lady

had thought, as a means of thawing the tardy compassion of her relations

on his behalf, of sending him to a Yorkshire school. “I was the poor

lady’s friend, travelling that way; and if the recipient of the letter

could inform me of a school in his neighbourhood, the writer would be

very much obliged.” The result of this “pious fraud” (as Dickens himself

termed it) has become a matter of history. The person to whom the

missive was addressed was a farmer (since identified as John S——, of

Broadiswood), who appears in the story as honest John Browdie. Not being

at home when the novelist called upon him, he journeyed through the snow

to the inn where Dickens was staying, and entreated him to advise the

widow to refrain from sending her boy to any of those wretched schools

“while there’s a harse to hoold in a’ Lunnun, or a goother to lie asleep

in!” The old coaching-house where this memorable interview is believed

to have taken place was the still existing Unicorn at Bowes. Another inn

associated with this tour of inspection is the King’s Head, Barnard

Castle,[69] where Dickens made a brief stay, and where he observed,

across the way, the name of “Humphreys, clockmaker,” over a shop door,

this suggesting the title of his next work, “Master Humphrey’s Clock.”

It was at Bowes where he obtained material which served him for

depicting the “internal economy” of Dotheboys Hall, in the school

presided over by William Shaw, who, it has since transpired, was by no

means the worst of his tribe. As a matter of fact, he won respect from

his neighbours, and is remembered by many of his pupils (some of whom

attained high positions in various professions) as a worthy and much

injured man. In “Nicholas Nickleby,” however, he became a scapegoat for

others who thoroughly deserved the punishment inflicted upon Shaw. Even

to-day many of the people at Bowes regard Dickens’s attack as unjust so

far as that particular schoolmaster is concerned, and visitors to the

place are advised to refrain from alluding to Dotheboys Hall.

There is no lack of evidence to prove the general accuracy of the

novelist’s description, and to him we owe a deep debt of gratitude for

so successful an attempt to annihilate those terrible “Caves of

Despair.” Bowes is situated high up on the moorland, and may now be

reached by railway from Barnard Castle. The village consists principally

of one street nearly three-quarters of a mile in length, running east to

west, and is lighted with oil lamps, under a village lighting committee.

Shaw’s house (known generally as Dotheboys Hall until recent times)

stands at the western extremity of Bowes. The present tenants have

altered somewhat the original appearance of the house by attempting to

convert it into a kind of suburban villa—in fact, it is now called “The

Villa.” Prior to these structural changes it was a long, low building of

two storeys. The classroom and dormitories were demolished a few years

ago, but the original pump, at which Shaw’s pupils used to wash, is

still in the yard at the back of the house, and an object of great

interest to tourists.

Nearly all provincial towns in England were visited by Dickens during

his acting and reading tours, and many can boast of more intimate

relations with the novelist. It was from Liverpool, on January 4, 1842,

that he embarked on board the _Britannia_ for the United States—his

first memorable visit to Transatlantic shores—and in 1844 he presided at

a great public meeting held in the Mechanics’ Institution, then sadly in

need of funds, on which occasion he delivered a powerful speech in

support of the objects of that foundation. Referring to the building, he

said: “It is an enormous place. The lecture-room ... will accommodate

over thirteen hundred people.... I should think it an easy place to

speak in, being a semicircle with seats rising one above another to the

ceiling.”

Respecting this function, we learn from a contemporary report that long

before the hour appointed for the opening of the doors the street was

crowded with persons anxious to obtain admission, so anxious were they

to see and hear the young man (then only in his thirty-third year) who

had given them “Pickwick,” “Oliver Twist,” and “Nicholas Nickleby.” At

the termination of his speech a vote of thanks was accorded to the

novelist, who, in replying thereto, concluded his acknowledgments by

quoting the words of Tiny Tim, “God bless us every one.” An interesting

incident lay in the fact that the young lady who presided at the

pianoforte was Miss Christina Weller, who, with her father, was

introduced to the author of “Pickwick,” thus causing considerable

merriment.

[Illustration: DOTHEBOYS HALL, BOWES. (_Page 126._)

Visited by Dickens when writing “Nicholas Nickleby.”]

In 1847 Dickens and his distinguished company of amateur actors gave a

representation in Liverpool of Ben Jonson’s comedy, “Every Man in His

Humour,” for the benefit of Leigh Hunt. The Reading tours in the fifties

and sixties again called him to that busy mercantile centre, one of the

readings taking place in St. George’s Hall—“the beautiful St. George’s

Hall,” as he described it: “brilliant to see when lighted up, and for a

reading simply perfect.” One of the closing incidents of his life was

the great Liverpool banquet, which took place on April 10, 1869, in St.

George’s Hall, after his country Readings, the late Marquis of Dufferin

presiding, the function being made memorable by an eloquent speech by

the novelist, replying to a remonstrance from Lord Houghton against his

(Dickens’s) objection to entering public life.[70] While sojourning at

Liverpool he usually stayed at the Adelphi Hotel. In 1844 he made

Radley’s Hotel his headquarters.

It is quite in accordance with our expectations to find frequent mention

of Liverpool throughout Dickens’s works. For descriptive passages we

must turn to the pages of “Martin Chuzzlewit” and certain of his minor

writings, where we discover interesting and important references “to

that rich and beautiful port,” as he calls it in one instance. Apropos

of the return to England of Martin Chuzzlewit the younger and his

faithful companion Mark Tapley after their trying experiences in the New

Country, the novelist, in thus depicting Liverpool and the Mersey,

doubtless records his own impressions of some two years previous on his

arrival there at the termination, in 1842, of his American tour:

“It was mid-day and high-water in the English port for which the _Screw_

was bound, when, borne in gallantly upon the fulness of the tide, she

let go her anchor in the river.

“Bright as the scene was—fresh, and full of motion; airy, free, and

sparkling—it was nothing to the life and exaltation in the hearts of the

two travellers at sight of the old churches, roofs, and darkened

chimney-stacks of home. The distant roar that swelled up hoarsely from

the busy streets was music in their ears; the lines of people gazing

from the wharves were friends held dear; the canopy of smoke that

overhung the town was brighter and more beautiful to them than if the

richest silks of Persia had been waving in the air. And though the

water, going on its glistening track, turned ever and again aside to

dance and sparkle round great ships, and heave them up, and leaped from

off the blades of oars, a shower of diving diamonds, and wantoned with

the idle boats, and swiftly passed, in many a sporting chase, through

obdurate old iron rings, set deep into the stonework of the quays, not

even it was half so buoyant and so restless as their fluttering hearts,

when yearning to set foot once more on native ground.”

In one of “The Uncommercial Traveller” papers (1860) will be found this

vivid pen-picture of the slums of Liverpool, favoured by seafaring men

of the lower class, a district probably little altered since those lines

were penned:

“A labyrinth of dismal courts and blind alleys, called ‘entries,’ kept

in wonderful order by the police, and in much better order than by the

Corporation, the want of gaslight in the most dangerous and infamous of

these places being quite unworthy of so spirited a town.... Many of

these sailors’ resorts we attained by noisome passages so profoundly

dark that we felt our way with our hands. Not one of the whole number we

visited was without its show of prints and ornamental crockery, the

quantity of the latter, set forth on little shelves and in little cases

in otherwise wretched rooms, indicating that Mercantile Jack must have

an extraordinary fondness for crockery to necessitate so much of that

bait in his traps ... etc.”[71]

With the characteristics of that other great Lancashire town,

Manchester, the novelist became, perhaps, even more intimate.

“Manchester is (_for_ Manchester) bright and fresh,” he wrote to Miss

Hogarth from the Queen’s Hotel in 1869, where he stayed on the occasion

of his Farewell Readings in the provinces, and where the chimney of his

sitting-room caught fire and compelled him to “turn out elsewhere to

breakfast.” Long before this date—that is, in 1843—the people of

Manchester were first privileged to meet him on the occasion of a bazaar

in the Free Trade Hall in aid of the fund for improving the financial

condition of the Athenæum, then sadly in debt. The bazaar was followed

by a soirée, held in the same building, under the presidency of Dickens,

who then delivered a speech which has been described as “a masterpiece

of graceful eloquence.” The subject thereof forcibly appealed to

him—viz., the education of the very poor, for he did not believe in the

old adage that averred a little learning to be a “dangerous thing,” but

rather that the most minute particle of knowledge is preferable to

complete and consummate ignorance. This memorable function is noteworthy

also by reason of the fact that among the speakers who addressed the

vast audience were Disraeli and Cobden. Dickens expressed a wish to

become a member of the Athenæum, but left Manchester without going

through the necessary formalities—an oversight soon rectified, however.

In 1852, on the occasion of the inauguration of the Manchester Public

Free Libraries, the novelist accepted an invitation to be present at an

important meeting held at Campfield, the “first home” of these free

libraries (formerly known as “The Hall of Science”); the meeting was

attended by a number of distinguished men, including Bulwer Lytton,

Thackeray, John Bright, Peter Cunningham, etc., and it naturally fell to

Dickens to make a speech, having the use of literature as its theme.

Thackeray, by the way, had prepared a careful oration, but, after

delivering half a sentence, ignominiously sat down! Public oratory was

not his forte. In 1858 Dickens presided at the annual meeting of the

Institutional Association of Lancashire and Cheshire, held in the

Manchester Athenæum and the Free Trade Hall, and handed prizes to

candidates from more than a hundred local mechanics’ institutes

affiliated to the association. “Knowledge has a very limited power

indeed,” he observed, in the speech delivered on behalf of the

Manchester Mechanics’ Institute in Cooper Street, “when it informs the

head alone; but when it informs the head and heart too, it has power

over life and death, the body and the soul, and dominates the universe.”

We are reminded that this peroration is an echo of words in “Hard Times”

(written four years previously), and that his exhortation to the

Manchester audience practically reproduced the leading thought in that

powerful novel—a story which impelled the admiration of Ruskin, who,

commenting upon it, said that the book “should be studied with close and

earnest care by persons interested in social questions.” In “Hard Times”

Manchester is disguised as matter-of-fact Coketown, and the presentment

is easily recognisable:

“It was a town of red brick, or of brick that would have been red if the

smoke and ashes had allowed it; but, as matters stood, it was a town of

unnatural red and black, like the painted face of a savage. It was a

town of machinery and tall chimneys, out of which interminable serpents

of smoke trailed themselves for ever and ever, and never got uncoiled.

It had a black canal in it, and a river that ran purple with

evil-smelling dye, and vast piles of building full of windows, where

there was a rattling and a trembling all day long, and where the piston

of the steam-engine worked monotonously up and down, like the head of an

elephant in a state of melancholy madness. It contained several large

streets, all very like one another, and many small streets, still more

like one another, inhabited by people equally like one another, who all

went in and out at the same hours, with the same sound upon the same

pavements, to do the same work, and to whom every day was the same as

yesterday and to-morrow, and every year the counterpart of the last and

the next. These attributes of Coketown were in the main inseparable from

the work by which it was sustained; against them were to be set off

comforts of life which found their way all over the world, and

elegancies of life which made we will not ask how much of the fine lady,

who could scarcely bear to hear the place mentioned. You saw nothing in

Coketown but what was severely workful....

“In the hardest working part of Coketown; in the innermost

fortifications of that ugly citadel, where Nature was as strongly

bricked out as killing airs and gasses were bricked in; at the heart of

the labyrinth of narrow courts upon courts, and close streets upon

streets, which had come into existence piecemeal, every piece in a

violent hurry for some one man’s purpose, and the whole one unnatural

family, shouldering, and trampling, and pressing one another to death;

in the last close nook of the great exhausted receiver, where the

chimneys, for want or air to make a draught, were built in an immense

variety of stunted and crooked shapes, as though every house put out a

sign of the kind of people who might be expected to be born in it.”

Of Coketown on a sunny midsummer day (for “there was such a thing

sometimes, even in Coketown”) the author exhibits a realistic picture.

“Seen from a distance in such weather, Coketown lay shrouded in a haze

of its own, which appeared impervious to the sun’s rays. You only knew

the town was there because you knew there could have been no such sulky

blotch upon the prospect without a town. A blur of soot and smoke, now

confusedly bending this way, now that way, now aspiring to the vault of

heaven, now murkily creeping along the earth as the wind rose and fell

or changed its quarter—a dense, formless jumble, with sheets of

cross-light in it, that showed nothing but masses of darkness. Coketown

in the distance was suggestive of itself, though not a brick of it could

be seen ... the streets were hot and dusty on the summer day, and the

sun was so bright that it even shone through the heavy vapour drooping

over Coketown, and could not be looked at steadily. Stokers emerged from

low underground doorways and factory yards, and sat on steps, and posts,

and palings, wiping their swarthy visages, and contemplating coals. The

whole town seemed to be frying in oil. There was a stifling smell of hot

oil everywhere. The steam-engines shone with it; the dresses of the

Hands were soiled with it; the mills throughout their many stories oozed

and trickled it. The atmosphere of those Fairy palaces[72] was like the

breath of the simoon, and their inhabitants, wasting with heat, toiled

languidly in the desert. But no temperature made the melancholy-mad

elephants more mad or more sane. Their wearisome heads went up and down

at the same rate, in hot weather and cold, wet weather and dry, fair

weather and foul. The measured motion of their shadows on the walls was

the substitute Coketown had to show for the shadows of rustling woods;

while for the summer hum of insects it could offer, all the year round,

from the dawn of Monday to the night of Saturday, the whir of shafts and

wheels.

“Drowsily they whirred all through this sunny day, making the passenger

more sleepy and more hot as he passed the humming walls of the mills.

Sun-blinds and sprinklings of water a little cooled the main streets and

shops, but the mills and the courts and the alleys baked at a fierce

heat. Down upon the river, that was black and thick with dye, some

Coketown boys, who were at large—a rare sight there—rowed a crazy boat,

which made a spurious track upon the water as it jogged along, while

every dip of an oar stirred up vile smells.”[73]

Apropos of “Hard Times,” it may be mentioned that in 1854 Dickens stayed

at the Bull Hotel in Preston, when he visited that town expressly for

the purpose of witnessing the effects of a strike in a manufacturing

town. He failed, however, to secure much material here for the story,

for he wrote: “Except the crowds at the street-corners reading the

placards _pro_ and _con_, and the cold absence of smoke from the

mill-chimneys, there is very little in the streets to make the town

remarkable.” He expected to find in Preston a model town, instead of

which it proved to be, in his estimation, a “nasty place,” while to the

Bull he referred in disrespectful terms as an “old, grubby, smoky, mean,

intensely formal red-brick house, with a narrow gateway and a dingy

yard.” Preston figures in the early chapters of “George Silverman’s

Explanation,” a cellar in that town being the birthplace of the

principal character, the Rev. George Silverman.

[Illustration: THE RED LION, BARNET. (_Page 173._)

Dickens and Forster dined here in March, 1838, to celebrate the

birth of Miss Mary (Mamie) Dickens.]

Reverting to Manchester, it must not be forgotten that Dickens, in the

capacity of an actor, journeyed thither four times, appearing with his

amateur company first at the Theatre Royal in 1847 for the benefit of

Leigh Hunt, twice in 1852 at the Old Free Trade Hall, and again in that

building in 1857. Needless to say, the performances attracted vast and

enthusiastic audiences, and were eminently successful both artistically

and financially.

The Free Trade Hall, too, was the scene of his public Readings in

Manchester, and it is recorded that he was accustomed to stay at Old

Trafford as the guest of Mr. John Knowles, of the Theatre Royal. This

large house was then surrounded by an extensive wood, and considered to

be a lonely and remote place, but is now near a network of railways, and

the reverse of rural.[74]

About the year 1841 Charles Dickens’s elder sister Fanny (nearly two

years his senior) married Henry Burnett, an accomplished operatic

singer, who had retired from performing on the stage, and taken up his

abode in Manchester as an instructor in music, Mrs. Burnett, herself a

musician of considerable acquirements, assisting her husband in

conducting the choir of Rusholme Road Congregational Chapel, where they

worshipped, and the pastor of which was the Rev. James Griffin, who has

recorded in print his recollections of the Burnetts. There is,

consequently, a link of a distinctly personal kind connecting Dickens

with Manchester, which is made additionally interesting by the fact that

the little crippled son of the Burnetts (who lived in Upper Brook

Street) was the prototype of Paul Dombey. It may be added that Mr.

Burnett unconsciously posed for some of the characteristics of Nicholas

Nickleby, while in Fanny Dorrit there are certain indications suggesting

that her portrait was inspired by the novelist’s sister.

In a literary sense, Manchester can boast of other Dickensian

associations, for here resided the originals of the delightful Cheeryble

Brothers, who (the author assures us in his preface to “Nicholas

Nickleby”) were “very slightly and imperfectly sketched” from life.

“Those who take an interest in this tale,” he adds, “will be glad to

learn that the Brothers Cheeryble live; that their liberal charity,

their singleness of heart, their noble nature, and their unbounded

benevolence, are no creation of the author’s brain, but are prompting

every day (and oftenest by stealth) some munificent deed in that town of

which they are the pride and honour.” The actual models whence he

portrayed the Cheerybles with approximate accuracy were the brothers

Grant, William and Daniel, merchants, of Ramsbottom and Manchester, with

whom the novelist declared he “never interchanged any communication in

his life.” From evidence recently forthcoming, however, we learn that in

1838 (the year prior to the publication of “Nickleby”) he and Forster

were the guests of Mr. Gilbert Winter, of Stocks House, Cheetham Hill

Road, Manchester, to whom they went with a letter of introduction from

Harrison Ainsworth. Stocks House (demolished in 1884) was formerly

surrounded by a moat, a portion of which was filled up at the time of

the construction of the old road to Bury, the fine old mansion probably

representing the manor-house of Cheetham Manor, given as a reward to the

Earls of Derby after the Battle of Bosworth Field. It was at Stocks

House that Dickens became acquainted with the Grants; indeed, Forster

practically admits this when he says: “A friend now especially welcome

was the novelist Mr. Ainsworth, with whom we visited, during two of

those years (1838 and 1839), friends of art and letters in his native

Manchester, from among whom Dickens brought away the Brothers

Cheeryble....” The Rev. Hume Elliot informs us that although William and

Daniel Grant had residences in Manchester, they preferred to live

together at Springside, Ramsbottom, “which they made a veritable home of

hospitality and good works,”[75] and it is fair to assume that Dickens

must have seen at their home the original of David, “the apoplectic

butler,” or ascertained from an authentic source the peculiarities of

Alfred, who served the Grants in a like capacity and possessed similar

idiosyncrasies.

There are two houses in Manchester associated with the Grants. One of

these, now a parcel-receiving office of the London and North-Western

Railway Company, is in Mosley Street, and the other (a more important

place) stands at the lower end of Cannon Street (No. 15), a large, roomy

warehouse, occupied by a paper dealer, who caused the name “Cheeryble

House” to be placed on the front of the building.[76]

The rare combination of the qualities of charity and humanity with sound

business instincts, such as are ascribed to the Cheeryble Brothers, was

exactly true of the Grants. On the death of William Grant (the elder

brother) in 1842, the novelist (writing from Niagara Falls to his

American friend, Professor Felton), said: “One of the noble hearts who

sat for the Cheeryble Brothers is dead. If I had been in England I would

certainly have gone into mourning for the loss of such a glorious life.

His brother is not expected to survive him. [He died in 1855, at the age

of seventy-five.] I am told that it appears from a memorandum found

among the papers of the deceased that in his lifetime he gave away

£600,000, or three million dollars.” There is a marble tablet to the

memory of William Grant in St. Andrew’s Presbyterian Church, Ramsbottom,

recording his “vigour of understanding, his spotless integrity of

character, and his true benevolence of heart.... If you are in poverty,”

the inscription continues, “grieve for the loss of so good a friend; if

born to wealth and influence, think of the importance of such a trust,

and earn in like manner by a life of charitable exertion the respect and

love of all who knew you, and the prayers and blessings of the poor.”

Honoured descendants of the two philanthropists are still surviving in

the city which cherishes their memory.

In 1847 the novelist presided at a meeting of the Mechanics’ Institute

in Leeds, thus proving his practical interest in the welfare of working

men—an interest again testified in 1855, when he visited Sheffield for

the purpose of reading the “Christmas Carol” in the Mechanics’ Hall on

behalf of the funds of the Institute in that busy town. After the

reading, the Mayor begged his acceptance of a handsome service of table

cutlery and other useful articles of local manufacture, the gift of a

few gentlemen in Sheffield, as a substantial manifestation of their

gratitude to him.

In a letter to Wilkie Collins, dated August 29, 1857, Dickens said: “I

want to cast about whether you and I can go anywhere—take any tour—see

anything—whereon we could write something together. Have you any idea

tending to any place in the world? Will you rattle your head and see if

there is any pebble in it which we could wander away and play at marbles

with?” This was written just after the conclusion of the readings and

theatrical performances in aid of the Douglas Jerrold fund, Dickens

experiencing a sense of restlessness when the excitement attending them

had subsided, and seeming anxious “to escape from himself” by means of a

pilgrimage with a congenial companion, and such as might provide

material for a series of papers in _Household Words_. Arrangements were

speedily made with this object, and the two friends started forthwith

“on a ten or twelve days’ expedition to out-of-the-way places, to do (in

inns and coast corners) a little tour in search of an article and in

avoidance of railroads.” They decided for a foray upon the fells of

Cumberland, Dickens having discovered (in “The Beauties of England and

Wales” and other topographical works) descriptions of “some promising

moors and bleak places thereabout.” To the Lake district they

accordingly departed in September, and their adventures are related in

“The Lazy Tour of Two Idle Apprentices” (published in _Household Words_

during the latter part of the same year), the authors skilfully

collaborating in the preparation of the record, nearly all the

descriptive passages emanating from the pen of Dickens. Almost the first

thing attempted by the travellers was the climbing of Carrock Fell, “a

gloomy old mountain 1,500 feet high.” “Nobody goes up,” said Dickens to

Forster; “guides have forgotten it.” The proprietor of a little inn,

however, volunteered his services as guide, and the party of enthusiasts

ascended in a downpour of rain. The Two Idle Apprentices (who bear the

respective names Francis Goodchild and Thomas Idle, the former being the

pseudonym favoured by Dickens) concluded that to perform the feat “would

be the culminating triumph of Idleness.” “Up hill and down hill, and

twisting to the left, and with old Skiddaw (who has vaunted himself a

great deal more than his merits deserve, but that is rather the way of

the Lake country) dodging the apprentices in a picturesque and pleasant

manner. Good, weatherproof, warm, pleasant houses, well white-limed,

scantily dotting the road.... Well-cultivated gardens attached to the

cottages.... Lonely nooks, and wild; but people can be born, and

married, and buried in such nooks, and can live, and love, and be loved

there as elsewhere, thank God!” The village is portrayed as consisting

of “black, coarse-stoned, rough-windowed houses, some with outer

staircases, like Swiss houses, a sinuous and stony gutter winding up

hill and round the corner by way of street.”[77] The ascent of the

mountain was safely achieved, but during the descent Collins

unfortunately fell into a watercourse and sprained his ankle, an

accident which proved to be a serious hindrance. They slept that night

at Wigton, which (we are told) “had no population, no business, no

streets to speak of.” In _Household Words_ may be found an elaborate,

amusing (but doubtless accurate) description of Wigton marketplace as

seen at night nearly fifty years ago, and written with Dickens’s

customary power, illustrating his marvellous acuteness of observation:

“Wigton market was over, and its bare booths were smoking with rain all

down the street.... ‘I see,’ said Brother Francis, ‘what I hope and

believe to be one of the most dismal places ever seen by eyes. I see the

houses with their roofs of dull black, their stained fronts, and their

dark-rimmed windows, looking as if they were all in mourning. As every

little puff of wind comes down the street, I see a perfect train of rain

let off along the wooden stalls in the market-place and exploded against

me. I see a very big gas-lamp in the centre, which I know, by a secret

instinct, will not be lighted to-night. I see a pump, with a trivet

underneath its spout whereon to stand the vessels that are brought to be

filled with water. I see a man come to the pump, and he pumps very hard;

but no water follows, and he strolls empty away.... I see one, two,

three, four, five linen-drapers’ shops in front of me. I see a

linen-draper’s shop next door to the right, and there are five more

linen-drapers’ shops round the corner to the left. Eleven homicidal

linen-drapers’ shops within a short stone’s-throw, each with its hands

at the throats of all the rest! Over the small first-floor of one of

these linen-drapers’ shops appears the wonderful inscription: _BANK_....

I see a sweet-meat shop, which the proprietor calls a ‘Salt

Warehouse.’... And I see a watchmaker’s, with only three great pale

watches of a dull metal hanging in his window, each on a separate pane.

“... There is nothing more to see, except the curl-paper bill of the

theatre ... and the short, square, chunky omnibus that goes to the

railway, and leads too rattling a life over the stones to hold together

long. Oh yes! Now I see two men with their hands in their pockets ...

they are looking at nothing very hard, very hard ... they spit at times,

but speak not. I see it growing darker, and I still see them, sole

visible population of the place, standing to be rained upon, with their

backs towards me, and looking at nothing very hard.

“... The murky shadows are gathering fast, and the wings of evening and

the wings of coal are folding over Wigton.... And now the town goes to

sleep, undazzled by the large unlighted lamp in the market-place; and

let no man wake it.”[78]

From Wigton the friends proceeded to Allonby, on the coast of

Cumberland, here resolving to begin their writing, to record their

impressions while fresh in their minds. They found a comfortable

lodging, a “capital little homely inn,” the Ship, overlooking the watery

expanse, and by a curious coincidence the landlady previously lived at

Greta Bridge, Yorkshire, when Dickens went there in quest of the cheap

boarding-schools.

[Illustration: THE ALBION HOTEL, BROADSTAIRS. (_Page 189._)

Dickens stayed at this hotel on several occasions, and in 1839

lodged at a house “two doors from the Albion,” and there “Nickleby”

was finished.]

The Ship still flourishes as a “family and commercial hotel and

posting-house, commanding extensive views of the Solway Firth and the

Scottish hills.” Dickens thought Allonby the dullest place he ever

entered, rendered additionally dull by “the monotony of an idle sea,”

and in sad contrast to the expectations formed of it. “A little place

with fifty houses,” said Dickens in a letter home, “five

bathing-machines, five girls in straw hats, five men in straw hats, and

no other company. The little houses are all in half-mourning—yellow

stone or white stone, and black; and it reminds me of what Broadstairs

might have been if it had not inherited a cliff, and had been an

Irishman.”

In the opinion of Mr. Francis Goodchild, Allonby was the most

“delightful place ever seen.” “It was what you might call a primitive

place. Large? No, it was not large. Who ever expected it would be large?

Shape? What a question to ask! No shape. Shops? Yes, of course (quite

indignant). How many? Who ever went into a place to count the shops?

Ever so many. Six? Perhaps. A library? Why, of course (indignant again).

Good collection of books? Most likely—couldn’t say—had seen nothing in

it but a pair of scales. Any reading-room? Of course there was a

reading-room! Where? Where! Why, over there. Where was over there? Why,

_there_! Let Mr. Idle carry his eye to that bit of waste ground above

high-water mark, where the rank grass and loose stones were most in a

litter, and he could see a sort of a long ruinous brick loft, next door

to a ruinous brick outhouse, which loft had a ladder outside to get up

by. That was the reading-room, and if Mr. Idle didn’t like the idea of a

weaver’s shuttle throbbing under a reading-room, that was his look-out.

_He_ was not to dictate, Mr. Goodchild supposed (indignant again), to

the company.” In short, he declared that “if you wanted to be primitive,

you could be primitive here, and if you wanted to be idle, you could be

idle here,” as were the local fishermen, who (apparently) never fished,

but “got their living entirely by looking at the ocean.” The “public

buildings” at Allonby were the two small bridges over the brook “which

crawled or stopped between the houses and the sea.” As if to make amends

for these shortcomings, Nature provided fine sunsets at Allonby, “when

the low, flat beach, with its pools of water and its dry patches,

changed into long bars of silver and gold in various states of

burnishing,” “and there were fine views, on fine days, of the Scottish

coast.”[79]

From Allonby the two apprentices proceeded to the county town, Carlisle,

putting up at “a capital inn,” kept by a man named Breach.

[Illustration: LAWN HOUSE, BROADSTAIRS. (_Page 193._)

Dickens occupied Lawn House in the summer of 1840, and the archway

is mentioned in a letter to his wife dated September 3, 1850.]

Carlisle “looked congenially and delightfully idle.... On market morning

Carlisle woke up amazingly, and became (to the two idle apprentices)

disagreeably and reproachfully busy. There were its cattle-market, its

sheep-market, and its pig-market down by the river, with raw-boned and

shock-headed Rob Roys hiding their Lowland dresses beneath heavy plaids,

prowling in and out among the animals, and flavouring the air with fumes

of whisky. There was its corn-market down the main street, with hum of

chaffering over open sacks. There was its general market in the street,

too, with heather brooms, on which the purple flower still flourished,

and heather baskets primitive and fresh to behold. With women trying on

clogs and caps at open stalls, and ‘Bible stalls’ adjoining. With ‘Dr.

Mantle’s Dispensary for the Cure of all Human Maladies and no charge for

advice,’ and with ‘Dr. Mantle’s Laboratory of Medical, Chemical, and

Botanical Science,’ both healing institutions established on one pair of

trestles, one board, and one sun-blind. With the renowned phrenologist

from London begging to be favoured (at 6d. each) with the company of

clients of both sexes, to whom, on examination of their heads, he would

make revelations ‘enabling him or her to know themselves.’”[80]

Maryport, a few miles south of Allonby, was also inspected, and is

described as “a region which is a bit of waterside Bristol, with a slice

of Wapping, a seasoning of Wolverhampton, and a garnish of

Portsmouth”—in fact, a kind of topographical salad. To the

supposititious query addressed to it by one of the apprentices, “Will

_you_ come and be idle with me?” busy Maryport metaphorically shakes its

head, and sagaciously answers in the negative, for she declares: “I am a

great deal too vaporous, and a great deal too rusty, and a great deal

too muddy, and a great deal too dirty altogether; and I have ships to

load, and pitch and tar to boil, and iron to hammer, and steam to get

up, and smoke to make, and stone to quarry, and fifty other disagreeable

things to do, and I can’t be idle with you.” Thus thrown upon his own

resources, this idle apprentice goes “into jagged uphill and downhill

streets, where I am in the pastry-cook’s shop at one moment, and next

moment in savage fastnesses of moor and morass, beyond the confines of

civilization, and I say to those murky and black-dusty streets: ‘Will

_you_ come and be idle with me?’ To which they reply: ‘No, we can’t

indeed, for we haven’t the spirits, and we are startled by the echo of

your feet on the sharp pavement, and we have so many goods in our

shop-windows which nobody wants, and we have so much to do for a limited

public which never comes to us to be done for, that we are altogether

out of sorts, and can’t enjoy ourselves with anyone.’ So I go to the

Post-office and knock at the shutter, and I say to the Postmaster: ‘Will

_you_ come and be idle with me?’ This invitation is refused in cynical

terms: ‘No, I really can’t, for I live, as you may see, in such a very

little Post-office, and pass my life behind such a very little shutter,

that my hand, when I put it out, is as the hand of a giant crammed

through the window of a dwarf’s house at a fair, and I am a mere

Post-office anchorite in a cell made too small for him, and I can’t get

in, even if I would.’”[81] Maryport of to-day differs considerably from

Maryport of nearly half a century since, and it is doubtful if its

inhabitants will recognise the presentment.

Hesket-New-Market, “that rugged old village on the Cumberland Fells,”

was included in this itinerary of irresponsible travelling, and of the

ancient inn where Idle and Goodchild sojourned, and of the contents of

their apartments, we have quite a pre-Raphaelite picture:

“The ceiling of the drawing-room was so crossed and recrossed by beams

of unequal lengths, radiating from a centre in the corner, that it

looked like a broken star-fish.... It had a snug fireside, and a couple

of well-curtained windows, looking out upon the wild country behind the

house. What it most developed was an unexpected taste for little

ornaments and nick-nacks, of which it contained a most surprising

number.... There were books, too, in this room.... It was very pleasant

to see these things in such a lonesome byplace; so very agreeable to

find these evidences of taste, however homely, that went beyond the

beautiful cleanliness and trimness of the house; so fanciful to imagine

what a wonder the room must be to the little children born in the gloomy

village—what grand impressions of it those of them who became wanderers

over the earth would carry away; and how, at distant ends of the world,

some old voyagers would die, cherishing the belief that the finest

apartment known to man was once in the Hesket-New-Market Inn, in rare

old Cumberland.”[82] Dickens does not give the name of the inn, but I

have ascertained that it was the Queen’s Head, and that it is now a

dwelling-house, having the curious-timbered ceiling intact, and still

retaining its old-fashioned character. An enclosure, fronting the

building, has been planted with shrubs by the present occupier, where it

used to be paved and open to the street—“a sinuous and stony gutter

winding uphill and round the corner,” as Dickens termed the roadway

through the still quaint and interesting village of Hesket-New-Market.

On September 12, 1857, Dickens announced that he and his companion were

on their way to Doncaster, _en route_ for London. Breaking the journey

at Lancaster, they stopped at another delightful hostelry, the King’s

Arms in Market Street. “We are in a very remarkable old house here,”

wrote Dickens to his sister-in-law, “with genuine old rooms and an

uncommonly quaint staircase. I have a state bedroom, with two enormous

red four-posters in it, each as big as Charley’s room at Gad’s

Hill.”[83] A more detailed description, however, appears in the printed

record, where we read that “the house was a genuine old house of a very

quaint description, teeming with old carvings and beams, and panels, and

having an excellent old staircase, with a gallery or upper staircase cut

off from it by a curious fence-work of old oak, or of the old Honduras

mahogany wood. It was, and is, and will be for many a long year to come,

a remarkably picturesque house; and a certain grave mystery lurking in

the depth of the old mahogany panels, as if they were so many deep pools

of dark water—such, indeed, as they had been much among when they were

trees—gave it a very mysterious character after nightfall.”[84]

In “The Lazy Tour” some particulars are given concerning a curious

custom at the King’s Arms, where they give you bride-cake every day

after dinner. This melodramatic love-story is presented in the form of a

narrative by one of the half-dozen “noiseless old men in black” who

acted as waiters at the inn, whence we learn that the strange custom

originated in the traditional murder, by poison, of a young bride in an

apartment afterwards known as the Bride’s Chamber, the criminal being

subsequently hanged at Lancaster Castle. Around the legend, in which

money and pride and greed and cruel revenge play a prominent part,

Dickens threw the halo of his wondrous fancy, and so stimulated public

interest in the hostelry that visitors thereto were eager to see the

alleged haunted chamber with its antique bedstead of black oak, and to

taste the bride-cake in memory of the unfortunate young woman.

[Illustration: FORT HOUSE, BROADSTAIRS. (_Page 194._)

As it was before the recent alterations. The “airy nest” of Dickens,

1850-1851. A portion of “David Copperfield” was written here.]

Externally, the old King’s Arms (situated at the corner of Market Street

and King’s Street) was not of a picturesque character, although a

certain quiet dignity was imparted to the stone frontage by the broad

windows extending from roof to basement, and by the pillared doorway of

the principal entrance. When Mr. Sly left the old place in 1879, it was

pulled down, and a kind of commercial hotel erected on the site, which

narrowly escaped destruction by fire in 1897. After his day the custom

of having bride-cake was discontinued, but it is interesting to know

that the famous oak bedstead (upon which Dickens himself slept) is in

the safe possession of the Duke of Norfolk, for whom it was purchased at

a high price when the old oak fittings, etc., were disposed of about

twenty-seven years since. Mr. Sly, who died in 1896, never tired of

recalling the visit of Charles Dickens and Wilkie Collins, and the

former delighted the worthy landlord by presenting him with a signed

portrait of himself, inscribed, “To his good friend Mr. Sly,” which is

still retained by the family as a cherished memento. Shortly after the

publication of “The Lazy Tour” Mr. Sly obtained permission to reprint

the descriptive chapter by Dickens, for presentation to his guests; the

pamphlet contained illustrations representing the entrance-hall and

staircase, and this prefatory note: “The reader is perhaps aware that

Mr. Charles Dickens and his friend Mr. Wilkie Collins, in the year 1857,

visited Lancaster, and during their sojourn stopped at Mr. Sly’s, King’s

Arms Hotel. In the October number of _Household Words_, under the title

of ‘The Lazy Tour of Two Idle Apprentices,’ Mr. Dickens presents his

readers with a remarkable story of a Bridal Chamber, from whence the

following extracts are taken.” Mr. J. Ashby-Sterry, writing in 1897,

alludes to the King’s Arms as “a rare old place, full of antique

furniture, curios, and musical bedsteads,” and says that its proprietor,

Mr. Sly (who died about a year previously), who took the greatest pride

in his admirable old inn, liked nothing better than taking an

appreciative visitor over the place and giving amusing reminiscences of

the memorable visit of the authors of “Pickwick” and “The Woman in

White.”

[Illustration: 3 ALBION VILLAS, FOLKESTONE. (_Page 199._)

“A very pleasant house, overlooking the sea.” The opening chapters

of “Little Dorrit” were written here. The conservatory is a modern

addition.]

[Illustration: THE WOODEN LIGHTHOUSE, FOLKESTONE HARBOUR. (_Page

200._)

“I may observe of the very little wooden lighthouse, that when it is

lighted at night—red and green—it looks like a medical man’s” (“Out

of Town”).]

With regard to Lancaster itself, it would seem that Dickens’s opinion

(as expressed by Francis Goodchild) then was “that if a visitor on his

arrival (there) could be accommodated with a pole which could push the

opposite side of the street some yards farther off, it would be better

for all parties”; but, while “protesting against being obliged to live

in a trench,” he conceded Lancaster to be a pleasant place—“a place

dropped in the midst of a charming landscape, a place with a fine

ancient fragment of castle, a place of lovely walks, a place possessing

staid old houses richly fitted with old Honduras mahogany, which had

grown so dark with time that it seems to have got something of a

retrospective mirror-quality into itself, and to show the visitor, in

the depths of its grain, through all its polish, the hue of the wretched

slaves who groaned long ago under old Lancaster merchants. And Mr.

Goodchild adds that the stones of Lancaster do sometimes whisper even

yet of rich men passed away—upon whose great prosperity some of these

old doorways frowned sullen in the brightest weather—that their

slave-gain turned to curses, as the Arabian Wizard’s money turned to

leaves, and that no good ever came of it even unto the third and fourth

generation, until it was wasted and gone.”[85] Concerning the lunatic

asylum at Lancaster there is a note of approval: “An immense place ...

admirable offices, very good arrangements, very good attendants,”

followed by this truly Dickensian touch of sympathy and pathos: “Long

groves of blighted men-and-women trees; interminable avenues of hopeless

faces; numbers without the slightest power of really combining for any

earthly purpose; a society of human creatures who have nothing in common

but that they have all lost the power of being humanly social with one

another.”[86]

From Lancaster Francis Goodchild and Thomas Idle took train to Leeds,

“of which enterprising and important commercial centre it may be

observed with delicacy that you must either like it very much or not at

all.” Next day, the first of the Race Week, they proceed to Doncaster,

and put up at that noted establishment the Angel, still flourishing in

the principal thoroughfare as of yore. Here they had “very good, clean,

and quiet apartments” on the second floor, looking down into the main

street, Dickens describing his own bedroom as “airy and clean, little

dressing-room attached, eight water-jugs (I never saw such a supply),

capital sponge-bath, perfect arrangement, and exquisite neatness.”[87]

That great annual festival known as Race Week had just begun, and the

streets of Doncaster were full of jockeys, betting men, drunkards, and

other undesirable persons, from morning to night—and all night. From

their windows the apprentices gazed with interest and wonderment upon

the motley assemblage, for this was their first experience of the St.

Leger and its saturnalia.

[Illustration: THE AULA NOVA AND NORMAN STAIRCASE, PART OF THE

KING’S SCHOOL, CANTERBURY. (_Page 203._)

The oldest public school in England, dating from the seventh

century, and the original of Dr. Strong’s in “David Copperfield.”]

[Illustration: HOUSE ON LADY WOOTTON’S GREEN, CANTERBURY. (_Page

203._)

Identified as the private residence of Dr. Strong in “David

Copperfield.”]

We are assured by Forster that the description here given in “The Lazy

Tour” of Doncaster and the races emanated from the pen of Wilkie

Collins; I venture, however, to believe that Dickens is more likely to

have composed the chapter in question, for not only is it written in his

characteristic vein, but we find that when at Doncaster Thomas Idle

(_i.e._, Collins) continued to suffer severely from the accident to his

ankle, which practically incapacitated him, and evidently prevented him

from witnessing the races. In a letter written at this time Dickens

remarks: “I am not going to the course this morning, but have engaged a

carriage (open, and pair) for to-morrow and Friday.... We breakfast at

half-past eight, and fall to work for _H. W._ afterwards. Then I go out,

and—hem! look for subjects.” The first person singular here is

significant, indicating as it does that Collins did not accompany his

friend to the scenes so vividly and realistically portrayed in the final

chapter of the “Tour.” In respect of the visit to Doncaster, a

remarkable incident may be noted. Dickens, who knew nothing (and cared

less) about matters relating to the turf, invested in a “c’rect card”

containing the names of the horses and jockeys, and, merely for the fun

of the thing, wrote down three names for the winners of the three chief

races, “and, if you can believe it (he said to Forster) without your

hair standing on end, those three races were won, one after another, by

those three horses!”[88] It was the St. Leger Day, which brought

ill-fortune to many, so that Dickens’s “half-appalling kind of luck”

seemed to him especially to be a “wonderful, paralyzing coincidence.” He

sincerely believed that if a boy with any good in him, but with a

damning propensity to sporting and betting, were taken to the Doncaster

Races soon enough, it would cure him, so terrible is the revolting

exhibition of rascality and the seamy side of humanity.

* * * * * * * *

Scotland may justly lay claim to an intimate association with Charles

Dickens. With the picturesque streets of Edinburgh he first became

familiar in 1834, during his reporting days, when he and his colleague,

Thomas Beard, represented the _Morning Chronicle_ at a grand banquet

given at the Scottish capital in honour of the then Prime Minister, Earl

Grey, the two young reporters going by sea from London to Leith. This

fact explains how Dickens secured such an accurate presentment of the

old town of Edinburgh as we find in “Pickwick,” in the forty-eighth

chapter of which Arthur’s Seat is described as “towering, surly and

dark, like some gruff genius, over the ancient city he has watched so

long,” while Canongate (as seen by the hero of “The Story of the

Bagman’s Uncle”) is represented as consisting of “tall, gaunt,

straggling houses, with time-stained fronts, and windows that seemed to

have shared the lot of eyes in mortals, and to have grown dim and sunken

with age. Six, seven, eight stories high were the houses; story piled

above story, as children build with cards, throwing their dark shadows

over the roughly-paved road, and making the night darker. A few oil

lamps were scattered at long distances, but they only served to mark the

dirty entrance to some narrow close, or to show where a common stair

communicated, by steep and intricate windings, with the various flats

above.” We are told that Tom Smart’s uncle, on reaching the North Bridge

connecting the old town with the new, “stopped for a minute to look at

the strange irregular clusters of lights piled one above the other, and

twinkling afar off so high that they looked like stars, gleaming from

the castle walls on the one side and the Calton Hill on the other, as if

they illuminated veritable castles in the air.”

The coach-yard (or rather enclosure) in Leith Walk, by which Tom had to

pass on the way to his lodging, and where he saw the vision of the old

mail-coach with its passengers, actually existed at that spot, and was

owned by Mr. Croall, whose family disposed of the carriages and coaches,

but subsequently owned all the cabs in the city. Dickens afterwards

visited Edinburgh on at least four occasions, staying at the Waterloo

Hotel in 1861 and at Kennedy’s in 1868, during his Reading tours, and on

the latter occasion he observed: “Improvement is beginning to knock the

old town of Edinburgh about here and there; but the Canongate and the

most picturesque of the horrible courts and wynds are not to be easily

spoiled, or made fit for the poor wretches who people them to live

in.”[89] The Scott Monument he could not but regard as a failure,

considering that it resembles the spire of a Gothic church taken off and

stuck in the ground.

In 1841, on the eve of his departure for the United States, the

“Inimitable Boz,” accompanied by his wife, made Scotland his destination

for a summer holiday tour in “Rob Roy’s country,” as he termed it. He

had thought of Ireland, but altered his mind. The novelist received a

magnificent welcome, initiated by a public dinner in Edinburgh, at which

Professor Wilson presided. During their brief stay in the Scottish

capital Dickens found excellent accommodation at the Royal Hotel, which

was consequently besieged, and he was compelled to take refuge in a

sequestered apartment at the end of a long passage. His chambers here

were “a handsome sitting-room, a spacious bedroom, and large

dressing-room adjoining,” with another room at his disposal for writing

purposes, while from the windows he obtained a noble view, in which the

castle formed a conspicuous object. From Edinburgh he travelled to the

Highlands, with intervals of rest, and thoroughly admired the

characteristic scenery of the country. Especially was he impressed by

the Pass of Glencoe, which he had often longed to see, and which he

thought “perfectly terrible.” “The Pass,” he said, “is an awful place.

It is shut in on each side by enormous rocks, from which great torrents

come rushing down in all directions. In amongst these rocks on one side

of the Pass ... there are scores of glens high up, which form such

haunts as you might imagine yourself wandering in in the very height and

madness of a fever. They will live in my dreams for years.... They

really are fearful in their grandeur and amazing solitude.” Indeed,

“that awful Glencoe,” as he called it, exercised a kind of fascination

over him which proved irresistible, compelling him to revisit the spot

the next day, when he found it “absolutely horrific,” for “it had rained

all night, and ... through the whole glen, which is ten miles long,

torrents were boiling and foaming, and sending up in every direction

spray like the smoke of great fires. They were rushing down every hill

and mountain side, and tearing like devils across the path, and down

into the depths of the rocks.... One great torrent came roaring down

with a deafening noise and a rushing of water that was quite

appalling.... The sights and sounds were beyond description.” This and

other adventures during his journeyings hereabouts were vividly

described in letters to Forster, who has printed the major portion of

them in his biography, and a very attractive record it is.

Before returning southward, the novelist became the recipient of an

invitation to a public dinner at Glasgow; but, yearning for home, he

pleaded pressing business connected with “Master Humphrey’s Clock,” then

appearing in weekly numbers, promising, however, to return a few months

later and accept the honour then. Illness unfortunately prevented the

fulfilment of that promise, and six years elapsed (1847) before he made

acquaintance with that city, when he performed the ceremony of opening

the Glasgow Athenæum, which was followed by a soirée in the City Hall.

In 1858 he was recommended by some of the students for election as Lord

Rector of Glasgow University, in opposition to his own wish, but

received only a few votes.

[Illustration: THE SUN INN, CANTERBURY. (_Page 203._)

“It was a little inn where Mr. Micawber put up, and he occupied a

little room in it” (“David Copperfield”).]

The same year found him again at Edinburgh, and giving, for charitable

purposes, a public Reading of the “Carol” in the Music Hall there, at

the conclusion of which the Lord Provost presented him with a massive

silver wassail-cup, which he bequeathed to his eldest son, and which is

now in the possession of Mr. W. H. Lever, of Port Sunlight, Cheshire.

His paid Readings subsequently took him to the leading cities in

Scotland, and in 1868 he wrote from the Royal Hotel, Glasgow (his

customary quarters there): “The atmosphere of this place, compounded of

mists from the Highlands and smoke from the town factories, is crushing

my eyebrows as I write, and it rains as it never does rain anywhere

else, and always does rain here. It is a dreadful place, though much

improved, and possessing a deal of public spirit.”[90]

The Dickens Country · 第 7 / 10 章