Such was the outcome of my first attempts as a teacher. The kind

indulgence and approval granted to me, more because of my good

intentions and the fire of my zeal than for my actual performance,

spurred me on to plunge deeper into the inquiry as to the nature of true

teaching. But the whole system of a large school must have its settled

form, with its previously-appointed teaching-course arranged as to times

and subjects; and everything must fit in like a piece of clockwork. My

system, on the other hand, called only for ready senses and awakened

intellect. Set forms could only tolerate this view of education so far

as it served to enliven and quicken them. But I have unfortunately again

and again observed during my career, that even the most active life, if

its activity and its vitality be not properly understood and urged ever

onward, easily stiffens into bony rigidity. Enough, my mind, now fully

awakened, could not suffer these set forms, necessary though they were;

and I felt that I must seek out some position in which my nature could

unfold itself freely according to the needs of the development of my

life and of my mind.

This longing endeavour of life and mind, which could not submit to the

fetters of external limitations, may have been the more exaggerated at

the time by my becoming acquainted with Arndt's "Fragments on Human

Culture,"[57] which I had purchased. This book satisfied at once my

character, my resolves, and my aspirations; and what hitherto lay

isolated within me was brought into ordered connection through its

pages, while ideas which possessed me without my perceiving them took

definite form and expression as the book brought them to light. Indeed,

I thought then that Arndt's book was the bible of education.

In those days I spoke of my life and my aims in the following words: "I

desire to educate men whose feet shall stand on God's earth, rooted fast

in Nature, while their head towers up to heaven, and reads its secrets

with steady gaze, whose heart shall embrace both earth and heaven, shall

enjoy the life of earth and nature with all its wealth of forms, and at

the same time shall recognise the purity and peace of heaven, that

unites in its love God's earth with God's heaven." In these phrases I

now see my former life and aims vividly brought before me as in a

picture.

Little by little a desire gained strength within me to free myself from

my engagement at the Model School, to which I had bound myself as

teacher for at least three years. The headmaster (Gruner), whom I have

already named, was sufficiently a student of men to have perceived that

so excitable a man as I could never work harmoniously in such an

institution as that which he directed; so I was released from my

engagement, under the condition that I should provide a suitable

successor. Fate was propitious to me once more. I found a young private

tutor with whom I had long been in friendly correspondence, and who had

all those qualities which were lacking in me. He was not only thoroughly

proficient in the grammar of his mother tongue (German), but also in the

grammar of the classical tongues; and, if I am not mistaken, in French

also. He had a knowledge of geography far beyond anything I could boast,

was acquainted with history, knew arithmetic, possessed some familiarity

with botany,--much greater, indeed, than I suspected. And what was worth

more than all this, he was full of vigour in mind, heart, and life.

Therefore the school was every way the gainer by my departure, so

greatly the gainer indeed, that from that time no further change has

been necessary. That same teacher still lives and works in that same

post.[58]

Before I begin a new chapter of my career, there are yet a few things

which need mention.

To know French was at that time the order of the day, and not to know it

stamped a man at once as of a very low degree of culture. To acquire a

knowledge of French, therefore, became one of my chief aims at the

moment. It was my good fortune to obtain instruction from an unrivalled

teacher of French, M. Perrault, a Frenchman by birth, who still, even

though an old man, diligently worked at the study of his mother tongue,

and who at the same time wrote and spoke German with elegance. I pursued

the study with ardour, taking two lessons a day, because I desired to

reach a certain proficiency by a given time. Slow, however, were my

steps, for I was far from having a sufficient knowledge of my own tongue

whereon to build a bridge that might carry me into French. I never could

properly acquire what I did not fully understand in such a way that it

had a living meaning for me; and so from all the genuine zeal and

considerable cost which I spent over this study I gained by no means a

corresponding result; but I did learn a good deal, much more even than I

then knew how to turn to account. My teacher cast on one side all the

usual grammatical difficulties of French study, he aimed at imparting

the language as a living thing. But I with my ignorance of language

could not completely follow this free method of teaching; and yet,

nevertheless, I felt that the teacher had fully grasped the meaning and

the method of his work, and I always enjoyed the lessons on this

account. He was especially successful in accustoming my ear to the

French pronunciation, always separating and reducing it to its simple

sounds and tones, and never merely saying "this is pronounced like the

German _p_, or _b_, or _ä_, or _ö_," etc. The best thing resulting from

this course of study was the complete exposure of my ignorance of German

grammar. I must do myself the justice to say that I had given myself

extraordinary trouble over the works of the most celebrated German

grammarians, trying to bring life and interconnection or even a logical

consequence into German grammar; but I only confused myself the worse

thereby. One man said one thing, another quite the reverse; and not one

of all of them, as far as I could see, had educed his theories from the

life and nature of the speech itself. I turned away a second time, quite

disheartened, from the German grammarians, and once more took my own

road. But unfortunately the dry forms of grammar had, quite against my

own will, stuck like scales over my eyes, dimming my perceptions; I

could find no means to rid myself of them, and they wrought fatally upon

me now and long afterwards. The more thoroughly I knew them the more

they stiffened and crushed me.

My departure from the school was now arranged, and I could let my mind

pursue its development free and unshackled. As heretofore, so now also,

my kindly fate came lovingly to my help: I can never speak of it with

sufficient thankfulness. The three lads to whom I had hitherto given

private instruction in arithmetic and language now needed a tutor, as

their former tutor was leaving them. The confidential charge was laid

upon me, because I of all men best knew their nature and its needs, of

seeking out some fit teacher and educator for them from amongst my

acquaintance. As for myself this tutor business lay far from my own

thoughts, and I therefore looked round me in every direction, and with

all earnestness, for some one else. Amongst others I applied to my

eldest brother, telling him my views as to the necessary requirements of

a true educator.

My brother wrote back very decidedly and simply, that he could not

propose any one to me as a teacher and educator who would fulfil the

requirements I had set forth, and further, he did not think I should

ever be able to find such a person; for if one should be found

possessing ample knowledge and experience of life in its external

aspects, he would be deficient in a vigorous inner life of his own, and

in the power to recognise and foster it in himself and his pupils; and,

on the other hand, another man who might have this power would be

deficient in the first-named (practical) qualities. I reported the

result of my labours. It caused much disappointment, indeed it could not

be otherwise, because the welfare of the children was really sought, in

all love and truth, and the highest and best obtainable at that day was

desired on their behalf. The family did not venture to press the post

upon me personally, knowing my love of freedom and independence.

So stood matters for several months. At last, moved by my earnest

affection for the lads, and by my care to deserve the confidence with

which their mother had entrusted to my hands the provision for their

education, I endeavoured to look at things from the point of view of

their parents. This brought me at last to the determination to become

myself the educator and teacher of the lads. After a hard struggle with

myself, the hardest and most exhausting I had undergone for a long time,

I made known my decision. It was thankfully received, and understood

quite in the spirit which had actuated me in forming it.

I communicated my decision to Gruner, with whom I still kept in the

friendliest relation. He looked at me with downright astonishment, and

said, "You will lose all hopes of the position you have so long sought

and waited for." I replied that I should protect myself as to my

position and my relations with others by a very definite written

contract. To which the man of experience retorted, "Certainly, and

everything will be punctually fulfilled, so that you cannot say that any

one condition of all those you stood out so firmly for has failed to be

observed; nevertheless you will find you will lose on all points." So

spake experienced shrewdness, and what had I to set against it? I spoke

of the educational necessities and wants of these children. "Good," said

he, "then you will leave your own educational necessities and your own

wants out of the question?" How it mortified me, that worldly wisdom

should be able to speak thus, and that I was unable to controvert it! We

talked no more about the matter.

And keen as was the internal conflict over this decision and this

resolve of mine, equally keen was the external contest which I had to

wage in entering on my new post.

There were, namely, two immutable conditions in our agreement. One was

that I should never be compelled to live in town with my pupils, and

that when I began my duties my pupils should be handed over entirely to

my care, without any restriction; that they should follow me into the

country, and there form a restricted and perfectly isolated circle, and

that when they returned to town life my duties as preceptor should be at

an end. The time for beginning my new career drew nigh. As the

stipulated dwelling for myself and my pupils was not yet ready, I was

expected to take up my abode, for a few days, with my pupils in their

town house. But I felt that it was clear that the least want of firmness

at the outset would endanger my whole educational plan; therefore, I

stood firm, and indeed gained my point, though at the price of being

called headstrong, self-willed, and stubborn. That my assumption of my

post was attended with a sharp contest was a very good and wholesome

discipline for me. It was the fitting inauguration of a position and a

sphere of work which was henceforth to be attended, for me, with

perpetual and never-ending strife.

But as to this family and all its members, my earnest unbending

maintenance of my resolve had a most wholesome effect upon them, even to

winning in the end their comprehension and approval, though this was

later and long after I had quitted the situation. It was ten or eleven

years afterwards--that is, four or five years after my departure--that

the mother of these lads expressed her entire approval of the adamantine

perseverance I had exhibited in my convictions.

I entered my new sphere of educational work in July 1807. I was

twenty-five years old, as far as years went, but younger by several

years in regard to the development of my character. I neither felt

myself so old as I was, nor indeed had I any conception or realisation

of my age. I was only conscious of the strength and striving of my life,

the extent of my mental culture, the circumstances of my experience in

the world, and especially of--what shall I call it?--the shiftlessness

and undeveloped state of my culture as far as its helplessness with the

external world was concerned, of my ignorance of life both as to what it

really was, and how it showed in its outer aspect. The state of my

culture was such as only to serve to plunge me into conflict, through

the contradiction and opposition in which I found myself henceforward

with all existing methods; and consequently the whole period of my

tutorial career was one continual contest.

It was a salutary thing for me that this was my appointed lot from the

very beginning. Now and later on I was therefore able to say to myself

by way of consolation and encouragement: "You knew beforehand just how

it would be." Still, unpleasantness seldom arrives in exactly the manner

expected, and the unexpected is always the hardest to bear. Thus it was

with me in this case; my situation seemed to contain insurmountable

difficulties. I sought the basis for them in imperfect culture; and the

cause of the disconnected nature of the culture I had been able to

attain, lay, so I perceived, in the interruptions which marred my

university career. Educator and teacher, however, I had determined to

become and to remain; and as far as I could know my own feelings and my

own powers, I must and would work out my profession in an independent

free fashion of my own, founded on the view of man and his nature and

relationships which had now begun to dawn upon me. Yet every man finds

it above all things difficult to understand himself, and especially hard

was it in my own case. I began to think that I must look for help

outside myself, and seek to acquire from others the knowledge and

experience I needed.

And thus there came to me once again the idea of fitting myself by

continuing my university studies to become founder, principal, and

manager of an educational establishment of my own. But the fact was to

be considered that I had turned away from the educational path on which

I had entered. Now, when the imperfection of my training pressed itself

upon me, I not only sought help from Nature as of old, that school

allotted to me by fate, but I turned also for assistance to my

fellow-men who had divided out the whole field of education and teaching

into separate departments of science, and had added to these the

assistance of a rich literature. This need of help so troubled and

oppressed me, and threw my whole nature into such confusion, that I

resolved, as soon as might be, once more to proceed to one of the

universities, and necessarily, therefore, to relinquish as speedily as

possible my occupation as an educator.

As I always discussed everything important with my brother, I wrote to

him on this occasion as usual, telling him of my plans and of my

resolve. But for this time, at least, my nature was able to work out its

difficulty without his help. I soon came to see that I had failed to

appreciate my position, and had misunderstood myself; and, therefore,

before I had time to get an answer from my brother to my first letter I

wrote to him again, telling him that my university plans had been given

up, and that my fixed resolve now was to remain at my post. He rejoiced

doubly at my decision, because this time he would have been unable to

agree with me.[59]

No sooner had I firmly come to my decision than I began to apply my

thoughts vigorously to the subjects of education and instruction. The

first thing that absorbed me was the clear conviction that to educate

properly one must share the life of one's pupil. Then came the

questions, "What is elementary education? and of what value are the

educational methods advocated by Pestalozzi? Above all, what is the

purpose of education?"

In answering the question, "What is the purpose of education?" I relied

at that time upon the following observations: Man lives in a world of

objects, which influence him, and which he desires to influence;

therefore he ought to know these objects in their nature, in their

conditions, and in their relations with each other and with mankind.

Objects have form, measurement, and number.

By the expression, "the external world," at this time I meant only

Nature; my life was so bound up in natural objects that I altogether

passed by the productions of man's art or manufacture. Therefore for a

long time it was an effort to me to regard man's handiwork, with

Pestalozzi's scholars, Tobler and Hopf, as a proper subject for

elementary culture, and it broadened my inward and outward glance

considerably when I was able to look upon the world of the works of man

as also part of the "external world." In this way I sought, to the

extent of such powers as I consciously possessed at that time, to make

clear the meaning of all things through man, his relations with himself,

and with the external world.

The most pregnant thought which arose in me at this period was this: All

is unity, all rests in unity, all springs from unity, strives for and

leads up to unity, and returns to unity at last. This striving in unity

and after unity is the cause of the several aspects of human life. But

between my inner vision and my outer perception, presentation, and

action was a great gulf fixed. Therefore it seemed to me that

everything which should or could be required for human education and

instruction must be necessarily conditioned and given, by virtue of the

very nature of the necessary course of his development, in man's own

being, and in the relationships amidst which he is set. A man, it seemed

to me, would be well educated, when he had been trained to care for

these relationships and to acknowledge them, to master them and to

survey them.

I worked hard, severely hard, during this period, but both the methods

and the aims of education came before me in such an incoherent heap, so

split up into little fragments, and so entirely without any kind of

order, that during several years I did not make much progress towards my

constant purpose of bringing all educational methods into an orderly

sequence and a living unity. As my habitual and therefore characteristic

expression of my desires then ran, I longed to see, to know, and to show

forth, all things in inter-connection.

For my good fortune, however there came out about that time certain

educational writings by Seller,[60] Jean Paul,[61] and others. They

supported and elevated me, sometimes by their concurrence with my own

views, expressed above, sometimes by the very contrary.

The Pestalozzian method I knew, it is true, in its main principles, but

not as a living force, satisfying the needs of man. What especially lay

heavy upon me at this time, however, painfully felt by myself though not

apparent to my pupils, was the utter absence of any organised connection

between the subjects of education. Joyful and unfettered work springs

from the conception of all things as one whole, and forms a life and a

lifework in harmony with the constitution of the universe and resting

firmly upon it.

That this was the true education I soon felt fervently convinced, and so

my first educational work consisted merely in being with my pupils and

influencing them by the power of my life and work; more than this I was

not at all in a position to give.

Oh, why is it that man knows so ill and prizes so little the blessings

that he possesses for the first time?

When I now seek to make myself clear as to the proper life and work of

an educator, my notes of that time rise fresh and fair to meet me. I

look back from now into that childhood of my teacher's life, and learn

from it; just as I look back into the childhood of my man's life, and

survey that, and learn from that, too. Why is all childhood and youth so

full of wealth and so unconscious of it, and why does it lose it without

knowing it only to learn what it possessed when it is for ever lost?

Ought this always to be so? Ought it to be so for every child, for every

youth? Will not a time come at last, come perhaps soon, when the

experience, the insight, the knowledge of age, and wisdom herself, shall

build up a defence, a shelter, a protection for the childhood of youth?

Of what use to mankind is the old man's experience and the greybeard's

wisdom when they sink into the grave with their possessors?

At first my life and my work with my pupils was confined within narrow

limits. It consisted in merely living, lounging, and strolling in the

open air, and going for walks. Although I was disgusted with the methods

of town education, I did not yet venture to convert life amidst Nature

into an educational course. That was taught me by my young pupils

themselves; and as from the circumstances of my own culture I eagerly

fostered to my utmost every budding sense for Nature that showed itself,

there soon developed amongst them a life-encompassing, life-giving, and

life-raising enjoyment of natural objects. In the following year[62]

this way of life was further enhanced by the father giving his sons a

piece of meadowland for a garden, at the cultivation of which we

accordingly worked in common. The greatest delight of my pupils was to

make little presents of the produce of their garden to their parents and

also to me. How their eyes would gleam with pleasure when they were

fortunate enough to be able to accomplish this. Pretty plants and little

shrubs from the fields, the great garden of God, were transplanted by us

to the children's gardens, and there carefully tended. Great was the

joy, especially of the two younger ones, when such a colonist frankly

enrolled himself amongst the citizens of the state. From this time forth

my own childhood no longer seemed wasted. I acknowledged how entirely

different a thing is the cultivation of plants, to one who has watched

them and studied them in all the stages of their own free development,

from what it is to one who has always stood aloof from Nature.

And here already, living cheerfully and joyfully in the bosom of Nature

with my first pupils, I began to tell myself that the training of

natural life was closely akin to the training of human life. For did not

those gifts of flowers and plants express appreciation and

acknowledgment of the love of parents and teacher? Were they not the

outcome of the characteristic lovingness and the enthusiastic

thankfulness of childhood? A child that of its own accord and of its own

free will seeks out flowers, cares for them, and protects them, so that

in due time he can weave a garland or make a nosegay with them for his

parents or his teacher, can never become a bad child, a wicked man. Such

a child can easily be led towards love, towards thankfulness, towards

recognition of the fatherliness of God, who gives him these gifts and

permits them to grow that he, as a cheerful giver in his turn, may

gladden with them the hearts of his parents.

Autobiography of Friedrich Froebel $c translated and annotated by Emilie Michaelis ... and H. Keatley Moore. · 第 6 / 15 段