CHAPTER IV.

A.D. 1776-85.

Vigour of Mirza Najaf — Zabita rebels — Emperor takes the Field,

and the Rebellion is suppressed — Sumroo's Jaigir — Abdul Ahid

takes the Field — Unsuccessful Campaign against the Sikhs — Dehli

threatened, but relieved by Najaf — Mirza's arrangements — Popham

takes Gwalior — Begum Sumroo — Death of Mirza Najaf — Consequent

Transactions — Afrasyab Khan becomes Premier — Mirza Shaffi

returns to Dehli — Is it Peace? — Murder of Shaffi — Action of

Mr. Hastings — Flight of Shahzada — Madhoji Sindhia goes to Agra

— Afrasyab's Death — Tribute claimed from British — Death of

Zabita Khan — Sindhia supreme — Chalisa famine — State of Country

— General distress.

1776. — THE splendid exertions of Mirza Najaf, though not yet at

an end, might have been expected to give the Empire a

breathing-time wherein to recover its strength. If we except the

British in Bengal, it was now the most formidable military power

on this side of India. No more than three fortified places

remained to the Jats of all their once vast possessions. The

Mahrattas had been occupied in the Deccan by the events that

followed upon the death of their Peshwa, Madho Rao; and the whole

of their forces were temporarily withdrawn during the course of

the year, by order of his successor. Najaf held viceregal state

at Agra, surrounded not only by his faithful Moghuls and

Persians, but by two brigades of foot and artillery, under the

command, respectively, of Sumroo and of Medoc. The Mirza's chief

Asiatic subordinates were Najaf Kuli Khan his adopted son, the

converted Hindu, otherwise Saif-ud-daulah; and Mohammad Beg of

Hamadan: two officers of whom frequent mention will be found in

the progress of this narrative. Mirza Shaffi, the minister's

nephew, also held a high command. Shah Alam lived the life of

ease which had become a second nature to him, at Dehli,

surrounded by able servants of the Mirza's selection. One of

these, indeed, soon obtained an apparent ascendancy over the

indolent monarch, which was destined to afford another instance

of the wisdom of that maxim invented of old in the East, "Put not

your trust in Princes." The only enemy who could disturb the

repose of what may be termed the Home Districts was Zabita Khan,

who still exhibited all the faithlessness so common with his

race, and a turbulent disposition peculiar to himself. Finding

all present hope of aid from the Jats and Mahrattas at an end

(and instigated, it was suspected, by his late unsuccessful

opponent, the Financial Minister, Abdul Ahlid Khan), Zabita, as

stated at the close of the preceding chapter, turned to the

Sikhs: a people who, in the decay of the Empire, had established

themselves in the Sirhind territory, notably in Pattiala, and in

Jhind. These pushing warriors — of whose prowess, both against

and for the British, modern history tells so much — gladly

accepted the invitation of the Pathan insurgent, and, crossing

the Jamna in considerable numbers, joined his force at Ghausgarh,

the fort between Saharanpur and Muzafarnagar, of which mention

has been already made. It is even stated by Francklin (though, as

usual, without specification of authority) that the Pathan on

this occasion embraced the religion of the Sikhs, a sort of

eclectic Monotheism tinctured with Hindu doctrine.

1777. — This conduct was justly regarded by the Mirza as a gross

instance, not merely of disloyalty, but — what in his eyes was

even worse — of impiety. In the opinion of a stern soldier of

Islam, such as the Persian Prince had always shown himself to be,

the act of joining with unbelievers was unpardonable. He

therefore despatched a strong force against the combined rebels,

under the command of an officer named Abdul Kasim Khan. Nothing

daunted, the Confederates drew out their troops in front of the

fort of Ghausgarh, and at once engaged the Imperial troops, whom

they at the same time outflanked with a large body of horse, who

got into the rear of the Imperialists without being perceived.

Placed between two attacks, and deprived of their leader by a

stray shot, the latter soon gave way, and Zabita, having pursued

them for some distance, returned to his stronghold triumphant. On

this Mirza Najaf Khan resolved to take the field with all his

power, and ere long presented himself before Ghausgarh,

accompanied by the Emperor in person. The Mirza was aided in this

campaign by the force of 5,000 men, with artillery, contributed

by the new Viceroy of Audh, as part of the peshkash, or fine for

the investiture, and for the succession to the office of Vazir of

the Empire, which had been held by his father, and which he

desired to retain against the counter-claims of the Nizam and of

other competitors. (Vide last chapter, p. 115.) The Pathan had,

however, evacuated the fort on receiving notice of their

approach, and retreated with his allies to their country beyond

the Jamna, closely followed by the Imperial forces. An attempt at

negotiation having been contemptuously rejected by the

Captain-General, Mirza Najaf Khan, the two armies engaged on the

famous field of Panipat, and the action which ensued is described

(with manifest exaggeration) as having been only less terrible

than the last that was fought on the same historic ground,

between the Mahrattas and the Musalmans, in 1761. Beyond this the

native historians give no particulars of the battle, which raged

till night, and with not unequal fortunes, if we may judge from

the result — for on the following morning Zabita Khan's renewed

applications to treat were favourably received; on which occasion

his estates were restored, and a double matrimonial alliance

concluded. The Mirza himself condescended to take the Pathan's

sister as his wife, while his godson (so to speak), Najaf Kuli,

was promised the hand of Zabita's daughter. The pardon of this

restless rebel was attributed to the intercession of Latafat, the

General of the Audh Vazir, who is said to have had a large bribe

on the occasion. (Francklin, chap. Y.)

Peace being thus restored to Hindustan, the Minister revisited

Agra, where he proceeded to provide for the administration of the

country.

The English sought his alliance; but the negotiation failed

because he would not surrender Sumroo. Asaf-ud-daulah, Viceroy of

Audh, was recognized as titular Vazir; a trustworthy chief,

Maulah Ahmad Dad, was appointed to the charge of Sirhind; Najaf

Kuli Khan held the vast tract extending from that frontier to the

borders of Rajputana; and Sumroo was placed in charge of the

country adjoining Zabita Khan's lands, in the centre of which he

fixed his capital at Sardhana, long destined to remain in the

possession of his family, and where a country house and park,

familiar to the English residents at Meerut, still belong to the

widow of his last descendant. This territory, nominally assigned

for the maintenance of the troops under the adventurer's command,

was valued in those days at six laths of rupees annually; so that

the blood-stained miscreant, whose saturnine manners had given

him a bad name, even among the rough Europeans of the Company's

battalion, found his career of crime rewarded by an income

corresponding to that of many such petty sovereigns as those of

his native country.

1778. — The beginning of this year was marked by a bloodless

campaign, to which Majad-ud-daulah led the Emperor. The Rajputs

were the object of the attack, and they were rigorously mulcted.

The Mirza's personal share in this matter was confined to that of

a peacemaker. He probably disapproved of the campaign, which had

been undertaken in a spirit of rivalry to himself; and by

obtaining terms for the Rajputs he made new ties while displaying

his own power. He accompanied the return of the expedition to

Dehli, where his daughter was married to Najaf Kuli in the

presence of the Emperor.

Mirza Najaf Khan then departed once more to Agra, the seat of his

administration and his favourite abode. But his repose was not of

long continuance, and he was soon called upon for fresh

exertions; the Sikhs having risen against Maulah Ahmad Dad, the

Faujdar of Sirhind, whom they defeated and slew. On the receipt

of this intelligence the Emperor had deputed Abdul Ahid Khan —

known to us by his title of Nawab Majad-ud-daulah — with an army

nominally under the command of one of the Imperial Princes, to

indict signal chastisement upon obstinate offenders. If the

surmise of the native historians be correct — that Abdul Ahid

Khan had been privy to the late combination between the Sikhs and

Zabita Khan against Mirza Najaf — the fact of his being sent

against them, without any objection from so wise and loyal a

minister as the Mirza, can only be accounted for by citing it as

a proof of the peculiar danger to which great men are exposed,

under an Eastern despotism, of reposing their confidence in

secret enemies. That Abdul Ahid was even then plotting against

his patron will be seen to be likely from his subsequent conduct,

and certainly derives no confutation from the circumstance of his

being a native of Kashmir, a country the faithlessness of whose

inhabitants is proverbial, even in Indian story.

The Prince, whose standard was the rallying point of the army, is

variously named as Jawan Bakht, Farkhanda Bakht, and Akbar; the

former being the name of the Prince whom we saw acting as Regent

during the Emperor's residence under English protection at

Allahabad, the later that of the future successor to the titular

Empire. Whoever it may have been, the outset of the expedition

promised him success, if not distinction. The Imperial host,

20,000 strong and with an efficient park of artillery. came in

contact with the enemy at Karnal; but Majad-ud-daulah preferred

negotiation to fighting, and induced the Sikhs to pay down a sum

of three lakhs, and pledge themselves to the payment of an annual

tribute. Joining the Sikh forces to his own, the Majad-ud-daulah

next proceeded northwards, but was brought to a check at Pattiala

by Amar Singh, the Jat chief of that state. Here fresh

negotiations ensued, in which the perfidious Kashmirian is said

to have offered to allay himself with the Sikhs for the

destruction of Mirza Najaf Khan, on condition of being supported

by them in his endeavours to be made Prime Minister in the room

of that statesman. Whether the Jat leader had profited by the

lesson lately read to his brethren of Bhartpur, or whether he was

merely actuated by a desire to try conclusions with the

Kashmirian, having penetrated the cowardice of his character, is

matter for conjecture. Whatever the intrigue may have been, it

was soon frustrated. A large Sikh reinforcement profited by the

time gained in the negotiation to advance from Lahor; the Karnal

force deserted the Imperial camp, and a general onset was made

upon it the following morning. Led by a half-hearted commander

and an inexperienced Prince, the Imperialists offered but a faint

resistance; but their retreat was covered by the artillery, and

they contrived to escape without suffering much in the pursuit,

and indeed without being very closely followed up. It is

interesting to observe, among the names of the Sikh Sirdars, who

played this game of "diamond cut diamond" with the Kashmirian,

that of Ranjit Singh, afterwards the wily Egbert of the Panjab

Heptarchy, and the firm friend of Britain for nearly forty years.

This disastrous campaign occurred in the cold weather of 1778-79,

and the victorious Panjabis poured into the Upper Doab, which

they forthwith began to plunder.

1779. — Meanwhile, Mirza Najaf Khan remained in contemptuous

repose at Agra, only interrupted by a short and successful dash

at some Rajput malcontents, who had been stirred up, it is

thought, at the instigation of his rival Majad-ud-daulah. That

inefficient but unscrupulous intriguer is also shown by Captain

Grant Duff to have been at the same time engaged in a

correspondence with Madhoji Sindhia, in view to joining, when

once he should have gained possession of the power of the Empire,

in an attack on the British Provinces. Duff gives this story on

the authority of Sindhia's own letters, which that chief's

grandson had placed in his hands; but he does not say whether the

fickle Emperor was or was not a party to this iniquitous

conspiracy for the ruin of his faithful servant and his

long-established friends.

Certain it is that Sindhia was at that time very far from the

statesmanlike views and reasonable aims which he ultimately

adopted. Towards the close of the year, indeed, he took the

ill-judged step of joining with Haidar Ali and the Nizam with the

object of expelling the British from every part of the Indian

Continent. But Mr. Hastings soon disturbed the plans of the

confederates and ere long rendered them hopeless. Some were

conquered by force of arms, others were conciliated; and Sindhia

in particular, received a lesson which made upon his sagacious

mind a permanent impression.

1780. — There was, in the country now known as Dholpur, between

Agra and Gwalior, a local Jat landholder who had in the decay of

the Empire followed the example of Suraj Mal (of Bhurtpore) and

assumed independence. In 1771, when Shah Alam was returning to

the throne of his ancestors, Chatr Singh, the then Zemindar,

advanced money to the Treasury, and was soon after created a peer

by the title of Maharaj Rana. Henceforth he figures in history as

the "Rana of Gohad." Having a hereditary feud against the

Mahrattas and a hereditary claim, such as it was, to the fortress

of Gwalior, then in Sindhia's hands, he seemed to Hastings a

useful instrument for causing a diversion. Major Popham, one of

the best of the local officers, was accordingly sent to assist

the Rana and stir up a confederation of Jat and Rajput powers to

aid against the Musalman-Mahratta alliance by which British

interests were threatened. The situation of the fort of Gwalior

on a scarped and isolated rock over 200 feet high, need not here

be more than mentioned; the manner of its capture, however,

cannot be too often referred to as an instance of what resolution

and conduct can effect in Asiatic warfare. Having prepared

scaling ladders in such secrecy that even his European officers

were ignorant of what was being done or planned, Popham sent a

storming party of sepoys, backed by twenty Europeans, to a place

at the foot of the rock pointed out to him by some thieves. It

was the night of the 3rd August, 1780, and the party, under the

command of Captain Bruce, were shod with cotton to render their

approach inaudible. The enemies' rounds were passing as they came

near the spot; so the assaulting column lay down and waited until

the lights and voices had ceased; then the ladders were placed

against the cliff, and one of the robber guides mounting returned

with intelligence that the guard had gone to sleep. The next

moment the first ladder was mounted by Lieutenant Cameron, the

engineer officer, and the others followed in silence, Captain

Bruce having reached the rampart with twenty sepoys, a scuffle

ensued which lasted till Popham arrived with the Europeans and

made good the entrance. Thus was this strong place captured, and

without the loss of one single life on the British side. The fort

was made over to the Rana, but he did not long retain it, Sindhia

having recaptured it. He soon afterwards took Gohad also (1784),

and the descendants of the Jat chief are now known as Ranas of

Dholpur.

We have seen how marked a feature of the Emperor's character was

his inability to resist the pertinacious counsels of an adviser

with whom he was in constant intercourse; and it is certain that

he gave Majad-ud-daulah all the support which his broken power

and enfeebled will enabled him to afford.

But the danger was now too close and too vast to allow of further

weakness. The Emperor's eyes seem to have been first opened by

his army's evident confusion, as it returned to Dehli, and by the

prevaricating reports and explanations which he received from its

commander. If Mirza Jawan Bakht was the prince who had

accompanied the ill-stared expedition, we know enough of his

prudence and loyalty to be sure that he would have done all in

his power to make his father see the matter in its true light;

and what was wanting to his firm but dutiful remonstrances, would

be supplied by the cries of fugitive villagers and the smoke of

plundered towns.

Najaf Khan was urgently summoned from Agra, and obeyed the call

with an alacrity inspired by his loyal heart, and perhaps also by

a dignified desire for redress. As he approached the capita], he

was met by the Prince and the baffled Kashmirian. To the former

he was respectful, but the latter he instantly placed under

arrest, and sent back under a strong guard. The fallen Minister

was confined, but in his own house; and the Mirza, on reaching

Dehli, confiscated, on behalf of the Imperial treasury, his

wealth, stated to have amounted to the large sum (for those days)

of twenty lakhs, reserving nothing for himself but some books and

a medicine chest. This was the second time he had triumphed over

an unworthy rival, and signalized his own noble temper by so

blending mercy with justice as has seldom been done by persons

situated as he was. Abdul Ahid Khan — or Majad-ud-daulah — was a

fop, very delicate in his habits, and a curiosity-seeker in the

way of food and physic. It is said by the natives that he always

had his table-rice from Kashmir, and knew by the taste whether it

was from the right field or not.

Fully restored to the Imperial favour, the Mirza lost no time in

obeying the pressing behests of his Sovereign, and sending an

adequate force under his nephew, Mirza Shafi, to check the

invaders. Their army, which had been collected to meet the

Imperialists, drew up and gave battle near Meerut, within forty

miles of the metropolis; but their unskilled energy proved no

match for the resolution of the Moghul veterans, and for the

disciplined valour of the Europeanized battalions. The Sikhs were

defeated with the loss of their leader and 5,000 men, and at once

evacuated the country.

1780. — It cannot have escaped notice we have been here reviewing

the career of one whose talents and virtues merited a nobler

arena than that on which they were displayed, and who would have

indeed distinguished himself in any age and country. Profiting by

experience, the successful Minister did not repeat the former

blunder of retiring to Agra, where, moreover, his presence was no

longer required; but continued for the brief remainder of his

life to reside in the metropolis, and enjoy the fruit of his

laborious career in the administration of the Empire, to which he

had restored something of its old importance. Mirza Shafi

commanded the army in the field; while Mohammad Beg, of Hamadan,

was Governor of the Fort and District of Agra. Najaf Khan himself

was appointed Amir-ul-Umra (Premier Noble); his title, as it had

long been, was Zulfikar-ud-daulah — "Sword of State."

I have not thought it necessary to interrupt the narrative of the

Mirza's successes by stopping to notice the death of Sumroo. This

event occurred at Agra on the 4th of May, 1778, as appears from

the Portuguese inscription upon his tombstone there. He appears

to have been a man without one redeeming quality —"stern and

bloody-minded, in no degree remarkable for fidelity or devotion

to his employers" — the one essential virtue of a free lance.

This character is cited from the memoirs of Skinner, where it is

also added that he cannot have been devoid of those qualities

which attach the soldiery to their officer. But even this becomes

doubtful, when we find the late Sir W. Sleeman (who was in the

habit of moving about among the natives, and is an excellent

authority on matters of tradition), asserting that he was

constantly under arrest, threatened, tortured, and in danger at

the hands of his men.

The force was maintained by his widow, and she was accordingly

put in charge of the lands which he had held for the same

purpose.

This remarkable woman was the daughter (by a concubine) of a

Mohamadan of Arab descent, settled in the town of Kotana, a small

place about thirty miles north-west of Meerut, and born about

1753. On the death of her father, she and her mother became

subject to ill-treatment from her half-brother the legitimate

heir; and they consequently removed to Dehli about 1760. It is

not certain when she first entered the family of Sumroo, but she

did not become his wife till some time afterwards. It has even

been doubted if any formal marriage-ceremony ever took place, for

Sumroo had a wife living, though insane; and the fact was

probably sufficiently notorious to prevent any Catholic clergyman

in that part of the country from celebrating a bigamous alliance

with the rites of the Church.

1781 .— At his death he left a son, baptized as "Aloysius," who

was still in his minority; and the Minister, observing the

Begum's abilities, saw fit to place her in charge, as has been

already said. The ultimate result amply justified his choice. In

1781 — under what influence is not recorded — she embraced

Christianity, and was baptized, according to the ritual of the

Latin Church, by the name of Johanna. Her army is stated to have

consisted, at this time, of five battalions of Sepoys, about 300

Europeans, officers and gunners, with 40 pieces of cannon, and a

body of Moghul horse. She founded a Christian Mission, which grew

by degrees into a convent, a cathedral, and a college; and to

this day there are some 1,500 native and Anglo-Indian Christians

resident at Sardhana.

1782. - On the 26th April died Mirza Najaf Khan, after a

residence in India of about forty-two years, so that he must have

been aged at least sixty. He appears to have been an even greater

and better man than his predecessor, Najib-ud-daulah, over whom

he had the advantage in point of blood, being at once a

descendant of the Arabian prophet, and a member of the Saffavi

house, which had been removed from the throne of Persia by the

usurpation of Nadir Shah. Captain Scott — who was a good scholar

and well acquainted with Native politics, as Persian Secretary to

the Governor-General of British India — records of the Mirza that

no one left his presence dissatisfied. If he could grant a

request he would, and that with a grace as if it pleased him; if

he could not, he could always convince the petitioner of his

sorrow at being obliged to refuse. The faulty side of him appears

to have been a love of money, and (towards the last part of his

life, at least,) of pleasure. It will be seen in the sequel how

soon his gains were dissipated, and his house overthrown. At his

death he wielded all the power of the Empire which his energies

and virtues had restored. He was Deputy Vazir of the absentee

Viceroy of Audh, and Commander-in-Chief of the army. He held the

direct civil administration, with receipt of the surplus

revenues, agreeably to Eastern usages, of the province of Agra

and the Jat territories, together with the district of Alwar to

the south-west and those portions of the Upper Doab which he had

not alienated in Jaidad. But he died without issue, and the

division of his offices and his estates became the subject of

speedy contests, which finally overthrew the last fragments of

Moghul dominion or independence. The following notice of these

transactions is chiefly founded on a Memorial, drawn up and

submitted to the British Governor at Lucknow in 1784, by the

Shahzada Jawan Bakht, of whom mention has been already made more

than once, and who had, for the ten years preceding the Emperor's

return to Dehli, in '71, held the Regency under the title of

Jahandar Shah. After referring to the fact that Majad-ud-daulah

(the title, it may be remembered, of Abdul Ahid Khan) had been

and still was in custody, but that an equerry of the Emperor's

procured the issue of patents confirming existing appointments,

the Prince proceeds, — "The morning after the Mirza's death, I

saw the attendants on His Majesty were consulting to send some

persons to the house of the deceased, in order to calm

disturbances; and at last the Wisdom enlightening the world

resolved on deputing me to effect that object. [I] having

departed with all speed, and given assurances to the afflicted,

the friends of the departed had leisure to wash and dress the

body, and the clamour began to cease. After necessary

preparation, I attended the corpse to the Masjid, and the rites

of Islam having been performed, sent it to the place of

interment, under the care of Afrasyab Khan, who was the

cherished-in-the- bosom" (adopted) "son" of the noble deceased;

whose sister also regarded him as her adopted son.

"Afrasyab Khan soon became ambitious of the dignities and

possessions of the deceased, and the Begam (deceased's sister)

petitioned his Majesty in his favour, with earnest entreaty; but

this proved disagreeable to the far-extending sight of the royal

Wisdom, as Mirza Shaffi Khan, who had a great army and

considerable resources, looked to the succession, and would never

agree to be superseded in this manner, so that contentions would

necessarily ensue." There can be no doubt of the correctness of

Shah Alam's views. Mirza Shaffi was the nearest relative of the

deceased, and in actual possession of the command of the army. He

was thus not merely the most eligible claimant, but the best able

to support his claims. But the Emperor — never, as we have seen,

a man of much determination — was now enfeebled by years and by a

habit of giving way to importunity.

"Instigated," proceeds Jawan Bakht, "by female obstinacy, the

Begam would not withdraw her request, and her petition was at

length, though reluctantly, honoured with compliance. The khillat

of Amir-ul-Omra and acting Minister was conferred upon Afrasyab

by his Majesty, who directed this menial (though he [the writer]

was sensible of the ill-promise of the measure) to write to Mirza

Shaffi to hasten to the presence."

It is not quite clear whether the measure, to which this

parenthesis represents the prince as objecting, was the

appointment of Afrasyab, or the summons to the Mirza. He was

evidently opposed to the former, who was a weak young man, devoid

of resources either mental or material. On the other hand, his

own matured good sense should have shown him that no good

consequences could follow the temporizing policy which brought

the rivals face to face at Court. Afrasyab's first measure was to

release the Kashmirian Ex-Minister Majad-ud-daulah (Abdul Ahid

Khan) from arrest, and by his recommendation this foolish and

notorious traitor was once more received into the Imperial

favour. In the meanwhile, Mirza Shaffi arrived at Dehli, and took

up his quarters in the house of his deceased uncle, whose widow

he conciliated by promising to marry her daughter, his first

cousin. A period of confusion ensued, which ended for the time in

the resignation of Afrasyab, who retired to his estate at Ajhir,

leaving his interests at Court to be attended to by

Majad-ud-daulah and by the converted Rajput Najaf Kuli. Shortly!

after his departure, Mirza Shaffi surrounded the houses of these

agents, and arrested Majad-ud-daulah on the 11th September, 1782,

and the Rajput on the following day, confining them in his aunt's

house under his own eye. The Prince upon this received orders to

negotiate with the Mizra, who was appointed to the office he had

been so long endeavouring to compass. But Afrasyab Khan, his

absent competitor, had still allies at Court, and they succeeded

in bringing over to his cause M. Paoli, the commander of Begam

Sumroo's Brigade, together with Latafat Khan, commandant of the

battalions that had been detached to the Imperial service by the

Viceroy of Audh. This took place a few days only after the arrest

of the agents, and was almost immediately followed by the

desertion from Mirza Shaffi of the bulk of the army. The Emperor

put himself at the head of the troops, and proceeded to the

Minister's house. Finding the premises had been evacuated the

Shah marched in triumph — not quite after the magnificent fashion

of his ancestors — to the Jamma Masjid, and Mirza Shaffi fled to

Kosi, in the vicinity of Mathra, acting by the advice of the

prince, as the latter informs us. The army did not pursue the

fugitive, and the latter enlarged Majad-ud-daulah, who promised

to intercede for him with the Emperor, and also made a friend in

Mohamad Beg of Hamadan, whom we have already met with as Governor

of Agra.

1783. — While the Moghuls were disturbing and weakening the

empire by these imbecile contentions, Madhoji Sindhia, the Patel,

was hovering afar off, like an eagle on the day of battle. His

position had just been greatly improved by the treaty of Salbai,

an arrangement which was probably the result of the spirited

policy pursued by Hastings, of which the storming of Gwalior was

a specimen. Coote and Stuart too, in Madras, and Goddard in the

Deccan, struck repeated blows at the confederacy. Peace, too, was

concluded between the French and English in India as in Europe.

Sindhia was one of the first to submit, and in 1782 acceded to

that famous instrument, in which the British authorities had

recognized him as the representative chief of the Mahrattas, the

Peshwa being still a minor, and the ostensible head of the

Regency, Nana Farnavis, being a mere civilian, though otherwise

an able man. The British Governor-General also, naturally alarmed

at what was going on, and foreseeing danger from the

interposition of the Mahrattas, with whom his Government had,

till lately, been engaged in a deadly conflict, soon after sent

two officers to the Imperial Court, being the first English

Embassy that had visited the city of the Moghul since the

memorable deputation from the infant Factory to the throne of

Farokhsiar.

But before these officials could arrive, further complications

had occurred; Mirza Shaffi returning to Dehli, in company with

Mohamad Beg, requested that his new opponents, Paoli and Latafat,

might be sent to them with authority to treat, and the

application was granted, much against the advice of the prince,

who tells us that he proposed either that an immediate attack

should be made upon the rebels before they had time to

consolidate their power, or else that they should be summoned to

the presence, and made to state their wishes there. To the envoys

elect, he observed that, even were the concession made of sending

a deputation to treat with refractory subjects, he would advise

that only one should go at a time. "But," he continues, "as the

designs of Providence had weakened the ears of their

understandings, an interview appeared to them most advisable; - a

mutual suspicion rendering each unwilling that one should go and

the other remain in camp, lest he who went should make his own

terms without the other." What a glimpse this gives of the

dissolution of all that we are accustomed to call society! The

two envoys set out, but never returned: like the emissaries sent

to the Jewish captain, as he drove furiously along the plain of

Esdraelon to ask, Is it peace? The European was slain at once,

the Audh general being imprisoned and deprived of sight. Mirza

Shaffi and Mohamad Beg next began to quarrel with each other. The

Emperor was now much perplexed, but matters were arranged for the

time through the instrumentality of the prince and by the return

of Afrasyab, who became reconciled to his late competitor. The

three nobles were presented with khillats (dresses of honour) and

Mirza Shaffi became Premier, under the title of Amir-ul-Umra,

while Majad-ud-daulah reverted to his ancient post of Intendant

of the Home Revenues. We pursue the prince's narrative.

"It was at this period that much anxiety and melancholy intruding

on the sacred mind of his Majesty, the Asylum of the World, and

also on the breast of this loyal servant," their attention was

turned towards the English alliance, which had been in abeyance

for some years. On the 23rd of September, 1783, Mirza Shaffi, who

had been to Agra, was shut out from the palace on his return,

probably owing to Afrasyab Khan's renewed desire to obtain the

chief place in the State. On this the Mirza retired to Agra

again, and naturally adopted a hostile attitude, an emissary was

sent forth to treat with him, in the person of Mohamad Beg

Hamadani. The meeting took place in the open air in front of the

main gate of the old Fort of Agra; and when the elephants, upon

which the two noblemen were seated, drew near to each other, the

Mirza held out his hand in greeting, when Mohamed Beg at once

seized the opportunity, and pistolled him under the arm. It is

asserted, indeed, by some that the actual crime was perpetrated

by the attendant who occupied the back seat of the howdah;

possibly Ismail Beg Khan, nephew of the Hamadani.

Afrasyab, who had instigated this murder, profited by it, and

succeeded to the post of his ambition, while the mind of the

prince became still more anxious, and still more bent upon

opening his case, if possible, in a personal interview with the

English Governor.

Meanwhile, the envoys of the latter were not less urgent on their

employer to support the Emperor with an army. "The business of

assisting the Shah" — thus they wrote in December, 1783 — "must

go on if we wish to be secure in India, or regarded as a nation

of faith and honour." Mr. Hastings was not deaf to these

considerations, and subsequent events proved their entire

soundness. He desired to sustain the authority of the Empire,

because he foresaw nothing from its dissolution but an

alternative between Chaos and the Mahrattas; and, but for the

opposition of his council in Calcutta, he would have interposed,

and interposed after his fashion, with effect. Yet his not doing

so was afterwards made the ground of one of the charges (No. 18)

against him, and he was accused of having intrigued in the

interest of Madhoji Sindhia, the Patel. That Mr. Hastings, when

overruled in his desire of anticipating Sindhia in Court

influence at Dehli, preferred seeing the latter succeed, rather

than the Empire should fall a prey to complete anarchy; that he

"turned the circumstance to advantage" — to use Grant Duff's

phrase — was neither contrary to sound statesmanship, nor to the

particular views of the British Government, which was then

occupied in completing the treaty of Salbai. Under this compact

Central India was pacified, and the Carnatic protected from the

encroachments of the notorious Haidar Ali Khan, and his son, the

equally famous Tippu Sahib. It is important here to observe that

the Calcutta Gazettes of the day contain several notices of the

progress of the Sikhs, and the feeble opposition offered to them

by the courtiers. All these things called for prompt action.

1781. — On the 27th March, the British Governor arrived at

Lucknow, and Jawan Bakht resolved to escape from the palace, and

lay before him an account of Dehli politics, such as should

induce him to interpose. The design being communicated to his

maternal uncle, a body of Gujars, from the prince's estate, was

posted on the opposite bank of the river, and everything fixed

for the 14th of April. About 8 P.M., having given out that he was

indisposed, and on no account to be disturbed, the prince

disguised himself, and, secretly departing from his chamber in

the palace, passed from the roof of one building to the roof of

another, until he reached the aqueduct which crossed the garden

of the palace. The night was stormy, and the prince was suffering

from fever, but he found a breach where the canal issued, by

which he got to the rampart of the Salimgarh. Here he descended

by means of a rope, and joined his friends on the river sands;

and, with a considerable mixture of audacity and address, found

means to elude the sentries and get across the river. One trait

is worth preserving, as illustrative of the characteristic

clemency of the house of Timur. "I believe," said the prince, in

talking of this night's adventure to Mr. Hastings, "I ought to

have killed the guide who showed me where to ford the river; but

my conscience disapproved, and I let him go, preferring to trust

myself to the care of Providence. In effect, the man justified my

suspicions, for he instantly went to the nearest guard and gave

him information of my route, as I learned soon after; but I made

such speed that my pursuers could not overtake me."

His Highness reached Lucknow, where he impressed all who met him

with a highly favourable opinion of his humanity, his

intelligence, and his knowledge of affairs; but the only

consolation he received, either from the Viceroy or from Mr.

Hastings, hampered as the latter was by the opposition of his

council, was the advice to turn to Madhoji Sindhia. Captain

Jonathan Scott (who was on Hastings' staff) says that the prince

received an allowance of £40,000 a year from the British

Government (Scott's Ferishta, vol. ii. 242.)

In the meanwhile Mohamed Beg, who had returned to his old

residence at Agra, continued to trouble the repose of the new

minister Afrasyab, so that he also turned to the redoubled Patel,

and this successful soldier who had barely escaped

four-and-twenty years before from the slaughter of Panipat, now

found himself master of the situation. The movements of the

Mahratta chief began, indeed, to be all-important. They were thus

noticed in the Calcutta Gazette for 18th April: — "We learn that

Sindhia is going on a hunting party. ... . We also learn that he

will march towards Bundelkund." He marched in the direction, as

it proved, of Agra.

He sent an envoy to Lucknow to treat with the Governor-General,

and proceeded in person to Hindustan, proposing to meet the

Emperor, who was on his way to dislodge Mohamad Beg from the fort

of Agra.

The Calcutta Gazette for May 10th says, "His Majesty has

signified by letters to the Governor-General and Sindhia that he

will march towards Agra."

The Emperor's desire to put himself into the hands of Sindhia was

very much increased by the violent conduct of Afrasyab towards

one who, whatever his faults, had endeared himself, by long

years' association, to the facile monarch. Majad-ud-daulah, the

Finance Minister, having attempted to dissuade his Majesty from

going to Agra, the haughty Moghul sent Najaf Kuli Khan with a

sufficient force to Majad's house, and seizing him, with the

whole of his property, kept him in close arrest, in which he

continued for the most part till his death, in 1788.

On his arrival, Sindhia had an interview with Afrasyab Khan, at

which it was agreed to concert a combined attack upon Mohamad Beg

forthwith. Three days after, the minister was assassinated, viz.,

2nd November, 1784. The actual hand that struck this blow was

that of Zain-ul-Abidin, brother of Mirza Shaffi, who, no doubt,

was not unwilling to have an opportunity of punishing the

supposed author of his uncle's murder; but there were not wanting

those who, on the well-known maxim, cui bono, attributed the

instigation to Sindhia. Francklin records, on the authority of

one Said Raza Khan, that Zain-ul-Abidin found shelter with

Sindhia immediately after the murder, which was effected in the

very tent of the victim. Rajah Himmat Bahadur (the Gosain leader)

at once proceeded to Sindhia's tent, accompanied by the chief

Moghul nobles, where all joined in congratulations and

professions of service.

1785 — The latter, at all events, immediately stepped into the

dead man's shoes, leaving the title of Vazir to the Audh Viceroy;

and contenting himself with the substance of authority. Calling

the Peshwa of Puna — the head of the Mahrattas — by the revived

title of Plenipotentiary of the Empire, formerly borne (it may be

remembered) by the first Nizam, he professed to administer as the

Peshwa's deputy. He assumed with the command of the army, the

direct management of the provinces of Dehli and Agra, and

allotted a monthly payment of sixty-five thousand rupees for the

personal expenses of Shah Alam. In order to meet these expenses,

and at the same time to satisfy himself and reward his followers,

the Pate] had to cast about him for every available pecuniary

resource. Warren Hastings having now left India, the time may

have been thought favourable for claiming some contribution from

the foreign possessors of the Eastern Subahs. Accordingly we find

in the Calcutta Gazette the following notice, under the date

Thursday, 12th May, 1785: —

"We have authority to inform the public that on the 7th of this

month the Governor-General received from the Emperor Shah Alam

and Maha Rajah Madagee Sindia an official and solemn disavowal,

under their respective seals, of demands which were transmitted

by them, on Mr. Macpherson's accession to the Government, for the

former tribute from Bengal.

"The demands of the tribute were transmitted through Major Brown,

and made immediately upon his recall from the Court of Shah Alam,

but without any communication of the subject to Mr. Anderson.

"Mr. Anderson was immediately instructed to inform Sindhia that

his interference in such demands would be considered in the light

of direct hostility, and a breach of our treaty with the

Mahrattas; and Shah Alam was to be informed that the justice of

the English to his illustrous house could never admit the

interference or recommendation of other powers, and could alone

flow from their voluntary liberality.

"A disavowal of claims advanced unjustly and disrespectfully was

insisted upon; and we are authorized to declare that Mr.

Anderson's conduct in obtaining that disavowal was open and

decided, highly honourable to him as a public minister. He acted

in conformity to the orders of Government even before he received

them. He founded his remonstrances on a short letter which he had

received from the Governor-General, and upon circumstances which

passed in the presence of Sindhia, at Shah Alam's Darbar, as

Major Brown was taking his leave.

"The effects which Mr. Anderson's remonstrance produced are very

satisfactory and creditable to Government, and such explanations

have followed upon the part of Sindhia, as must eventually

strengthen our alliance with the Mahrattas, expose the designs of

secret enemies, and secure the general tranquillity of India."

The revolution begun by the Patel was soon completed. Zabita Khan

died about this time; and Mohamad Beg, being deserted by his

troops, had no resource but to throw himself upon the mercy of

the Mahratta chief. The fort of Agra surrendered on the 27th of

March, 1785; and all that remained of the power of the Moghul

party was the fort of Aligarh, where the widow and brother of the

late minister, Afrasyab Khan, still held out, in the hope of

preserving the property of the deceased, the bulk of which was

stored there. This stronghold, which the late Najaf Khan had

wrested from the Jats, had been fortified with great care, and it

had a strong garrison, but, having held out from July to

November, the Governor was at last prevailed upon, by the

entreaties of the ladies, to avert from them the horrors of a

storm, and make terms with the besiegers. The result of the

capitulation was that the eldest son of the deceased Afrasyab

received an estate, yielding a yearly revenue of a lakh and a

half of rupees. The rest of the property — valued at a crore, a

sum then corresponding to a million of money, but really

representing much more of our present currency — was seized by

Sindhia.

The latter was now supreme in Hindustan; the disunited Moghul

chiefs, one and all, acknowledged his authority; and a Mahratta

garrison, occupying the Red Castle of Shah Jahan, rendered the

Emperor little more than an honourable pageant. He joined,

however, personally in all the operations of 1785, and did not

return to Dehli until the middle of the following year. Sindhia

did not at the time accompany him, but retired to his favourite

cantonment of Mathra.

It has been already mentioned that there is little or nothing

recorded of the condition of the country or of the people by

native historians. It must not, however, be thought that I am

satisfied with recording merely the dates of battles, or the

biographies of prominent men. On the contrary, the absence of

information upon the subject of the condition of the nation at

large, is a great cause of regret and disappointment to me. A few

particulars will be found in the concluding chapter.

In 1783, when Afrasyab Khan was distracting the country by his

ambitious attempts, occurred a failure of the periodical rains,

followed by one of those tremendous famines which form such a

fearful feature of Indian life. In Bengal, where the monsoon is

regular, and the alluvial soil moist, these things are almost as

unknown as in England: but the arid plains of Hindustan, basking

at the feet of the vastest mountain-chain in the world, become a

perfect desert, at least once in every quarter of a century. The

famine of 1783-4 has made a peculiarly deep impression upon the

popular mind, under the name of the "Chalisa," in reference to

the Sambat date 1840, of the era of Vikram Adit. An old Gosain,

who had served under Himmat Bahadur, near Agra, once told the

author that flour sold near Agra that year 8 seers for the rupee;

which, allowing for the subsequent fall in the value of money, is

perhaps equivalent to a rate of three seers for our present rupee

— a state of things partly conceivable by English readers, if

they will imagine the quartern loaf at four shillings, and

butcher's meat in proportion.

These famines were greatly intensified by the want of hands for

field-labour, that must have been caused by the constant drafting

of men to the armies, and by the massacre and rapine that

accompanied the chronic warfare of those times. The drain on the

population, however, combined with the absence of the

tax-gatherer, must have given this state of things some sort of

compensation in the long run. Some few further particulars

regarding the state of the country will be found in the

concluding chapter.

NOTE.—Besides the Mozafari, the principal authorities for this

chapter have been Francklin's "Shah Alum" (v. inf. p. 194) the

narrative of the Shahzadah published by Warren Hastings and the

continuation of Ferishta by Captain Jonathan Scott. This

gentleman has already been mentioned (V. sup. p. 132), he was

assisted in compiling his narrative by Maj. Polier, who was at

Dehli at the time. All these authorities are strictly original

and contemporaneous; and in general agree with each other. The

Memoirs of Iradat Khan have also been consulted — a Dehli noble

of the period. A traditional account of the Famine by an "Old

Resident" of Aligarh may not be without interest. It is taken

from the Dehli Gazette of 6th June, 1874. "As told by many

persons who witnessed it, the disastrous circumstance which

occurred during Sindiah's rule and prior to Du Boigne's

administration known by the people as the 'Chaleesa Kaut,' the

severe famine of A.D. 1783 in a considerable degree desolated the

country, and the many ruinous high mounds still visible in the

district owe their origin to this calamity. The inhabitants

either fell victims, or fled to other parts where they met a

similar fate, for the famine was a general one. It was described

to me by those who lived then, that for the two previous years

the rains were very unfavourable, and the produce very scanty,

the third year, A.D. 1783, the people entertained strong hopes

that the season would be a propitious one: but sad was their

condition when they found the rainy months, 'Assaur and Sawun,

passing off with a scorching sun. In 'Bhadoon' they had clouds

but no rain, and when the calamity came, all hopes were gone the

price of grain was enormous and with difficulty it could be

procured, thousands died of sheer starvation within their walls

and streets, and the native governments rendered no assistance to

ameliorate or relieve the wants of their unfortunate subjects.

Children were left to go astray and find their sustenance in the

wild berries of the peepul, burrh, and goolur, and thus became an

easy prey to the wild beasts who in numbers roved round the

country in open day, living on carcases. About the middle of

September or 'Kooar,' the rains fell, and so regularly that the

grain which was thrown in the fields in the two previous years

and did not generate for want of moisture, now came up profusely,

and abundant was the produce. The state of things gradually

changed for the better in October and November. An old Brahmin of

Secundra Rao narrated that some years before 1810 the harvest was

so plentiful that on the occasion he built a house which was on a

very high plinth: he filled the plinth instead of with mud with

an inferior course of small grain called 'kodun,' selling at that

time uncommonly cheap, much lower than the cost of mud would be;

when the famine came he dug up the coarse grain, which was found

good, and sold it, and with the money he made his house a pucka

one, besides gaining a large sum in coin."

The Fall of the Moghul Empire of Hindustan · 第 4 / 7 章